Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Polymer Bulletin
Erschienen in: Polymer Bulletin 9/2015

01.09.2015 | Review

Bacterial cellulose in the field of wound healing and regenerative medicine of skin: recent trends and future prospectives

verfasst von: J. Kucińska-Lipka, I. Gubanska, H. Janik

Erschienen in: Polymer Bulletin | Ausgabe 9/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this overview, we focused on the bacterial cellulose (BC) applications, described in recently published scientific papers, in the field of skin regenerative medicine and wound care industry. Bacterial cellulose was proven to be biocompatible with living tissues. Moreover, its mechanical properties and porous structure are considered to be suitable for biomedical applications. It is due to the fact that porous structure of bacterial cellulose mimics the extracellular matrix of the skin. Moreover, it can also hold the incorporated drugs and other modifiers, which can modulate its properties improving the bacterial cellulose antimicrobial activity which is rather poor for native BC. Bacterial cellulose reveals high hydrophilic properties and never dries, which is a desired property, because it was proven that wounds heal better and faster when the wound is being constantly moisturized. This characteristic of bacterial cellulose indicates that it may successfully serve as wound dressings and skin tissue scaffolds.
Vorheriger Artikel Lignin as coupling agent in EPDM rubber: thermal and mechanical properties

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Boateng JS, Matthews KH, Stevens HNE, Eccleston GM (2008) Wound healing dressing and drug delivery systems: a review. J Pharm Sci 97(8):2892
2.
Zhong SP, Zhang YZ, Lim CT (2010) Tissue scaffolds for skin wound healing and dermal reconstruction. Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 2(5):510–525
3.
Yildirimer L, Thanh NTK, Seifalian AM (2012) Skin regeneration scaffolds: a multimodal bottom-up approach. Trends Biotechnol. 30(12):638
4.
Pham C, Greenwood J, Cleland H, Woodruff P, Madden G (2007) Bioengineered skin substitutes for the management of burns: a systematic review. Burns. 33:946–957
5.
Fu L, Zhou P, Zhang S, Yang G (2013) Evaluation of bacterial naocellulose-based uniform wound dressing for large area skin transplantation. Mater Sci Eng C 33:2995–3000
6.
Gurtner GC, Werner S, Barrandon Y, Longaker MT (2008) Wound repair and regeneration. Nature 453(7193):314–321
7.
MacNeil S (2007) Progress and opportunities for tissue-engineered skin. Nature 445(7130):874–880
8.
Esa F, Tasirin SM, Rahman NA (2014) ST26943, 2nd international conference on agricultural and food engineering, CAFEi2014. Overview of bacterial cellulose production and application. Agric Agric Sci Proc 2:113–119
9.
Kobayashi S, Kashiwa K, Kawasaki T, Shoda S (1991) Novel method for polysaccharide synthesis using an enzyme: the first in vitro synthesis of cellulose via a nonbiosynthetic path utilizing cellulase as catalyst. J Am Chem Soc 113: 3079–3084
10.
Nakatsubo F, Kamitakahra H, Hori M (1996) Cationic ring-opening polymerization of 3,6-di-O-benzyl-alfa-d-glucose 1,2,4-orthopivalate and the first chemical synthesis of cellulose. J Am Chem Sci. 118(7):1677–1681
11.
Takayasu T, Fumihiro Y (1997) Production of bacterial cellulose by agitation culture systems. Pure Appl Chem 69(11):2453–2458
12.
Eichhorn SJ, Baillaie CA, Zafeiropoulos N, Mwaikambo LY, Ansell MP, Dufresne A et al (2001) Review current international research into cellulosic fibers and composites. J Mater Sci 36(9):2107–2131
13.
Iguchi M, Yamanaka S, Budhiono A (2000) Bacterial cellulose—a masterpiece of nature’s arts. J Mater Sci 35:261–270
14.
Okiyama A, Motoki M, Yamanaka S (1992) Bacterial cellulose II: processing of the gelatinous cellulose for food materials. Food Hydrocoll. 6:479–487
15.
Yamanaka S, Watanabe K, Kitamura N, Iguchi M, Mitsuhashi S, Nishi Y et al (1989) The structure and mechanical properties of sheets prepared from bacterial cellulose. J Mater Sci 24:3141–3145
16.
Festucci-Buselli RA, Otoni WC, Joshi CP (2007) Structure, organization and functions of cellulose synthase complexes in higher plants. Braz J Plant Physiol 19(1):1–13
17.
Svensson A, Nicklasson E, Harrah T, Panilaitis B, Kaplan DL, Brittberg M et al (2005) Bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for tissue engineering of cartilage. Biomaterials 26:419–431
18.
Bodin A, Concaro S, Brittberg M, Gatenholm P (2007) Bacterial cellulose as a potential meniscus implant. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 1:406–408
19.
Klemm D, Schumann D, Udhardt U, Marsch S (2001) Bacterial synthesized cellulose-artificial blood vessels for microsurgery. Prog Polym Sci 26:1561–1603
20.
Backdahl H, Helenius G, Bodin A, Nannmark U, Johansson BR, Risberg B et al (2006) Mechanical properties of bacterial cellulose and interactions with smooth muscle cells. Biomaterials 27:2141–2149
21.
Backdahl H, Esguerra M, Delbro D, Risberg B, Gatenholm P (2008) Engineering microporosity in bacterial cellulose scaffolds. J Tissue Eng Reg Med. 2:320–330
22.
Wippermann J, Schumann D, Klemm D, Kosmehl H, Salehi-Gelani S, Wahlers T (2009) Preliminary results of small arterial substitute performed with a new cylindrical biomaterial composed of bacterial cellulose. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 37:592–596
23.
Novaes ABJ, Novaes AB, Grissi MFM, Soares UN, Gabarra F (1993) Gengiflex, an alkali-cellulose membrane for GTR: histologic observations. Braz Dent J. 4:65–71
24.
Novaes ABJ, Novaes AB (1997) Soft tissue management for primary closure in guided bone regeneration: surgical technique and case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 12:84–87
25.
Salata LA, Craig GT, Brook IM (1995) In vivo evaluation of a new membrane (gengiflex) for guided bone regeneration (GBR). J Dent Res 74:825
26.
Maneerung T, Tokura S, Rujiravanit R (2008) Impregnation of silver nanoparticles into bacterial cellulose for antimicrobial wound dressing. Carbohydr Polym 72:43–51
27.
Fontana JD, de Souza AM, Fontana CK, Torriani IL, Moreschi JC, Gallotti BJ et al (1990) Acetobacter cellulose pellicle as a temporary skin substitute. Apply Biochem Biotechnol. 25–25:253–264
28.
Sokolnicki AM, Fisher RJ, Harrah T, Kaplan DL (2006) Permeability of bacterial cellulose membranes. J Membr Sci 272:15–27
29.
Amin MCIM, Ahmad N, Halib N, Ahmad I (2012) Synthesis and characterization of thermo- and pH-responsive bacterial cellulose/acrylic acid hydrogels for drug delivery. Carbohydr Polym 88:465–473
30.
Yano H, Sugiyama J, Nakagaito AN, Nogi M, Matsuura T, Hikita M et al (2005) Optically transparent composites reinforced with networks of bacterial nanofibers. Adv Mater 17:153–155
31.
Brown RMJ, Willison JHM, Richardson CL (1976) Cellulose biosynthesis in Acetobacter xylinum: visualization of the site of synthesis and direct measurement of the in vivo process. Proc Natl Acad Sci 73:4565–4569
32.
Rambo CR, Recouvreux DOS, Carminatti CA, Pitlovanciv AK, Antonio RV, Porto LM (2008) Template assisted synthesis of porous nanofibrous cellulose membranes for tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C 28:549–554
33.
Herrick FW, Casebier RL, Hamilton JK, Sandberg KR (1983) Microfibrillated cellulose: morphology and accessibility. J Apply Polym Sci Appl Polym Symp. 37:797–813
34.
Cannon RE, Anderson SM (1991) Biogenesis of bacterial cellulose. Crit Rev Microbiol. 17(6):435–447
35.
Nashiyama Y (2009) Structure and properties of the cellulose microfibril. J Wood Sci. 55:241–249
36.
O’Sullivan AC (1997) Cellulose: the structure slowly unravels. Cellulose 4:173–207
37.
Matsuo M, Sawatari C, Iwai Y, Ozaki F (1990) Effect of orientation distribution and crystallinity on the measurement by X-ray diffraction of the crystal lattice moduli of cellulose I and II. Macromol. 23:3266–3275
38.
Czaja W, Krystynowicz A, Bielecki S, Brown MRJ (2006) Microbial cellulose—the natural power to heal wounds. Biomaterials 27:145–151
39.
Tanskul S, Amornthatree K, Jaturonlak N (2013) A new cellulose-producing bacterium, Rhodococcus Sp. MI2: screening and optimization of culture conditions. Carbohydr Polym 92(1):421–428
40.
Budhiono A, Rosidi B, Taher H, Iguchi M (1999) Kinetic aspects of bacterial cellulose formation in nata-de-coco culture system. Carbohydr Polym 40:137–143
41.
Borzani W, Souza SJ (1995) Mechanism of the film thickness increasing during the bacterial production of cellulose on non-agitated liquid media. Biotechnol Lett. 17:1271–1272
42.
Cakar F, Ozer I, Aytekin AO, Sahin F (2014) Improvement production of bacterial cellulose by semi-continous process in molasses medium. Carbohydr Polym 106:7–17
43.
Kurosumi A, Sasaki CYY, Nakamura Y (2009) Utilization of various fruit juices as carbon source for production of bacterial cellulose by Acetobacter xylinum NBRC 13693. Carbohydr Polym 76(2):333–335
44.
Gomes FP, Silva NHCS, Trovatti E, Serafim LS, Duarte MF et al (2013) Production of bacterial cellulose by Gluconacetobacter sacchari using dry olive mill residue. Biomass Bioenergy 55:205–211
45.
Lin D, Lopez-Sanchez P, Li R, Li Z (2014) Production of bacterial cellulose by Gluconobacter hansenii CGMCC 3917 using only waste beer yeast as nutrient source. Bioresour Technol 151:113–119
46.
Carreira P, Mendes JAS, Trovatti E, Serafim LS, Freire CSR et al (2011) Utilization of residues from agro-forest industries in the production of high value bacterial cellulose. Bioresour Technol 102:7354–7360
47.
Zeng X, Small DP, Wan W (2011) Statistical optimization of culture conditions for bacterial cellulose production by Acetobacter xylinum Bpr 2001 from mapla syrup. Carbohydr Polym 85(3):506–513
48.
Chawla PR, Bajaj IB, Survase SA, Singhal RS (2009) Microbial cellulose: fermentative production and Applications. Food Technol Biotechnol. 47(2):107–124
49.
Szot CS, Buchmann CF, Gatenholm P, Rylander MN, Freeman JW (2011) Investigation of cancer cell behavior on nanofibrous scaffolds. Mater Sci Eng C 31:37–42
50.
Langer R, Vacanti JP (1993) Tissue engineering. Science 260(5110):920–926
51.
Backdahl H, Helenius G, Bodin A, Nannmark U, Johansson BR, Risberg B et al (2006) Mechanical properties of bacterial cellulose and interactions with smooth muscle cells. Biomaterials 27(9):2141–2149
52.
Helenius G, Backdahl H, Bodin A, Nannmark U, Gatenholm P, Risberg B (2006) In vivo biocompatibility of bacterial cellulose. J Biomed Mater Res A. 76(2):431–438
53.
Petersen N, Gatenholm P (2011) Bacterial cellulose-based materials and medical devices: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 91(5):1277–1286
54.
Jeong SI, Lee SE, Yang H, Jin YH, Park CS, Park YS (2010) Toxicologic evaluation of bacterial synthesized cellulose in endothelial cells and animals. Mol Cell Toxicol. 6:373–380
55.
Lin Q, Zheng Y, Ren L, Wu J, Wang H, An J et al (2014) Preparation and characteristic of a sodium alginate/carboxymethylated bacterial cellulose composite with crosslinking semi-interpenetrating network. J Appl Polym Sci 131(3):3948–3957
56.
Demitras Y, Yagmur C, Soylemez F, Ozturk N, Demir A (2010) Management of split-thickness skin graft donor site: a prospective clinical trial for comparison of five different dressing materials. Burns. 36:99–1005
57.
Chen HH, Lin SB, Hsu CP, Chen LC (2013) Modifying bacterial cellulose with gelatin peptides for improved rehydratation. Cellulose 20:1967–1977
58.
Cho LAR, Leem H, Lee J, Park KC (2005) Reversal of silver sulfadiazine-impaired wound healing by epidermal growth factor. Biomaterials 26:4670–4676
59.
Kennedy P, Brammah S, Willis E (2010) Biofilm and a new appraisal of burn wound sepsis. Burns. 36:49–56
60.
Elsner JJ, Berdicevsky I, Zilberman M (2011) In vitro microbial inhibition and cellular response to novel biodegradable composite wound dressing with controlled release of antibiotics. Acta Biomater 7:325–336
61.
Ovington LG, Pierce B (2001) Wound dressings: form, function, feasibility and facts. In: Krasner D, Rodeheaver G, Sibbald G (eds) Chronic wound care: a clinical source book for healthcare professionals. Management Publications Inc, Wayne, pp 311–319
62.
Robson MC (1997) Wound infection: a failure of wound healing caused by an imbalance of bacteria. Surg Clin N Am 77:637–650
63.
Pinto JBR, Daina S, Sadocco P, Neto CPN, Trindade T (2013) Antibacterial activity of nanocomposites of copper and cellulose. BioMed Res Int. 2013:280512
64.
Pinto RJB, Marques PAAP, Neto PC, Trindade T, Daina S, Sadocco P (2009) Antibacterial activity of nanocomposites of silver and bacterial or vegetable cellulosic fibers. Acta Biomater 5:2279–2289
65.
Yang G, Xie JJ, Hong F, Cao ZJ, Yang XX (2012) Antimicrobial activity of silver nanoparticle impregnated bacterial cellulose membrane: effect of fermentation carbon sources of bacterial cellulose. Carbohydr Polym 84:533–538
66.
Maria LCS, Santos ALC, Oliveira PC, Valle ASS (2010) Preparation and antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles impregnated in bacterial cellulose. Polimeros 20(1):72–77
67.
Hu WL, Chen SY, Li X, Shi SK, Shen W, Zhang X et al (2009) In situ synthesis of silver chloride nanoparticles into bacterial cellulose membranes. Mater Sci Eng C 29:1216–1219
68.
Wei B, Yang G, Hong F (2011) Preparation and evaluation of a kind of bacterial cellulose dry films with antibacterial properties. Carbohydr Polym 84:533–538
69.
Kim J, Cai Z, Chen Y (2010) Biocompatible bacterial cellulose composites for biomedical application. J Nanotechnol Eng Med 1:011006
70.
Dash M, Chiellini F, Ottenbrite RM, Chiellini E (2011) Chitosan—a versatile semi-synthetic polymer in biomedical applications. Prog Polym Sci 36:981–1014
71.
Khor E, Lim LY (2003) Implantable applications of chitin and chitosan. Biomaterials 24:2339–2349
72.
Pillai CKS, Paul W, Sharma CP (2009) Chitin and chitosan polymers: chemistry, solubility and fiber formation. Prog Polym Sci 34:641–678
73.
Zhijiang C, Kim J (2010) Bacterial cellulose/poly(ethylene glycol) composite: characterization and first evaluation of biocompatibility. Cellulose 17:83–91
74.
Lin WC, Lien CC, Yeh HJ, Yu CM, Hsu SH (2013) Bacterial cellulose and bacterial cellulose–chitosan membranes for wound dressing applications. Carbohydr Polym 94:603–611
75.
Luan J, Wu J, Zheng Y, Song W, Wang G, Guo J et al (2012) Impregnation of silver sulfadiazine into bacterial cellulose for antimicrobial and biocompatible wound dressing. Biomed Mater 7:065006
76.
Atiyeh BS, Costagliola M, Hayek SN, Dibo SA (2007) Effect of silver on burn wound infection control and healing: review of the literature. Burns. 33:139–148
77.
Heimbach D, Mann R, Engrav L (2002) Evaluation of the burn wound management decisions. Total burn care, 2nd edn. Saunders, New York
78.
Seetharaman S, Natesan S, Stowers RS, Mullens C, Baer DG, Suggs LJ et al (2011) A PEGylated fibrin-based wound dressing with antimicrobial and angiogenic activity. Acta Biomaters. 7:2787–2796
79.
Konrad D, Tsunoda M, Weber K, Corney SJ, Ullmann L (2001) Effects of a topical silver sulfadiazine polyurethane dressing (Mikacure) on wound healing in experimentally infected wounds in the pig. J Exp Anim Sci 42:31–43
80.
Modak SM, Fox CL (1973) Binding of silver sulfadiazine to the cellular components of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biochem Pharmacol 22:2391–2404
81.
Klasen HJ (2000) A historical review of the use of silver in the treatment of burns: II. Renewed interest for silver. Burns. 26:131–138
82.
Kumar A, Vemula PK, Ajayan PM, John G (2008) Silver-nanoparticle-embedded antimicrobial paints based on vegetable oil. Nat Mater. 7:236–241
83.
Damm C, Munsted H, Rosch A (2007) Long-term antimicrobial polyamide 6/silver-nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 42:6067–6073
84.
Cho KH, Park JE, Osaka T, Park SG (2005) The study of antimicrobial activity and preservative effects of nanosilver ingredient. Electrochim Acta 51:956–960
85.
Precival SL, Bowler PG, Russell D (2005) Bacterial resistance to silver in wound care. J Hosp Inf. 60:1–7
86.
Wright JB, Lam K, Hansen D, Burrell RE (2004) Optical and structural studies of silver nanoparticles. Rad Phys Chem. 27(4):344–350
87.
Cai J, Kimura S, Wada M, Kuga S (2009) Nanoporous cellulose as metal nanoparticles support. Biomacromol. 10:87–94
88.
Ifku S, Tsuji M, Morimoto M, Saimoto H, Yano H (2009) Synthesis of silver nanoparticles templated by TEMPO-mediated oxidized bacterial cellulose nanofibers. Biomacromol. 10:2714–2717
89.
Barud H, Regiani T, Marques RC, Lustri WR, Messaddeq Y, Ribeiro SJL (2011) Antimicrobial bacterial cellulose–silver nanoparticles composite membranes. J Nanomater. 2011:1–8
90.
de Santa MLC, Santos ALC, Oliveira PC, Barud HS, Messaddeq Y, Ribeiro SJL (2009) Synthesis and characterization of silver nanoparticles impregnated into bacterial cellulose. Mater Lett 63:797–799
91.
Sureshkumar M, Siswanto DY, Lee CK (2010) Magnetic antimicrobial nanocomposite based on bacterial cellulose and silver nanoparticles. J Mater Chem 20:6948–6955
92.
Cohen SY, Quentel G, Egasse D, Cadot M, Ingster-moati I, Coscas GJ (1993) The dark choroid in systemic argyrosis. Retina. 13:312–316
93.
Rosenman K, Moss A, Kon S (1979) Argyria: clinical implications of exposure of silver nitrate and silver oxide. J Occup Med. 21:430–435
94.
Ahmed M, Karns M, Goodson M, Rowe J, Hussain SM, Schlager JJ et al (2008) DNA damage response to different surface chemistry of silver nanoparticles in mammalian cells. Toxicol Appl Pharm. 233:404–410
95.
Wu J, Zheng Y, Wen X, Lin Q, Chen X, Wu Z (2014) Silver nanoparticle/bacterial cellulose gel membranes for antibacterial wound dressing: investigation in vitro and in vivo. Biomed Mater 9:035005
96.
Wu J, Zheng Y, Song W, Luan J, Wen X, Wu Z et al (2014) In situ synthesis of silver-nanoparticles/bacterial cellulose composites for slow-released antimicrobial wound dressing. Carbohydr Polym 102:762–771
97.
AshaRani PV, Mun GLK, Hande MP, Valiyaveettil S (2009) Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of silver nanoparticles in human cells. ACS Nano 3(2):279–290
98.
Park MV, Neigh AM, Vermulen JP, de la Fonteyene LJ, Verharen HW et al (2011) The effect of particle size on the cytotoxicity, inflammation, developmental toxicity and genotoxicity of silver nanoparticles. Biomaterials 32(36):9810–9817
99.
Cady NC, Behnke JL, Strickland AD (2011) Copper-based nanostructured coatings on natural cellulose: nanocomposites exhibiting rapid and efficient inhibition of a multi-drug resistant wound pathogen, A baumannii, and mammalian cell biocompatibility in vitro. Adv Funct Mate. 21(13):2506–2514
100.
Turnlund JR (1998) Human whole-body copper metabolism. Am J Clinic Nutr. 67(5):960S–964S
101.
Yoon KY, Byeon JH, Park JH, Hwang J (2007) Susceptibility constant of Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis to silver and copper nanoparticles. Sci Total Environ 373(2–3):572–575
102.
Pinto RJB, Neves MC, Pascoal NTT (2012) Growth and chemical stability of copper nanostructures on cellulose fibers. Eur J Inorg Chem 31:5043–5049
103.
Rovee DT (2003) Wounds: a compendium of clinical research and practice. Wounds. 15(6):A10
104.
Park SU, Lee BK, Kim MS, Park KK, Sung WJ, Kim HY et al (2014) The possibility of microbial cellulose for dressing and scaffold materials. Int Wound J. 11(1):35–43
105.
Ramakrishna S, Mayer J, Wintermantel E, Leong KW (2001) Biomedical applications of polymer-composite materials: a review. Compos Sci Technol 61:1189–1224
106.
Alberto S, Giovanni T, Anna MB, Erinestina SP, Elena S, Bruni M (2001) Characterization of native cellulose/poly(ethylene glycol) films. Macromol Mater Eng 286:524–538
107.
Zhijiang C, Guang Y, Kim J (2011) Biocompatible nanocomposites prepared by impregnating bacterial cellulose nanofibrils into poly(3-hydroxybutyrate). Curr Appl Phys 11:247–249
108.
Zhijiang C, Changwei H, Guang Y (2012) Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate)/bacterial cellulose composite porous scaffold: preparation, characterization and biocompatybility. Carbohydr Polym 87:1073–1080
Metadaten
Titel
Bacterial cellulose in the field of wound healing and regenerative medicine of skin: recent trends and future prospectives
verfasst von
J. Kucińska-Lipka
I. Gubanska
H. Janik
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Polymer Bulletin / Ausgabe 9/2015
Print ISSN: 0170-0839
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-2449
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-015-1407-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2015

Polymer Bulletin 9/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Original Paper

Antimicrobial nitrile gloves coated by electrospun trimethylated chitosan-loaded polyvinyl alcohol ultrafine fibers

Original Paper

Lignin as coupling agent in EPDM rubber: thermal and mechanical properties

Original Paper

Studies towards understanding the effect of hexane on polysulfone membranes

Original Paper

Facile synthesis of boronic acid-functionalized nanocarriers for glucose-triggered caffeic acid release

Original Paper

MALDI-TOF MS analysis of the self-termination products in the anionic methyl methacrylate/tert-butyl acrylate block copolymerization

Original Paper

Cu2+ adsorption onto ion-imprinted composite hydrogels: thermodynamics and mechanism studies

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise