Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Journal of Business Ethics
Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics 2/2022

04.01.2021 | Original Paper

Business Ethics and Quantification: Towards an Ethics of Numbers

verfasst von: Gazi Islam

Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics | Ausgabe 2/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Social practices of quantification, or the production and communication of numbers, have been recognized as important foundations of organizational knowledge, as well as sources of power. With the advent of increasingly sophisticated digital tools to capture and extract numerical data from social life, however, there is a pressing need to understand the ethical stakes of quantification. The current study examines quantification from an ethical lens, to frame and promote a research agenda around the ethics of quantification. After a brief overview of quantification research and its uses in state and market organization, I discuss quantification in terms of three core subprocesses—capture, specification, and appropriation, illustrating and identifying ethical concerns around each process. Linking these processes to the performative effects of measures, I present a working model of quantification from which the discussion builds ideas for developing a research agenda around quantification.
Nächster Artikel Escaping the Fantasy Land of Freedom in Organizations: The Contribution of Hannah Arendt

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Fußnoten
1
For a description of the various (and sometimes opposing) conceptions of performativity, see Gond et al (2016).
 
Literatur
Aitken, R. (2017). ‘All data is credit data’: Constituting the unbanked. Competition & Change, 21(4), 274–300.
Alexandrova, A. (2012). Well-being as an object of science. Philosophy of Science, 79, 678–689.
Alexandrova, A. (2017). A philosophy for the science of well-being. New York: Oxford University Press.
Alexandrova, A., & Haybron, D. M. (2016). Is construct validation valid? Philosophy of Science, 83(5), 1098–1109.
Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.
Appadurai, A. (2016). Banking on words: The failure of language in the age of derivative finance. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Bache, I. (2019). How does evidence matter? Understanding ‘what works’ for wellbeing. Social Indicators Research, 142(3), 1153–1173.
Baud, C., Brivot, M., & Himick, D. (2019). Accounting Ethics and the Fragmentation of Value. Journal of Business Ethics, 153, 1121–1142.
Berman, E. P., & Hirschman, D. (2018). The sociology of quantification: Where are we now? Contemporary Sociology, 47(3), 257–266.
Beverungen, A., Beyes, T., & Conrad, L. (2019). The organizational powers of (digital) media. Organization, 26(5), 621–635.
Beverungen, A., Bohm, S., & Land, C. (2015). Free labour, social media, management: Challenging marxist organization studies. Organization Studies, 36(4), 473–489.
Boje, D. M., Gardner, C. L., & Smith, W. L. (2006). (Mis)Using numbers in the Enron story. Organizational Research Methods, 9(4), 456–474.
Boltanski, L. (2016). Alain Desrosières’s reflexive numbers. In I. Bruno, F. Jany-Catrice, & B. Touchelay (Eds.), The social sciences of quantification: From the politics of large numbers to target-driven policies (pp. 33–42). Cham: Springer.
Bourdieu, P. (1985). The social space and the genesis of groups. Theory and Society, 14(6), 723–774.
Boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for Big Data. Information, Communication & Society, 5(15), 662–679.
Bruno, I., Didier, E., & Prévieux, J. (Eds.). (2014a). Statactivisme. Comment lutter avec des nombres. Paris: La Découverte.
Bruno, I., Didier, E., & Vitale, T. (2014b). Statactivism: forms of action between disclosure and affirmation. The Open Journal of Sociopolitical Studies, 2(7), 198–220.
Bruno, I., Jany-Catrice, F., & Touchelay, B. (Eds.). (2016). The social sciences of quantification: from politics of large numbers to target-driven policies. Cham: Springer.
Campbell, D. T. (1979). Assessing the impact of planned social change. Evaluation and Program Planning, 2(1), 67–90.
Charitsis, V. (2016). Prosuming(the)self. Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization, 16(3), 37–59.
Chelli, M., & Gendron, Y. (2013). Sustainability ratings and the disciplinary power of the ideology of numbers. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(2), 187–203.
Corkery M. & Silver-Greenberg J. (2015). Banks reject New York City IDs, leaving ‘unbanked’ on sidelines. New York Times, 23 December.
Cussó, R. (2016). From statistics to international quantification: A dialogue with Alain Desrosières. In I. Bruno, F. Jany-Catrice, & B. Touchelay (Eds.), The social sciences of quantification: From the politics of large numbers to target-driven policies (pp. 55–65). Cham: Springer.
Davis, K. E., Fisher, A., Kingsbury, B., & Merry, S. E. (Eds.). (2012). Governance by indicators: Global power through classification and rankings. Oxford, UK: Oxford University of Press.
De Santos, M. (2009). Fact-totems and the statistical imagination: The public life of a statistic in Argentina 2001. Sociological Theory, 27(4), 466–489.
Dean, J. (2006). Communicative capitalism: Circulation and the foreclosure of politics. Cultural Politics: An International Journal, 1(1), 51–74.
Dean, J. (2010). Blog theory: Feedback and capture in circuits of drive. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Dean, J. (2016). Crowds and party. London: Verso.
Desrosières, A. (1993). La Politique des grands nombres: Histoire de la raison statistique. Paris: Editions la Decouverte.
Desrosières, A. (2016). The quantification of the social sciences: An historical comparison. In I. Bruno, F. Jany-Catrice, & B. Touchelay (Eds.), The social sciences of quantification: From the politics of large numbers to target-driven policies (pp. 183–204). Cham: Springer.
Didier, E. (2018). Globalization of quantitative policing: Between management and statactivism. Annual Review of Sociology, 44, 515–534.
Dourish, P., & Gómez Cruz, E. (2018). Datafication and data fiction: Narrating data and narrating with data. Big Data & Society, 5(2), 1–10.
Elden, S. (2006). Speaking against number: Heidegger, language and the politics of calculation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Espeland, W. N., & Sauder, M. (2007). Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. American Journal of Sociology, 113, 1–40.
Espeland, W. N., & Stevens, M. L. (1998). Commensuration as a social process. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 313–343.
Espeland, W. N., & Stevens, M. L. (2008). A sociology of quantification. European Journal of Sociology, 49, 401–436.
Eyraud C. (2012). Une comptabilité d’entreprise pour l’Etat. Sociologie d’un dispositif de quantification économique. Mémoire en vue de l’Habilitation à diriger des recherches, Université Paris-Sorbonne.
Foucault, M. (1988). The history of sexuality. New York: Vintage.
Fuchs, C. (2012). The political economy of privacy on Facebook. Television & New Media, 13, 139–159.
Gephart, R. P. (2006). Ethnostatistics and organizational research methodologies: An Introduction. Organizational Research Methods, 9(4), 417–431.
Gill, R., & Pratt, A. (2008). In the social factory? Immaterial labour, precariousness and cultural work. Theory, Culture & Society, 25, 1–30.
Gond, J.-P., Cabantous, L., Harding, N., & Learmonth, M. (2016). What do we mean by performativity in organizational and management theory? The uses and abuses of performativity. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(4), 440–463.
Greenfield, A. (2017). Radical technologies: The design of everyday life. Brooklyn: Verso Books.
Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hacking, I. (1990). The taming of chance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hornstein, G. A. (1988). Quantifying psychological phenomena: Debates, dilemmas, and implications. In J. G. Morawski (Ed.), The Rise of Experimentation in American Psychology. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Humphreys, L. (2018). The qualified self, social media and the accounting of everyday life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ingram, D., & Bar-Tura, A. (2014). The public sphere as site of emancipation and enlightenment: A discourse-theoretic critique of digital communication. In D. Boros & J. Glass (Eds.), Re-imagining public space: The Frankfurt School in the 21st century (pp. 65–85). New York: Palgrave.
Jany-Catrice, F. (2016). Evaluating public policies or measuring the performance of public services? In I. Bruno, F. Jany-Catrice, & B. Touchelay (Eds.), The social sciences of quantification: From the politics of large numbers to target-driven policies (pp. 123–135). Cham: Springer.
Jay, M. (2005). Songs of experience: Modern American and European variations on a universal theme. Berkeley: University of California Press.
John, S., & Alexandrova, A. (2018). Limits of the Numerical. An ISRF-funded research project 2015–2018 CRASSH. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.
Kroeger, A., & Weber, C. (2020). Developing a conceptual framework for comparing social value creation. The Academy of Management Review, 39(4), 513–540.
Loveman, M. (2005). The modern state and the primitive accumulation of symbolic power. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 1651–1683.
Löwy, M. (1987). The romantic and the Marxist critique of modern civilization. Theory and Society, 16(6), 891–904.
Markham, A. N. (2019). Critical pedagogy as a response to datafication. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(8), 754–760.
Martin, E. (2007). Bipolar expeditions: Mania and depression in American culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Mau, S. (2019). The metric society: On the quantification of the social. London: Polity Press.
Mayer-Schoenberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2013). Big data. A revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. London: John Murray.
Mazmanian, M., & Beckman, C. M. (2018). “Making” your numbers: Engendering organizational control through a ritual of quantification. Organization Science, 29(3), 357–379.
Mennicken, A., & Espeland, W. N. (2019). What’s new with numbers? Sociological approaches to the study of quantification. Annual Review of Sociology, 45, 1–23.
Mingers, J., & Willmott, H. (2013). Taylorizing business school research: On the ‘one best way’ performative effects of journal ranking lists. Human Relations, 66, 1051–1073.
Neff, G. (2013). Why big data won’t cure us. Big Data., 1, 117–123.
Ottaviani, F. (2015). Performativité des indicateurs: indicateurs alternatifs et transformation des modes de rationalisation. Economies et finances: Université Grenoble Alpes.
Peter, M., & O’Leary, T. (1987). Accounting and the construction of the governable Person. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12, 235–266.
Pink, S., & Lanzeni, D. (2018). Future anthropology ethics and datafication: Temporality and responsibility in research. Social Media and Society, 4(2), 1–9.
Porter, T. M. (1995a). Statistical and social facts from Quetelet to Durkheim. Sociological Perspectives, 38(1), 15–26.
Porter, T. M. (1995b). Trust in numbers. The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Power, M. (1994). From the science of accounts to the financial accountability of science. Science in Context, 7(3), 355–387.
Power, M. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford: OUP Oxford.
Raffnsøe, S., Mennicken, A., & Miller, P. (2019). The Foucault effect in Organization Studies. Organization Studies, 40(2), 155–182.
Ruckenstein, M., & Schüll, N. D. (2017). The datafication of health. Annual Review of Anthropology, 46(1), 261–278.
Sadowski, J. (2019). When data is capital: Datafication, accumulation, and extraction. Big Data and Society, 6(1), 1–12.
Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Shapiro, A. (2018). Street-level: Google Street View’s abstraction by datafication. New Media and Society, 20(3), 1201–1219.
Sibilia, P. (2008). La intimidad como espectáculo. Buenos Aires: Fondo Cultura Económica.
Singh, R., & Alexandrova, A. (2020). Happiness economics as technocracy. Behavioural Public Policy, 4, 236–244.
Stein, M.-K., Wagner, E. L., Tierney, P., Newell, S., & Galliers, R. D. (2019). Datification and the pursuit of meaningfulness in work. Journal of Management Studies, 56(3), 685–717.
Supiot, A. (2015). La gouvernance par les nombres. Paris: Fayard.
Taylor, F. (1911). The principles of scientific management. New York: Norton.
Taylor, L. (2020). The price of certainty: How the politics of pandemic data demand an ethics of care. Big Data & Society, 3, 1–9.
Thévenot, L. (2011). Conventions for measuring and questioning policies. The case of 50 years of policies evaluations through a statistical survey. Historical Social Research, 36(4), 192–217.
Thévenot, L. (2019). Measure for measure: Politics of quantifying individuals to govern them. Historical Social Research, 44(2), 44–76.
Toraldo, M. L., Islam, G., & Mangia, G. (2018). Modes of knowing: Video research and the problem of elusive knowledges. Organizational Research Methods, 21(2), 438–465.
Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.
Urueña, R. (2015). Indicators and the law: A case study of the rule of law index. In S. E. Merry, K. E. Davis, & B. Kingsbury (Eds.), The Quiet Power of Indicators: Measuring Governance, Corruption, and Rule of Law (pp. 75–102). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ustek-Spilda, F. (2019). Statisticians as back-office policy-makers: Counting asylum-seekers and refugees in Europe. Science Technology and Human Values, 25, 1–28.
van Dijck, J. (2014). Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big Data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance & Society, 12(2), 197–208.
Vanoli, A. (2005). A history of national accounting. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Williams, R. (1977). Structures of feeling. In Marxism and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zelizer, V. (1994). Pricing the priceless child: The changing social value of children. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Zelizer, V. (2005). The purchase of intimacy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. Journal of Information Technology, 30, 75–89.
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. New York: Hatchett.
Zyphur, M. J., & Pierides, D. C. (2017). Is quantitative research ethical? Tools for ethically practicing, evaluating, and using quantitative research. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(1), 1–16.
Zyphur, M. J., & Pierides, D. C. (2019). Statistics and probability have always been value-laden: An historical ontology of quantitative research methods. Journal of Business Ethics, 167, 1–18.
Metadaten
Titel
Business Ethics and Quantification: Towards an Ethics of Numbers
verfasst von
Gazi Islam
Publikationsdatum
04.01.2021
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Business Ethics / Ausgabe 2/2022
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04694-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2022

Journal of Business Ethics 2/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Original Paper

How do Expatriate Managers Draw the Boundaries of Moral Free Space in the Case of Guanxi?

Original Paper

Hometown Ties and Favoritism in Chinese Corporations: Evidence from CEO Dismissals and Corporate Social Responsibility

Original Paper

Cultural Diversity and Corporate Tax Avoidance: Evidence from Chinese Private Enterprises

Acknowledgment

Reviewers 2021

Original Paper

Should You Buy Local?

Original Paper

Legitimacy and Cosmopolitanism: Online Public Debates on (Corporate) Responsibility

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise