nach oben

Cellulose

Erschienen in:

19.09.2020 | Review Paper

Bacterial cellulose: a biomaterial with high potential in dental and oral applications

verfasst von: A. Cañas-Gutiérrez, M. Osorio, C. Molina-Ramírez, D. Arboleda-Toro, C. Castro-Herazo

Erschienen in: Cellulose | Ausgabe 17/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Bacterial cellulose has great potential as a biomaterial for dental and oral applications. It has been used mainly in dental pulp tissue regeneration, periodontal regeneration, and dressing of surgical wounds of the oral mucosa. In addition, bacterial cellulose has been explored in dental root canal treatment to remove the total residue and dry the canal. This review describes some bacterial cellulose studies focused on these applications, as well as advantages, disadvantages and some important results in both in vitro and in vivo evaluations, based on the physiological and structural components of the particular tissue. Furthermore, this work describes the properties and advantages of bacterial cellulose in dental and oral applications compared with other biomaterials. Finally, in the new era of biomaterials, composite materials inspired by biological tissue based on bacterial cellulose are proposed for alveolar bone regeneration.

Graphic abstract

Nächster Artikel Synthesis of an enantiomer of cellulose via cationic ring-opening polymerization

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Ali E, Neel A, Chrzanowski W et al (2014) Tissue engineering in dentistry. J Dent 42:915–928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.05.008CrossRef

Alshehadat S, Thu H, Hamid S et al (2016) Scaffolds for dental pulp tissue regeneration: a review. Int Dent Med J Adv Res 2:1–12. https://doi.org/10.15713/ins.idmjar.36CrossRef

Andrade FK, Silva JP, Carvalho M et al (2011) Studies on the hemocompatibility of bacterial cellulose. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 98A:554–566. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.33148CrossRef

Arikan V, Sonmez H, Sari S (2016) Comparison of two base materials regarding their effect on root canal treatment success in primary molars with furcation lesions. Biomed Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1429286CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Aurer A, JorgiE-Srdjak K (2005) Membranes for periodontal regeneration. Acta Stomatol Croat 39:107–112

Backdahl H, Esguerra M, Delbro D et al (2008) Engineering microporosity in bacterial cellulose scaffolds. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2:320–330. https://doi.org/10.1002/termCrossRefPubMed

Bäckdahl H, Helenius G, Bodin A et al (2006) Mechanical properties of bacterial cellulose and interactions with smooth muscle cells. Biomaterials 27:2141–2149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.10.026CrossRefPubMed

Bäckdahl H, Risberg B, Gatenholm P (2011) Observations on bacterial cellulose tube formation for application as vascular graft. Mater Sci Eng C 31:14–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2010.07.010CrossRef

Bansal R, Bansal R (2011) Regenerative endodontics: a state of the art. Indian J Dent Res 22:122–131. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.79977CrossRefPubMed

Basso FG, Hebling J, Marcelo CL et al (2017) Development of an oral mucosa equivalent using a porcine dermal matrix. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 55:308–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2016.09.019CrossRefPubMed

Binnetoglu A, Demir B, Akakin D et al (2019) Bacterial cellulose tubes as a nerve conduit for repairing complete facial nerve transection in a rat model. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05637-9CrossRef

Birkheur S, de Sousa Faria-Tischer PC, Tischer CA et al (2017) Enhancement of fibroblast growing on the mannosylated surface of cellulose membranes. Mater Sci Eng C 77:672–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.04.006CrossRef

Bodin A, Concaro S, Brittberg M, Gatenholm P (2007) Bacterial cellulose as a potential meniscus implant. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 1:406–408. https://doi.org/10.1002/termCrossRefPubMed

Bodin A, Bharadwaj S, Wu S et al (2010) Tissue-engineered conduit using urine-derived stem cells seeded bacterial cellulose polymer in urinary reconstruction and diversion. Biomaterials 31:8889–8901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.108CrossRefPubMed

Brown AJ (1886) On an acetic ferment which forms cellulose. J Chem Soc Trans 49:432–439CrossRef

Chawla PR, Bajaj IB, Survase SA, Singhal RS (2009) Microbial cellulose: fermentative production and applications. Food Technol Biotechnol 47:107–124

Chen MYH, Chen KL, Chen CA et al (2012) Responses of immature permanent teeth with infected necrotic pulp tissue and apical periodontitis/abscess to revascularization procedures. Int Endod J 45:294–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01978.xCrossRefPubMed

Chen S, Lopez-sanchez P, Wang D et al (2018) Mechanical properties of bacterial cellulose synthesised by diverse strains of the genus Komagataeibacter. Food Hydrocoll. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.02.031CrossRef

Cheung GSP, Stock CJR (1993) In vitro cleaning ability of root canal irrigants with and without endosonics. Int Endod J 26:334–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1993.tb00766.xCrossRefPubMed

Chiaoprakobkij N, Sanchavanakit N, Subbalekha K et al (2011) Characterization and biocompatibility of bacterial cellulose/alginate composite sponges with human keratinocytes and gingival fibroblasts. Carbohydr Polym 85:548–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.03.011CrossRef

Czaja W, Krystynowicz A, Bielecki S, Brown RM (2006) Microbial cellulose—the natural power to heal wounds. Biomaterials 27:145–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.035CrossRefPubMed

Czaja W, Kawecki M, Wróblewski P et al (2007a) Biomedical applications of microbial cellulose in burn wound recovery. In: Brown RMJ, Saxena IM (eds) Cellulose: molecular and structural biology. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 307–321CrossRef

Czaja WK, Young DJ, Kawecki M, Brown RM (2007b) The future prospects of microbial cellulose in biomedical applications. Biomacromolecules 8:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm060620dCrossRefPubMed

Dávila Rodríguez LA, Barcha Barreto DA, León Barrios E, Simancas Pallares MA (2013) Manejo estético y endodóncico de dientes con formación radicular incompleta. Av Odontoestomatol 29:201–206. https://doi.org/10.4321/s0213-12852013000400005CrossRef

Dayal MS, Catchmark JM (2016) Mechanical and structural property analysis of bacterial cellulose composites. Carbohydr Polym 144:447–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.02.055CrossRefPubMed

de Oliveira Barud HG, da Silva RR, da Silva Barud H et al (2016) A multipurpose natural and renewable polymer in medical applications: bacterial cellulose. Carbohydr Polym 153:406–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.07.059CrossRefPubMed

De Souza FC, Olival-Costa H, Da Silva L et al (2011) Bacterial cellulose as laryngeal medialization material: an experimental study. J Voice 25:765–769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2010.07.005CrossRefPubMed

Donyavi Z, Ghahari P, Esmaeilzadeh M et al (2016) Antibacterial efficacy of calcium hydroxide and chlorhexidine mixture for treatment of teeth with primary endodontic lesions: a randomized clinical trial. Iran Endod J 11:255–260. https://doi.org/10.22037/iej.2016.1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Evans EW (2017) Treating scars on the oral mucosa mucosa scar skin fibroblast epithelium TGF-b. Wound 25:89–97

Fadel G, Luiz C, Rita M et al (2017) Bacterial cellulose in biomedical applications: a review. Int J Biol Macromol 104:97–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.05.171CrossRef

Fan X, Zhang T, Zhao Z et al (2013) Preparation and characterization of bacterial cellulose microfiber/goat bone apatite composites for bone repair. J Appl Polym Sci 129:595–603. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.38702CrossRef

Favi PM, Benson RS, Neilsen NR et al (2013) Cell proliferation, viability, and in vitro differentiation of equine mesenchymal stem cells seeded on bacterial cellulose hydrogel scaffolds. Mater Sci Eng C 33:1935–1944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2012.12.100CrossRef

Fontana JD, De Souza AM, Fontana CK et al (1990) Acetobacter cellulose pellicle as a temporary skin substitute. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 24–25:253–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02920250CrossRefPubMed

Gatenholm P, Klemm D (2010) Bacterial nanocellulose as a renewable material for biomedical applications. MRS Bull 35:208–213. https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs2010.653CrossRef

Gomes FP, Silva NHCS, Trovatti E et al (2013) Production of bacterial cellulose by Gluconacetobacter sacchari using dry olive mill residue. Biomass Bioenergy 55:205–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.02.004CrossRef

Gong T, Heng BC, Lo ECM, Zhang C (2016) Current advance and future prospects of tissue engineering approach to dentin/pulp regenerative therapy. Stem Cells Int 2016:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9204574CrossRef

Grande CJ, Torres FG, Gomez CM, Carmen Bañó M (2009) Nanocomposites of bacterial cellulose/hydroxyapatite for biomedical applications. Acta Biomater 5:1605–1615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2009.01.022CrossRefPubMed

Greca LG, Lehtonen J, Tardy BL et al (2018) Biofabrication of multifunctional nanocellulosic 3D structures: a facile and customizable route. Mater Horizons. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7MH01139CCrossRef

Habibi Y, Lucia LA, Rojas OJ (2010) Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications. Chem Rev 110:3479–3500CrossRef

Hakkarainen T, Koivuniemi R, Kosonen M et al (2016) Nanofibrillar cellulose wound dressing in skin graft donor site treatment. J Control Release 244:292–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.07.053CrossRefPubMed

Helenius G, Bäckdahl H, Bodin A et al (2006) In vivo biocompatibility of bacterial cellulose. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 76:431–438. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.30570CrossRef

Holzwarth JM, Ma PX (2011) Biomimetic nanofibrous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 32:9622–9629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.09.009CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hong L, Wang YL, Jia SR et al (2006) Hydroxyapatite/bacterial cellulose composites synthesized via a biomimetic route. Mater Lett 60:1710–1713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2005.12.004CrossRef

Hu Y, Catchmark JM (2011) In vitro biodegradability and mechanical properties of bioabsorbable bacterial cellulose incorporating cellulases. Acta Biomater 7:2835–2845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2011.03.028CrossRefPubMed

Hu Y, Catchmark JM, Vogler EA (2013) Factors impacting the formation of sphere-like bacterial cellulose particles and their biocompatibility for human osteoblast growth. Biomacromolecules 14:3444–3452. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm400744aCrossRefPubMed

Hutchens SA, Benson RS, Evans BR et al (2006) Biomimetic synthesis of calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite in a natural hydrogel. Biomaterials 27:4661–4670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.04.032CrossRefPubMed

Jazayeri HE, Fahmy MD, Razavi M et al (2016) Dental applications of natural-origin polymers in hard and soft tissue engineering. J Prosthodont 25:510–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12465CrossRefPubMed

Jinga SI, Voicu G, Stroescu M et al (2014) Biocellulose nanowhiskers cement composites for endodontic use. Dig J Nanomater Biostruct 9:543–550

Jonas R, Farah LF (1998) Production and application of microbial cellulose. Polym Degrad Stab 59:101–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-3910(97)00197-3CrossRef

ABN Jr, Novaes AB, Grisi MF et al (1993) Genfiflex, an alkali-cellulose membrane for GTR: histologic observations. Braz Dent J 4:65–71

Kaigler D, Mooney D, Ph D (2001) Tissue engineering’ s impact on dentistry. J Dent Educ 65:456–462CrossRef

Kerekes K, Heide S, Jacobsen I (1980) Follow-up examination of endodontic treatment in traumatized juvenile incisors. J Endod 6:744–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(80)80186-5CrossRefPubMed

Keshk SM (2014) Bacterial cellulose production and its industrial applications. J Bioprocess Biotech 04:1–10. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9821.1000150CrossRef

Khalid A, Khan R, Ul-Islam M et al (2017) Bacterial cellulose-zinc oxide nanocomposites as a novel dressing system for burn wounds. Carbohydr Polym 164:214–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.01.061CrossRefPubMed

Klemm D, Schumann D, Udhardt U, Marsch S (2001) Bacterial synthesized cellulose: artificial blood vessels for microsurgery. Prog Polym Sci 26:1561–1603. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6700(01)00021-1CrossRef

Klemm D, Kramer F, Moritz S et al (2011) Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials. Angew Chem Int Ed 50:5438–5466. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201001273CrossRef

Kowalska-Ludwicka K, Cala J, Grobelski B et al (2013) Modified bacterial cellulose tubes for regeneration of damaged peripheral nerves. Arch Med Sci 3:527–534. https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2013.33433CrossRef

Leitão AF, Gupta S, Pedro J et al (2013) Hemocompatibility study of a bacterial cellulose/polyvinyl alcohol nanocomposite. Colloids Surf B 111:493–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.06.031CrossRef

Li Y, Wang S, Huang R et al (2015) Evaluation of the effect of the structure of bacterial cellulose on full thickness skin wound repair on a microfluidic chip. Biomacromolecules 16:780–789. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm501680sCrossRefPubMed

Lin N, Dufresne A (2014) Nanocellulose in biomedicine: current status and future prospect. Eur Polym J 59:302–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.07.025CrossRef

Lin WC, Lien CC, Yeh HJ et al (2013) Bacterial cellulose and bacterial cellulose-chitosan membranes for wound dressing applications. Carbohydr Polym 94:603–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.01.076CrossRefPubMed

Lv X, Yang J, Feng C et al (2016) Bacterial cellulose-based biomimetic nanofibrous scaffold with muscle cells for hollow organ tissue engineering. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2:19–29. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5b00259CrossRefPubMed

Märtson M, Viljanto J, Hurme T et al (1999) Is cellulose sponge degradable or stable as implantation material? An in vivo subcutaneous study in the rat. Biomaterials 20:1989–1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00094-0CrossRefPubMed

Mendes P, Rahal S, Pereira-Junior O et al (2009) In vivo and in vitro evaluation of an Acetobacter xylinum synthesized microbial cellulose membrane intended for guided tissue repair. Acta Vet Scand 51:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-51-12CrossRef

Méndez González V, Madrid Aispuro KC, Amador Lizard EA et al (2014) Revascularization in permanent teeth with pulp necrosis and immature apex: a review of the literature. Rev ADM 71:110–114

Mente J, Hage N, Pfefferle T et al (2009) Mineral trioxide aggregate apical plugs in teeth with open apical foramina: a retrospective analysis of treatment outcome. J Endod 35:1354–1358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.05.025CrossRefPubMed

Messaddeq Y, Ribeiro SJL, Thomazini W (2008) Contact lens for therapy, method and apparatus for their production and use. Brazil patent BR, PI0603704-6

Miyamoto T, Takahashi S, Ito H et al (1989) Tissue biocompatibility of cellulose and its derivatives. J Biomed Mater Res 23:125–133. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820230110CrossRefPubMed

Moreau JL, Caccamese JF, Coletti DP et al (2007) Tissue engineering solutions for cleft palates. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 65:2503–2511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2007.06.648CrossRefPubMed

Murray PE, Garcia-Godoy F, Hargreaves KM (2007) Regenerative endodontics: a review of current status and a call for action. J Endod 33:377–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.09.013CrossRefPubMed

Nakashima M (2005) Bone morphogenetic proteins in dentin regeneration for potential use in endodontic therapy. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 16:369–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cytogfr.2005.02.011CrossRefPubMed

Nimeskern L, Martinez Avila H, Sundberg J et al (2013) Mechanical evaluation of bacterial nanocellulose as an implant material for ear cartilage replacement. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 22:12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.03.005CrossRefPubMed

Novaes AJ, Novaes A (1993) Bone formation over a TiAl6V4 (IMZ) implant placed into an extraction socket in association with membrane therapy (Gengiflex). Clin Oral Implants Res 4:106–110CrossRef

Novaes AB Jr, Novaes A (1997) Soft tissue management for primary closure in guided bone regeneration: surgical technique and case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 12:84–87PubMed

Osorio Delgado M, Ortiz I, Caro G et al (2014) Matrices nanocompuestas de alcohol de polivinilo (PVA)/celulosa bacteriana (CB) para el crecimiento celular y la ingenieria de tejidos. Rev Colomb Mater 5:338–346

Osorio M, Velásquez-Cock J, Restrepo LM et al (2017) Bioactive 3D-shaped wound dressings synthesized from bacterial cellulose: effect on cell adhesion of polyvinyl alcohol integrated in situ. Int J Polym Sci 2017:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3728485CrossRef

Osorio M, Cañas A, Puerta J et al (2019a) Ex vivo and in vivo biocompatibility assessment (blood and tissue) of three-dimensional bacterial nanocellulose biomaterials for soft tissue implants. Sci Rep 9:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46918-xCrossRef

Osorio M, Fernández-Morales P, Gañán P et al (2019b) Development of novel three-dimensional scaffolds based on bacterial nanocellulose for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: effect of processing methods, pore size, and surface area. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 107:348–359. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36532CrossRef

Park M, Lee D, Shin S, Hyun J (2015) Effect of negatively charged cellulose nanofibers on the dispersion of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles for scaffolds in bone tissue engineering. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 130:222–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.04.014CrossRefPubMed

Payne JM, Cobb CM, Rapley JW et al (1996) Migration of human gingival fibroblasts over guided tissue regeneration barrier materials. J Periodontol 67:236–244CrossRef

Pértile RAN, Moreira S, Gil RM et al (2013) Bacterial cellulose : long-term biocompatibility studies. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 23:1339–1354. https://doi.org/10.1163/092050611X581516CrossRef

Petersen N, Gatenholm P (2011) Bacterial cellulose-based materials and medical devices: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 91:1277–1286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-011-3432-yCrossRefPubMed

Pradel W, Lauer G (2012) Tissue-engineered bone grafts for osteoplasty in patients with cleft alveolus. Ann Anat 194:545–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2012.06.002CrossRefPubMed

Qiu Y, Qiu L, Cui J, Wei Q (2016) Bacterial cellulose and bacterial cellulose-vaccarin membranes for wound healing. Mater Sci Eng C 59:303–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.10.016CrossRef

Recouvreux DOS, Rambo CR, Berti FV et al (2011) Novel three-dimensional cocoon-like hydrogels for soft tissue regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C 31:151–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2010.08.004CrossRef

Reszka P, Nowicka A, Lipski M et al (2016) A comparative chemical study of calcium silicate-containing and epoxy resin-based root canal sealers. Biomed Res Int 2016:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9808432CrossRef

Revin V, Liyaskina E, Nazarkina M et al (2018) Cost-effective production of bacterial cellulose using acidic food industry by-products. Braz J Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjm.2017.12.012CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Roh JL, Jang H, Lee J, Kim EH, Shin D (2017) Promotion of oral surgical wound healing using autologous mucosal cell sheets. Oral Oncol 69:84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.04.012CrossRefPubMed

Ross P, Mayer R, Benziman M (1991) Cellulose biosynthesis and function in bacteria. Microbiol Rev 55:35–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbalip.2012.08.009CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Rouabhia M, Allaire P (2010) Gingival mucosa regeneration in athymic mice using in vitro engineered human oral mucosa. Biomaterials 31:5798–5804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.004CrossRefPubMed

Salata LA, Hatton PV, Devlin AJ et al (2001) In vitro and in vivo evaluation of e-PTFE and alkali-cellulose membranes for guided bone regeneration. Clin Oral Implants Res 12:62–68. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012001062.xCrossRefPubMed

Saloned JI, Persson R (1990) Migration of epithelial cells on materials used in guided tissue regeneration. J Periodontal Res 25:215–221CrossRef

Saska S, Barud HS, Gaspar AMM et al (2011) Bacterial cellulose-hydroxyapatite nanocomposites for bone regeneration. Int J Biomater 2011:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/175362CrossRef

Shah G, Costello B (2017) Soft tissue regeneration incorporating 3-dimensional biomimetic scaffolds. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin N Am 29:9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coms.2016.08.003CrossRef

Sharif F, Ur Rehman I, Muhammad N, MacNeil S (2016) Dental materials for cleft palate repair. Mater Sci Eng C 61:1018–1028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.12.019CrossRef

Solovyeva AM, Dummer PMH (2000) Cleaning effectiveness of root canal irrigation with electrochemically activated anolyte and catholyte solutions: a pilot study. Int Endod J 33:494–504. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2000.00342.xCrossRefPubMed

Stumpf TR, Yang X, Zhang J, Cao X (2016) In situ and ex situ modifications of bacterial cellulose for applications in tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.11.121CrossRef

Stumpf TR, Tang L, Kirkwood K et al (2020) Production and evaluation of biosynthesized cellulose tubes as promising nerve guides for spinal cord injury treatment. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 108:1380–1389. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36909CrossRef

Taba M Jr, Jin Q, Sugai JV, Giannobile WV (2005) Current concepts in periodontal bioengineering. Orthod Craniofac Res 8:292–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-6343.2005.00352.xCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Takata T, Miyauchi M, Wang H-L (2001) Migration of osteoblastic cells on various guided bone regeneration membranes. Clin Oral Implants Res 12:332–338. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012004332.xCrossRefPubMed

Tang W, Jia S, Jia Y, Yang H (2010) The influence of fermentation conditions and post-treatment methods on porosity of bacterial cellulose membrane. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 26:125–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-009-0151-yCrossRef

Tazi N, Zhang Z, Messaddeq Y et al (2012) Hydroxyapatite bioactivated bacterial cellulose promotes osteoblast growth and the formation of bone nodules. AMB Express 2:61–71. https://doi.org/10.1186/2191-0855-2-61CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Tran KT, Torabinejad M, Shabahang S et al (2013) Comparison of efficacy of pulverization and sterile paper point techniques for sampling root canals. J Endod 39:1057–1059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.04.012CrossRefPubMed

Tsouko E, Kourmentza C, Ladakis D et al (2015) Bacterial cellulose production from industrial waste and by-product streams. Int J Mol Sci 16:14832–14849. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms160714832CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ullah H, Badshah M, Correia A et al (2019) Functionalized bacterial cellulose microparticles for drug delivery in biomedical applications. Curr Pharm Des 25:3692–3701. https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612825666191011103851CrossRefPubMed

Van Der Waal SV, Oonk CAM, Nieman SH et al (2015) Additional disinfection with a modified salt solution in a root canal model. J Dent 43:1280–1284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.07.015CrossRefPubMed

Vazquez A, Foresti ML, Cerrutti P, Galvagno M (2013) Bacterial cellulose from simple and low cost production media by Gluconacetobacter xylinus. J Polym Environ 21:545–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-012-0541-3CrossRef

Voicu G, Jinga SI, Drosu BG, Busuioc C (2017) Improvement of silicate cement properties with bacterial cellulose powder addition for applications in dentistry. Carbohydr Polym 174:160–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.06.062CrossRefPubMed

Wan Y, Hong L, Jia S et al (2006) Synthesis and characterization of hydroxyapatite–bacterial cellulose nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 66:1825–1832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.11.027CrossRef

Wu H, Williams GR, Wu J et al (2018) Regenerated chitin fibers reinforced with bacterial cellulose nanocrystals as suture biomaterials. Carbohydr Polym 180:304–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.10.022CrossRefPubMed

Xu C, Ma X, Chen S et al (2014) Bacterial cellulose membranes used as artificial substitutes for dural defection in rabbits. Int J Mol Sci 15:10855–10867. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms150610855CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Yamada Y (2014) Transfer of Gluconacetobacter kakiaceti, Gluconacetobacter medellinensis and Gluconacetobacter maltaceti to the genus Komagataeibacter as Komagataeibacter kakiaceti comb. nov., Komagataeibacter medellinensis comb. nov. and Komagataeibacter maltaceti comb. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64:1670–1672. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.054494-0CrossRefPubMed

Yin N, Stilwell MD, Santos TMA et al (2015) Agarose particle-templated porous bacterial cellulose and its application in cartilage growth in vitro. Acta Biomater 12:129–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.10.019CrossRefPubMed

Yoshino A, Tabuchi M, Uo M et al (2013) Applicability of bacterial cellulose as an alternative to paper points in endodontic treatment. Acta Biomater 9:6116–6122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.12.022CrossRefPubMed

Yunus Basha R, Sampath SK, Doble M (2015) Design of biocomposite materials for bone tissue regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C 57:452–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.07.016CrossRef

Zaborowska M, Bodin A, Bäckdahl H et al (2010) Microporous bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for bone regeneration. Acta Biomater 6:2540–2547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.01.004CrossRefPubMed

Zahedmanesh H, Mackle JN, Sellborn A et al (2011) Bacterial cellulose as a potential vascular graft: mechanical characterization and constitutive model development. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 97:105–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31791CrossRefPubMed

Zeng M, Laromaine A, Roig A (2014) Bacterial cellulose films: influence of bacterial strain and drying route on film properties. Cellulose 21:4455–4469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0408-yCrossRef

Titel: Bacterial cellulose: a biomaterial with high potential in dental and oral applications
verfasst von: A. Cañas-Gutiérrez
M. Osorio
C. Molina-Ramírez
D. Arboleda-Toro
C. Castro-Herazo
Publikationsdatum: 19.09.2020
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Cellulose / Ausgabe 17/2020
Print ISSN: 0969-0239
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-882X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03456-4

Springer Professional

Abstract

Graphic abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 17/2020

Magnetic amendment in the fabrication of environment friendly and biodegradable iron oxide/ethyl cellulose nanocomposite membrane via electrospinning

High-power lithium-ion capacitor using orthorhombic Nb2O5 nanotubes enabled by cellulose-based electrospun scaffolds

Identifying the weak spots in packaging paper: local variations in grammage, fiber orientation and density and the resulting local strain and failure under load

Quantitative Raman spectroscopy for the Ioncell® process: Part 2—quantification of ionic liquid degradation products and improvement of prediction performance through interval PLS

Effect of PCC crystallization and morphology on flocculation with microfibrillated cellulose, on sheet densification and liquid absorption behavior

Modelling of water absorption kinetics and biocompatibility study of synthesized cellulose nanofiber-assisted starch-graft-poly(acrylic acid) hydrogel nanocomposites