nach oben

Education and Information Technologies

Erschienen in:

31.03.2020

Adoption of artificial intelligence in higher education: a quantitative analysis using structural equation modelling

verfasst von: Sheshadri Chatterjee, Kalyan Kumar Bhattacharjee

Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies | Ausgabe 5/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Emergence of the use and application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in higher education in India has opened new possibilities and challenges. Use of AI in will bring in effective change of governance in the entire internal architecture of Indian Institutes of higher education. The prospect of use of AI includes investigation of educational implications as to how teachers would enrich them, how students would learn, and how accurate and prompt decisions can be taken in the institutes of higher education. This is important since the workload has been multiplied due to massification of higher education. Such being the scenario, help of AI is highly essential. The question of adoption of AI in higher education is an important issue in this perspective. The purpose of this study is to explore how the stakeholders would be able to adopt it. For this, we have taken help of many adoption theories and models including ‘Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology’ (UTAUT) model. We have developed hypotheses and a conceptual model and got it validated through survey with the help of feedbacks from useable 329 respondents. It has been found that the model can help the authorities to facilitate adoption of AI in higher education.

Vorheriger Artikel Editorial for EAIT issue 5, 2020

Nächster Artikel Prospective middle school mathematics teachers’ points of view on the flipped classroom: The case of Turkey

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Aboelmaged, M. G. (2010). Predicting e-procurement adoption in a developing country: An empirical integration of technology acceptance model and theory of planned behaviour. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 110(3), 392–414. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635571011030042.CrossRef

Abu-Shanah, E., & Pearson, J. (2009). Internet banking in Jordon: An Arabian Instrument Validation Process. The International Arab Journal of Information Technology, 6(3), 235–244 https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0c41/7c34af35d347b44b66e4922ce2.8cf14a3f3f.pdf. Accessed October 28, 2018.

Agarwal, P. (2005). Engineering education in India: Chancing realities and response. In: Engineering education—a vision for better tomorrow. Association of Indian Universities, 43(39). http://icrier.org/pdf/ICRIER_WP180__Higher_Education_in_India_.pdf. Accessed December 11, 2018.

Ahmad, T. (2019). Scenario based approach to re-imagining future of higher education which prepares students for the future of work. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 10(1), 217–238. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-12-2018-0136.CrossRef

Ajzen, J. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.CrossRef

Alrawashdeh, T.A., Muhairat, M.I., & Alquatawnah, S.M. (2012). Factors affecting acceptance of web-based training system: Using extended UTAUT and structural equation modelling. https://arxiv.org/abs/1205.1904. Accessed January 12, 2019.

Alshare, K. A., & Lane, P. L. (2011). Predicting student-perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in ERP courses: An empirical investigation. Communication of the Association for Information Systems, 28(1), 572–584 http://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol28/iss1/34. Accessed November 22, 2018.

Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modelling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Journal of Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423 http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.540.4887&rep=rep1&type=pdf. AccessedDecember 14, 2018.CrossRef

Andrea, K., Holz, E. M., Sellers, E. W., & Vaughan, T. M. (2015). Toward independent home use of brain-computer interfaces: A decision algorithm for selection of potential end-users. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96(3), 527–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.03.036.CrossRef

Bigg, S. J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university (3rd ed.). Berkshire: McGraw-Hill & Open University Press.

Bonder, G., Klobuchar, M., & Geelan, D. (2001). Online symposium: Piaget, constructivism, and beyond the many forms of constructivism. Journal of Chemical Education, 78(8), 1107. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed078p1107.4?journalCode=jceda8.CrossRef

Borroso, C., Carrion, G. C., & Roldan, J. L. (2010). Applying maximum likelihood and PLS on different sample sizes: Studies on Seroquel model and employee behavior model (pp. 427–447). Methods and Applications, Heidelberg, Springer: Handbook of Partial Least Squares Concepts.

Buckner, E. (2011). The role of higher education in the Arab State and Society: Historical legacies and recent reform patterns. Comparative and International Higher Education, 3(1), 21–26 https://elizabethbuckner.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/buckner-number03—06.pdf. Accessed December 15, 2018.

Carpenter, S. (2018). Ten steps in scale development and reporting: A guide for researchers. Communication Methods and Measures, 12(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1396583.CrossRef

Carter, L., & Belanger, F. (2005). The utilization of e-government services: Citizen trust innovation and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00183.x.CrossRef

Carter, L., Schaupp, I. C., Hobbs, J., & Campbell, R. (2012). E-government utilization: Understanding the impact of reputation and risk. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 8(1), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.4018/jegr.2012010105.CrossRef

Chiu, Y. T. H., Lee, W. I., Liu, C. C., & Liu, L. Y. (2012). Internet lottery commerce: An integrated view of online sport lottery adoption. Journal of Internet Commerce, 11(1), 68–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2012.650990. Accessed December 27, 2018.

Chong, A. Y. L. (2013). Predicting m-commerce adoption determinants: A neural network approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 40, 523–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.07.068.CrossRef

Chrisinger, D. (2019). The solution lies in education: Artificial intelligence & the skills gap. On the Horizon, 27(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-03-2019-096.CrossRef

Cox, J. (2012). Information system users security: A structured model of the knowing-doing gap. Computers in Human Behaviour, 28(5), 1849–1858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.003.CrossRef

Cox, A., Pinfield, S., & Rutter, S. (2019). The intelligent library: Thought leaders’ views on the likely impact of artificial intelligence on academic libraries. Library Hi Tech, 37(3), 418–435. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-08-2018-0105.CrossRef

Cremer, D., & Bettignies, H. C. (2013). Pragmatic business ethics. The Leadership Maestro, 24(2), 64–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8616.2013.00938.x.CrossRef

Croxford, L., & Raffe, D. (2015). The iron law of hierarchy? Institutional differentiation in UK higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 40(9), 1625–1640. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.899342.CrossRef

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008.CrossRef

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982.CrossRef

Deb, M., & David, E. L. (2014). An empirical examination of customers’ adoption of m-banking in India. Journal of Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 32(4), 475–494. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-07-2013-0119.CrossRef

Dwivedi, Y. K., Wastell, D., Laumer, S., Henrikson, H. Z., Mayers, M. D., & Bunker, D. (2015). Research on information system failures and success: Status update and future directions. Information Systems Frontiers, 17(1), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-014-9500-y.CrossRef

Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Janssen, M., Lal, B., Williams, M. D., & Clement, M. (2017). An empirical validation of a unified model of electronic government adoption (UMEGA). Government Information Quarterly, 34(2), 211–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.03.001.CrossRef

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, J. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison-Wesley Publication Company.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312.CrossRef

Gefen, D., & Straub, D. (2005). A practical guide to factorial validity using pls-graph: tutorial and annotated example. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16(2), 91–109 https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3020&context=cais Accessed January 10, 2019.

Hair Jr., J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). Pearson Education International.

Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis (6th ed.). Pearson: Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA.

Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: indeed, a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069—6679190202.CrossRef

Hoyle, R. H. (1995). The structural equation modelling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues, and applications (pp. 1—15). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.

Hung, S. Y., Tang, K. Z., Chang, C. M., & Ke, C. D. (2009). User acceptance of inter-governmental services: An example of electronic document management system. Government Information Quarterly, 23(2), 387–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.07.003.CrossRef

Hung, S. Y., Chang, C. M., & Kuo, S. R. (2013). User acceptance of mobile e-government services: An empirical study. Government Information Quarterly, 30(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.07.008.CrossRef

James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T. and Tibshirani, R. 2017. An introduction to statistical learning. Springer Science Publication, New York (8th edition). ISBN 978-1-4614-7138-7.

Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.MATH

Kock, N., & Lynn, G. (2012). Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance — Based SEM: An illustration and recommendations. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(7), 546–580 http://aisel.aisnet.org/jais/vol13/iss7/2. Accessed December 21, 2018.CrossRef

Kremer, M., Brannen, C., & Glennerster, R. (2013). The challenges of education and learning in the developing world. Science, 340(6130), 297–300. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1235350.CrossRef

Kumar, S. (2019). Artificial intelligence divulges effective tactics of top management institutes of India. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 26(7), 2188–2204. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-08-2018-0251.CrossRef

Lee, V., & Lin, S. J. (2008). Podcasting acceptance on campus: An extension of the UTAUT model, DIGIT 2008 proceedings. France: Paris https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.Cgi?Article=1002&context=digit2008. Accessed December 27, 2018.

Lewis, J. D., & Weighert, A. (1985). Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, 64(3), 967–985. https://doi.org/10.2307/2578601.CrossRef

Lin, F., Fofanah, S. S., & Liang, D. (2011). Assessing citizen adoption of e-government initiatives in Gambia: A validation of the technology acceptance model in information system success. Government Information Quarterly, 28(2), 271–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.09.004.CrossRef

Lu, H. P., Hsu, C. L., & Hsu, H. Y. (2005). An empirical study of the effect of perceived risk upon intention to use online applications. Information Management and Computer Security, 13(2), 106–120. https://doi.org/10.1108/09685220510589299.CrossRef

Menon, R., Tiwari, A., Chhabra, A., & Singh, D. (2014). Study on the higher education in India and the need for a paradigm shift. Procedia Economics and Finance, II, 1, 886–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00250-0.CrossRef

Nasrallah, R. (2014). Learning outcomes role in higher education teaching. Education, Business and Society, 7(4), 257–276. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBS-03-2014-0016.CrossRef

Schaper, L.K. and Pervan, G.P. (2007) An investigation of factors affecting technology acceptance and use decisions by Australian allied health therapists. Available at: http://csdl2.computer.org/comp/proceedings/hiccs/2007/2755/00/27550141c.pdf. (Accessed on 25 December 2019).

Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2013). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87(2), 224–240. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10066.CrossRef

Schaupp, L. C., & Carter, L. (2010). The impact of trust, risk and optimism bias on e-file adoption. Information Systems Frontiers, 12(3), 299–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-008-9138-8.CrossRef

Scieluna, H. A., Grimm, M. C., O’Sullivan, A., Harris, P., Pilotto, L. S., Jones, P. O., & McNeil, H. P. (2012). Clinical capabilities of graduates of an outcome-based integrated medical program. BMC Medical Education, 23(12), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-12-23.CrossRef

Segars, A. H., & Grover, V. (1993). Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: A confirmatory factor analysis. MIS Quarterly, 17(4), 517–525. https://doi.org/10.2307/249590.CrossRef

Sharma, S., Mukherjee, S., Kumar, A., & Dillon, W. R. (2005). A simulation study to investigate the use of cutoff values for assessing model fit in covariance structure models. Journal of Business Research, 58(7), 935–943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.10.007.CrossRef

Silander, C., & Stigmar, M. (2019). Individual growth or institutional development? Ideological perspectives on motives behind Swedish higher education teacher training. Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education Research, 77, 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0272-z.CrossRef

Stefan, A. D. P., & Sharon, K. (2017). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1, 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-017-0062-8.CrossRef

Steiger, J. H. (2007). Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Journal of Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 893–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.017.CrossRef

Susanto, T. D., & Goodwin, R. (2011). In M. Janssen, H. J. Scholl, M. A. Wimmer, & Y. H. Tan (Eds.), User acceptance of SMS-based e-government services (Vol. 6846, pp. 75–87). EGOV 2011, INCS.

Teo, T. S., & Liu, J. (2007). Consumer trust in e-commerce in the United States, Singapore and China. Omega, 35(1), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2005.02.001.CrossRef

The Times of India. (2018). Bennett University’s AI programme to reach a million in 2 years, Published on 18 April 2018, p.5.

Urbach, N., & Ahlemann, F. (2011). Structural equation modelling in information system research using partial least squares. Journal of Information Technology, Theory and Applications, 11(2), 5–40 http://aisel.aisnet.org/jitta/vol11/iss2/2. Accessed November 16, 2018.

Urumsah, D., Quaddus, M., & Gelbrieth, J. (2011). An investigation into the factors influencing consumers to use e-services of Indonesian airlines: The role of motivation. In European Conference of Information Systems 2011 Proceedings. Finland: Helsinki https://espace.curtin.edu.au/bitstream/handle/20.500.11937/48280/180844_54080_ECIS%20Quaddus_%20Paper.pdf?sequence=2. Accessed November 19, 2018.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540.CrossRef

Venkatesh, V., Chan, F. K., & Thong, J. Y. (2012a). Designing e-government services: Key service attributes and citizens’ preference structures. Journal of Operations Management, 30(1), 116–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2011.10.001.CrossRef

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J., & Ku, K. (2012b). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178.CrossRef

Warkentin, M., Gefen, D., Pavlon, P. A., & Rose, G. M. (2002). Encouraging citizen adoption of e-government by building trust. Electronic Markets, 12(3), 157–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/101967802320245929.CrossRef

Williams, M. D., Dwivedi, Y. K., Lal, B., & Schwarz, A. (2009). Contemporary trends and issues in IT adoption and diffusion research. Journal of Information Technology, 24(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2008.30.CrossRef

Zhang, W., & Guterrez, O. (2007). Information technology acceptance in the social services sector context: An exploration. Social Work, 52(3), 221–231. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/52.3.221.CrossRef

Zhang, X., & Maruping, I. (2008). Household technology adoption in a global marketplace: Incorporating the role of espoused cultural values. Information Systems Frontiers, 10(4), 403–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-008-9099-y.CrossRef

Zikmund, W. G. (1994). Business research methods. Fort Worth: Dryden Press, Harcourt Brace College Publishers.

Titel: Adoption of artificial intelligence in higher education: a quantitative analysis using structural equation modelling
verfasst von: Sheshadri Chatterjee
Kalyan Kumar Bhattacharjee
Publikationsdatum: 31.03.2020
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies / Ausgabe 5/2020
Print ISSN: 1360-2357
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7608
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10159-7

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2020

Transforming learning with computers: Calculus for kids

Machine learning algorithm for grading open-ended physics questions in Turkish

Longitudinal study of Kyrgyz students’ general physics course performance in paper-based versus online–based tests

Effect of coding and robotic education on pre-school children’s skills of scientific process

Students’ interaction patterns in different online learning activities and their relationship with motivation, self-regulated learning strategy and learning performance

ICT resources for research: an ANOVA analysis on the digital research skills of higher education teachers comparing the areas of knowledge within each gender

Premium Partner