nach oben

Education and Information Technologies

Erschienen in:

28.08.2021

What to do and what to avoid on the use of gamified intelligent tutor system for low-income students

verfasst von: Sivaldo Joaquim, Ig Ibert Bittencourt, Rafael de Amorim Silva, Patrícia Leone Espinheira, Marcelo Reis

Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies | Ausgabe 2/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Educational indicators have revealed that a significant portion of Brazilian Basic Education students have a less than satisfactory skill level in reading and solving Mathematics problems. Despite several proven benefits, adaptive learning technologies are scarcely used with low-income students in public schools’ due unavailable resources and lack of technological infrastructure. Nonetheless, there is a great expectation that the access to new technologies will assist and improve teaching practices and contribute to enhance learning performance. This study aimed to identify good and bad pedagogical practices from teaching and learning processes using a gamified Intelligent Tutor System (ITS) in Elementary Education. In order to achieve this goal, a case study was conducted with a qualitative research approach based on observations made in classrooms in a 9 months period and the application of Framework Analysis as a data analysis technique involving 6 teachers and 112 students aged between 9 and 21 years old from public schools in Brazil. Results presented provide evidence of significant improvement in the domain of Portuguese Language and Mathematical skills. The highlights of the paper are the seven good practices and six bad pedagogical practices with the use of gamified ITS. Additionally, while gamified ITS are important to improve learning and promote more engagement, this study also sheds light on the importance of using gamified ITS aligned with the school curriculum and a clear intervention proposal instead of voluntary use.

Vorheriger Artikel Systemic model for technology integration in teaching

Nächster Artikel Web-based discussions in teaching and learning: Secondary school teachers’ and students’ perception and potentiality to enhance students’ performance in organic chemistry

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

AbuEloun, N. N., & Abu Naser, S. S. (2017). Mathematics Intelligent Tutoring System. International Journal of Advanced Scientific Research, 2(1), 11–16.

Alsawaier, R. S. (2018). The effect of gamification on motivation and engagement. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 35(1), 56–79. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-02-2017-0009CrossRef

Amanda, N., Andersena, F., Christian, R., Warnars, H. L. H. S., Ramadhan, A., Putra, A. S., Noordin, N., Utomo, W. H. (2021). Learning Math for 1st Grade Primary School Students using Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(6), 2020–2030. https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v12i6.4806

Andrade, F. R., Pedro, L. Z., Lopes, A. M. Z., Bittencourt, I. I., & Isotani, S. (2013). Desafio do Uso de Gamificação em Sistemas Tutores Inteligentes Baseados em Web Semântica. In XXXIII Congresso da Sociedade Brasileira de Computação (Vol. 1, pp. 1453–1462).

Azevedo, O., de Morais, F., & Jaques, P. A. (2018). Exploring gamification to prevent gaming the system and help refusal in tutoring systems. In European conference on technology enhanced learning (pp. 231–244). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98572-5_18

Barbosa, A. F. (2016). Pesquisa sobre o uso das tecnologias de informação e comunicação nas escolas brasileiras: tic educação 2015. São Paulo: Comitê Gestor da Internet no Brasil.

Brasil. Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira. (2018). Relatório do 2º Ciclo de Monitoramento das Metas do Plano Nacional de Educação – 2018. Brasília, DF: INEP.

Brasil. Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira. (2020). Relatório Brasil no PISA 2018. Brasília: Inep/MEC.

Brusilovsky, P., Malmi, L., Hosseini, R., et al. (2018). An integrated practice system for learning programming in Python: Design and evaluation. RPTEL, 13, 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-018-0085-9CrossRef

Cakir, R. (2019). Effect of Web-Based Intelligence Tutoring System on Students' Achievement and Motivation. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7(4), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.17220/mojet.2019.04.004

Couto, G., & Primi, R. (2011). Teoria de resposta ao item (TRI): Conceitos elementares dos modelos para itens dicotômicos. Boletim De Psicologia, 61(134), 1–15.

Creswell, J. W. (2010). Projeto de Pesquisa: métodos qualitativo, quantitativo e misto. 3ª ed. – Porto Alegre: Artmed.

Cristea, A. I., Bittencourt, I. I., & Lima, F. (Eds.). (2018). Higher Education for All. From Challenges to Novel Technology-Enhanced Solutions: First International Workshop on Social, Semantic, Adaptive and Gamification Techniques and Technologies for Distance Learning, HEFA 2017, Maceió, Brazil, March 20–24, 2017, Revised Selected Papers (Vol. 832). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97934-2

De-Marcos, L., Domínguez, A., Saenz-de-Navarrete, J., & Pagés, C. (2014). An empirical study comparing gamification and social networking on e-learning. Computers & Education, 75, 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.012CrossRef

Denny, P., McDonald, F., Empson, R., Kelly, P., & Petersen, A. (2018). Empirical support for a causal relationship between gamification and learning outcomes. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–13). https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173885

Dermeval, D., & Bittencourt, I. I. (2020). Co-designing Gamified Intelligent Tutoring Systems with Teachers. Brazilian Journal of Computers in Education (Revista Brasileira de Informática na Educação - RBIE), 28, 73–91. https://doi.org/10.5753/rbie.2020.28.0.73

Dermeval, D., Lima, I., Castro, M., Couto, H., Gomes, D., Peixoto, A., & Bittencourt, I. I. (2019). Helping teachers design gamified intelligent tutoring systems. In 2019 IEEE 19th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) (Vol. 2161, pp. 60–62). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2019.00024

Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: defining gamification. In Proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference: Envisioning future media environments (pp. 9–15). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040

Feng M., Cui W., Wang S. (2018) Adaptive Learning Goes to China. In: Penstein Rosé C. et al. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 10948. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93846-2_17

Ghali, M. A., & Ayyad Abu-Naser Laban, A. A. S. S. M. A. (2018). An Intelligent Tutoring System for Teaching English Grammar. International Journal of Academic Engineering Research (IJAER), 2(2), 1–6

González, C., Mora, A., & Toledo, P. (2014). Gamification in intelligent tutoring systems. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (pp. 221–225). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2669711.2669903

Hanus, M. D., & Fox, J. (2015). Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom: A longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort, and academic performance. Computers & Education, 80, 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.019CrossRef

Holmes, W., Porayska-Pomsta, K., Holstein, K., Sutherland, E., Baker, T., Shum, S. B., Santos, O. C., Rodrigo, M. T., Cukurova, M., Bittencourt, I. I., Koedinger, K. R. (2021). Ethics of AI in education: towards a community-wide framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 1-23.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1

Jagušt, T., Botički, I., & So, H. J. (2018). Examining competitive, collaborative and adaptive gamification in young learners’ math learning. Computers & Education, 125, 444–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.022CrossRef

Johnson, L., Becker, S. A., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2015). NMC horizon report: 2015 K (Vol. 6101). New Media Consortium.

Kamunya, S., Mirirti, E., Oboko, R., & Maina, E. (2020). An Adaptive Gamification Model for E-Learning. In 2020 IST-Africa Conference (IST-Africa) (pp. 1–10). IEEE.

Kapp, K. M. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction: Game-based methods and strategies for training and education. John Wiley & Sons.

Karaci, A., Akyüz, H. I., Bilgici, G., & Arici, N. (2018). Effects of Web-Based Intelligent Tutoring Systems on Academic Achievement and Retention. Online Submission, 181(16), 35–41.

King, C. L., Warnars, H. L., Nordin, N., & Utomo, W. H. (2021). Intelligent Tutoring System: Learning Math for 6th-Grade Primary School Students. Education Research International. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5590470CrossRef

Lacey, A.; Luff, D. (2009). Qualitative Research Analysis. The NIHR RDS for the East.

Loja-Argudo, P., González-Arias, K., Robles-Bykbaev, V., & Suquilanda-Cuesta, P. (2020). Intelligent tutor system to provide automated support to learning pre-reading concepts for children from 5 to 7. In 2020 IEEE ANDESCON (pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ANDESCON50619.2020.9272179

Lopes, A. M. M., de Magalhães Netto, J. F., de Souza, R. A., Mourão, A. B., Almeida, T. O., & de Lima, D. P. (2019). Improving Students Skills to Solve Elementary Equations in K-12 Programs Using an Intelligent Tutoring System. In 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1–9). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028363

Lüdke, Menga; André, Marli E. D. A. (2013). Pesquisa em educação: abordagens qualitativas. 2ª ed. – Rio de Janeiro: E.P.U.

Ma, W., Adesope, O. O., Nesbit, J. C., & Liu, Q. (2014). Intelligent tutoring systems and learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(4), 901. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037123CrossRef

Marinho, A., Bittencourt, I. I., dos Santos, W. O. & Dermeval, D. (2019). Does Gamification Improve Flow Experience in Classroom? An Analysis of Gamer Types in Collaborative and Competitive Settings. Brazilian Journal of Computers in Education (Revista Brasileira de Informática na Educação - RBIE), 27(2), 40–68. https://doi.org/10.5753/rbie.2019.27.02.40

Mitrović A., Holland J. (2020) Effect of Non-mandatory Use of an Intelligent Tutoring System on Students’ Learning. In: Bittencourt I., Cukurova M., Muldner K., Luckin R., Millán E. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 12163. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52237-7_31

Montgomery, D. C. (2013). Design and analysis of experiments. John wiley & sons.

Mui Lee, H., & Loo, P. A. (2021). Gamification of Learning in Early Age Education. Journal La Edusci, 2(2), 44–50. https://doi.org/10.37899/journallaedusci.v2i2.380

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results: Excellence and Equity in Education (Vol. I). OECD Publishing.CrossRef

Paiva, R., Bittencourt, I. I., Tenório, T., Jaques, P., & Isotani, S. (2016). What do students do on-line? Modeling students’ interactions to improve their learning experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 769–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.048CrossRef

Paiva R., Bittencourt I.I. (2020). Helping Teachers Help Their Students: A Human-AI Hybrid Approach. In: Bittencourt I., Cukurova M., Muldner K., Luckin R., Millán E. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 12163. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52237-7_36

Pascual, R. M. (2020). Effectiveness of an Automated Reading Tutor Design for Filipino Speaking Children. In 2020 IEEE 8th R10 Humanitarian Technology Conference (R10-HTC) (pp. 1–5). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/R10-HTC49770.2020.9357059

QEdu. (2021). Portal QEdu. Available at: http://qedu.org.br/. Accessed 20 Apr 2021.

Rachels, J. R., & Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. J. (2018). The effects of a mobile gamification app on elementary students’ Spanish achievement and self-efficacy. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(1–2), 72–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1382536CrossRef

Reich, J. (2021). Ed tech’s failure during the pandemic, and what comes after. Phi Delta Kappan, 102(6), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721721998149CrossRef

Ritchie, J.; Spencer, L. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis for Applied Policy Research. In A. Bryman and R. Burgess (Eds). Analyzing Qualitative Data, London: Sage.

Rocha Seixas, L., Gomes, A. S., & de Melo Filho, I. J. (2016). Effectiveness of gamification in the engagement of students. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 48–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.021CrossRef

Sailer, M., & Homner, L. (2020). The Gamification of Learning: A Meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32, 77–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09498-wCrossRef

Santana, S. J., Paiva, R., Bittencourt, I. I., Ospina, P. E., de Amorim Silva, R., & Isotani, S. (2016a). Evaluating the impact of Mars and Venus Effect on the use of an Adaptive Learning Technology for Portuguese and Mathematics. In Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on (pp. 31–35). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2016.58

Santana, S. J., Souza, H. A., Florentin, V. A., Paiva, R., Bittencourt, I. I., & Isotani, S. (2016b). A quantitative analysis of the most relevant gamification elements in an online learning environment. In Proceedings of the 25th international conference companion on world wide web (pp. 911–916). https://doi.org/10.1145/2872518.2891074

Spencer, L., & Ritchie, J. (2002). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In Analyzing qualitative data (pp. 187–208). Routledge.

Steenbergen-Hu, S., & Cooper, H. (2014). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems on college students’ academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(2), 331. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034752CrossRef

Tenório, M. M., Lopes, R. P., Góis, L. A. de, & Junior, G. dos S. (2018). Influence of Gamification on Khan Academy in Brazilian High School. PUPIL: International Journal of Teaching, Education and Learning, 2(2), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijtel.2018.22.5165

Tenório, K., Dermeval, D., Challco, G., Lemos, B., Nascimento, P., Santos, R., & Silva, A. (2020). An Evaluation of the GamAnalytics Tool: Is the Gamification Analytics Model Ready for Teachers?. In Anais do XXXI Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação, (pp. 562–571). Porto Alegre: SBC. https://doi.org/10.5753/cbie.sbie.2020.562

United Nations Children’s Fund and International Telecommunication Union. (2020). How many children and young people have internet access at home? Estimating digital connectivity during the COVID-19 pandemic. UNICEF.

VanLehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.611369CrossRef

Yudelson, M. V., Koedinger, K. R., & Gordon, G. J. (2013). Individualized bayesian knowledge tracing models. In International conference on artificial intelligence in education (pp. 171–180). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_18

Titel: What to do and what to avoid on the use of gamified intelligent tutor system for low-income students
verfasst von: Sivaldo Joaquim
Ig Ibert Bittencourt
Rafael de Amorim Silva
Patrícia Leone Espinheira
Marcelo Reis
Publikationsdatum: 28.08.2021
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies / Ausgabe 2/2022
Print ISSN: 1360-2357
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7608
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10728-4

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2022

The effect of usability on the intention to use the e-learning system in a sustainable way: A case study at Universitas Indonesia

Medical and public health instructors’ perceptions of online teaching: A qualitative study using the Technology Acceptance Model 2

Construction of proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus using dynamic mathematics software in the calculus classroom

Identification and evaluation of technology trends in K-12 education from 2011 to 2021

Contradictions in mathematical modeling with digital technologies

Effect of instructional methods on pre-service science teachers learning outcomes: a meta-analysis

Premium Partner