Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Technology and Design Education 3/2017

30.01.2016

Sketching by design: teaching sketching to young learners

verfasst von: Todd R. Kelley, Euisuk Sung

Erschienen in: International Journal of Technology and Design Education | Ausgabe 3/2017

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Recent science educational reforms in the United States have prompted increased efforts to teach engineering design as an approach to improve STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) learning in K-12 classrooms. Teaching design in early grades is a new endeavor for teachers in the United States. Much can be learned from design teaching and research on K-12 design education outside of the US. The purpose of this study was to explore how students learn and use design sketching to support their learning of science and design practices. Researchers provided a treatment of design sketching instruction based on best practices of prior research finding (Hope in Des Technol Educ Int J 10: 43–53, 2005; Gustafson et al. J Technol Educ 19(1):19–34, 2007). A delayed treatment model was used to provide a two-group counterbalanced quasi-experimental design to compare an experimental group and comparison (delayed treatment) group results from (6) grade 3 classrooms. Researchers employed Hope’s Des Technol Educ Int J 10: 43–53, (2005) frame to organize sketching data for analysis. Findings from this study indicated that design instruction treatment did improve student’s design and communication practices, moving from using sketching as a container of ideas to the use of sketching as a form of design communication and to refine design ideas. Both the treatment and comparison groups improved sketching skills after treatment was provided to both groups. Sketching is a design practice that can also help student learn science concepts through the generation of mental models of conceptual understanding.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Ary, D., Jacobs, L., Sorensen, C., & Walker, D. (2013). Introduction to research in education. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning. Ary, D., Jacobs, L., Sorensen, C., & Walker, D. (2013). Introduction to research in education. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning.
Zurück zum Zitat Björklund, L., & Klasander, C. (2004). Understanding technological systems: Classroom implications for a systems approach. In Proceedings of the 3rd biennial international conference on technology education research, learning for innovation in technology education, December 2004 (Vol. 1, pp. 78–86). Gold Coast: Centre for Learning Research Griffith University. Björklund, L., & Klasander, C. (2004). Understanding technological systems: Classroom implications for a systems approach. In Proceedings of the 3rd biennial international conference on technology education research, learning for innovation in technology education, December 2004 (Vol. 1, pp. 78–86). Gold Coast: Centre for Learning Research Griffith University.
Zurück zum Zitat Coley, F., Houseman, O., & Roy, R. (2007). An introduction to capturing and understanding the cognitive behavior of design engineers. Journal of Engineering Design, 18(4), 311–325.CrossRef Coley, F., Houseman, O., & Roy, R. (2007). An introduction to capturing and understanding the cognitive behavior of design engineers. Journal of Engineering Design, 18(4), 311–325.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Curriculum Corporation. (1994a). A statement on technology for Australian schools. Victoria: Curriculum Corporation. Curriculum Corporation. (1994a). A statement on technology for Australian schools. Victoria: Curriculum Corporation.
Zurück zum Zitat Curriculum Corporation. (1994b). Technology: A curriculum profile for Australian schools. Victoria: Curriculum Corporation. Curriculum Corporation. (1994b). Technology: A curriculum profile for Australian schools. Victoria: Curriculum Corporation.
Zurück zum Zitat Danos, X. (2014). Graphicacy and culture: Refocusing on visual learning. Leicestershire: Loughborough Design Press Ltd. Danos, X. (2014). Graphicacy and culture: Refocusing on visual learning. Leicestershire: Loughborough Design Press Ltd.
Zurück zum Zitat Daugherty, J., & Johnson, S. D. (2008). Quality and characteristics of recent research in technology education. Journal of Technology Education, 20(1), 16–31. Daugherty, J., & Johnson, S. D. (2008). Quality and characteristics of recent research in technology education. Journal of Technology Education, 20(1), 16–31.
Zurück zum Zitat Department for Education. (1992). Technology for ages 5 to 16 (1992): Proposals for the secretary of state for education and the secretary of state for wales. London: HMSO. Department for Education. (1992). Technology for ages 5 to 16 (1992): Proposals for the secretary of state for education and the secretary of state for wales. London: HMSO.
Zurück zum Zitat Dorst, K. (2006). Design problems and design paradoxes. Design Issues, 22(3), 4–17.CrossRef Dorst, K. (2006). Design problems and design paradoxes. Design Issues, 22(3), 4–17.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Finger, G., & Houguet, B. (2009). Insights into the intrinsic and extrinsic challenges for implementing technology education: Case studies of Queensland teachers. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19, 309–334.CrossRef Finger, G., & Houguet, B. (2009). Insights into the intrinsic and extrinsic challenges for implementing technology education: Case studies of Queensland teachers. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19, 309–334.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fleer, M. (2000). Working technologically: Investigations into how young children design and make during technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10, 43–59.CrossRef Fleer, M. (2000). Working technologically: Investigations into how young children design and make during technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10, 43–59.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gaitskell, D. (1958). Art; child artists; study and teaching (elementary). New York: Harcourt Brace. Gaitskell, D. (1958). Art; child artists; study and teaching (elementary). New York: Harcourt Brace.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldschmidt, G. (1991). The dialectics of sketching. Creativity Research Journal, 4(2), 123–143.CrossRef Goldschmidt, G. (1991). The dialectics of sketching. Creativity Research Journal, 4(2), 123–143.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Goldschmidt, G., & Smolkov, M. (2004). (2004). Design problems are not of a kind: Differences in the effectiveness of visual stimuli in design problem solving. In J. Gero, B. Tversky, & T. Knight (Eds.), Visual and spatial reasoning in design (pp. 199–218). Sydney: Key Centre. Goldschmidt, G., & Smolkov, M. (2004). (2004). Design problems are not of a kind: Differences in the effectiveness of visual stimuli in design problem solving. In J. Gero, B. Tversky, & T. Knight (Eds.), Visual and spatial reasoning in design (pp. 199–218). Sydney: Key Centre.
Zurück zum Zitat Gustafson, B., MacDonald, D., & Gentilini, S. (2007). Using talking and drawing to design: Elementary children collaborating with university industrial design students. Journal of Technology Education, 19(1), 19–34.CrossRef Gustafson, B., MacDonald, D., & Gentilini, S. (2007). Using talking and drawing to design: Elementary children collaborating with university industrial design students. Journal of Technology Education, 19(1), 19–34.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hope, G. (2000). Beyond their capability? Drawing, designing and the young child. Journal of Design and Technology Education, 5(2), 106–114. Hope, G. (2000). Beyond their capability? Drawing, designing and the young child. Journal of Design and Technology Education, 5(2), 106–114.
Zurück zum Zitat Hope, G. (2005). Types of drawings that young children produce in response to design tasks. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 10(1), 43–53. Hope, G. (2005). Types of drawings that young children produce in response to design tasks. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 10(1), 43–53.
Zurück zum Zitat Hope, G. (2008). Thinking and learning through drawing. London: SAGE. Hope, G. (2008). Thinking and learning through drawing. London: SAGE.
Zurück zum Zitat International Technology Education Association. (2000/2002/2007). Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology. Reston, VA: Author. International Technology Education Association. (2000/2002/2007). Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology. Reston, VA: Author.
Zurück zum Zitat Jansson, D. G., & Smith, S. M. (1991). Design fixation. Design Studies, 12(1), 3–11.CrossRef Jansson, D. G., & Smith, S. M. (1991). Design fixation. Design Studies, 12(1), 3–11.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and Ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 65–94.CrossRef Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and Ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 65–94.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jones, A., Harlow, A., & Cowie, B. (2004). New Zealand teachers’ experiences in implementing the technology curriculum. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14, 101–119.CrossRef Jones, A., Harlow, A., & Cowie, B. (2004). New Zealand teachers’ experiences in implementing the technology curriculum. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14, 101–119.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kazdin, A. E., & Hartmann, D. P. (1978). The simultaneous-treatment design. Behavior Therapy, 9(5), 912–922.CrossRef Kazdin, A. E., & Hartmann, D. P. (1978). The simultaneous-treatment design. Behavior Therapy, 9(5), 912–922.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kelley, T., & Wicklein, R. C. (2009). Examination of engineering design curriculum content in secondary technology education. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 46(1), 7–31. Kelley, T., & Wicklein, R. C. (2009). Examination of engineering design curriculum content in secondary technology education. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 46(1), 7–31.
Zurück zum Zitat Kellogg, R. (1970). Analyzing children’s art, Palo Alto. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company. Kellogg, R. (1970). Analyzing children’s art, Palo Alto. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company.
Zurück zum Zitat Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., et al. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting learning by design™ into practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495–547.CrossRef Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., et al. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting learning by design™ into practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495–547.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometics, 33(1), 159–174.CrossRef Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometics, 33(1), 159–174.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lawson, B., & Dorst, K. (2009). Design expertise (Vol. 31). Oxford: Architectural Press. Lawson, B., & Dorst, K. (2009). Design expertise (Vol. 31). Oxford: Architectural Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Lewis, T. (2005). Coming to terms with engineering design as content. Journal of Technology Education., 16(2), 37–54.CrossRef Lewis, T. (2005). Coming to terms with engineering design as content. Journal of Technology Education., 16(2), 37–54.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lowenfeld, V. (1964). Creative and mental growth (4th ed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company. Lowenfeld, V. (1964). Creative and mental growth (4th ed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Zurück zum Zitat McCormick, D. (2007). Seeing mechanical: A case for advancing the role of sketching in the art of engineering. Mechanical engineering, 129(9), 35–36. McCormick, D. (2007). Seeing mechanical: A case for advancing the role of sketching in the art of engineering. Mechanical engineering, 129(9), 35–36.
Zurück zum Zitat McCracken, J. (2000). Design: The creative soul of technology. In E. Martin (Ed.), Technology education for the 21st century: 49th Yearbook, council on technology teacher education (pp. 85–90). Peoria, Il: Glencoe/McGraw-Hill. McCracken, J. (2000). Design: The creative soul of technology. In E. Martin (Ed.), Technology education for the 21st century: 49th Yearbook, council on technology teacher education (pp. 85–90). Peoria, Il: Glencoe/McGraw-Hill.
Zurück zum Zitat Mehalik, M. M., Doppelt, Y., & Schuun, C. D. (2008). Middle-school science through design-based learning versus scripted inquiry: Better overall science concept learning and equity gap reduction. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(1), 71–85.CrossRef Mehalik, M. M., Doppelt, Y., & Schuun, C. D. (2008). Middle-school science through design-based learning versus scripted inquiry: Better overall science concept learning and equity gap reduction. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(1), 71–85.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Middleton, H. (2002). Technology education in Australia: Developing a new basic. The Technology Teacher, 62(3), 1–4. Middleton, H. (2002). Technology education in Australia: Developing a new basic. The Technology Teacher, 62(3), 1–4.
Zurück zum Zitat Morford, L. L., & Warner, S. A. (2004). The status of design in technology teacher education in the United States. Journal of Technology Education, 15(2), 33–45. Morford, L. L., & Warner, S. A. (2004). The status of design in technology teacher education in the United States. Journal of Technology Education, 15(2), 33–45.
Zurück zum Zitat NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Noddings, N. (2012). Philosophy of education (3rd ed.). Boulder, PA: Westview Press. Noddings, N. (2012). Philosophy of education (3rd ed.). Boulder, PA: Westview Press.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Connor, D. (2003). Application sharing in K-12 education: Teaching and learning with Rube Goldberg. TechTrends, 47(5), 6–13.CrossRef O’Connor, D. (2003). Application sharing in K-12 education: Teaching and learning with Rube Goldberg. TechTrends, 47(5), 6–13.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Petrina, S. (1998). The politics of research in technology education: A critical content and discourse analysis of the Journal of Technology Education, volumes 1–8. Journal of Technology Education, 10(1), 27–57.CrossRef Petrina, S. (1998). The politics of research in technology education: A critical content and discourse analysis of the Journal of Technology Education, volumes 1–8. Journal of Technology Education, 10(1), 27–57.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Phillips, D. C. (1983). On describing a student’s cognitive structure. Educational Psychologist, 18(2), 59–74.CrossRef Phillips, D. C. (1983). On describing a student’s cognitive structure. Educational Psychologist, 18(2), 59–74.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Smith, S., Ward, T., & Schumacher, J. S. (1993). Constraining effect of examples in a creative generation task. Memory and Cognition, 21(6), 837–845.CrossRef Smith, S., Ward, T., & Schumacher, J. S. (1993). Constraining effect of examples in a creative generation task. Memory and Cognition, 21(6), 837–845.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Suwa, M., & Tversky, B. (1997). What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? A protocol analysis. Design Studies, 18, 385–403.CrossRef Suwa, M., & Tversky, B. (1997). What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? A protocol analysis. Design Studies, 18, 385–403.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Suwa, M., Tversky, B., Gero, J. S., & Purcell, A. T. (2001). Seeing into sketches: Regrouping parts encourages new interpretations. In J. S. Gero, B. Tversky, & T. Purcell (Eds.), Visual and spatial reasoning in design II, key centre of design computing and cognition (pp. 207–219). Sydney: University of Sydney. Suwa, M., Tversky, B., Gero, J. S., & Purcell, A. T. (2001). Seeing into sketches: Regrouping parts encourages new interpretations. In J. S. Gero, B. Tversky, & T. Purcell (Eds.), Visual and spatial reasoning in design II, key centre of design computing and cognition (pp. 207–219). Sydney: University of Sydney.
Zurück zum Zitat Tversky, B. (2002). What do sketches say about thinking?. In AAAI spring symposium, sketch understanding workshop, Stanford University, AAAI technical report SS-02-08. 2002. Tversky, B. (2002). What do sketches say about thinking?. In AAAI spring symposium, sketch understanding workshop, Stanford University, AAAI technical report SS-02-08. 2002.
Zurück zum Zitat Tversky, B., Suwa. M., Agrawala, M., Heiser, J., Stolte, C., Hanrahan, P., et al. (2003). Sketches for design and design of sketches. In U. Lindemann (Ed.), Human behaviour in design (pp. 79–86). Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRef Tversky, B., Suwa. M., Agrawala, M., Heiser, J., Stolte, C., Hanrahan, P., et al. (2003). Sketches for design and design of sketches. In U. Lindemann (Ed.), Human behaviour in design (pp. 79–86). Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tversky, B., & Porter, S. (2002). Sketching, concept development and automotive design. Design Studies, 24, 135–153. Tversky, B., & Porter, S. (2002). Sketching, concept development and automotive design. Design Studies, 24, 135–153.
Zurück zum Zitat Ullman, D. G., Wood, S., & Craig, D. (1990). The importance of drawing in the mechanical design process. Computer and Graphics, 14(2), 263–274.CrossRef Ullman, D. G., Wood, S., & Craig, D. (1990). The importance of drawing in the mechanical design process. Computer and Graphics, 14(2), 263–274.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Welch, M., Barlex, D., & Lim, H. S. (2000). Sketching: Friend or foe to the novice designer? International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10, 125–148.CrossRef Welch, M., Barlex, D., & Lim, H. S. (2000). Sketching: Friend or foe to the novice designer? International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10, 125–148.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wendell, K. B., & Rogers, C. (2013). Engineering design-based science, science content performance, and science attitudes in elementary school. Journal of Engineering, 102(4), 513–540. Wendell, K. B., & Rogers, C. (2013). Engineering design-based science, science content performance, and science attitudes in elementary school. Journal of Engineering, 102(4), 513–540.
Zurück zum Zitat Williams, P. J. (1993). Technology education in Australia. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 3(3), 43–54.CrossRef Williams, P. J. (1993). Technology education in Australia. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 3(3), 43–54.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Williams, P. J. (2000). Design: The only methodology of technology. Journal of Technology Education., 11(2), 48–60.CrossRef Williams, P. J. (2000). Design: The only methodology of technology. Journal of Technology Education., 11(2), 48–60.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zuga, K. F. (1997). An analysis of technology education in the United States based upon an historical overview and review of contemporary curriculum research. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7(3), 203–217.CrossRef Zuga, K. F. (1997). An analysis of technology education in the United States based upon an historical overview and review of contemporary curriculum research. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7(3), 203–217.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Sketching by design: teaching sketching to young learners
verfasst von
Todd R. Kelley
Euisuk Sung
Publikationsdatum
30.01.2016
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
International Journal of Technology and Design Education / Ausgabe 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0957-7572
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1804
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-016-9354-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2017

International Journal of Technology and Design Education 3/2017 Zur Ausgabe

    Premium Partner