Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
International Journal of Technology and Design Education

11.02.2019

An exploration of the variables contributing to graphical education students’ CAD modelling capability

verfasst von: Thomas Delahunty, Niall Seery, Rónán Dunbar, Michael Ryan

Erschienen in: International Journal of Technology and Design Education | Ausgabe 2/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper reports on a study exploring the variables that contribute to upper second level students’ capability in a digital graphical modelling exercise in the field of technology education. The study evolves previous work in the area conducted in different contexts such as teacher education. Findings indicate deficiencies in second-level students’ digital modelling abilities and a significant relationship between students’ analytical, strategic and visuospatial abilities are presented. The paper discusses these findings as they relate to pedagogical reasoning processes and present the necessity to broaden the conception of graphical capability within digital CAD modelling contexts. Some key implications for technology education programmes and pedagogical approaches are discussed in conclusion.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
Ault, H. K. (2003). A comparison of solid modelling approaches. In American society for engineering education annual conference and exposition. Nashville.
Baddeley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer: a new compnent of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences,4(11), 417–423.
Baddeley, A., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working Memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation. New York: Academic Press.
Barr, R. E. (1999). Developing the EDG Curriculum for the 21st Century: a team effort. In ASEE annual conference and exposition. Charlotte.
Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House,83(2), 39–43.
Bhavnani, S., & John, B. (1997). From sufficient to efficient usage: an analysis of strategic knowledge. In Chi 97 conference proceedings (pp. 91–98). Atlanta: Georgia.
Black, P., & Harrison, G. (1985). In place of confusion: Technology and science in the school curriculum. London: Nuffield-Chelsea Curriculum Trust and the National Centre for School Technology.
Branoff, T. J., & Dobelis, M. (2014). Relationship between students’ spatial visualization ability and their ability to create 3D constraint-based models from various types of drawings. In 121st ASEE annual conference and exposition. Indianapolis.
Cabeza, R., & Nyberg, L. (2000). Imaging cognition II: An empirical review of 275 PET and fMRI studies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,12(1), 1–47.
Chester, I. (2007). Teaching for CAD expertise. International Journal of Technology and Design Education,17(1), 23–35.
Chester, I. (2008). 3D-CAD: Modern technology—Outdated pedagogy. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal,12(1), 7–9.
Cohen, J. W. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dakers, J. R. (2005). The hegemonic behaviorist cycle. International Journal of Technology and Design Education,15(2), 111–126.
D’Argembau, A., Ortoleva, C., Jumentier, S., & VanderLinden, M. (2010). Component processes underlying future thinking. Memory and Cognition,38(6), 809–819.
Delahunty, T., Seery, N., & Lynch, R. (2012). an evaluation of the assessment of graphical education at junior cycle in the Irish system. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal,17(2), 9–20.
Delahunty, T., Seery, N., & Lynch, R. (2015). Spatial skills and success in problem solving within engineering education. In 6th Research in Engineering Education Symposium DIT, July 13–15.
Delahunty, T., Seery, N., & Lynch, R. (2018). Exploring the use of electroencephalography to gather objective evidence of cognitive processing during problem solving. Journal of Science Education and Technology,27, 114–130.
Dow, W. (2006). The need to change pedagogies in science and technology subjects: A European perspective. International Journal of Technology and Design Education,16, 307–321.
Edwards, A., Gilroy, P. & Hartley, D. (2002). Rethinking teacher education: An interdisciplinary analysis. London: Routledge Falmer.
Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review,102(2), 211.
Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change. Journal of Research on Technology in Education,42(3), 255–284.
Fang, Z. (1996). A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices. Educational Research,38(1), 47–65.
Field, D. A. (2004). Education and training for CAD in the auto industry. Computer-Aided Design,36(14), 1431–1437.
Fish, J., & Scrivener, S. (1990). Amplifying the mind’s eye: Sketching and visual cognition. Leonardo,23(1), 117–126.
Gagel, C. (2004). Technology profile: An assessment strategy for technological literacy. The Journal of Technology Studies,30(4), 38–44.
Garrison, R. D., & Akyol, Z. (2015). Toward the development of a metacognition construct for communities of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education,24, 66–71.
Gibson, K. (2008). Technology and technological knowledge: A challenge for school curricula. Teachers and Teaching,14(1), 3–15.
Gimmestad, B. J. (1985). Using computer graphics for the development of spatial visualization. In American Society for Engineering education, p. 530.
Goldschmidt, G. (2003). The backtalk of self-generated sketches. Design Issues,19(1), 72–88.
Guay, R. (1976). Purdue spatial vizualization test. Princeton: Educational testing service.
Hassabis, D., & Maguire, E. A. (2007). Deconstructing episodic memory with construction. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,11(7), 299–306.
Hermans, R., Tondeur, J., vanBraak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). The impact of primary school teachers’ educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers. Computers & Education,51, 1499–1509.
Johnson, M. D., & Diwakaran, R. P. (2011). An educational exercise examining the role of model attributes on the creation and alteration of CAD models. Computers & Education,57, 1749–1761.
Kimbell, R. (2004). Ideas and ideation. The Journal of Design and Technology Education,9(3), 136–137.
Levin, T., & Wadmany, R. (2005). Changes in educational beliefs and classroom practices of teachers and students in rich technology-based classrooms. Technology, Pedagogy and Education,14(3), 281–308.
Mcgarr, O. (2011). The elephant in the room: the influence of prevailing pedagogical practice on the integration of Design and Communication Graphics in the post-primary classroom. In E. Norman & N. Seery (Eds.), Graphicacy and Modelling. UK: Loughborough.
McGarr, O., & Seery, N. (2011). Parametric pedagogy: Integrating parametric CAD in Irish post-primary schools. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal,16(2), 57–66.
NCCA (2007). Leaving Certificate Design and Communication Graphics Syllabus, Dublin.
Norris, K., Sullivan, T., Poirot, J., & Soloway, E. (2003). No access, no use, no impact: snapshot surveys of educational technology in K-12. Journal of Research on Technology in Education,36(1), 15–27.
Orlando, J. (2009). Understanding changes in teachers’ ICT practices: A longitudinal perspective. Technology, Pedagogy and Education,18(1), 33–44.
Owen-Jackson, G. (2000). Design and technology in the school curriculum. In G. Owen-Jackson (Ed.), Learning to Teach Design and Technology in the secondary school (pp. 1–9). London: Routledge Falmer.
Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching and assessing. Theory into Practice,41(4), 219–225.
Prawat, R. S. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs about teaching and learning: A constructivist perspective. American Journal of Education,100(3), 354–395.
Rodriguez, J., Ridge, J., Dickinson, A., & Whitwam, R. (1998). CAD training using interactive computer sessions. In American Society for Engineering Education annual conference and exposition conference proceedings.
Rynne, A., Gaughran, W. F., & Seery, N. (2011). Defining the variables that contribute to developing 3D CAD modelling expertise. In E. Norman, & N. Seery (Eds.), Graphicacy and modelling (pp. 161–178). Loughborough.
Schacter, D. L., & Addis, D. R. (2007). ‘The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory: Remembering the past and imagining the future. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences,362, 773–786.
Seery, N., Lynch, R., & Dunbar, R. (2011). A review of the nature, provision and progression of graphical education in Ireland. In E. Norman, & N. Seery (Eds.), Graphicacy and modelling. Loughborough.
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review,57, 1–22.
Sorby, S. (2000). Spatial abilities and their relationship to effective learning of 3-D modeling software. Engineering Design Graphics Journal,64(3), 30–35.
Sorby, S. A. (2007). Developing 3D spatial skills for engineering students. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education,13(1), 1–11.
Sorby, S. (2009). Educational research in developing 3-D spatial skills for engineering students. International Journal of Science Education,31(3), 459–480.
Stillings, N. A., Weisler, S. E., Chase, C. H., Feinstein, M. H., Garfield, J. L., & Rissland, E. L. (1995). Cognitive science: An introduction. London: MIT Press.
Sweller, J., vanMerrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review,10(3), 251–296.
Todd, P. M., & Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Précis of simple heuristics that make us smart. Behavioral and Brain Sciences,23, 727–780.
Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology,101(4), 817.
Williams, P. J. (2009). Technological literacy: A multiliteracies approach for democracy. International Journal of Technology and Design Education,19(3), 237–254.
Williams, J., Iglesias, J., & Barak, M. (2008). Problem based learning: Application to technology education in three countries. International Journal of Technology and Design Education,18, 319–335.
Metadaten
Titel
An exploration of the variables contributing to graphical education students’ CAD modelling capability
verfasst von
Thomas Delahunty
Niall Seery
Rónán Dunbar
Michael Ryan
Publikationsdatum
11.02.2019
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
International Journal of Technology and Design Education / Ausgabe 2/2020
Print ISSN: 0957-7572
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1804
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09503-x

    Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise