Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Business and Psychology 1/2011

01.03.2011

Relative Importance Analysis: A Useful Supplement to Regression Analysis

verfasst von: Scott Tonidandel, James M. LeBreton

Erschienen in: Journal of Business and Psychology | Ausgabe 1/2011

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This article advocates for the wider use of relative importance indices as a supplement to multiple regression analyses. The goal of such analyses is to partition explained variance among multiple predictors to better understand the role played by each predictor in a regression equation. Unfortunately, when predictors are correlated, typically relied upon metrics are flawed indicators of variable importance. To that end, we highlight the key benefits of two relative importance analyses, dominance analysis and relative weight analysis, over estimates produced by multiple regression analysis. We also describe numerous situations where relative importance weights should be used, while simultaneously cautioning readers about the limitations and misconceptions regarding the use of these weights. Finally, we present step-by-step recommendations for researchers interested in incorporating these analyses in their own work and point them to available web resources to assist them in producing these weights.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Aguinis, H., Werner, S., Abbott, J. L., Angert, C., Park, J. H., & Kohlhausen, D. (2010). Customer-centric science: Reporting research results with rigor, relevance, and practical impact in mind. Organizational Research Methods, 13, 515–539.CrossRef Aguinis, H., Werner, S., Abbott, J. L., Angert, C., Park, J. H., & Kohlhausen, D. (2010). Customer-centric science: Reporting research results with rigor, relevance, and practical impact in mind. Organizational Research Methods, 13, 515–539.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Azen, R., & Budescu, D. V. (2003). The dominance analysis approach for comparing predictors in multiple regression. Psychological Methods, 8, 129–148.CrossRefPubMed Azen, R., & Budescu, D. V. (2003). The dominance analysis approach for comparing predictors in multiple regression. Psychological Methods, 8, 129–148.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Azen, R., & Budescu, D. V. (2006). Comparing predictors in multivariate regression models: an extension of dominance analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 157–180.CrossRef Azen, R., & Budescu, D. V. (2006). Comparing predictors in multivariate regression models: an extension of dominance analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 157–180.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Azen, R., & Traxel, N. M. (2009). Using dominance analysis to determine predictor importance in logistic regression. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 34, 319–347.CrossRef Azen, R., & Traxel, N. M. (2009). Using dominance analysis to determine predictor importance in logistic regression. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 34, 319–347.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Budescu, D. V. (1993). Dominance analysis: A new approach to the problem of relative importance of predictors in multiple regression. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 542–551.CrossRef Budescu, D. V. (1993). Dominance analysis: A new approach to the problem of relative importance of predictors in multiple regression. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 542–551.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Budescu, D. V., & Azen, R. (2004). Beyond global measures of relative importance: Some insights from dominance analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7(3), 341–350.CrossRef Budescu, D. V., & Azen, R. (2004). Beyond global measures of relative importance: Some insights from dominance analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7(3), 341–350.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cortina, J. M., & Landis, R. S. (2009). When small effect sizes tell a big story, and when large effect sizes don’t. In C. E. Lance & R. J. Vandenberg (Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity and fable in the organizational and social sciences (pp. 287–308). New York: Routledge. Cortina, J. M., & Landis, R. S. (2009). When small effect sizes tell a big story, and when large effect sizes don’t. In C. E. Lance & R. J. Vandenberg (Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity and fable in the organizational and social sciences (pp. 287–308). New York: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Courville, T., & Thompson, B. (2001). Use of structure coefficients in published multiple regression articles: β is not enough. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 229–248. Courville, T., & Thompson, B. (2001). Use of structure coefficients in published multiple regression articles: β is not enough. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 229–248.
Zurück zum Zitat Darlington, R. B. (1968). Multiple regression in psychological research and practice. Psychological Bulletin, 69, 161–182.CrossRefPubMed Darlington, R. B. (1968). Multiple regression in psychological research and practice. Psychological Bulletin, 69, 161–182.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Fabbris, L. (1980). Measures of predictor variable importance in multiple regression: An additional suggestion. Quality & Quantity, 4, 787–792.CrossRef Fabbris, L. (1980). Measures of predictor variable importance in multiple regression: An additional suggestion. Quality & Quantity, 4, 787–792.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hocking, R. R. (1976). The analysis and selection of variables in linear regression. Biometrics, 32, 1–49.CrossRef Hocking, R. R. (1976). The analysis and selection of variables in linear regression. Biometrics, 32, 1–49.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson, J. W. (2000). A heuristic method for estimating the relative weight of predictor variables in multiple regression. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 35, 1–19.CrossRef Johnson, J. W. (2000). A heuristic method for estimating the relative weight of predictor variables in multiple regression. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 35, 1–19.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson, J. W. (2004). Factors affecting relative weights: The influence of sampling and measurement error. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 283–299.CrossRef Johnson, J. W. (2004). Factors affecting relative weights: The influence of sampling and measurement error. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 283–299.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson, J. W., & LeBreton, J. M. (2004). History and use of relative importance indices in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 238–257.CrossRef Johnson, J. W., & LeBreton, J. M. (2004). History and use of relative importance indices in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 238–257.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Krasikova, D., LeBreton, J. M., & Tonidandel, S. (2011). Estimating the relative importance of variables in multiple regression models. In G. P. Hodgkinson & J. K. Ford (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology. Indianapolis, IN: Wiley. Krasikova, D., LeBreton, J. M., & Tonidandel, S. (2011). Estimating the relative importance of variables in multiple regression models. In G. P. Hodgkinson & J. K. Ford (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology. Indianapolis, IN: Wiley.
Zurück zum Zitat LeBreton, J. M., Hargis, M. B., Griepentrog, B., Oswald, F. L., & Ployhart, R. E. (2007). A multidimensional approach for evaluating variables in organizational research and practice. Personnel Psychology, 60, 475–498.CrossRef LeBreton, J. M., Hargis, M. B., Griepentrog, B., Oswald, F. L., & Ployhart, R. E. (2007). A multidimensional approach for evaluating variables in organizational research and practice. Personnel Psychology, 60, 475–498.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat LeBreton, J. M., Ployhart, R. E., & Ladd, R. T. (2004). A Monte Carlo comparison of relative importance methodologies. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 258–282.CrossRef LeBreton, J. M., Ployhart, R. E., & Ladd, R. T. (2004). A Monte Carlo comparison of relative importance methodologies. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 258–282.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat LeBreton, J. M., & Tonidandel, S. (2008). Multivariate relative importance: Extending relative weight analysis to multivariate criterion spaces. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 329–345.CrossRefPubMed LeBreton, J. M., & Tonidandel, S. (2008). Multivariate relative importance: Extending relative weight analysis to multivariate criterion spaces. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 329–345.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat LeBreton, J. M. & Tonidandel, S. (2009, April). Estimating relative importance of interactive and other higher-order effects. Paper presented at the 24th annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New Orleans, LA. LeBreton, J. M. & Tonidandel, S. (2009, April). Estimating relative importance of interactive and other higher-order effects. Paper presented at the 24th annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New Orleans, LA.
Zurück zum Zitat Martell, R. F., Lane, D. M., & Emrich, C. (1996). Male-female differences: A computer simulation. American Psychologist, 51, 157–158.CrossRef Martell, R. F., Lane, D. M., & Emrich, C. (1996). Male-female differences: A computer simulation. American Psychologist, 51, 157–158.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Miller, A. J. (1990). Subset selection in regression. London: Chapman & Hall. Miller, A. J. (1990). Subset selection in regression. London: Chapman & Hall.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Boyle, E. H., Jr., Humphrey, R. H., Pollack, J. M., Hawver, T. H., & Story, P. A. (2010). The relation between emotional intelligence and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior. doi:10.1002/job.714. O’Boyle, E. H., Jr., Humphrey, R. H., Pollack, J. M., Hawver, T. H., & Story, P. A. (2010). The relation between emotional intelligence and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior. doi:10.​1002/​job.​714.
Zurück zum Zitat Thall, P. F., Russell, K. E., & Simon, R. M. (1997). Variable selection in regression via repeated data splitting. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 6, 416–434.CrossRef Thall, P. F., Russell, K. E., & Simon, R. M. (1997). Variable selection in regression via repeated data splitting. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 6, 416–434.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tonidandel, S., & LeBreton, J. M. (2010). Determining the relative importance of predictors in logistic regression: An extension of relative weights analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 13, 767–781.CrossRef Tonidandel, S., & LeBreton, J. M. (2010). Determining the relative importance of predictors in logistic regression: An extension of relative weights analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 13, 767–781.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tonidandel, S., LeBreton, J. M., & Johnson, J. W. (2009). Determining the statistical significance of relative weights. Psychological Methods, 14, 387–399.CrossRefPubMed Tonidandel, S., LeBreton, J. M., & Johnson, J. W. (2009). Determining the statistical significance of relative weights. Psychological Methods, 14, 387–399.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Tonidandel, S., LeBreton, J., & Perkins, J. (2006). Applying relative importance to multivariate analysis of variance. In J. Cortina (Chair), Devoting rashly something as holy, ye must then reconsider: Revisiting methodological sacred cows. Symposium conducted at the 21st Annual Meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Dallas, Texas. Tonidandel, S., LeBreton, J., & Perkins, J. (2006). Applying relative importance to multivariate analysis of variance. In J. Cortina (Chair), Devoting rashly something as holy, ye must then reconsider: Revisiting methodological sacred cows. Symposium conducted at the 21st Annual Meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Dallas, Texas.
Metadaten
Titel
Relative Importance Analysis: A Useful Supplement to Regression Analysis
verfasst von
Scott Tonidandel
James M. LeBreton
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2011
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Business and Psychology / Ausgabe 1/2011
Print ISSN: 0889-3268
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-353X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9204-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2011

Journal of Business and Psychology 1/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner