nach oben

Transportation

Erschienen in:

05.06.2019

Demand management of congested public transport systems: a conceptual framework and application using smart card data

verfasst von: Anne Halvorsen, Haris N. Koutsopoulos, Zhenliang Ma, Jinhua Zhao

Erschienen in: Transportation | Ausgabe 5/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Transportation demand management, long used to reduce car traffic, is receiving attention among public transport operators as a means to reduce congestion in crowded public transportation systems. Though far less studied, a more structured approach to public transport demand management (PTDM) can help agencies make informed decisions on the combination of PTDM and infrastructure investments that best manage crowding. Automated fare collection data, readily available in many public transport agencies, provide a unique platform to advance systematic approaches for the design and evaluation of PTDM strategies. The paper discusses the main steps for developing PTDM programs: (a) problem identification and formulation of program goals; (b) program design; (c) evaluation; and (d) monitoring. The problem identification phase examines bottlenecks in the system based on a spatiotemporal passenger flow analysis. The design phase identifies the main design parameters based on a categorization of potential interventions along spatial, temporal, modal, and targeted user group parameters. Evaluation takes place at the system, group, and individual levels, taking advantage of the detailed information obtained from smart card transaction data. The monitoring phase addresses the long-term sustainability of the intervention and informs potential changes to improve its effectiveness. A case study of a pre-peak fare discount policy in Hong Kong’s MTR network is used to illustrate the application of the various steps with focus on evaluation and analysis of the impacts from a behavioral point of view. Smart card data from before and after the implementation of the scheme from a panel of users was used to study policy-induced behavior shifts. A cluster analysis inferred customer groups relevant to the analysis based on their usage patterns. Users who shifted their behavior were identified based on a change point analysis and a logit model was estimated to identify the main factors that contribute to this change: the amount of time a user needed to shift his/her departure time, departure time variability, fare savings, and price sensitivity. User heterogeneity suggests that future incentives may be improved if they target specific groups.

Vorheriger Artikel On the effect of operational service attributes on transit satisfaction

Nächster Artikel To compete or not compete: exploring the relationships between motorcycle-based ride-sourcing, motorcycle taxis, and public transport in the Jakarta metropolitan area

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Anupriya, A., Graham, D., Hörcher, D., Anderson, R.J.: The impact of early bird scheme on commuter trip scheduling in Hong Kong: a causal analysis using travel card data. Paper Presented at the Transportation Research Board 97th Annual Meeting, Washington DC, United States (2018)

Arthur, D., Vassilvitskii, S.: k-means++: the advantages of careful seeding. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, New Orleans, Louisiana (2007)

Bai, J.: Least squares estimation of a shift in linear processes. J. Time Ser. Anal. 15(5), 453–472 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9892.1994.tb00204.xCrossRef

Bamberg, S., Fujii, S., Friman, M., Gärling, T.: Behaviour theory and soft transport policy measures. Transp. Policy 18(1), 228–235 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.08.006CrossRef

Bamford, C.G., Carrick, R.J., Hay, A.M., MacDonald, R.: The use of association analysis in market segmentation for public transport: a case study of bus passengers in West Yorkshire, UK. Transportation 14(1), 21–32 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00172464CrossRef

Batarce, M., Muñoz, J.C., Ortúzar, J., de Dios Ortúzar, J.: Valuing crowding in public transport: implications for cost-benefit analysis. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 91, 358–378 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.06.025CrossRef

Ben-Akiva, M.E., Lerman, S.R., Lerman, S.R.: Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand, vol. 9. MIT Press, Cambridge (1985)

Brickman, P., Campbell, D.: Hedonic Relativism and Planning the Good Society. Academic Press, New York (1971)

Cervero, R.: Transit pricing research. Transportation 17(2), 117–139 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02125332CrossRef

Currie, G.: Exploring the impact of the “Free before 7” campaign on reducing overcrowding on Melbourne’s trains. Paper Presented at the 32nd Australasian Transport Research Forum, Auckland, New Zealand (2009)

Currie, G.: Design and impact of a scheme to spread peak rail demand using pre-peak free fares. Paper Presented at the European Transport Conference Glasgow, Scotland (2011)

Dale, S., Frost, M.W., Ison, S.G., Warren, P.: Evaluating transport demand management interventions. Paper Presented at the Transportation Research Board 94th Annual Meeting, Washington DC, United States (2015)

Ekström, J., Sumalee, A., Lo, H.K.: Optimizing toll locations and levels using a mixed integer linear approximation approach. Transp. Res. B Methodol. 46(7), 834–854 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2012.02.006CrossRef

Eriksson, L., Nordlund, A.M., Garvill, J.: Expected car use reduction in response to structural travel demand management measures. Transp. Res. F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 13(5), 329–342 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2010.06.001CrossRef

Ferguson, E.: Transportation demand management planning, development, and implementation. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 56(4), 442–456 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369008975448CrossRef

Gärling, T., Eek, D., Loukopoulos, P., Fujii, S., Johansson-Stenman, O., Kitamura, R., Vilhelmson, B.: A conceptual analysis of the impact of travel demand management on private car use. Transp. Policy 9(1), 59–70 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-070X(01)00035-XCrossRef

Gärling, T., Fujii, S.: Travel behavior modification: theories, methods, and programs. Paper Presented at the 11th International Conference on Travel Behavior Research, Kyoto, Japan (2006)

Gärling, T., Schuitema, G.: Travel demand management targeting reduced private car use: effectiveness, public acceptability and political feasibility. J. Soc. Issues 63(1), 139–153 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00500.xCrossRef

Giuliano, G.: Transportation demand management: promise or panacea? J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 58(3), 327–335 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369208975811CrossRef

Gordon, J., Koutsopoulos, H., Wilson, N., Attanucci, J.: Automated inference of linked transit journeys in London using fare-transaction and vehicle location data. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2343, 17–24 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3141/2343-03CrossRef

Goulet-Langlois, G., Koutsopoulos, H.N., Zhao, J.: Inferring patterns in the multi-week activity sequences of public transport users. Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol. 64, 1–16 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2015.12.012CrossRef

Greene-Roesel, R., Castiglione, J., Guiriba, C., Bradley, M.: BART perks: using incentives to manage transit demand. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118792765CrossRef

Halvorsen, A., Koutsopoulos, H.N., Lau, S., Au, T., Zhao, J.: Reducing subway crowding: analysis of an off-peak discount experiment in Hong Kong. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2544, 38–46 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3141/2544-05CrossRef

Hamdouch, Y., Florian, M., Hearn, D.W., Lawphongpanich, S.: Congestion pricing for multi-modal transportation systems. Transp. Res. B Methodol. 41(3), 275–291 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2006.04.003CrossRef

Henn, L., Douglas, N., Sloan, K.: Surveying Sydney rail commuters’ willingness to change travel time. Paper Presented at the 34th Australasian Transport Research Forum Adelaide, Australia (2011)

Hörcher, D., Graham, D.J., Anderson, R.J.: Crowding cost estimation with large scale smart card and vehicle location data. Transp. Res. B Methodol. 95, 105–125 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2016.10.015CrossRef

Hurdle, J.: Use of public transit in US reaches highest level since 1956, advocates report. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/10/us/use-of-public-transit-in-us-reaches-highest-level-since-1956-advocates-report.html (2014)

Jolliffe, I.: Principal component analysis. In: Lovric, M. (ed.) International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science, pp. 1094–1096. Springer, Berlin (2011)CrossRef

Kachroo, P., Gupta, S., Agarwal, S., Ozbay, K.: Optimal control for congestion pricing: theory, simulation, and evaluation. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 18(5), 1234–1240 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2016.2601245CrossRef

Koutsopoulos, H.N., Ma, Z., Noursalehi, P., Zhu, Y.: Transit data analytics for planning, monitoring, control and information. In: Antoniou, C., Dimitriou, L., Pereira, F. (eds.) Mobility Patterns, Big Data and Transport Analytics, 1st edn, p. 448. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2018)

Kroes, E., Kouwenhoven, M., Debrincat, L., Pauget, N.: Value of crowding on public transport in Île-de-France, France. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2417, 37–45 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3141/2417-05CrossRef

Li, S.-M., Wong, F.C.L.: The effectiveness of differential pricing on route choice. Transportation 21(3), 307–324 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01099216CrossRef

Li, Z., Hensher, D.A.: Crowding and public transport: a review of willingness to pay evidence and its relevance in project appraisal. Transp. Policy 18(6), 880–887 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.06.003CrossRef

Loukopoulos, P.: A classification of travel demand management measures. In: Steg, L. (ed.) Threats from Car Traffic to the Quality of Urban Life: Problems, Causes and Solutions, pp. 273–292. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley (2007)CrossRef

Lta, S.: Travel smart. http://www.lta.gov.sg/content/ltaweb/en/public-transport/mrt-and-lrt-trains/travel-smart.html (2014)

Luo, D., Cats, O., Lint, H.V.: Analysis of network-wide transit passenger flows based on principal component analysis. Paper Presented at the 2017 5th IEEE International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS) (2017)

Ma, Z., Ferreira, L., Mesbah, M.: Measuring service reliability using automatic vehicle location data. Math. Probl. Eng. 2014, 1–12 (2014)

Ma, Z., Koutsopoulos, H.N.: Optimal design of promotion based transit demand management strategies. Working paper (2018)

Ma, Z., Koutsopoulos, H.N., Chen, Y., Wilson, N.H.M.: Estimation of denied boarding in urban rail systems: alternative formulations and comparative analysis. Transp. Res. Rec. (2019) (in press)

Mark, S., Phil, C.: Developments in transit fare policy reform. Paper Presented at the 29th Australasian Transport Research Forum Queensland, Australia (2006)

Maruyama, T., Sumalee, A.: Efficiency and equity comparison of cordon- and area-based road pricing schemes using a trip-chain equilibrium model. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 41(7), 655–671 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2006.06.002CrossRef

Maunsell, F.: Demand management techniques-peak spreading. Department for Transport, Transport for London and Network Rail, London, United Kingdom (2007)

Pelletier, M.-P., Trépanier, M., Morency, C.: Smart card data use in public transit: a literature review. Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol. 19(4), 557–568 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2010.12.003CrossRef

Pluntke, C., Prabhakar, B.: INSINC: a platform for managing peak demand in public transit, pp. 31–39. JOURNEYS (Magazine of the Land Transport Authority Academy, Singapore) (2013)

Prud’homme, R., Koning, M., Lenormand, L., Fehr, A.: Public transport congestion costs: the case of the Paris subway. Transp. Policy 21, 101–109 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.11.002CrossRef

Rose, G.: Appraisal and evaluation of travel demand management measures. Paper Presented at the 30th Australasian Transport Research Forum, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (2007)

Rousseeuw, P.J.: Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 20, 53–65 (1987)CrossRef

Schade, J., Schlag, B.: Acceptability of urban transport pricing strategies. Transp. Res. F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 6(1), 45–61 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-8478(02)00046-3CrossRef

Schlag, B., Teubel, U.: Public acceptability of transport pricing. IATSS Res. 21, 134–142 (1997)

Smith, B., Moniruzzaman, M.: Review of TDM appraisal and evaluation tools. Perth, Australia (2014)

Steg, L.: Factors influencing the acceptability and effectiveness of transport pricing. In: Schlag, B. (ed.) Acceptability of Transport Pricing Strategies, pp. 187–202. Pergamon Press, Oxford (2003)CrossRef

Steg, L., Vlek, C.: The role of problem awareness in willingness-to-change car use and in evaluating relevant policy measures. Paper Presented at the Traffic and Transport Psychology: Theory and Application, Amsterdam, Netherlands (1997)

Taylor, C., Nozick, L., Meyburg, A.: Selection and evaluation of travel demand management measures. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1598, 49–60 (1997)CrossRef

Tibshirani, R., Walther, G., Hastie, T.: Estimating the number of clusters in a data set via the gap statistic. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Stat. Methodol.) 63(2), 411–423 (2001)CrossRef

Tirachini, A., Hurtubia, R., Dekker, T., Daziano, R.A.: Estimation of crowding discomfort in public transport: results from Santiago de Chile. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 103, 311–326 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.06.008CrossRef

Wang, Z.-J., Li, X.-H., Chen, F.: Impact evaluation of a mass transit fare change on demand and revenue utilizing smart card data. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 77, 213–224 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.018CrossRef

Wie, B.-W.: Dynamic Stackelberg equilibrium congestion pricing. Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol. 15(3), 154–174 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2007.03.002CrossRef

Wie, B.-W., Tobin, R.L.: Dynamic congestion pricing models for general traffic networks. Transp. Res. B Methodol. 32(5), 313–327 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-2615(97)00043-XCrossRef

Yang, H., Tang, Y.: Managing rail transit peak-hour congestion with a fare-reward scheme. Transp. Res. B Methodol. 110, 122–136 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2018.02.005CrossRef

Yap, M., Cats, O., van Arem, B.: Crowding valuation in urban tram and bus transportation based on smart card data. Transportmetrica A: Transp. Sci. 22, 1–20 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/23249935.2018.1537319CrossRef

Zeileis, A., Kleiber, C., Krämer, W., Hornik, K.: Testing and dating of structural changes in practice. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 44(1), 109–123 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9473(03)00030-6CrossRef

Zhang, J., Yan, X., An, M., Sun, L.: The impact of beijing subway’s new fare policy on riders’ attitude, travel pattern and demand. Sustainability 9(5), 689 (2017)CrossRef

Zhang, Z., Fujii, H., Managi, S.: How does commuting behavior change due to incentives? An empirical study of the Beijing Subway System. Transp. Res. F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 24, 17–26 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.02.009CrossRef

Zhu, Y., Koutsopoulos, H.N., Wilson, N.H.M.: Inferring left behind passengers in congested metro systems from automated data. Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol. (2017a). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2017.10.002CrossRef

Zhu, Y., Koutsopoulos, H.N., Wilson, N.H.M.: A probabilistic passenger-to-train assignment model based on automated data. Transp. Res. B Methodol. (2017b). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2017.04.012CrossRef

Titel: Demand management of congested public transport systems: a conceptual framework and application using smart card data
verfasst von: Anne Halvorsen
Haris N. Koutsopoulos
Zhenliang Ma
Jinhua Zhao
Publikationsdatum: 05.06.2019
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Transportation / Ausgabe 5/2020
Print ISSN: 0049-4488
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-9435
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-019-10017-7

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2020

On the effect of operational service attributes on transit satisfaction

Short run fare elasticities for Bogotá’s BRT system: ridership responses to fare increases

Modelling the determinants of car-sharing adoption intentions among young adults: the role of attitude, perceived benefits, travel expectations and socio-demographic factors

Are millennials more multimodal? A latent-class cluster analysis with attitudes and preferences among millennial and Generation X commuters in California

Calibration of a transit route choice model using revealed population data of smartcard in a multimodal transit network

Intrazonal or interzonal? Improving intrazonal travel forecast in a four-step travel demand model

Premium Partner