Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Chinese Political Science 1/2023

28.07.2022 | Research Article

Power in the Age of Datafication: Exploring China’s Global Data Power

verfasst von: Ying Huang, Maximilian Mayer

Erschienen in: Journal of Chinese Political Science | Ausgabe 1/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Anxieties about China’s growing data power have begun to drive geopolitical and technological competition. Yet, the size of Chinese data power is unclear. Most assessments are unsystematic. Drawing on Barnett and Duvall’s fourfold power taxonomy and insights into the stack-layers of information technology, this article develops a new conceptual framework. Using the concepts of compulsory, institutional, infrastructural, and productive data power, we assess how China exercises different forms of data power and what shapes and limits the increase of Chinese data power. The study concludes that China’s data power is less grandiose than often assumed. The Chinese state wields influence and obtains desired outcomes predominantly through compulsory and institutional data power operations. But by contrast, infrastructural and productive dimensions remain limited, largely due to China’s high compulsory and institutional data power. The intricacies of China’s case demonstrate the complexities of power research in the age of datafication as different forms of data power evolve in tension.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
See on the long-standing debate  about the relationship between the state, the  Internet and digital technologies [33, 70, 89].
 
2
Instead of the term “structural power,” the paper adopts the notion of “infrastructural data power”. Different from Michael Mann’s understanding, which highlights the capacities of the state to penetrate civil society and distinguishes it from “despotic power” of the state elite, we focus here on the global affordances of data infrastructures.
 
3
English is used by 59.9% of all websites, while Chinese is only used by 1.5% of all websites. The language barrier is less relevant here, though, because all Chinese websites included here have an English version.
 
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Amy, Tong. 2020. China’s Information and Communications Technologies Engagement in Africa: A Comparative Analysis. The Yale Review of International Studies 11 (2): 42–63. Amy, Tong. 2020. China’s Information and Communications Technologies Engagement in Africa: A Comparative Analysis. The Yale Review of International Studies 11 (2): 42–63.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Ando, Clifford and Seth Richardson. 2017. Ancient states and infrastructural power: Europe, Asia, and America. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRef Ando, Clifford and Seth Richardson. 2017. Ancient states and infrastructural power: Europe, Asia, and America. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Aouragh, Miriyam and Paula Chakravartty. 2016. Infrastructures of empire: Towards a critical geopolitics of media and information studies. Media, Culture & Society 38 (4): 559–575.CrossRef Aouragh, Miriyam and Paula Chakravartty. 2016. Infrastructures of empire: Towards a critical geopolitics of media and information studies. Media, Culture & Society 38 (4): 559–575.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Arsène, Séverine. 2016. Global internet governance in Chinese academic literature. Rebalancing a hegemonic world order? China Perspectives 2: 25–35.CrossRef Arsène, Séverine. 2016. Global internet governance in Chinese academic literature. Rebalancing a hegemonic world order? China Perspectives 2: 25–35.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Barnett, Michael and Raymond Duvall. 2005. Power in international politics. International Organization 59 (1): 39–75.CrossRef Barnett, Michael and Raymond Duvall. 2005. Power in international politics. International Organization 59 (1): 39–75.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Bellanova, Rocco and Marieke de Goede. 2022. The algorithmic regulation of security: An infrastructural perspective. Regulation & Governance 16 (1): 102-118. Bellanova, Rocco and Marieke de Goede. 2022. The algorithmic regulation of security: An infrastructural perspective. Regulation & Governance 16 (1): 102-118.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Bernards, Nick and Malcolm Campbell-Verduyn. 2019. Understanding technological change in global finance through infrastructures. Review of International Political Economy 26 (5): 773–789.CrossRef Bernards, Nick and Malcolm Campbell-Verduyn. 2019. Understanding technological change in global finance through infrastructures. Review of International Political Economy 26 (5): 773–789.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Betz, David J. and Tim Stevens. 2011. Cyberspace and the state: Toward a strategy for cyber-power. London: Routledge. Betz, David J. and Tim Stevens. 2011. Cyberspace and the state: Toward a strategy for cyber-power. London: Routledge.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Bigo, Didier, Engin Isin, and Ecelyn Ruppert, eds. 2019. Data politics. Worlds, subjects, rights. Routledge Studies in International Political Sociology. Bigo, Didier, Engin Isin, and Ecelyn Ruppert, eds. 2019. Data politics. Worlds, subjects, rights. Routledge Studies in International Political Sociology.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Bratton, Benjamin H. 2015. The stack: On software and sovereignty. Cambridge: The MIT Press.CrossRef Bratton, Benjamin H. 2015. The stack: On software and sovereignty. Cambridge: The MIT Press.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Bremmer, Ian. 2021. The Technopolar moment: How digital powers will reshape the global order. Foreign Affairs 100 (6): 112–128. Bremmer, Ian. 2021. The Technopolar moment: How digital powers will reshape the global order. Foreign Affairs 100 (6): 112–128.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bueger, Christian and Tobias Liebetrau. 2021. Protecting hidden infrastructure: The security politics of the global submarine data cable network. Contemporary Security Policy 42 (3): 391–413.CrossRef Bueger, Christian and Tobias Liebetrau. 2021. Protecting hidden infrastructure: The security politics of the global submarine data cable network. Contemporary Security Policy 42 (3): 391–413.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Cai, Cuihong. 2014. Connotations and challenges of big data in international relations. World Economics and Politics 5: 124–143. Cai, Cuihong. 2014. Connotations and challenges of big data in international relations. World Economics and Politics 5: 124–143.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Campion, Andrew Stephen. 2020. From CNOOC to Huawei: Securitization, the China threat, and critical infrastructure. Asian Journal of Political Science 28 (1): 47–66.CrossRef Campion, Andrew Stephen. 2020. From CNOOC to Huawei: Securitization, the China threat, and critical infrastructure. Asian Journal of Political Science 28 (1): 47–66.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Castells, Manuel. 1997. An introduction to the information age. City 2 (7): 6–16.CrossRef Castells, Manuel. 1997. An introduction to the information age. City 2 (7): 6–16.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Cavelty, Myriam Dunn and Andreas Wenger. 2020. Cyber security meets security politics: Complex technology, fragmented politics, and networked science. Contemporary Security Policy 41 (1): 5–32.CrossRef Cavelty, Myriam Dunn and Andreas Wenger. 2020. Cyber security meets security politics: Complex technology, fragmented politics, and networked science. Contemporary Security Policy 41 (1): 5–32.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Cavelty, Myriam Dunn. 2018. Europe’s cyber-power. European Politics and Society 19: 304–320.CrossRef Cavelty, Myriam Dunn. 2018. Europe’s cyber-power. European Politics and Society 19: 304–320.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Collin, S.M.H. 2002. Dictionary of information technology. Third Edition. Peter Collin. Collin, S.M.H. 2002. Dictionary of information technology. Third Edition. Peter Collin.
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Constantinides, Panos, Ola Henfridsson, and Geoffrey G. Parker. 2018. Introduction – Platforms and infrastructures in the digital age. Information Systems Research 29 (2): 381–400.CrossRef Constantinides, Panos, Ola Henfridsson, and Geoffrey G. Parker. 2018. Introduction – Platforms and infrastructures in the digital age. Information Systems Research 29 (2): 381–400.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Couldry, Nick and Ulises A. Mejias. 2018. Data colonialism: Rethinking big Data’s relation to the contemporary subject. Television and New Media 20 (4): 336–349.CrossRef Couldry, Nick and Ulises A. Mejias. 2018. Data colonialism: Rethinking big Data’s relation to the contemporary subject. Television and New Media 20 (4): 336–349.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Creemers, Rogier. 2017. Cyber China: Upgrading propaganda, public opinion work and social management for the twenty-first century. Journal of Contemporary China 26 (103): 85–100.CrossRef Creemers, Rogier. 2017. Cyber China: Upgrading propaganda, public opinion work and social management for the twenty-first century. Journal of Contemporary China 26 (103): 85–100.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Cukier, Kenneth and Viktor Mayer-Schoenberger. 2013. The rise of big data: How it’s changing the way we think about the world. Foreign Affairs 92 (3): 28–40. Cukier, Kenneth and Viktor Mayer-Schoenberger. 2013. The rise of big data: How it’s changing the way we think about the world. Foreign Affairs 92 (3): 28–40.
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Dahl, Robert. 1957. The concept of power. Behavioral Science 2 (3): 201–215.CrossRef Dahl, Robert. 1957. The concept of power. Behavioral Science 2 (3): 201–215.CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat de Goede, Marieke. 2021. Finance/security infrastructures. Review of International Political Economy 28 (2): 351–368.CrossRef de Goede, Marieke. 2021. Finance/security infrastructures. Review of International Political Economy 28 (2): 351–368.CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Drezner, Daniel W. 2004. The global governance of the internet: Bringing the state Back in. Political Science Quarterly 119 (3): 477–498.CrossRef Drezner, Daniel W. 2004. The global governance of the internet: Bringing the state Back in. Political Science Quarterly 119 (3): 477–498.CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Drezner, Daniel W. 2019. Counter-hegemonic strategies in the global economy. Security Studies 28 (3): 505–531.CrossRef Drezner, Daniel W. 2019. Counter-hegemonic strategies in the global economy. Security Studies 28 (3): 505–531.CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Drezner, Daniel W., Henry Farrell, and Abraham L. Newman, eds. 2021. The uses and abuses of weaponized interdependence. Washington: Brookings Institution Press. Drezner, Daniel W., Henry Farrell, and Abraham L. Newman, eds. 2021. The uses and abuses of weaponized interdependence. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Flensburg, Sofie and Signe Sophus Lai. 2020. Mapping digital communication systems: Infrastructures, markets, and policies as regulatory forces. Media, Culture & Society 42 (5): 692–710.CrossRef Flensburg, Sofie and Signe Sophus Lai. 2020. Mapping digital communication systems: Infrastructures, markets, and policies as regulatory forces. Media, Culture & Society 42 (5): 692–710.CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Floridi, Luciano. 2020. The fight for digital sovereignty: What it is, and why it matters, especially for the EU. Philosophy & Technology 33: 369–378.CrossRef Floridi, Luciano. 2020. The fight for digital sovereignty: What it is, and why it matters, especially for the EU. Philosophy & Technology 33: 369–378.CrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Forsyth, Donelson R. 2010. Group dynamics. Firth ed. Cengage Learning: Wadsworth. Forsyth, Donelson R. 2010. Group dynamics. Firth ed. Cengage Learning: Wadsworth.
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Friis, Karsten, and Olav Lysne. 2021. Huawei, 5G and security: Technological limitations and political responses. Development and Change 52 (5): 1174–1195.CrossRef Friis, Karsten, and Olav Lysne. 2021. Huawei, 5G and security: Technological limitations and political responses. Development and Change 52 (5): 1174–1195.CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Fritsch, Stefan. 2011. Technology and global affairs. International Studies Perspectives 12 (1): 27–45.CrossRef Fritsch, Stefan. 2011. Technology and global affairs. International Studies Perspectives 12 (1): 27–45.CrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Gagliardone, Iginio. 2019. China, Africa, and the future of the internet. London: Zed Books.CrossRef Gagliardone, Iginio. 2019. China, Africa, and the future of the internet. London: Zed Books.CrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Godehardt, Nadine and Paul J. Kohlenberg. 2020. China’s global connectivity politics: A meta-geography in the making. In The multidimensionality of regions in world politics, ed. Paul J. Kohlenberg and Nadine Godehardt, 191–214. London: Routledge.CrossRef Godehardt, Nadine and Paul J. Kohlenberg. 2020. China’s global connectivity politics: A meta-geography in the making. In The multidimensionality of regions in world politics, ed. Paul J. Kohlenberg and Nadine Godehardt, 191–214. London: Routledge.CrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Goode, J. Paul. 2021. Artificial intelligence and the future of nationalism. Nations and Nationalism 27 (2): 363–376.CrossRef Goode, J. Paul. 2021. Artificial intelligence and the future of nationalism. Nations and Nationalism 27 (2): 363–376.CrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Gu, Yanfeng, Xuan Qin, Zhongyuan Wang, et al. 2020. Global justice index report. Chinese Political Science Review 5: 253–331.CrossRef Gu, Yanfeng, Xuan Qin, Zhongyuan Wang, et al. 2020. Global justice index report. Chinese Political Science Review 5: 253–331.CrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Gu, Yanfeng, Xuan Qin, Zhongyuan Wang, et al. 2021. Global justice index report 2020. Chinese Political Science Review 6: 322–486.CrossRef Gu, Yanfeng, Xuan Qin, Zhongyuan Wang, et al. 2021. Global justice index report 2020. Chinese Political Science Review 6: 322–486.CrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Hao, Yeli. 2017. A three-perspective theory of cyber sovereignty. PRISM 7 (2): 109–115. Hao, Yeli. 2017. A three-perspective theory of cyber sovereignty. PRISM 7 (2): 109–115.
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Hart, Jeffrey. 1976. Three approaches to the measurement of power in international relations. International Organization 30 (2): 289–305.CrossRef Hart, Jeffrey. 1976. Three approaches to the measurement of power in international relations. International Organization 30 (2): 289–305.CrossRef
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Harvey, Penelope. 2012. The topological quality of infrastructural relation: An ethnographic approach. Theory, Culture & Society 29 (4–5): 76–92.CrossRef Harvey, Penelope. 2012. The topological quality of infrastructural relation: An ethnographic approach. Theory, Culture & Society 29 (4–5): 76–92.CrossRef
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Hassid, Jonathan. 2020. Censorship, the media, and the market in China. Journal of Chinese Political Science 25: 285–309.CrossRef Hassid, Jonathan. 2020. Censorship, the media, and the market in China. Journal of Chinese Political Science 25: 285–309.CrossRef
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Herrera, Geoffrey L. 2002. The politics of bandwidth: International political implications of a global digital information network. Review of International Studies 28 (1): 93–122.CrossRef Herrera, Geoffrey L. 2002. The politics of bandwidth: International political implications of a global digital information network. Review of International Studies 28 (1): 93–122.CrossRef
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Hills, Jill. 1994. Dependency theory and its relevance today: International institutions in telecommunications and structural power. Review of International Studies 20 (2): 169–186.CrossRef Hills, Jill. 1994. Dependency theory and its relevance today: International institutions in telecommunications and structural power. Review of International Studies 20 (2): 169–186.CrossRef
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Hong, Yu and Eric Harwit. 2020. China’s globalizing internet: history, power, and governance. Chinese Journal of Communication 13 (1): 1–7. Hong, Yu and Eric Harwit. 2020. China’s globalizing internet: history, power, and governance. Chinese Journal of Communication 13 (1): 1–7.
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang, Keman, Stuart Madnick, Fang Zhang, et al. 2022. Varieties of public–private co-governance on cybersecurity within the digital trade: Implications from Huawei’s 5G. Journal of Chinese Governance 7 (1): 81–110.CrossRef Huang, Keman, Stuart Madnick, Fang Zhang, et al. 2022. Varieties of public–private co-governance on cybersecurity within the digital trade: Implications from Huawei’s 5G. Journal of Chinese Governance 7 (1): 81–110.CrossRef
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Jasanoff, Sheila. 2006. Biotechnology and empire: The global power of seeds and science. Osiris 21 (1): 273–292.CrossRef Jasanoff, Sheila. 2006. Biotechnology and empire: The global power of seeds and science. Osiris 21 (1): 273–292.CrossRef
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones, Charles I. and Christopher Tonettil. 2020. Nonrivalry and the economics of data. American Economic Review 110 (9): 2819–2858.CrossRef Jones, Charles I. and Christopher Tonettil. 2020. Nonrivalry and the economics of data. American Economic Review 110 (9): 2819–2858.CrossRef
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Keane, Michael, and Yu. Haiqing. 2019. A digital empire in the making: China’s outbound digital platforms. International Journal of Communication 13: 4624–4641. Keane, Michael, and Yu. Haiqing. 2019. A digital empire in the making: China’s outbound digital platforms. International Journal of Communication 13: 4624–4641.
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Kennedy, Andrew B., and Darren J. Lim. 2018. The innovation imperative: Technology and US–China rivalry in the twenty-first century. International Affairs 94 (3): 553–572.CrossRef Kennedy, Andrew B., and Darren J. Lim. 2018. The innovation imperative: Technology and US–China rivalry in the twenty-first century. International Affairs 94 (3): 553–572.CrossRef
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Keohane, Robert O., and Joseph S. Nye. 1998. Power and interdependence in the information age. Foreign Affairs 77 (5): 81–94.CrossRef Keohane, Robert O., and Joseph S. Nye. 1998. Power and interdependence in the information age. Foreign Affairs 77 (5): 81–94.CrossRef
66.
Zurück zum Zitat Hansen, Hans Krause and Tony Porter. 2017. What do big data do in global governance. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 23 (1): 31–42.CrossRef Hansen, Hans Krause and Tony Porter. 2017. What do big data do in global governance. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 23 (1): 31–42.CrossRef
67.
Zurück zum Zitat Krause, Theresa and Doris Fischer. 2021. Data as the new driver for growth? European and Chinese perspectives on the new factor of production. Chair of China Business and Economics (CBE), Research Note 1/2021. Available at https://d-nb.info/1229838236/34. Krause, Theresa and Doris Fischer. 2021. Data as the new driver for growth? European and Chinese perspectives on the new factor of production. Chair of China Business and Economics (CBE), Research Note 1/2021. Available at https://​d-nb.​info/​1229838236/​34.
68.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuehl, Daniel T. 2009. From cyberspace to cyberpower: Defining the problem. In Cyberpower and national security, ed. Franklin D. Kramer, Stuart H. Starr, and Larry K. Wentz, 24–42. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. Kuehl, Daniel T. 2009. From cyberspace to cyberpower: Defining the problem. In Cyberpower and national security, ed. Franklin D. Kramer, Stuart H. Starr, and Larry K. Wentz, 24–42. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
70.
Zurück zum Zitat Lambach, Daniel. 2020. The Territorialization of cyberspace. International Studies Review 22 (3): 482–506.CrossRef Lambach, Daniel. 2020. The Territorialization of cyberspace. International Studies Review 22 (3): 482–506.CrossRef
72.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee, Kai-Fu. 2018. AI superpowers: China, Silicon Valley, and the new world order. Boston, New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Lee, Kai-Fu. 2018. AI superpowers: China, Silicon Valley, and the new world order. Boston, New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
73.
Zurück zum Zitat Lindsay, Jon R. 2014. The impact of China on cybersecurity: Fiction and friction. International Security 39 (3): 7–47.CrossRef Lindsay, Jon R. 2014. The impact of China on cybersecurity: Fiction and friction. International Security 39 (3): 7–47.CrossRef
74.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu, Jinhe. 2020. China’s data localization. Chinese Journal of Communication 13 (1): 84–103.CrossRef Liu, Jinhe. 2020. China’s data localization. Chinese Journal of Communication 13 (1): 84–103.CrossRef
75.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu, Lizhi. 2021. The rise of data politics: Digital China and the world. Studies in Comparative International Development 56: 45–67.CrossRef Liu, Lizhi. 2021. The rise of data politics: Digital China and the world. Studies in Comparative International Development 56: 45–67.CrossRef
76.
Zurück zum Zitat Ma, Liang and Xia Wu. 2020. Citizen engagement and co-production of e-government services in China. Journal of Chinese Governance 5 (1): 68–89.CrossRef Ma, Liang and Xia Wu. 2020. Citizen engagement and co-production of e-government services in China. Journal of Chinese Governance 5 (1): 68–89.CrossRef
77.
Zurück zum Zitat MacKinnon, Rebecca. 2011. Liberation technology: China’s “networked authoritarianism”. Journal of Democracy 22 (2): 32–46.CrossRef MacKinnon, Rebecca. 2011. Liberation technology: China’s “networked authoritarianism”. Journal of Democracy 22 (2): 32–46.CrossRef
78.
Zurück zum Zitat Mahrenbach, Laura C., Katja Mayer, and Jürgen Pfeffer. 2018. Policy visions of big data: Views from the global south. Third World Quarterly 39 (10): 1861–1882.CrossRef Mahrenbach, Laura C., Katja Mayer, and Jürgen Pfeffer. 2018. Policy visions of big data: Views from the global south. Third World Quarterly 39 (10): 1861–1882.CrossRef
79.
Zurück zum Zitat Mann, Michael. 1984. The autonomous power of the state: Its origins, mechanisms and results. Archives Européennes de Sociologie 25 (2): 185–213.CrossRef Mann, Michael. 1984. The autonomous power of the state: Its origins, mechanisms and results. Archives Européennes de Sociologie 25 (2): 185–213.CrossRef
80.
Zurück zum Zitat Mann, Michael. 2008. Infrastructural power revisited. Studies in Comparative International Development 43 (3): 355–365.CrossRef Mann, Michael. 2008. Infrastructural power revisited. Studies in Comparative International Development 43 (3): 355–365.CrossRef
81.
Zurück zum Zitat Mao, Weizhun and Yishen Liu. 2020. Data nationalism: Driving logic and policy implications. Global Review 6: 20–42. Mao, Weizhun and Yishen Liu. 2020. Data nationalism: Driving logic and policy implications. Global Review 6: 20–42.
83.
Zurück zum Zitat Marr, Bernard. 2015. Big Data: Using SMART big data, analytics and metrics to make better decisions and improve performance. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. Marr, Bernard. 2015. Big Data: Using SMART big data, analytics and metrics to make better decisions and improve performance. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
84.
Zurück zum Zitat Mayer-Schönberger, Viktor and Kenneth Cukier. 2013. Big data: A revolution that will transform how wInstitute of European Studiese live, work, and think. Boston, Massachusetts: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Mayer-Schönberger, Viktor and Kenneth Cukier. 2013. Big data: A revolution that will transform how wInstitute of European Studiese live, work, and think. Boston, Massachusetts: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
85.
Zurück zum Zitat Mayer, Maximilian, and Michele Acuto. 2015. The global governance of large technical systems. Millennium 43 (2): 660–683.CrossRef Mayer, Maximilian, and Michele Acuto. 2015. The global governance of large technical systems. Millennium 43 (2): 660–683.CrossRef
86.
Zurück zum Zitat Mayer, Maximilian, Mariana Carpes, and Ruth Knoblich. 2014. The global politics of science and technology: An introduction. In The global politics of science and technology – Vol.1, ed. Maximilian Mayer, Mariana Carpes, and Ruth Knoblich, 1–35. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. Mayer, Maximilian, Mariana Carpes, and Ruth Knoblich. 2014. The global politics of science and technology: An introduction. In The global politics of science and technology – Vol.1, ed. Maximilian Mayer, Mariana Carpes, and Ruth Knoblich, 1–35. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
87.
Zurück zum Zitat Mayer, Maximilian. 2020. China’s authoritarian internet and digital orientalism. In Redesigning Organizations: Concepts for the Connected Society, ed. Denise Feldner, 177–192. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRef Mayer, Maximilian. 2020. China’s authoritarian internet and digital orientalism. In Redesigning Organizations: Concepts for the Connected Society, ed. Denise Feldner, 177–192. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRef
88.
Zurück zum Zitat Mori, Satoru. 2019. US technological competition with China: The military, industrial and digital network dimensions. Asia-Pacific Review 26 (1): 77–120.CrossRef Mori, Satoru. 2019. US technological competition with China: The military, industrial and digital network dimensions. Asia-Pacific Review 26 (1): 77–120.CrossRef
89.
Zurück zum Zitat Mueller, Milton L. 2010. Networks and states. The global politics of internet governance. MIT Press.CrossRef Mueller, Milton L. 2010. Networks and states. The global politics of internet governance. MIT Press.CrossRef
90.
Zurück zum Zitat Mueller, Milton L. 2020. Against sovereignty in cyberspace. International Studies Review 22 (4): 779–801.CrossRef Mueller, Milton L. 2020. Against sovereignty in cyberspace. International Studies Review 22 (4): 779–801.CrossRef
91.
Zurück zum Zitat Munn, Luke. 2020. Red territory: Forging infrastructural power. Territory, Politics, Governance: 1–20. Munn, Luke. 2020. Red territory: Forging infrastructural power. Territory, Politics, Governance: 1–20.
92.
Zurück zum Zitat Naughton, Barry. 2020. Chinese industrial policy and the digital silk road: The case of Alibaba in Malaysia. Asia Policy 15 (1): 23–39.CrossRef Naughton, Barry. 2020. Chinese industrial policy and the digital silk road: The case of Alibaba in Malaysia. Asia Policy 15 (1): 23–39.CrossRef
94.
Zurück zum Zitat Nye, Joseph S. 2011. The future of power. New York: PublicAffairs. Nye, Joseph S. 2011. The future of power. New York: PublicAffairs.
95.
96.
Zurück zum Zitat Plantin, Jean-Christophe and Aswin Punathambekar. 2019. Digital media infrastructures: Pipes, platforms, and politics. Media, Culture & Society 41 (2): 163–174.CrossRef Plantin, Jean-Christophe and Aswin Punathambekar. 2019. Digital media infrastructures: Pipes, platforms, and politics. Media, Culture & Society 41 (2): 163–174.CrossRef
97.
Zurück zum Zitat Plantin, Jean-Christophe and Gabriele de Seta. 2019. WeChat as infrastructure: The techno-nationalist shaping of Chinese digital platforms. Chinese Journal of Communication 12 (3): 257–273.CrossRef Plantin, Jean-Christophe and Gabriele de Seta. 2019. WeChat as infrastructure: The techno-nationalist shaping of Chinese digital platforms. Chinese Journal of Communication 12 (3): 257–273.CrossRef
100.
Zurück zum Zitat Qiang, Xiao. 2019. The road to digital unfreedom: President Xi’s surveillance state. Journal of Democracy 30 (1): 53–67.CrossRef Qiang, Xiao. 2019. The road to digital unfreedom: President Xi’s surveillance state. Journal of Democracy 30 (1): 53–67.CrossRef
102.
Zurück zum Zitat Rafik, Meriem. 2021. Data sovereignty: New challenges for diplomacy. In Artificial Intelligence and Digital Diplomacy, ed. Fatima Roumate, 33–43. Cham: Springer.CrossRef Rafik, Meriem. 2021. Data sovereignty: New challenges for diplomacy. In Artificial Intelligence and Digital Diplomacy, ed. Fatima Roumate, 33–43. Cham: Springer.CrossRef
103.
Zurück zum Zitat Raven, Bertram H. 1965. Social influence and power. In Current studies in social psychology, ed. Ivan Steiner and Martin Fishbein, 371–382. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Raven, Bertram H. 1965. Social influence and power. In Current studies in social psychology, ed. Ivan Steiner and Martin Fishbein, 371–382. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
105.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenau, James N., and J.P. Singh, eds. 2002. Information technologies and global politics: The changing scope of power and governance. State University of New York Press. Rosenau, James N., and J.P. Singh, eds. 2002. Information technologies and global politics: The changing scope of power and governance. State University of New York Press.
108.
Zurück zum Zitat Rowley, Jennifer. 1998. What is information? Information Services and Use 18 (4): 243–254.CrossRef Rowley, Jennifer. 1998. What is information? Information Services and Use 18 (4): 243–254.CrossRef
110.
Zurück zum Zitat Rühlig, Tim. 2021. The shape of things to come: The race to control technical standardisation. European Chamber in partnership with the Swedish Institute of International Affairs. Rühlig, Tim. 2021. The shape of things to come: The race to control technical standardisation. European Chamber in partnership with the Swedish Institute of International Affairs.
111.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruppert, Evelyn, Engin Isin, and Didier Bigo. 2017. Data politics. Big Data & Society 4 (2): 1–7.CrossRef Ruppert, Evelyn, Engin Isin, and Didier Bigo. 2017. Data politics. Big Data & Society 4 (2): 1–7.CrossRef
113.
Zurück zum Zitat Sadowski, Jathan. 2019. When data is capital: Datafication, accumulation, and extraction. Big Data & Society 6 (1): 1–12.CrossRef Sadowski, Jathan. 2019. When data is capital: Datafication, accumulation, and extraction. Big Data & Society 6 (1): 1–12.CrossRef
114.
Zurück zum Zitat Schiller, Dan. 2011. Geopolitical-economic conflict and network infrastructures. Chinese Journal of Communication 4 (1): 90–107.CrossRef Schiller, Dan. 2011. Geopolitical-economic conflict and network infrastructures. Chinese Journal of Communication 4 (1): 90–107.CrossRef
115.
Zurück zum Zitat Schindler, Seth, Jessica DiCarlo, and Dinesh Paudel. 2021. The new cold war and the rise of the 21st century infrastructure state. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 47 (2): 331–346. Schindler, Seth, Jessica DiCarlo, and Dinesh Paudel. 2021. The new cold war and the rise of the 21st century infrastructure state. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 47 (2): 331–346.
116.
Zurück zum Zitat Segal, Adam. 2020. China’s vision for cyber sovereignty and the global governance of cyberspace. In An Emerging China-Centric Order. China’s Vision for a New World Order in Practice, ed. Nadège Rolland, 86–100. NBR Special Report no. 87. Washington, DC: The National Bureau of Asian Research. Segal, Adam. 2020. China’s vision for cyber sovereignty and the global governance of cyberspace. In An Emerging China-Centric Order. China’s Vision for a New World Order in Practice, ed. Nadège Rolland, 86–100. NBR Special Report no. 87. Washington, DC: The National Bureau of Asian Research.
117.
Zurück zum Zitat Sharma, Munish. 2016. China’s emergence as a cyber power. Journal of Defence Studies 10 (1): 43–68. Sharma, Munish. 2016. China’s emergence as a cyber power. Journal of Defence Studies 10 (1): 43–68.
119.
Zurück zum Zitat Shen, Hong. 2018. Building a digital silk road? Situating the internet in China’s belt and road initiative. International Journal of Communication 12: 2683–2701. Shen, Hong. 2018. Building a digital silk road? Situating the internet in China’s belt and road initiative. International Journal of Communication 12: 2683–2701.
121.
Zurück zum Zitat Singh, J.P. 2013. Information technologies, Meta-power, and transformations in global politics. International Studies Review 15 (1): 5–29.CrossRef Singh, J.P. 2013. Information technologies, Meta-power, and transformations in global politics. International Studies Review 15 (1): 5–29.CrossRef
122.
Zurück zum Zitat Slaughter, Matthew J. and David H. McCormick. 2021. Data is power. Washington needs to craft new rules for the digital age. Foreign Affairs 100 (3): 54–63. Slaughter, Matthew J. and David H. McCormick. 2021. Data is power. Washington needs to craft new rules for the digital age. Foreign Affairs 100 (3): 54–63.
123.
Zurück zum Zitat Soifer, Hillel. 2008. State infrastructural power: Approaches to conceptualization and measurement. Studies in Comparative International Development 43: 231–251.CrossRef Soifer, Hillel. 2008. State infrastructural power: Approaches to conceptualization and measurement. Studies in Comparative International Development 43: 231–251.CrossRef
132.
Zurück zum Zitat Stevenson, Christopher. 2007. Breaching the great firewall: China’s internet censorship and the quest for freedom of expression in a connected world. Boston College International and Comparative Law Review 30 (2): 531–558. Stevenson, Christopher. 2007. Breaching the great firewall: China’s internet censorship and the quest for freedom of expression in a connected world. Boston College International and Comparative Law Review 30 (2): 531–558.
133.
Zurück zum Zitat Strange, Susan. 1987. The persistent myth of lost hegemony. International Organization 41 (4): 551–574.CrossRef Strange, Susan. 1987. The persistent myth of lost hegemony. International Organization 41 (4): 551–574.CrossRef
134.
Zurück zum Zitat Strange, Susan. 1988. States and markets. Second ed. London: Pinter Publishers. Strange, Susan. 1988. States and markets. Second ed. London: Pinter Publishers.
135.
Zurück zum Zitat Suzuki, Kazuto. 2021. U.S.-China technological hegemony and Japan’s economic security. Policy Brief 13. The Global Governance Programme, EU-Asia project. Retrieved from Cadmus, European University Institute Research Repository. Available at https://hdl.handle.net/1814/70602. Accessed 18 July 2022. Suzuki, Kazuto. 2021. U.S.-China technological hegemony and Japan’s economic security. Policy Brief 13. The Global Governance Programme, EU-Asia project. Retrieved from Cadmus, European University Institute Research Repository. Available at https://​hdl.​handle.​net/​1814/​70602. Accessed 18 July 2022.
136.
Zurück zum Zitat Tang, Min. 2020. Huawei versus the United States? The geopolitics of exterritorial internet infrastructure. International Journal of Communication 14: 4556–4577. Tang, Min. 2020. Huawei versus the United States? The geopolitics of exterritorial internet infrastructure. International Journal of Communication 14: 4556–4577.
139.
Zurück zum Zitat Ullah, Atta, Chen Pinglu, Saif Ullah, et al. 2020. The role of E-governance in combating COVID-19 and promoting sustainable development: A comparative study of China and Pakistan. Chinese Political Science Review 6 (1): 86–118.CrossRef Ullah, Atta, Chen Pinglu, Saif Ullah, et al. 2020. The role of E-governance in combating COVID-19 and promoting sustainable development: A comparative study of China and Pakistan. Chinese Political Science Review 6 (1): 86–118.CrossRef
140.
Zurück zum Zitat Voelsen, D. 2021. Internet aus dem Weltraum: Wie neuartige Satellitenverbindungen die globale Internet-Governance verändern könnten. Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik-Studies. Voelsen, D. 2021. Internet aus dem Weltraum: Wie neuartige Satellitenverbindungen die globale Internet-Governance verändern könnten. Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik-Studies.
141.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang, You and Dinging Chen. 2018. Rising Sino-US competition in artificial intelligence. China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies 4 (2): 241–258.CrossRef Wang, You and Dinging Chen. 2018. Rising Sino-US competition in artificial intelligence. China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies 4 (2): 241–258.CrossRef
142.
Zurück zum Zitat Weber, Steven. 2017. Data, development, and growth. Business and Politics 19 (3): 397–423.CrossRef Weber, Steven. 2017. Data, development, and growth. Business and Politics 19 (3): 397–423.CrossRef
145.
Zurück zum Zitat Westermeier, Carola. 2020. Money is data – The platformization of financial transactions. Information, Communication & Society 23 (14): 2047–2063.CrossRef Westermeier, Carola. 2020. Money is data – The platformization of financial transactions. Information, Communication & Society 23 (14): 2047–2063.CrossRef
147.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu, Fei, Lu Cewu, Mingjie Zhu, et al. 2020. Towards a new generation of artificial intelligence in China. Nature Machine Intelligence 2: 312–316.CrossRef Wu, Fei, Lu Cewu, Mingjie Zhu, et al. 2020. Towards a new generation of artificial intelligence in China. Nature Machine Intelligence 2: 312–316.CrossRef
148.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu, Tim. 2010. The master switch: The rise and fall of information empires. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. Wu, Tim. 2010. The master switch: The rise and fall of information empires. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
151.
Zurück zum Zitat Yan, Xuetong. 2020. Bipolar rivalry in the early digital age. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 13 (3): 313–341.CrossRef Yan, Xuetong. 2020. Bipolar rivalry in the early digital age. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 13 (3): 313–341.CrossRef
152.
Zurück zum Zitat Zeng, Jinghan. 2020. Artificial intelligence and China’s authoritarian governance. International Affairs 96 (6): 1441–1459.CrossRef Zeng, Jinghan. 2020. Artificial intelligence and China’s authoritarian governance. International Affairs 96 (6): 1441–1459.CrossRef
153.
Zurück zum Zitat Zeng, Jinghan. 2021. Securitization of artificial intelligence in China. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 14 (3): 417–445.CrossRef Zeng, Jinghan. 2021. Securitization of artificial intelligence in China. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 14 (3): 417–445.CrossRef
154.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang, Li. 2012. A Chinese perspective on cyber war. International Review of the Red Cross 94 (886): 801–807.CrossRef Zhang, Li. 2012. A Chinese perspective on cyber war. International Review of the Red Cross 94 (886): 801–807.CrossRef
155.
Zurück zum Zitat Zins, Chaim. 2007. Conceptual approaches for defining data, information, and knowledge. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58 (4): 479–493.CrossRef Zins, Chaim. 2007. Conceptual approaches for defining data, information, and knowledge. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58 (4): 479–493.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Power in the Age of Datafication: Exploring China’s Global Data Power
verfasst von
Ying Huang
Maximilian Mayer
Publikationsdatum
28.07.2022
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Chinese Political Science / Ausgabe 1/2023
Print ISSN: 1080-6954
Elektronische ISSN: 1874-6357
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-022-09816-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2023

Journal of Chinese Political Science 1/2023 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner