Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 4/2014

01.04.2014 | UNEP/SETAC CORNER

Global guidance on environmental life cycle impact assessment indicators: findings of the scoping phase

verfasst von: Olivier Jolliet, Rolf Frischknecht, Jane Bare, Anne-Marie Boulay, Cecile Bulle, Peter Fantke, Shabbir Gheewala, Michael Hauschild, Norihiro Itsubo, Manuele Margni, Thomas E. McKone, Llorenç Mila y Canals, Leo Postuma, Valentina Prado-Lopez, Brad Ridoutt, Guido Sonnemann, Ralph K. Rosenbaum, Tom Seager, Jaap Struijs, Rosalie van Zelm, Bruce Vigon, Annie Weisbrod, with contributions of the other workshop participants

Erschienen in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment | Ausgabe 4/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Excerpt

During Phase 1 (2002–2007) of the Life Cycle Initiative, work was intensively conducted on developing an initial framework (Jolliet et al. 2004) and contributed to the development of first-stage harmonized LCIA tools such as the USEtox model for life cycle toxicity impact assessment (Hauschild et al. 2008). Activities in Phase 2 (2007–2012) similarly addressed carbon footprint, water use and land use impact assessment throughout the life cycle (Bayart et al. 2010; Koellner et al. 2013; Kounina et al. 2013). In parallel, and also building on these activities, a number of other initiatives have been advancing proposals and dissemination of impact assessment indicators in various continents (Hauschild et al. 2013; Murakami et al. 2012). With the globalization of our economy, there has been a steadily growing need to create a worldwide consensus set of environmental impact category indicators embedded in a consistent methodological framework. Such a set is expected to be used in particular in environmental product information schemes, benchmarking in industry sectors, corporate reporting by companies, intergovernmental and/or national environmental policies and common LCA work commissioned by governments and companies. …

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
The mini-workshop was held in conjunction with the International Symposium of Sustainable Systems and Technology (ISSST), on 16 May 2013 (http://​issst2014.​net/​).
 
2
A Pellston workshop is an intensive, week-long event format developed by the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) in the 1970s. Each of the more than 50 such workshops held to date has adhered to the same structure, format and ground rules. Among these are the requirements that each of the invited participants agrees to engage as an individual expert, not as a representative of an organization, participate for the entire duration, contribute to a major publication derived from the effort and respect the consensus-building process employed during the conduct of the workshop. SETAC Pellston workshops have produced seminal publications across a variety of environmental science topics and issues, including five such publications on LCA.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Bayart JB, Bulle C, Deschenes L, Margni M, Pfister S, Vince F, Koehler A (2010) A framework for assessing off-stream freshwater use in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:439–453CrossRef Bayart JB, Bulle C, Deschenes L, Margni M, Pfister S, Vince F, Koehler A (2010) A framework for assessing off-stream freshwater use in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:439–453CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hauschild M, Huijbregts M, Jolliet O, Margni M, MacLeod M, van de Meent D, Rosenbaum R, McKone T (2008) Building a model based on scientific consensus for life cycle impact: assessment of chemicals: the search for harmony and parsimony. Environ Sci Technol 42(19):7032–7036CrossRef Hauschild M, Huijbregts M, Jolliet O, Margni M, MacLeod M, van de Meent D, Rosenbaum R, McKone T (2008) Building a model based on scientific consensus for life cycle impact: assessment of chemicals: the search for harmony and parsimony. Environ Sci Technol 42(19):7032–7036CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hauschild M, Goedkoop M, Guinée J, Heijungs R, Huijbregts M, Jolliet O, Margni M, De Schryver A, Humbert S, Laurent A, Sala S, Pant R (2013) Identifying best existing practice for characterization modelling in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(3):683–697CrossRef Hauschild M, Goedkoop M, Guinée J, Heijungs R, Huijbregts M, Jolliet O, Margni M, De Schryver A, Humbert S, Laurent A, Sala S, Pant R (2013) Identifying best existing practice for characterization modelling in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(3):683–697CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jolliet O, Mueller-Wenk R, Bare J, Brent A, Goedkoop M, Heijungs R, Itsubo N, Peña C, Pennington D, Potting J, Rebitzer G, Stewart M, Udo de Haes H, Weidema B (2004) The life cycle impact assessment framework of the UNEP-SETAC life cycle initiative. Int J Life Cycle Assess 9(6):394–404CrossRef Jolliet O, Mueller-Wenk R, Bare J, Brent A, Goedkoop M, Heijungs R, Itsubo N, Peña C, Pennington D, Potting J, Rebitzer G, Stewart M, Udo de Haes H, Weidema B (2004) The life cycle impact assessment framework of the UNEP-SETAC life cycle initiative. Int J Life Cycle Assess 9(6):394–404CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Koellner T, De Baan L, Beck T, Brandão M, Civit B, Margni M, Canals LMI, Saad R, De Souza DM, Müller-Wenk R (2013) UNEP-SETAC guideline on global land use impact assessment on biodiversity and ecosystem services in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(6):1188–1202CrossRef Koellner T, De Baan L, Beck T, Brandão M, Civit B, Margni M, Canals LMI, Saad R, De Souza DM, Müller-Wenk R (2013) UNEP-SETAC guideline on global land use impact assessment on biodiversity and ecosystem services in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(6):1188–1202CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kounina A, Margni M, Bayard JB, Boulay AM, Berger M, Bulle C, Frischknecht KA, Mila-i-Canals L, Motoshita M, Nunez M, Peters G, Pfister S, Ridoutt B, van Zelm R, Verones F, Humbert S (2013) Review of methods addressing freshwater availability in life cycle inventory and impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:707–721CrossRef Kounina A, Margni M, Bayard JB, Boulay AM, Berger M, Bulle C, Frischknecht KA, Mila-i-Canals L, Motoshita M, Nunez M, Peters G, Pfister S, Ridoutt B, van Zelm R, Verones F, Humbert S (2013) Review of methods addressing freshwater availability in life cycle inventory and impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:707–721CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, Danaei G, Shibuya K et al (2012) A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet 380:2224–2260CrossRef Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, Danaei G, Shibuya K et al (2012) A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet 380:2224–2260CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Murakami K, Itsubo N, Kuriyama K, Yoshida K, Tokimatsu K (2012) Development of global scale weighting factors in LIME3. Proceedings of the International Conference on Ecobalance, D2–05, Yokohama, Japan, P-118 Murakami K, Itsubo N, Kuriyama K, Yoshida K, Tokimatsu K (2012) Development of global scale weighting factors in LIME3. Proceedings of the International Conference on Ecobalance, D2–05, Yokohama, Japan, P-118
Zurück zum Zitat Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin FS, Lambin EF, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber HJ, Nykvist B, de Wit CA, Hughes T, van der Leeuw S, Rodhe H, Sörlin S, Snyder PK, Costanza R, Svedin U, Falkenmark M, Karlberg L, Corell RW, Fabry VJ, Hansen J, Walker B, Liverman D, Richardson K, Crutzen P, Foley JA (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461:472–475CrossRef Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin FS, Lambin EF, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber HJ, Nykvist B, de Wit CA, Hughes T, van der Leeuw S, Rodhe H, Sörlin S, Snyder PK, Costanza R, Svedin U, Falkenmark M, Karlberg L, Corell RW, Fabry VJ, Hansen J, Walker B, Liverman D, Richardson K, Crutzen P, Foley JA (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461:472–475CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Global guidance on environmental life cycle impact assessment indicators: findings of the scoping phase
verfasst von
Olivier Jolliet
Rolf Frischknecht
Jane Bare
Anne-Marie Boulay
Cecile Bulle
Peter Fantke
Shabbir Gheewala
Michael Hauschild
Norihiro Itsubo
Manuele Margni
Thomas E. McKone
Llorenç Mila y Canals
Leo Postuma
Valentina Prado-Lopez
Brad Ridoutt
Guido Sonnemann
Ralph K. Rosenbaum
Tom Seager
Jaap Struijs
Rosalie van Zelm
Bruce Vigon
Annie Weisbrod
with contributions of the other workshop participants
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2014
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment / Ausgabe 4/2014
Print ISSN: 0948-3349
Elektronische ISSN: 1614-7502
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0703-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2014

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 4/2014 Zur Ausgabe