Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Philosophy of Management 3/2018

26.10.2017

Who’s Afraid of Organization? Concepts, Process and Identity Thinking

verfasst von: Christian Garmann Johnsen

Erschienen in: Philosophy of Management | Ausgabe 3/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This article argues that we should not abandon the noun ‘organization’ in favour of the verb ‘organizing’ in order to capture processes of change, flow and movement, but instead explore how such processes reveal themselves when the concept of organization diverges from the objects it is supposed to encapsulate. Here I make use of Adorno’s critique of identity thinking in order to show how the experience of organizational phenomena remains trapped within a contradiction: concepts are needed to describe objects even though concepts can never fully exhaust the objects they describe. However, I maintain that it is precisely this discrepancy between concepts and objects that provides us the opportunity to experience the elusive state of organizations and their processual nature. Consequently, this article shows how organizational phenomena are always more complex, temporal and dynamic than what the concept of organization permits us to grasp.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Adorno, T.W. 1983. Negative dialectics. New York: Continuum. Adorno, T.W. 1983. Negative dialectics. New York: Continuum.
Zurück zum Zitat Adorno, T.W. 2002a. Introduction to sociology. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Adorno, T.W. 2002a. Introduction to sociology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Adorno, T.W. 2002b. Metaphysics: Concept and problems. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Adorno, T.W. 2002b. Metaphysics: Concept and problems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Adorno, T. W. (2006) Aesthetic theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Adorno, T. W. (2006) Aesthetic theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Adorno, T.W. 2008. Lectures on negative dialectics: Fragments of a lecture course 1965/1966. Cambridge: Polity. Adorno, T.W. 2008. Lectures on negative dialectics: Fragments of a lecture course 1965/1966. Cambridge: Polity.
Zurück zum Zitat Bakken, T., and T. Hernes. 2006. Organizing is both a verb and a noun: Weick meets whitehead. Organization Studies 27 (11): 1599–1616.CrossRef Bakken, T., and T. Hernes. 2006. Organizing is both a verb and a noun: Weick meets whitehead. Organization Studies 27 (11): 1599–1616.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Benson, J.K. 1977. Organizations: A dialectical view. Administrative Science Quarterly 22 (1): 1–21.CrossRef Benson, J.K. 1977. Organizations: A dialectical view. Administrative Science Quarterly 22 (1): 1–21.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bernstein, J.M. 2004. Negative dialectic as fate: Adorno and Hegel. In The Cambridge companion to Adorno, ed. T. Huhn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bernstein, J.M. 2004. Negative dialectic as fate: Adorno and Hegel. In The Cambridge companion to Adorno, ed. T. Huhn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Chia, R. 1995. From modern to postmodern organizational analysis. Organization Studies 16 (4): 579–604.CrossRef Chia, R. 1995. From modern to postmodern organizational analysis. Organization Studies 16 (4): 579–604.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chia, R. 1999. A “rhizomic” model of organizational change and transformation: Perspective from a metaphysics of change. British Journal of Management 10 (3): 209–227.CrossRef Chia, R. 1999. A “rhizomic” model of organizational change and transformation: Perspective from a metaphysics of change. British Journal of Management 10 (3): 209–227.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Clegg, S.R., M. Kornberger, and C. Rhodes. 2005. Learning/becoming/organizing. Organization 12 (2): 147–167.CrossRef Clegg, S.R., M. Kornberger, and C. Rhodes. 2005. Learning/becoming/organizing. Organization 12 (2): 147–167.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cooper, R. 1986. Organization/Disorganization. Social Science Information 25 (2): 299–335.CrossRef Cooper, R. 1986. Organization/Disorganization. Social Science Information 25 (2): 299–335.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cooper, R. 1998. Assemblage notes. In Organized worlds, ed. R. Chia, 131–180. London: Routledge. Cooper, R. 1998. Assemblage notes. In Organized worlds, ed. R. Chia, 131–180. London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Cooper, R. 2005. Peripheral vision: Relationality. Organization Studies 26 (11): 1689–1710.CrossRef Cooper, R. 2005. Peripheral vision: Relationality. Organization Studies 26 (11): 1689–1710.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cunliffe, A.L. 2008. Organization theory. Los Angeles and London: SAGE. Cunliffe, A.L. 2008. Organization theory. Los Angeles and London: SAGE.
Zurück zum Zitat Curtis, R. 2014. Foucault beyond Fairclough: From transcendental to immanent critique in organization studies. Organization Studies 35 (12): 1753–1772.CrossRef Curtis, R. 2014. Foucault beyond Fairclough: From transcendental to immanent critique in organization studies. Organization Studies 35 (12): 1753–1772.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Guthey, E., and B. Jackson. 2005. CEO portraits and the authenticity paradox. Journal of Management Studies 42 (5): 1057–1082.CrossRef Guthey, E., and B. Jackson. 2005. CEO portraits and the authenticity paradox. Journal of Management Studies 42 (5): 1057–1082.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hatch, M.J., and A.L. Cunliffe. 2013. Organization theory: Modern, symbolic and postmodern perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hatch, M.J., and A.L. Cunliffe. 2013. Organization theory: Modern, symbolic and postmodern perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Helin, J. 2015. Writing process after reading Bakhtin from theorized plots to unfinalizable “living” events. Journal of Management Inquiry 24 (2): 174–185.CrossRef Helin, J. 2015. Writing process after reading Bakhtin from theorized plots to unfinalizable “living” events. Journal of Management Inquiry 24 (2): 174–185.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Helin, J., T. Hernes, D. Hjorth, and R. Holt, eds. 2014. The Oxford handbook of process philosophy and organization studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Helin, J., T. Hernes, D. Hjorth, and R. Holt, eds. 2014. The Oxford handbook of process philosophy and organization studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Hernes, T. 2007. Understanding organization as process: Theory for a tangled world. London: Routledge.CrossRef Hernes, T. 2007. Understanding organization as process: Theory for a tangled world. London: Routledge.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hernes, T., and E. Weik. 2007. Organization as process: Drawing a line between endogenous and exogenous views. Scandinavian Journal of Management 23 (3): 251–264.CrossRef Hernes, T., and E. Weik. 2007. Organization as process: Drawing a line between endogenous and exogenous views. Scandinavian Journal of Management 23 (3): 251–264.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hirsch, M., and D.Z. Levin. 1999. Umbrella advocates versus validity police: A life-cycle model. Organization Science 10 (2): 199–212.CrossRef Hirsch, M., and D.Z. Levin. 1999. Umbrella advocates versus validity police: A life-cycle model. Organization Science 10 (2): 199–212.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jameson, F. 2007. Late marxism: Adorno, or, the persistence of the dialectic. London: Verso. Jameson, F. 2007. Late marxism: Adorno, or, the persistence of the dialectic. London: Verso.
Zurück zum Zitat Jarvis, S. 1998. Adorno: A critical introduction. New York: Routledge. Jarvis, S. 1998. Adorno: A critical introduction. New York: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat King, B.G., T. Felin, and D.A. Whetten. 2010. Perspective - finding the organization in organizational theory: A meta-theory of the organization as a social actor. Organization Science 21 (1): 290–305.CrossRef King, B.G., T. Felin, and D.A. Whetten. 2010. Perspective - finding the organization in organizational theory: A meta-theory of the organization as a social actor. Organization Science 21 (1): 290–305.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Linstead, S., and T. Thanem. 2007. Multiplicity, virtuality and organization: The contribution of Gilles Deleuze. Organization Studies 28 (10): 1483–1501.CrossRef Linstead, S., and T. Thanem. 2007. Multiplicity, virtuality and organization: The contribution of Gilles Deleuze. Organization Studies 28 (10): 1483–1501.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lopdrup-Hjorth, T. 2015. Object and objective lost? Journal of Cultural Economy 8 (4): 439–461.CrossRef Lopdrup-Hjorth, T. 2015. Object and objective lost? Journal of Cultural Economy 8 (4): 439–461.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mintzberg, H. 1983. Structure in fives: Designing effective organizations. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Mintzberg, H. 1983. Structure in fives: Designing effective organizations. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Zurück zum Zitat Munro, I., and C. Huber. 2012. Kafka’s mythology: Organization, bureaucracy and the limits of sensemaking. Human Relations 65 (4): 523–543.CrossRef Munro, I., and C. Huber. 2012. Kafka’s mythology: Organization, bureaucracy and the limits of sensemaking. Human Relations 65 (4): 523–543.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nayak, A. 2008. On the way to theory: A processual approach. Organization Studies 29 (2): 173–190.CrossRef Nayak, A. 2008. On the way to theory: A processual approach. Organization Studies 29 (2): 173–190.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Neimark, M., and T. Tinker. 1987. Identity and non-identity thinking: Dialectical critique of the transaction cost theory of the modern corporation. Journal of Management 13 (4): 661–673.CrossRef Neimark, M., and T. Tinker. 1987. Identity and non-identity thinking: Dialectical critique of the transaction cost theory of the modern corporation. Journal of Management 13 (4): 661–673.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat O’Doherty, D.P. 2007. The question of theoretical excess: Folly and fall in theorizing organization. Organization 14 (6): 837–867.CrossRef O’Doherty, D.P. 2007. The question of theoretical excess: Folly and fall in theorizing organization. Organization 14 (6): 837–867.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Parker, M. 2007. Organizing: Skyscrapers and multitudes. Critical Perspectives on International Business 3 (3): 220–225.CrossRef Parker, M. 2007. Organizing: Skyscrapers and multitudes. Critical Perspectives on International Business 3 (3): 220–225.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Parker, M. 2016. Secret societies: Intimations of organization. Organization Studies 37 (1): 99–113.CrossRef Parker, M. 2016. Secret societies: Intimations of organization. Organization Studies 37 (1): 99–113.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Reed, M. 2011. The post-bureaucratic organization and the control revolution. In Managing modernity: Beyond bureaucracy? ed. S.R. Clegg, M. Harris, and H. Höpfl. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Reed, M. 2011. The post-bureaucratic organization and the control revolution. In Managing modernity: Beyond bureaucracy? ed. S.R. Clegg, M. Harris, and H. Höpfl. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Rhodes, C. 2009. After reflexivity: Ethics, freedom and the writing of organization studies. Organization Studies 30 (6): 653–672.CrossRef Rhodes, C. 2009. After reflexivity: Ethics, freedom and the writing of organization studies. Organization Studies 30 (6): 653–672.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Robbins, S.P. 1990. Organization theory: Structures, designs and applications. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Robbins, S.P. 1990. Organization theory: Structures, designs and applications. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Zurück zum Zitat Scott, W.R. 1998. Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Scott, W.R. 1998. Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Zurück zum Zitat Shotter, J. 2006. Understanding process from within: An argument for ‘withness’-thinking. Organization Studies 27: 585–604.CrossRef Shotter, J. 2006. Understanding process from within: An argument for ‘withness’-thinking. Organization Studies 27: 585–604.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sørensen, B.M. 2004. Making events work: Or, how to multiply your crisis. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School. Sørensen, B.M. 2004. Making events work: Or, how to multiply your crisis. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School.
Zurück zum Zitat Spoelstra, S. 2007. What is organization? Lund: Lund University. Spoelstra, S. 2007. What is organization? Lund: Lund University.
Zurück zum Zitat Stone, A. 2014. Adorno, Hegel, and dialectic. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22: 1118–1141.CrossRef Stone, A. 2014. Adorno, Hegel, and dialectic. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22: 1118–1141.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tsoukas, H. 2005. Complex knowledge: Studies in organizational epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Tsoukas, H. 2005. Complex knowledge: Studies in organizational epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsoukas, H., and R. Chia. 2002. On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organization Science 13: 567–582.CrossRef Tsoukas, H., and R. Chia. 2002. On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organization Science 13: 567–582.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tsoukas, H., and C. Knudsen. 2005. The Oxford handbook of organization theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Tsoukas, H., and C. Knudsen. 2005. The Oxford handbook of organization theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Van de Ven, A.H., and M.S. Poole. 2005. Alternative approaches for studying organizational change. Organization Studies 26 (9): 1377–1404.CrossRef Van de Ven, A.H., and M.S. Poole. 2005. Alternative approaches for studying organizational change. Organization Studies 26 (9): 1377–1404.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Weick, K.E. 1979. The social psychology of organizing. New York: McGraw-Hill. Weick, K.E. 1979. The social psychology of organizing. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Zurück zum Zitat Weick, K.E. 1993. The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The mann gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly 38 (4): 628–652.CrossRef Weick, K.E. 1993. The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The mann gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly 38 (4): 628–652.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Weick, K.E. 1995. Sensemaking in organizations. London: Sage. Weick, K.E. 1995. Sensemaking in organizations. London: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Weick, K.E., K.M. Sutcliffe, and D. Obstfeld. 2005. Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science 16 (4): 409–421.CrossRef Weick, K.E., K.M. Sutcliffe, and D. Obstfeld. 2005. Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science 16 (4): 409–421.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Weik, E. 2011. In deep waters: Process theory between Scylla and Charybdis. Organization 18 (5): 655–672.CrossRef Weik, E. 2011. In deep waters: Process theory between Scylla and Charybdis. Organization 18 (5): 655–672.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Willmott, H. 2014. Conceptually grounded analysis: The elusive facticity and ethical upshot of “Organization”. In Critical management research: reflections from the field, ed. Emma Jeanes and Tony Huzzard. London: Sage. Willmott, H. 2014. Conceptually grounded analysis: The elusive facticity and ethical upshot of “Organization”. In Critical management research: reflections from the field, ed. Emma Jeanes and Tony Huzzard. London: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Zundel, M., R. Holt, and J. Cornelissen. 2013. Institutional work in the wire an ethological investigation of flexibility in organizational adaptation. Journal of Management Inquiry 22: 102–120.CrossRef Zundel, M., R. Holt, and J. Cornelissen. 2013. Institutional work in the wire an ethological investigation of flexibility in organizational adaptation. Journal of Management Inquiry 22: 102–120.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Who’s Afraid of Organization? Concepts, Process and Identity Thinking
verfasst von
Christian Garmann Johnsen
Publikationsdatum
26.10.2017
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Philosophy of Management / Ausgabe 3/2018
Print ISSN: 1740-3812
Elektronische ISSN: 2052-9597
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-017-0079-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2018

Philosophy of Management 3/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner