Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Superhydrophobic Coatings for the Protection of Natural Stone Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

6. Inorganic Nanomaterials for the Consolidation and Antifungal Protection of Stone Heritage

verfasst von : A. Sierra-Fernandez, L. S. Gomez-Villalba, S. C. De la Rosa-García, S. Gomez-Cornelio, P. Quintana, M.E. Rabanal, R. Fort

Erschienen in: Advanced Materials for the Conservation of Stone

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The degradation of stone cultural heritage represents an irreversible loss of rich cultural heritage, and seeking ways to preserve it is urgent. Among different degradation processes, the loss of stone cohesion and biodeterioration are two of the most common issues that affect stone substrates. To solve this, the introduction of nanotechnology in the cultural heritage preservation field has represented a great revolution. The reason is that a particle size reduction of materials to the nanoscale highly increases their effectiveness as stone treatments. Thereby, different nanomaterials have been developed and applied as consolidating products and protective coatings in stone artworks. Due to the increased compatibility of inorganic nanoparticles (NPs) with a large part of the built and sculptural heritage, this chapter accentuates the use of inorganic NPs for the consolidation and antifungal protection of stone heritage. Special focus is given to the factors that can influence the success of the treatment.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Compatible Mortars for the Sustainable Conservation of Stone in Masonries
Nächstes Kapitel Nanomaterials for the Consolidation of Stone Artifacts
Literatur
1.
Ruedrich J. Physical weathering of building stones induced by freeze-thaw action: a laboratory long-term study. Environ Earth Sci. 2011;63:1573–86.CrossRef
2.
Ákos T, Licha T, Simon K. Urban and rural limestone weathering; the contribution of dust to black crust formation. Environ Earth Sci. 2011;63:675–93.CrossRef
3.
Steiger M, Charola AE, Sterflinger K. Weathering and deterioration. In: Siegesmund S, Snethlage R, editors. Stone in architecture: properties, durability. Heidelberg: Springer; 2011. p. 227–316.CrossRef
4.
Cardell C, Delalieux F, Roumpopoulos A, Moropoulou A, Auger F, Van Grieken R. Salt-induced decay in calcareous stone monuments and buildings in a marine environment in SW France. Const Build Mater. 2003;17:165–79.CrossRef
5.
Scheerer S, Ortega-Morales O, Gaylarde C. Microbial deterioration of stone monuments-an updated overview. Adv Appl Microbiol. 2009;66:97–139.CrossRef
6.
Jain A, Bhadauria S, Kumar V, Chauhan RS. Biodeterioration of sandstone under the influence of different humidity levels in laboratory conditions. Build Environ. 2009;44:1276–84.CrossRef
7.
Campagna BA, Kumar R, Kumar AV. Biodeterioration of stone in tropical environments: an overview. Madison: The J. Paul Getty Trust; 2000.
8.
Doehne E, Price CA. Stone conservation. An overview of current research. 2nd ed. Los Angeles: Getty Publications; 2010.
9.
Delgado Rodrigues J. Consolidation of decayed stones. A delicate problem with few practical solutions. Proc Int Semin Hist Constr. 2001:3–14.
10.
Dornieden T, Gorbushina AA, Krumbein WE. Biodecay of cultural heritage as a space/time-related ecological situation-An evaluation of a series of studies. Int Biodeterior Biodegr. 2000;46:261–70.CrossRef
11.
Sterflinger K. Fungi: their role in deterioration of cultural heritage. Fungal Biol Rev. 2010;24:47–55.CrossRef
12.
Murty BS, Shankar P, Raj B, Rath BB, Murday J. Unique properties of nanomaterials. In: Murty BS, Shankar P, Raj B, Rath BB, Murday J, editors. Textbook of nanoscience and nanotechnology. Heidelberg: Springer; 2013. p. 29–65.CrossRef
13.
Guo D, Xie G, Luo J. Mechanical properties of nanoparticles: basics and applications. J Phys D Appl Phys. 2013;47:1–25.
14.
Savage T, Rao AM. Thermal properties of nanomaterials and nanocomposites. In: Tritt TM, editor. Thermal conductivity. Physics of solids and liquids. Boston: Springer; 2004. p. 261–84.
15.
La Russa MF, Macchia A, Ruffolo SA, De Leo F, Barberio M, Barone P, Crisci GM, Urzi C. Testing the antibacterial activity of doped TiO2 for preventing biodeterioration of cultural heritage building materials. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad. 2014;96:87–96.CrossRef
16.
Munafò P, Battista G, Quaglirini E. TiO2-based nanocoatings for preserving architectural stone surfaces: an overview. Const Build Mater. 2015;84:201–18.CrossRef
17.
Colangiuli D, Calia A, Bianco N. Novel multifunctional coatings with multifunctional coatings with photocatalytic and hydrophobic properties for the preservation of the stone building heritage. Const Build Mater. 2015;93:189–96.CrossRef
18.
Natali I, Tomasin P, Becherini F, Bernardi A, Ciantelli C, Favaro M, Favoni O, Forrat Pérez VJ, Olteanu ID, Romero Sanchez MD, Vivarelli A, Bonazza A. Innovative consolidating products for stone materials: field exposure tests as a valid approach for assessing durability. Heritage Sci. 2015;3:6.CrossRef
19.
Graziani G, Sassoni E, Franzoni E. Consolidation of porous carbonate stones by an innovative phosphate treatment: mechanical strengthening and physical-microstructural compatibility in comparison with TEOS-based treatments. Heritage Sci. 2015;3:1.CrossRef
20.
Sierra-Fernandez A, Gomez-Villalba LS, Rabanal ME, Fort R. New nanomaterials for applications in conservation and restoration of stony materials: a review. Mater Constr. 2017;67:107.CrossRef
21.
Buzea C, Pacheco I. Nanomaterials and their classification. In: Kumar Shukla A, editor. EMR/ESR/EPR spectroscopy for characterization of nanomaterials. India: Springer; 2017. p. 3–45.CrossRef
22.
Daraio C, Jin S. Synthesis and patterning methods for nanostructures useful for biological applications. In: Silva G, Parpura V, editors. Nanotechnology for biology and medicine. Fundamental biomedical technologies. New York: Springer; 2012. p. 27–44.CrossRef
23.
Chelazzi D, Poggi G, Jaidar Y, Toccafondi N, Giorgi R, Baglioni P. Hydroxide nanoparticles for cultural heritage: consolidation and protection of wall paintings and carbonate materials. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2013;392:42–9.CrossRef
24.
Öner D, McCarthy TJ. Ultrahydrophobic surfaces. Effects of topography length scales on wettability. Langmuir. 2000;20:7777–82.CrossRef
25.
Fan M, Andrade GFS, Brolo AG. A review on the fabrication of substrates for surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy and their applications in analytical chemistry. Anal Chim Acta. 2011;693:7–25.CrossRef
26.
Ali G, Kim HJ, Kum JM, Cho SO. Rapid synthesis of TiO2 nanoparticles by electrochemical anodization of a Ti wire. Nanotechnology. 2013;24:185601.CrossRef
27.
Giorgi R, Dei L, Ceccato M, Schettino C, Baglioni P. Nanotechnologies for conservation of cultural heritage: paper and canvas deacidification. Langmuir. 2002;18:8198–203.CrossRef
28.
Poggi G, Toccafondi N, Melita LN, Knowles JC, Bozec L, Giorgi R, Baglioni P. Calcium hydroxide nanoparticles for the conservation of cultural heritage: new formulations for the deacidification of cellulose-based artifacts. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process. 2014;114:685–93.CrossRef
29.
Sierra-Fernandez A, Gomez-Villalba LS, Milosevic O, Fort R, Rabanal ME. Synthesis and morphostructural characterization of nanostructured magnesium hydroxide nanostructured magnesium hydroxide obtained by a hydrothermal method. Ceram Int. 2014;40:12285–92.CrossRef
30.
Gómez-Ortiz N, De la Rosa-García S, González-Gómez W, Soria-Castro M, Quintana P, Oskam G, Ortega-Morales B. Antifungal coatings based on Ca(OH)2 mixed with ZnO/TiO2 nanomaterials for protection of limestone monuments. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2013;5:1556–65.CrossRef
31.
Sierra-Fernandez A, De la Rosa-García S, Gomez-Villalba LS, Gómez-Cornelio S, Rabanal ME, Fort R, Quintana P. Synthesis, photocatalytic and antifungal properties of MgO, ZnO and Zn/Mg Oxide Nanoparticles for the protection of calcareous stone heritage. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9:24873–86.CrossRef
32.
Taglieri G, Daniele V, Del Re G, Volpe R. A new and original method to produce Ca(OH)2 nanoparticles by using and anion exchange resin. Adv Nanopart. 2015;4:17–24.CrossRef
33.
Cueto M, Sanz M, Ouija M, Gámez F, Martínez-Haya B, Castillejo M. Platinum nanoparticles prepared by laser ablation in aqueous solutions: fabrication and application to laser desorption ionization. J Phys Chem C. 2011;45:22217–24.CrossRef
34.
Saoud KM, Ibala I, El Ladki D, Ezzeldeen O, Saeed S. Microwave assisted preparation of calcium hydroxide and barium hydroxide nanoparticles and their application for conservation of cultural heritage. In: Ionnides M, Magnetat-Thalmann N, Fink E, Zarnic R, Yen AY, Quak E, editors. Digital heritage. Progress in cultural heritage: documentation, preservation, and protection. Switzerland: Springer; 2014. p. 342–52.
35.
Flores G, Carrillo J, Luna JA, Martínez R, Sierra-Fernandez A, Milosevic O, Rabanal ME. Synthesis, characterization and photocatalytic properties of nanostructured ZnO particles obtained by low temperature air-assisted-USP. Adv Powder Tecnol. 2014;25:1435–41.CrossRef
36.
Gregorczyk K, Knez M. Hybrid nanomaterials through molecular and atomic layer deposition: top down, bottom up, and in-between approaches to new materials. Prog Mater Sci. 2016;75:1–37.CrossRef
37.
Marquardt AE, Breitung EM, Drayman-Weisser T, Gates G, Phaneuf RJ. Protecting silver cultural heritage objects with atomic layer deposited corrosion barriers. Heritage Sci. 2015;3:37.CrossRef
38.
Taglieri G, Mondelli C, Daniele V, Pusceddu E, Trapananti A. Synthesis and X-ray diffraction analyses of calcium hydroxide nanoparticles in aqueous suspension. Adv Mater Phys Chem. 2013;3:108–12.CrossRef
39.
Rodriguez-Navarro C, Suzuki A, Ruiz-Agudo E. Alcohol dispersions of calcium hydroxide nanoparticles for stone conservation. Langmuir. 2013;29:11457–70.CrossRef
40.
Narayanan T, Wacklin H, Konovalov O, Lund R. Recent applications of synchrotron radiation and neutrons in the study of soft matter. Crystallogr Rev. 2017;23:160–226.CrossRef
41.
Gomez-Villalba LS, López-Arce P, Alvarez de Buergo M, Fort R. Structural stability of a coloidal solution of Ca(OH)2 nanocrystals exposed to high relative humidity conditions. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process. 2011;104:1249–54.CrossRef
42.
Ciliberto E, Condorelli GG, La Delfa S, Viscuso E. Nanoparticles of Sr(OH)2: synthesis in homogeneous phase at low temperature and application for cultural heritage artifacts. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process. 2008;92:37–141.CrossRef
43.
Taglieri V, Daniele V, Macera L, Mondelli C. Nano Ca(OH)2 synthesis using a cost-effective and innovative method: reactivity study. J Am Ceram Soc. 2017;100(12):5766–78.CrossRef
44.
Rodriguez-Navarro C, Ruiz-Agudo E, Ortega Huertas M, Hansen E. Nanostructure and irreversible behavior of Ca(OH)2: implications in cultural heritage conservation. Langmuir. 2005;24:10948–57.CrossRef
45.
Kumar SSR. Transmission electron microscopy characterization of nanomaterials. Berlin: Springer; 2014.CrossRef
46.
Ditaranto N, Van der Werf ID, Picca RA, Sportelli MC, Giannossa LC, Bonerba E, Tantillo G, Sabbatini L. Characterization and behaviour of ZnO-based nanocomposites designed for the control of biodeterioration of patrimonial stonework. New J Chem. 2015;39:6836–43.CrossRef
47.
Licchelli M, Malagoudi M, Weththimuni M, Zanchi C. Nanoparticles for conservation of bio-calcarenite stone. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process. 2014;114:673–83.CrossRef
48.
De Ferri L, Lottici PP, Lorenzi A, Montenero A, Salvioli-Mariani E. Study of silica nanoparticles-polysiloxane hydrophobic treatments for Stone-based monument protection. J Cult Herit. 2011;12:356–63.CrossRef
49.
Willian DB, Carter CB. The transmission electron microscope. In: Willian DB, Carter CB, editors. Transmission electron microscopy. New York: Springer; 2009. p. 3–22.CrossRef
50.
Gomez-Villalba LS, Sierra-Fernandez A, Rabanal ME, Fort R. TEM-HRTEM study on the dehydration process of nanostructured Mg-Ca hydroxide into Mg-Ca oxide. Ceram Int. 2016;42:9455–66.CrossRef
51.
Bellot-Gurlet L, Dillmann P, Neff D. From archaeological sites to nanoscale: the quest of tailored analytical strategy and modelling. In: Dillmann P, Bellot-Gurlet L, Nenner I, editors. Nanoscience and cultural heritage. Paris: Atlantis Press; 2016. p. 205–30.
52.
Manoudis P, Papadopoulou S, Karapanagiotis I, Tsakalof A, Zuburtikudis I, Panayiotou C. Polymer-Silica nanoparticles composite film as protective coatings for stone-based monuments. J Phys Conf Ser. 2007;61:1361.CrossRef
53.
Rodriguez-Navarro C, Jroundi F, Schiro M, Ruiz-Agudo E, González-Muñoz MT. Influence of substrate mineralogy on bacterial mineralization of calcium carbonate: implications for stone conservation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78:4017–29.CrossRef
54.
Lin PC, Lin S, Wang PC, Sridhar R. Techniques for physicochemical characterization of nanomaterials. Biotechnol Adv. 2014;32:711–26.CrossRef
55.
Xiao Y, Gao F, Fang Y, Tan Y. Dispersions of surface modified calcium hydroxide nanoparticles with enhanced kinetic stability: properties and applications to desalination and consolidation of the Yungang Grottoes. Mater Res Soc Symp Proc. 2015;1656.
56.
Giorgi R, Baglioni M, Berti D, Baglioni P. New methodologies for the conservation of cultural heritage: micellar solutions, microemulsions, and hydroxide nanoparticles. Acc Chem Res. 2010;43:695–704.CrossRef
57.
Giorgi R, Ambrosi M, Toccafondi N, Baglioni P. Nanoparticles for cultural heritage conservation: calcium and barium hydroxide nanoparticles for wall painting consolidation. Chem Eur J. 2010;16:9374–82.CrossRef
58.
Ziegenbald G. Colloidal calcium hydroxide: a new material for consolidation and conservation of carbonate stone. In: 11th International Congress on Deterioration and Conservation of Stone III. 2008. p. 1119.
59.
López-Arce P, Gomez-Villalba LS, Pinho L, Fernández Valle ME, Álvarez de Buergo M, Fort R. Influence of porosity and relative humidity on consolidation of dolostone with calcium hydroxide nanoparticles: effectiveness assessment with non-destructive techniques. Mater Char. 2010;61:168–84.CrossRef
60.
López-Arce P, Gomez-Villalba LS, Martinez-Ramírez S, Álvarez de Buergo M, Fort R. Influence of relative humidity on the carbonation of calcium hydroxide nanoparticles and the formation of calcium carbonate polymorphs. Powder Technol. 2011;205:263–9.CrossRef
61.
Rodríguez-Navarro C, Elert K, Sevcik R. Amorphous and crystalline calcium carbonate phases during carbonation of nanolimes: implications in heritage conservation. Cryst Eng Comm. 2016;35:6594–607.CrossRef
62.
Gomez-Villalba LS, López-Arce P, Fort R. Nucleation of CaCO3 polymorphs from a coloidal alcoholic solution of Ca(OH)2 nanocrystals exposed to low humidity conditions. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process. 2012;106:213–7.CrossRef
63.
Baglioni P, Chelazzi D, Giorgi R. Nanotechnologies in the conservation of cultural heritage: a compendium of materials and techniques. Dordrecht: Springer; 2014.
64.
Gomez-Villalba LS, López-Arce P, Álvarez de Buergo M, Fort R. Atomic defects and their relationship to aragonite-calcite transformation in portlandite nanocrystal carbonation. Cryst Growth Des. 2012;12:4844–52.CrossRef
65.
Gomez-Villalba LS, López-Arce P, Álvarez de Buergo M, Zornoza-Indart A, Fort R. Mineralogical and textural considerations in the assessment of aesthetic changes in dolostones by effect of treatments with Ca(OH)2 nanoparticles. In: Rogerio-Candelera MA, Lazzari M, Cano E, editors. Science and technology for the conservation of cultural heritage. London: CRC Press; 2013. p. 235–329.CrossRef
66.
Gomez-Villalba LS, López-Arce P, Zornoza-Indart A, Álvarez de Buergo M, Fort R. Evaluation of a consolidation treatment in dolostones by mean of calcium hydroxide nanoparticles in high relative humidity conditions. Bol Soc Esp Ceram V. 2011;50:85–92.CrossRef
67.
Borsoi G, Lubelli B, Van Hees R, Veiga R, Santos Silva A. Evaluation of the effectiveness and compatibility of nanolime consolidants with improved properties. Constr Build Mater. 2017;142:385–94.CrossRef
68.
Borsoi G, Lubelli B, Van Hees RPJ, Tomasin P. Effect of solvent on nanolime transport within limestone: how to improve in-depth deposition. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2016;497:171–81.CrossRef
69.
López-Arce P, Zornoza-Indart A. Carbonation acceleration of calcium hydroxide nanoparticles: induced by yeast fermentation. Apply Phys A. 2015;120:1475–95.CrossRef
70.
Rodriguez-Navarro C, Vettori I, Ruiz-Agudo E. Kinetics and mechanism of calcium hydroxide conversion into calcium alkoxides: implication in heritage conservation using nanolimes. Langmuir. 2013;32:5183–94.CrossRef
71.
Warscheid T, Braams J. Biodeterioration of stone: a review. Int Biodeter Biodegr. 2000;46:343–68.CrossRef
72.
Gadd GM. Geomicology: biogeochemical transformations of rocks, minerals, metals and radionuclides by fungi, bioweathering and bioremediation. Mycol Res. 2007;11:3–49.CrossRef
73.
Perry IVTD, McNamara CJ, Mitchell R. Biodeterioration of stone. In: Sackler NAS Colloquium. Scientific examination of art: modern techniques in conservation and analysis. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences; 2005. p. 72–84.
74.
May-Crespo J, Ortega-Morales BO, Camacho-Chab JC, Quintana P, Alvarado-Gil JJ, Gonzalez-García G, Reyes-Estebanez M, Chan-Bacab MJ. Photoacoustic monitoring of water transport process in calcareous stone coated with biopolymers. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process. 2016;122:1060–70.CrossRef
75.
Gorbushina AA. Life on the rocks. Environ Microbiol. 2007;9:1613–31.CrossRef
76.
Cámara B, De los Ríos A, García del Cura MA, Galván A, Ascaso C. Dolostone bioreceptivity to fungal colonization. Mater Constr. 2008;58:113–24.CrossRef
77.
Hirsch P, Eckhardt FEW, Palmer RJ Jr. Fungi active in weathering of rock and stone monuments. Can J Bot. 1995;73:1384–90.CrossRef
78.
Gorbushina AA, Krumbein WE, Hamann CH, Panina L, Soukharjevski S. Role of black fungi in color change and biodeterioration of antique marbles. Geomicrobiol J. 1993;11:205–21.CrossRef
79.
Gadd GM. Geomicrobiology of the built environment. Nat Microbiol. 2017;2:16275.CrossRef
80.
Sterflinger K, Krumbein WE. Dematiaceous fungi as a major agent for biopitting on Mediterranean marbles and limestones. Geomicrobiol J. 1997;14:219–30.CrossRef
81.
Fomina M, Burford EP, Hillier S, Kierans M, Gadd G. Rock-building fungi. Geomicrobiol J. 2010;27:624–9.CrossRef
82.
Urzi C, García-Valles MT, Vendrell M, Pernice A. Biomineralization processes of the rock surfaces in field and in laboratory. Geomicrobiol J. 1999;16:39–54.CrossRef
83.
Bellissima F, Bonini M, Giorgi R, Baglioni P, Barresi P, Mastromei G, Perito B. Antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles grafted on stone surface. Environ Sci Pollut R. 2014;21:13278–86.CrossRef
84.
Essa AM, Khallaf MK. Biological nanosilver particles for the protection of archaeological stones against microbial colonization. Int Biodeterior Biodegr. 2014;94:31–7.CrossRef
85.
Ditaranto N, Loperfido S, Van der Werf I, Mangone A, Cioffi N, Sabbatini L. Synthesis and analytical characterisation of copper-based nanocoatings for bioactive stone artworks treatment. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2011;399:473–81.CrossRef
86.
Ruffolo SA, La Russa MF, Malagodi M, Oliviero Rossi C, Palermo AM, Crisci GM. ZnO and ZnTiO3 nanopowders for antimicrobial stone coating. Appl Phys A: Mater. 2010;100:829–34.CrossRef
87.
Gambino M, Ahmed MAAA, Villa F, Cappitelli F. Zinc oxide nanoparticles hinder fungal biofilm development in an ancient Egyptian tomb. Int Biodeterior Biodegr. 2017;122:92–9.CrossRef
88.
Lemire JA, Harrison JJ, Turner RJ. Antimicrobial activity of metals: mechanisms, molecular targets and applications. Nature Rev Microbiol. 2013;11:371–84.CrossRef
89.
Wang L, Hu C, Shao L. The antimicrobial activity of nanoparticles: present situation and prospects for the future. Int J Nanomedicine. 2017;12:1227–49.CrossRef
90.
Savi GD, Bortoluzzi AJ, Scussel VM. Antifungal properties of zinc-compounds against toxigenic fungi and mycotoxin. Int J Food Sci Technol. 2013;48:1834–40.CrossRef
91.
Vatansever F, De Melo WCMA, Avci P, Vecchio D, Sadasivam M, Gupta A, Chandran R, Karimi M, Parizotto NA, Yin R, Tegos GP, Hamblin MR. Antimicrobial strategies centered around reactive oxygen species-bactericidal antibiotics, photodynamic therapy and beyond. FEMS Microbial Rev. 2013;37:955–89.CrossRef
92.
Manke A, Wang L, Rojanasakul Y. Mechanisms of nanoparticle-induced oxidative stress and toxicity. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:942916.CrossRef
93.
Raghunath A, Perumal E. Metal oxide nanoparticles as antimicrobial agents: a promise for the future. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2017;49:137–52.CrossRef
94.
Yamamoto O. Influence of particle size on the antibacterial activity of zinc oxide. Int J Inor Mater. 2001;3:643–6.CrossRef
95.
Chung YC, Su YP, Chen CC, Jia G, Wang HL, Wu JC, Lin JG. Relationship between antibacterial activity of chitosan and surface characteristics of cell wall. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2004;25:932–6.
96.
Kumar S, Singh M, Halder D, Mitra A. Mechanistic study of antibacterial activity of biologically synthesized silver nanocolloids. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2014;449:82–6.CrossRef
97.
Ivask A, Voelcker NH, Seabrook SA, Hor M, Kirby JK, Fenech M, Davis TP, Ke PC. DNA melting and genotoxicity induced by silver nanoparticles and graphene. Chem Res Toxicol. 2015;28:1023–35.CrossRef
98.
Bonetta S, Bonetta S, Motta F, Strini A, Carraro E. Photocatalytic bacterial inactivation by TiO2-coated surfaces. AMB Express. 2013;3:59.CrossRef
99.
Viswanath B, Patra S, Munichandraiah N, Ravishankar N. Nanoporous Pt with high surface area by reaction-limited aggregation of nanoparticles. Langmuir. 2009;25:3115–21.CrossRef
100.
Usman MS, El Zowalaty ME, Shameli K, Zainuddin N, Salama M, Ibrahim NA. Synthesis, characterization, and antimicrobial properties of copper nanoparticles. Int J Nanomedicine. 2013;3:4467–79.
101.
Noeiaghaei T, Dhami N, Mukherjee A. Nanoparticles surface treatments on cemented materials for inhibition of bacterial growth. Constr Build Mater. 2017;150:880–91.CrossRef
102.
Chitra K, Annadurai G. Antibacterial activity of Ph-dependent biosynthesized silver nanoparticles against clinical pathogen. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:725165.CrossRef
103.
Lin JQ, Zhang HW, Chen Z, Zheng YG. Penetration of lipid membranes by gold nanoparticles: insights into cellular uptake, cytotoxicity, and their relationship. ACS Nano. 2010;4(9):5421.CrossRef
104.
Lakshmi Prassana V, Vijayaraghavan R. Insight into the mechanism of antibacterial activity of ZnO: surface defects mediated reactive oxygen species even in the dark. Langmuir. 2015;31:9155–62.CrossRef
105.
Stankic S, Suman S, Haque F, Vidic J. Pure and multi metal oxide nanoparticles: synthesis, antibacterial and cytotoxic properties. J Nanobiotechnol. 2016;14:73.CrossRef
106.
Pinna D, Salvadori B, Galeotti M. Monitoring the performance of innovative and traditional biocides mixed with consolidants and water-repellents for the prevention of biological growth on stone. Sci Total Environ. 2012;423:132–41.CrossRef
107.
Aflori M, Simionescu B, Bordiani I, Olaru M. Silsesquioxane-based hybrid nanocomposites with methacrylate units containing titania and/or silver nanoparticles as antibacterial/antifungal coatings for monumental stones. Mat Si Eng B. 2013;178:1339–46.CrossRef
108.
La Russa MF, Ruffolo SA, Rovella N, Belfiore CM, Palermo AM, Guzzi MT, Crisci GM. Multifunctional TiO2 coatings for cultural heritage. Prog Org Sci. 2012;74:186–91.CrossRef
109.
Jurado V, Fernandez-Cortes A, Cuezva S, Laiz L, Cañaveras JC, Sanchez-Moral S, Saiz-Jimenez C. The fungal colonisation of rock-art caves: experimental evidence. Naturwissenschaften. 2009;96:1027–34.CrossRef
110.
De Los Ríos A, Pérez-Ortega S, Wierzchos J, Ascaso C. Differential effects of biocide treatments on saxicolous communities: case study of the Segovia cathedral cloister (Spain). Int Biodeterior Biodegr. 2012;67:64–72.CrossRef
111.
Mihajlovsji A, Seyer D, Benamara H, Bousta F, Di Martino P. An overview of techniques for the characterization and quantification of microbial colonization on stone monuments. Ann Microbiol. 2015;65:1243–55.CrossRef
112.
De Los Ríos A, Wierzchos J, Sancho LG, Green TGA, Ascaso C. Ecology of endolithic lichens colonizing granite in continental Antarctica. Lichenologist. 2005;37:383–95.CrossRef
113.
De los Ríos A, Pérez-Ortega S, Wierzchos J, Ascaso C. Differential effects of biocide treatments on saxicolous communities: case study of the Segovia cathedral cloister (Spain). Int Biodeter Biodegr. 2012;67:64–72.CrossRef
114.
De los Ríos A, Ascaso C. Contributions of in situ microscopy to current understanding of stone biodeterioration processes. Int Microbiol. 2005;8:181–8.
115.
Schlafer S, Meyer RL. Confocal microscopy imaging of the biofilms matrix. J Microbiol Methods. 2017;138:50–9.CrossRef
116.
Ascaso C, Wierzchos J, Souza-Egipsy V, de los Ríos A, Delgado Rodrigues J. In situ evaluation of the biodeteriorating action of microorganisms and the effects of biocides on carbonate rock of the Jeronimos Monastery (Lisbon). Int Biodeterior Biodegr. 2002;49:1–12.CrossRef
117.
118.
Portillo MC, Saiz-Jimenez C, Gonzalez JM. Molecular characterization of total and metabolically active bacterial communities of “white colonizations” in the Altamira Cave, Spain. Res Microbiol. 2009;160:41–7.CrossRef
119.
Sterflinger K, Piñar G. Microbial deterioration of cultural heritage and works of art-tilting at windmills? Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97:9637–46.CrossRef
120.
Simon C, Daniel R. Metagenomic analyses: past and future trends. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77:1153–61.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Inorganic Nanomaterials for the Consolidation and Antifungal Protection of Stone Heritage
verfasst von
A. Sierra-Fernandez
L. S. Gomez-Villalba
S. C. De la Rosa-García
S. Gomez-Cornelio
P. Quintana
M.E. Rabanal
R. Fort
Copyright-Jahr
2018
Buch
Advanced Materials for the Conservation of Stone

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72259-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-72260-3

Copyright-Jahr: 2018

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72260-3_6

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise