Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
Erschienen in: Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 3/2020

17.01.2020 | Review Paper

Surrogate-assisted global sensitivity analysis: an overview

verfasst von: Kai Cheng, Zhenzhou Lu, Chunyan Ling, Suting Zhou

Erschienen in: Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization | Ausgabe 3/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Surrogate models are popular tool to approximate the functional relationship of expensive simulation models in multiple scientific and engineering disciplines. Successful use of surrogate models can provide significant savings of computational cost. However, with a variety of surrogate model approaches available in literature, it is a difficult task to select an appropriate one at hand. In this paper, we present an overview of surrogate model approaches with an emphasis of their application for variance-based global sensitivity analysis, including polynomial regression model, high-dimensional model representation, state-dependent parameter, polynomial chaos expansion, Kriging/Gaussian Process, support vector regression, radial basis function, and low rank tensor approximation. The accuracy and efficiency of these approaches are compared with several benchmark examples. The strengths and weaknesses of these surrogate models are discussed, and the recommendations are provided for different types of applications. For ease of implementations, the packages, as well as toolboxes, of surrogate model techniques and their applications for global sensitivity analysis are collected.
Vorheriger Artikel Formation of periodic ribbed or lattice structures in topology optimization assisted by biological pattern formation
Nächster Artikel Reliability analysis of concrete barriers under vehicular crashes using augmented RBFs

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
Abdallah I, Lataniotis C, Sudret B, (2018) Parametric hierarchical kriging for multi-fidelity aero-servo-elastic simulators—application to extreme loads on wind turbines. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics
Abraham S et al (2017) A robust and efficient stepwise regression method for building sparse polynomial chaos expansions. J Comput Phys 332:461–474MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Ahlfeld R, Belkouchi B, Montomoli F (2016) SAMBA: sparse approximation of moment-based arbitrary polynomial chaos. J Comput Phys 320:1–16MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
AIAA (2009) Efficient uncertainty quantification using gradient-enhanced Kriging
Amouzgar K, Strömberg N (2017) Radial basis functions as surrogate models with a priori bias in comparison with a posteriori bias. Struct Multidiscip Optim 55(4):1453–1469MathSciNetCrossRef
Amouzgar K, Bandaru S, Ng AHC (2018) Radial basis functions with a priori bias as surrogate models: a comparative study. Eng Appl Artif Intell 71:28–44CrossRef
Barton RR, Meckesheimer M (2006) Chapter 18 Metamodel-based simulation optimization, in Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, Henderson SG and Nelson BL, Editors, Elsevier. p. 535–574
Bhosekar A, Ierapetritou M (2018) Advances in surrogate based modeling, feasibility analysis, and optimization: a review. Comput Chem Eng 108:250–267CrossRef
Blatman G, Sudret B (2010a) Efficient computation of global sensitivity indices using sparse polynomial chaos expansions. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 95(11):1216–1229CrossRef
Blatman G, Sudret B (2010b) An adaptive algorithm to build up sparse polynomial chaos expansions for stochastic finite element analysis. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 25(2):183–197CrossRef
Blatman G, Sudret B (2011) Adaptive sparse polynomial chaos expansion based on least angle regression. J Comput Phys 230(6):2345–2367MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Bouhlel MA, Martins JRRA (2018) Gradient-enhanced kriging for high-dimensional problems. Eng Comput, p. 1–17
Bouhlel MA et al (2016) Improving kriging surrogates of highdimensional design models by partial least squares dimension reduction. Struct Multidiscip Optim 53(5):935–952MathSciNetCrossRef
Bourinet JM (2016) Rare-event probability estimation with adaptive support vector regression surrogates. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 150:210–221CrossRef
Bourinet JM, Deheeger F, Lemaire M (2011) Assessing small failure probabilities by combined subset simulation and support vector machines. Struct Saf 33(6):343–353CrossRef
Bryson DE, Rumpfkeil MP (2017) All-at-once approach to multifidelity polynomial chaos expansion surrogate modeling. Aerosp Sci Technol 70:121–136CrossRef
Bucher CG, Bourgund U (1990) A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problems. Struct Saf 7(1):57–66CrossRef
Cao Y et al (2002) Adjoint sensitivity analysis for differential-algebraic equations: the Adjoint DAE system and its numerical solution. SIAM J Sci Comput 24(3):1076–1089MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Chang CC, Lin CJ (2011) LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. 2(3): p. 1–27
Chen W, Jin R (2004) Analytical variance-based global sensitivity analysis in simulation-based design under uncertainty. J Mech Des 127(5):953–962
Chen X, Kim KK (2014) Stochastic kriging with biased sample estimates. Acm Transactions on Modeling & Computer Simulation 24(2):1–23MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Chen X, Wang K, Yang F (2013) Stochastic kriging with qualitative factors. Winter Simulation Conference
Cheng K, Lu Z (2018a) Adaptive sparse polynomial chaos expansions for global sensitivity analysis based on support vector regression. Comput Struct 194:86–96CrossRef
Cheng K, Lu Z (2018b) Sparse polynomial chaos expansion based on DMORPH regression. Appl Math Comput 323:17–13
Cheng K et al (2017a) Global sensitivity analysis using support vector regression. Appl Math Model
Cheng K et al (2017b) Mixed kernel function support vector regression for global sensitivity analysis. Mech Syst Signal Process 96:201–214CrossRef
Cheng K, Lu Z, Zhen Y (2019) Multi-level multi-fidelity sparse polynomial chaos expansion based on Gaussian process regression. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng
Chevreuil M et al (2013) A least-squares method for sparse low rank approximation of multivariate functions. 3(1)
Chevreuil M, Rai P, Nouy A (2014) Sampling based tensor approximation method for uncertainty propagation. Icossar Org
Chowdhury R, Adhikari S (2010) High dimensional model representation for stochastic finite element analysis. ApplMathModel 34(12):3917–3932MathSciNetMATH
Constantine PG, Dow E, Wang Q (2013) Active subspace methods in theory and practice: applications to kriging surfaces. SIAM J Sci Stat Comput, 36(4)
Corveleyn S, Vandewalle S (2017) Computation of the output of a function with fuzzy inputs based on a low-rank tensor approximation. Fuzzy Sets Syst 310:74–89MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Couckuyt I et al (2012) Blind Kriging: implementation and performance analysis. Adv Eng Softw 49(1):1–13CrossRef
Couckuyt I, Dhaene T, Demeester P (2014) ooDACE toolbox: a flexible object-oriented Kriging implementation. J Mach Learn Res 15(1):3183–3186MATH
Crestaux T, Le Maıˆtre O, Martinez J-M (2009) Polynomial chaos expansion for sensitivity analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94(7):1161–1172CrossRef
Debusschere B et al (2015) Uncertainty quantification toolkit (UQTk)
Diaz P, Doostan A, Hampton J (2018) Sparse polynomial chaos expansions via compressed sensing and D-optimal design. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 336:640–666MathSciNetCrossRef
Doksum K, Samarov A (1995) Nonparametric estimation of global functionals and a measure of the explanatory power of covariates in regression. Ann Stat 23(5):1443–1473MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Doostan A, Validi A, Iaccarino G (2013) Non-intrusive low-rank separated approximation of high-dimensional stochastic models. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 263:42–55MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Dutfoy A et al (2009) OpenTURNS, an Open Source initiative to Treat Uncertainties, Risks'N Statistics in a structured industrial approach. 41èmes Journées De Statistique Sfds Bordeaux
Efron B (1982) P The Jackknife, the bootstrap and other resampling plans. Siam Monograph, 38(384)
Fernándezgodino MG et al (2017) Review of multi-fidelity models
Forrester AIJ, Keane AJ (2009) Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization. Prog Aerosp Sci 45(1):50–79CrossRef
Garcia-Cabrejo O, Valocchi A (2014) Global sensitivity analysis for multivariate output using polynomial chaos expansion. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 126:25–36CrossRef
Garud SS, Karimi IA, Kraft M (2017) Design of computer experiments: a review. Comput Chem Eng 106:71–95CrossRef
Genyuan Li A (2002) Shengwei Wang, and Herschel Rabitz, practical approaches to construct RS-HDMR component functions. J Phys Chem A 106(37):8721–8733CrossRef
Ghanem R, Higdon D, Owhadi H (2016) Handbook of Uncertainty Quantification
Giles MB, Pierce NA (2000) An introduction to the adjoint approach to design. Flow Turbulence & Combustion 65(3–4):393–415MATHCrossRef
Gratiet LL (2012) Recursive co-kriging model for design of computer experiments with multiple levels of fidelity with an application to hydrodynamic. 4(5)
Gratiet LL (2013) Multi-fidelity Gaussian process regression for computer experiments
Gratiet LL (2015) Recursive co-kriging model for design of computer experiments with multiple levels of fidelity 4(5)
Guan XL, Melchers RE (2001) Effect of response surface parameter variation on structural reliability estimates. Struct Saf 23(4):429–444CrossRef
Guo L, Narayan A, Zhou T (2018) A gradient enhanced ℓ1-minimization for sparse approximation of polynomial chaos expansions. J Comput Phys
Hadigol M et al (2014) Partitioned treatment of uncertainty in coupled domain problems: a separated representation approach. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 274(6):103–124MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Haftka RT, Villanueva D, Chaudhuri A (2016) Parallel surrogateassisted global optimization with expensive functions—a survey. Struct Multidiscip Optim 54(1):3–13MathSciNetCrossRef
Halton J (1964) Radical-inverse quasi-random point sequence [G5]. Commun ACM 7
Hampton J, Doostan A (2015) Compressive sampling of polynomial chaos expansions: convergence analysis and sampling strategies. J Comput Phys 280:363–386MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Han ZH, Görtz S (2012) Hierarchical Kriging model for variable-fidelity surrogate modeling. AIAA J 50(9):1885–1896CrossRef
Han Z-H, Görtz S, Zimmermann R (2013) Improving variable-fidelity surrogate modeling via gradient-enhanced kriging and a generalized hybrid bridge function. Aerosp Sci Technol 25(1):177–189CrossRef
HaoW LZ, Li L (2013) A new interpretation and validation of variance based importance measures for models with correlated inputs. Comput Phys Commun 184(5):1401–1413MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Hardy RL (1971) Multiquadric equations of topography and other irregular surfaces. J Geophys Res 76(8):1905–1915CrossRef
Jakeman JD, EldredMS SK (2015) Enhancing ℓ1-minimization estimates of polynomial chaos expansions using basis selection. J Comput Phys 289:18–34MathSciNetCrossRef
Jin R, Chen W, Simpson TW (2001) Comparative studies of metamodelling techniques under multiple modelling criteria. Struct Multidiscip Optim 23(1):1–13CrossRef
Johnson ME, Moore LM, Ylvisaker D (1990) Minimax and maximin distance designs ☆. J Stat Plan Inference 26(2):131–148MathSciNetCrossRef
Kennedy MC, O'Hagan A (2000) Predicting the output from a complex computer code when fast approximations are available. Biometrika 87(1):1–13MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Kersaudy P et al (2015) A new surrogate modeling technique combining Kriging and polynomial chaos expansions—application to uncertainty analysis in computational dosimetry. J Comput Phys 286:103–117MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Kohavi R (1995) A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation andmodel selection. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Konakli K, Sudret B (2016a) Global sensitivity analysis using low-rank tensor approximations. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 156:64–83MATHCrossRef
Konakli K, Sudret B (2016b) Polynomial meta-models with canonical low-rank approximations: numerical insights and comparison to sparse polynomial chaos expansions. J Comput Phys 321:1144–1169MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Konakli K, Sudret B (2016c) Reliability analysis of high-dimensional models using low-rank tensor approximations. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 46:18–36MATHCrossRef
Krige DG (1953) A statistical approach to some basic mine valuation problems on the Witwatersrand. OR 4(1):18–18
Lambert RSC et al (2016) Global sensitivity analysis using sparse high dimensional model representations generated by the group method of data handling. Math Comput Simul 128(C):42–54MathSciNetCrossRef
Li G, Wang SW (2001) High dimensional model representations generated from low dimensional data samples. I mp-Cut-HDMR J Math Chem 30(1):1–30MATHCrossRef
Li G et al (2006) Random sampling-high dimensional model representation (RS-HDMR) and orthogonality of its different order component functions. J Phys Chem A 110(7):2474–2485CrossRef
Li L, Lu Z, Zhou C (2011) Importance analysis for models with correlated input variables by the state dependent parameters method. Comput Math Appl 62(12):4547–4556MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Li E, Wang H, Li G (2012a) High dimensional model representation (HDMR) coupled intelligent sampling strategy for nonlinear problems. Comput Phys Commun 183(9):1947–1955MathSciNetCrossRef
Li L et al (2012b) Moment-independent importance measure of basic variable and its state dependent parameter solution. Struct Saf 38:40–47CrossRef
Li L, Lu Z, Chen C (2016a) Moment-independent importance measure of correlated input variable and its state dependent parameter solution. Aerosp Sci Technol 48:281–290CrossRef
Li W, Lin G, Li B (2016b) Inverse regression-based uncertainty quantification algorithms for high-dimensional models: theory and practice. J Comput Phys 321:259–278MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Lin Q, Zhao Z, Liu JS (2016) Sparse sliced inverse regression for high dimensional data
Liu W (2003) Development of gradient‐enhanced kriging approximations for multidisciplinary design optimization. Univ of Notre Dame, Notre Dame Indiana, pp 177
Liu Y, Yousuff Hussaini M, Ökten G (2016) Accurate construction of high dimensional model representation with applications to uncertainty quantification. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 152:281–295CrossRef
Liu H, Ong Y-S, Cai J (2018) A survey of adaptive sampling for global metamodeling in support of simulation-based complex engineering design. Struct Multidiscip Optim 57(1):393–416CrossRef
Lucor D, Karniadakis GE (2005) Adaptive generalized polynomial chaos for nonlinear random oscillators. Soc Ind Appl Math :720–735
Luo X, LuZ XX (2014) Reproducing kernel technique for high dimensional model representations (HDMR). Comput Phys Commun 185(12):3099–3108MATHCrossRef
Ma X, Zabaras N (2010) An adaptive high-dimensional stochastic model representation technique for the solution of stochastic partial differential equations. J Comput Phys 229(10):3884–3915MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Marelli S, Sudret B (2014) UQLab: a framework for uncertainty quantification in Matlab. Int Conf on Vulnerability, Risk Analysis and Management
Marelli S, Sudret B (2018) An active-learning algorithm that combines sparse polynomial chaos expansions and bootstrap for structural reliability analysis. Struct Saf 75:67–74CrossRef
Marrel A et al (2008) Calculations of Sobol indices for the Gaussian process metamodel. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94(3):742–751CrossRef
Mathelin L, Gallivan KA (2012) A compressed sensing approach for partial differential equations with random input data. Communications in Computational Physics 12(4):919–954MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Mathelin L, Gallivan KA (2015) A compressed sensing approach for partial differential equations with random input data. Communications in Computational Physics 12(4):919–954MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Matheron G (1963) Principles of geostatistics. Econ Geol 58(8):1246–1266CrossRef
Mavriplis D (2013) A discrete adjoint-based approach for optimization problems on three-dimensional unstructured meshes
Mckay MD, Beckman RJ, Conover WJ (2000) A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 21(2):239–245MathSciNetMATH
Meczekalski B, Podfigurna-Stopa A (2000) Global optimization of costly nonconvex functions using radial basis functions. Optim Eng 1(4):373–397MathSciNetCrossRef
Ng WT, Eldred M (2012) Multifidelity uncertainty quantification using non-intrusive polynomial chaos and stochastic collocation
Ng LWT, Willcox KE (2015) Multifidelity approaches for optimization under uncertainty. Int J Numer Methods Eng 100(10):746–772MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Oakley JE, O'Hagan A (2004) Probabilistic sensitivity analysis of complex models: a Bayesian approach. J R Stat Soc 66(3):751–769MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Owen A (1992) Orthogonal arrays for computer experiments, integration and visualization. Stat Sin 2(2):439–452MathSciNetMATH
Palar PS, Shimoyama K (2017) Multi-fidelity uncertainty analysis in CFD using hierarchical Kriging. Aiaa Applied Aerodynamics Conference
Palar PS, Tsuchiya T, Parks GT (2016) Multi-fidelity non-intrusive polynomial chaos based on regression. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 305:579–606MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Palar PS et al (2018) Global sensitivity analysis via multi-fidelity polynomial chaos expansion. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 170:175–190CrossRef
Pan Q, Dias D (2017) Sliced inverse regression-based sparse polynomial chaos expansions for reliability analysis in high dimensions. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 167:484–493CrossRef
Parussini L et al (2017) Multi-fidelity Gaussian process regression for prediction of random fields. J Comput Phys 336(C):36–50MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Patelli E et al (2014) OpenCossan: an efficient open tool for dealing with epistemic and aleatory uncertainties. International Conference on Vulnerability and Risk Analysis and Management
Pathirage CSN et al (2018) Structural damage identification based on autoencoder neural networks and deep learning. Eng Struct 172:13–28CrossRef
Pati YC, Rezaiifar R, Krishnaprasad PS (1993) Orthogonal matching pursuit: recursive function approximation with applications to wavelet decomposition. Proceedings of 27th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers
Peng J, Hampton J, Doostan A (2014) A weighted ℓ1-minimization approach for sparse polynomial chaos expansions. J Comput Phys 267:92–111MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Peng J, Hampton J, Doostan A (2016) On polynomial chaos expansion via gradient-enhanced ℓ 1 -minimization. J Comput Phys 310(C):440–458MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Picheny V et al (2012) Adaptive designs of experiments for accurate approximation of a target region. J Mech Des 132(7):461–471
Queipo NV et al (2005) Surrogate-based analysis and optimization. Prog Aerosp Sci 41(1):1–28CrossRef
Rabitz H et al (1999) Efficient input—output model representations. Comput Phys Commun 117(1–2):11–20MATHCrossRef
Rasmussen C, Williams C (2006) Gaussian processes for machine learning. MIT Press :69–106
Ratto M, Pagano A, Young P (2007) State dependent parameter metamodelling and sensitivity analysis. Comput Phys Commun 177(11):863–876CrossRef
Ratto M, Pagano A, Young PC (2009) Non-parametric estimation of conditional moments for sensitivity analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94(2):237–243CrossRef
Razavi S, Tolson BA, Burn DH (2012) Review of surrogate modeling in water resources. Water Resour Res 48(7):7401CrossRef
Roshan V, Ying H, Sudjianto A (2008) Blind Kriging: a new method for developing metamodels. JMech Des 130(3):350–353
Salehi S et al (2017) Efficient uncertainty quantification of stochastic CFD problems using sparse polynomial chaos and compressed sensing. Comput Fluids 154:296–321MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Salehi S et al (2018) An efficient multifidelity ℓ1-minimization method for sparse polynomial chaos. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 334:183–207MathSciNetCrossRef
Saltelli A (2008) Global sensitivity analysis : the primer, John Wiley
Saltelli A et al (2010) Variance based sensitivity analysis of model output. Design and estimator for the total sensitivity index. Comput Phys Commun 181(2):259–270MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Schöbi R, Sudret B (2017) Uncertainty propagation of p-boxes using sparse polynomial chaos expansions. J Comput Phys 339:307–327MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Shao Q et al (2017) Bayesian sparse polynomial chaos expansion for global sensitivity analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 318:474–496MathSciNetCrossRef
Shlomo M, Shaul M (2011) Applications of Monte CarloMethods in Science and Engineering
Sirignano J, Spiliopoulos K (2018) DGM: a deep learning algorithm for solving partial differential equations. J Comput Phys 375:1339–1364MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Sn Lophaven HN, Søndergaard J (2002) DACE –AMATLABKriging Toolbox – Version 2.0
Sobol IM (1967) On the distribution of points in a cube and the approximate evaluation of integrals. USSR Comput Math Math Phys 7(4):86–112MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Sobol IM (1993) Sensitivity estimates for nonlinear mathematical models. Math model comput exp 1(1):112–118MathSciNetMATH
Sobol IM (2003) Theorems and examples on high dimensional model representation. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 79(2):187–193CrossRef
Sobol IM (2001) Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates, Elsevier Science Publishers B. V. 271–280
Song S, Wang L (2017) Modified GMDH-NN algorithm and its application for global sensitivity analysis. J Comput Phys 348
Staum J (2009) Better Simulation metamodeling: the why, what, and how of stochastic kriging. Simulation Conference
Sudret B (2008) Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93(7):964–979CrossRef
Sudret B, Mai CV (2015) Computing derivative-based global sensitivity measures using polynomial chaos expansions. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 134:241–250CrossRef
Sudret B, Marelli S, Wiart J (2017) Surrogate models for uncertainty quantification: an overview. European Conference on Antennas and Propagation
Tang K, Congedo PM, Abgrall R (2016) Adaptive surrogate modeling by ANOVA and sparse polynomial dimensional decomposition for global sensitivity analysis in fluid simulation. J Comput Phys 314(3):557–589MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Tang K et al (2018) An adaptive least-squares global sensitivity method and application to a plasma-coupled combustion prediction with parametric correlation. J Comput Phys 361:167–198MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Tarantola S, Becker W (2016) SIMLAB Software for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis
Tripathy RK, Bilionis I (2018) Deep UQ: learning deep neural network surrogate models for high dimensional uncertainty quantification. J Comput Phys 375:565–588MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Tripathy R, Bilionis I, Gonzalez M (2016) Gaussian processes with builtin dimensionality reduction: applications to high-dimensional uncertainty propagation. J Comput Phys 321:191–223MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Ulaganathan S et al (2015) Performance study of multi-fidelity gradient enhanced kriging. Struct Multidiscip Optim 51(5):1–17MathSciNetCrossRef
Ulaganathan S et al (2016) High dimensional Kriging metamodelling utilising gradient information. Appl Math Model 40(9):5256–5270MATHCrossRef
Validi AA (2014) Low-rank separated representation surrogates of highdimensional stochastic functions: application in Bayesian inference. J Comput Phys 260(2):37–53MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Van Steenkiste T et al (2018) Sequential sensitivity analysis of expensive black-box simulators with metamodelling. Appl Math Model 61:668–681MathSciNetCrossRef
Vapnik VN (2008) Statistical learning theory. Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning 41(4):3185–3185
Vapnik VN (1997) The nature of statistical learning theory. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 38(4):409–409
Wan X, Karniadakis GE (2005) An adaptive multi-element generalized polynomial chaos method for stochastic differential equations. J Comput Phys 209(2):617–642MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Wang GG, Shan S (2007) Review of metamodeling techniques in support of engineering design optimization. ASME 2006 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
Wang SW et al (2003) Random sampling-high dimensional model representation (RS-HDMR) with nonuniformly distributed variables: application to an integrated multimedia/multipathway exposure and dose model for trichloroethylene. J Phys Chem A 107(23):4707–4716CrossRef
Wang D et al (2014a) A CAD/CAE integrated framework for structural design optimization using sequential approximation optimization. Adv Eng Softw 76(3):56–68CrossRef
Wang D et al (2014b) Structural design employing a sequential approximation optimization approach. Comput Struct 134(4):75–87CrossRef
Wang C et al (2016) A GUI platform for uncertainty quantification of complex dynamical models. EnvironModel Softw 76:1–12
Wei P, Lu Z, Song J (2015) Variable importance analysis: a comprehensive review. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 142:399–432CrossRef
Wu HM (2008) Kernel sliced inverse regression with applications to classification. J Comput Graph Stat 17(3):590–610MathSciNetCrossRef
Wu Z et al (2016a) Global sensitivity analysis using a Gaussian radial basis function metamodel. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 154:171–179CrossRef
Wu Z et al (2016b) Unified estimate of Gaussian kernel width for surrogate models. Neurocomputing 203:41–51CrossRef
Wu Z et al (2016c) Global sensitivity analysis using a Gaussian radial basis function metamodel. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 154:171–179CrossRef
Xiao S, Lu Z (2017) Structural reliability sensitivity analysis based on classification of model output. Aerosp Sci Technol 71
Xiao M et al (2018) Extended co-Kriging interpolation method based on multi-fidelity data. Appl Math Comput 323:120–131MATH
Xie W, Nelson BL, Staum J (2010) The influence of correlation functions on stochastic kriging metamodels. Simulation Conference
Xiu D, Karniadakis GE (2002) TheWiener–Askey polynomial chaos for stochastic differential equations. Siam J Sci Comput
Yan L et al (2018) Gaussian processes and polynomial chaos expansion for regression problem: linkage via the RKHS and comparison via the KL divergence. Entropy 20(3):191CrossRef
Yang X, Karniadakis GE (2013) Reweighted ℓ1 minimization method for stochastic elliptic differential equations. J Comput Phys 248:87–108MATHCrossRef
Yeh YR, Huang SY, Lee YJ (2009) Nonlinear dimension reduction with kernel sliced inverse regression. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge & Data Engineering 21(11):1590–1603CrossRef
Yeo K, Melnyk I (2019) Deep learning algorithm for data-driven simulation of noisy dynamical system. J Comput Phys 376:1212–1231MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Yondo R, Andrés E, Valero E (2018) A review on design of experiments and surrogate models in aircraft real-time and many-query aerodynamic analyses. Prog Aerosp Sci 96:23–61CrossRef
Youn BD, Choi KK (2004) A new response surface methodology for reliability-based design optimization. Comput Struct 82(2):241–256CrossRef
Young P (1993) Time variable and state dependent modelling of nonstationary and nonlinear time series. Developments in Time
Young P (2000) Stochastic, dynamic modelling and signal processing: time variable and state dependent parameter estimation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 74–114MATH
Young P, McKenna P, Bruun J (2001) Identification of non-linear stochastic systems by state dependent parameter estimation. Int J Control 74(18):1837–1857MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Zhang K et al (2017a) Analytical variance based global sensitivity analysis for models with correlated variables. Appl Math Model 45:748–767MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Zhang J et al (2017b) Estimation of the Pareto front in stochastic simulation through stochastic Kriging. Simul Model Pract Theory 79:69–86CrossRef
Zhou X, Jiang T (2018) An effective way to integrate ε-support vector regression with gradients. Expert Syst Appl 99:126–140CrossRef
Zhou Q et al (2015) An adaptive global variable fidelity metamodeling strategy using a support vector regression based scaling function. Simul Model Pract Theory 59:18–35CrossRef
Zhu Y, Zabaras N (2018) Bayesian deep convolutional encoder–decoder networks for surrogate modeling and uncertainty quantification. J Comput Phys 366:415–447MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Ziehn T, Tomlin AS (2008) Global sensitivity analysis of a 3D street canyon model—part I: the development of high dimensional model representations. Atmos Environ 42(8):1857–1873CrossRef
Ziehn T, Tomlin AS (2009) GUI–HDMR—a software tool for global sensitivity analysis of complex models. Environ Model Softw 24(7):775–785CrossRef
Zuniga MM, Kucherenko S, Shah N (2013) Metamodelling with independent and dependent inputs. Comput Phys Commun 184(6):1570–1580MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Surrogate-assisted global sensitivity analysis: an overview
verfasst von
Kai Cheng
Zhenzhou Lu
Chunyan Ling
Suting Zhou
Publikationsdatum
17.01.2020
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization / Ausgabe 3/2020
Print ISSN: 1615-147X
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-1488
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-019-02413-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2020

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 3/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Research Paper

Multifidelity design guided by topology optimization

Industrial Application Paper

Design optimization of a small-scale hydropower harvesting device

Industrial Application Paper

Life reliability assessment of twin-web disk using the active learning kriging model

Research Paper

A model-independent adaptive sequential sampling technique based on response nonlinearity estimation

Editorial

Gaussian process as complement to test functions for surrogate modeling

Industrial Application Paper

Lightweight design of electric bus roof structure using multi-material topology optimisation

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise