nach oben

The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology

Erschienen in:

02.06.2022 | Critical Review

Recent progress on the application of nanofluids and hybrid nanofluids in machining: a comprehensive review

verfasst von: Maisarah Kursus, Pay Jun Liew, Nor Azwadi Che Sidik, Jingsi Wang

Erschienen in: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology | Ausgabe 3-4/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This paper summarises the recent progress of nanofluids and hybrid nanofluids in various machining processes including milling, turning, grinding and drilling. Thermophysical properties of nanofluid and hybrid nanofluid, such as viscosity, thermal conductivity, stability and wettability, are also discussed. Results showed that thermal conductivity and viscosity of nanofluid are strongly affected by temperature, mass volume fraction, types of nanoparticles and nanoparticle size. Thermophysical properties of hybrid nanofluids are greater than those of nanofluids and base fluids. Scientific findings also indicated that nanofluids and hybrid nanofluids outperform other cooling-lubrication techniques. The application of nanofluids and hybrid nanofluids enhances the surface finish and reduces the cutting temperature, cutting force and tool wear during machining. However, more research work is still needed to determine their applicability in practical industries, especially in the usage of hybrid nanofluid in milling and drilling processes.

Nächster Artikel Back-drilling of high-speed printed circuit boards: a review

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Ogedengbe TS, Okediji AP, Yussouf AA, Aderoba OA, Abiola OA, Alabi IO, Alonge O (2019) The effects of heat generation on cutting tool and machined workpiece. J Phys Conf Ser 1378:10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1378/2/022012

Esfe MH, Bahiraei M, Mir A (2020) Application of conventional and hybrid nanofluids in different machining processes: a critical review. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 282:102199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2020.102199CrossRef

Samanta S, Kumar S, Guha S (2018) Process parameters optimization of CNC turning on Al-6061 using multiple cutting fluids. Int Res J Eng Technol 5:1751–1757

Goindi GS, Sarkar P (2017) Dry machining: a step towards sustainable machining – Challenges and future directions. J Clean Prod 165:1557–1571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.235CrossRef

Jianxin D, Jiantou Z, Hui Z, Pei Y (2011) Wear mechanisms of cemented carbide tools in dry cutting of precipitation hardening semi-austenitic stainless steels. Wear 270:520–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2011.01.006CrossRef

Debnath S, Reddy MM, Yi QS (2014) Environmental friendly cutting fluids and cooling techniques in machining: a review. J Clean Prod 83:33–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.071CrossRef

Gueli M, Ma J, Cococcetta N, Pearl D, Jahan MP (2021) Experimental investigation into tool wear, cutting forces, and resulting surface finish during dry and flood coolant slot milling of Inconel 718. Procedia Manuf 53:236–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2021.06.026CrossRef

Razak NH, Rahman MM, Kadirgama K (2017) Cutting force and chip formation in end milling operation when machining nickelbased superalloy, Hastelloy C-2000. J Mech Eng Sci 14:2539–2551. https://doi.org/10.15282/jmes.11.1.2017.12.0233

Najiha MS, Rahman MM (2016) Experimental investigation of flank wear in end milling of aluminum alloy with water-based TiO₂ nanofluid lubricant in minimum quantity lubrication technique. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 86:2527–2537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-8256-yCrossRef

10.

Singh RK, Dixit AR, Mandal A, Sharma AK (2017) Emerging application of nanoparticle-enriched cutting fluid in metal removal processes: a review. J Brazilian Soc Mech Sci Eng 39:4677–4717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-017-0839-0CrossRef

11.

Jagatheesan K, Babu K, Madhesh D (2021) Experimental investigation of machining parameter in MQL turning operation using AISI 4320 alloy steel. Mater Today Proc 46:4331–4335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.03.289CrossRef

12.

Sun H, Zou B, Chen P, Huang C, Guo G, Liu J, Li L, Shi Z (2022) Effect of MQL condition on cutting performance of high-speed machining of GH4099 with ceramic end mills. Tribol Int 167:107401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2021.107401CrossRef

13.

Lu T, Kudaravalli R, Georgiou G (2018) Cryogenic machining through the spindle and tool for improved machining process performance and sustainability: pt. II, sustainability performance study. Procedia Manuf 21:273–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.121CrossRef

14.

Sivaiah P, Chakradhar D (2018) Effect of cryogenic coolant on turning performance characteristics during machining of 17–4 PH stainless steel: a comparison with MQL, wet, dry machining. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 21:86–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2018.02.004CrossRef

15.

Pusavec F, Hamdi H, Kopac J, Jawahir IS (2011) Surface integrity in cryogenic machining of nickel based alloy—Inconel 718. J Mater Process Technol 211:773–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.12.013CrossRef

16.

Danish M, Gupta MK, Rubaiee S, Ahmed A, Sarıkaya M, Krolczyk GM (2022) Environmental, technological and economical aspects of cryogenic assisted hard machining operation of inconel 718: a step towards green manufacturing. J Clean Prod 337:130483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130483CrossRef

17.

Choi SUS, Eastman JA (1995) Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles. In: 1995 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exhibition, November, San Francisco, CA, p 196525. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/196525. Accessed 10 Apr 2022

18.

Şirin Ş, Kıvak T (2019) Performances of different eco-friendly nanofluid lubricants in the milling of Inconel X-750 superalloy. Tribol Int 137:180–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2019.04.042CrossRef

19.

Chakma P, Bhadra D, Dhar NR (2022) Modeling and optimization of the control parameters in machining of aluminum metal matrix nanocomposite under CNT induced nanofluid. Mater Today Proc 54:866–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.192CrossRef

20.

Danish M, Gupta MK, Rubaiee S, Ahmed A, Sarikaya M (2021) Influence of graphene reinforced sunflower oil on thermo-physical, tribological and machining characteristics of inconel 718. J Mater Res Technol 15:135–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.07.161CrossRef

21.

Sidik NAC, Adamu IM, Jamil MM, Kefayati GHR, Mamat R, Najafi G (2016) Recent progress on hybrid nanofluids in heat transfer applications: a comprehensive review. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 78:68–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2016.08.019CrossRef

22.

Sarkar J, Ghosh P, Adil A (2015) A review on hybrid nanofluids: recent research, development and applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 43:164–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.023CrossRef

23.

Aslantas K, Danish M, Hasçelik A, Mia M, Gupta M, Ginta T, Ijaz H (2020) Investigations on surface roughness and tool wear characteristics in micro-turning of Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Materials (Basel) 13:2998. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13132998CrossRef

24.

Jamil M, Khan AM, Hegab H, Mia M, Gupta MK (2020) Modeling, multi-objective optimization and cost estimation of bone drilling under micro-cooling spray technique: an integrated analysis. Int J Interact Des Manuf 14:435–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-019-00635-xCrossRef

25.

Danish M, Ginta TL, Habib K, Carou D, Rani AMA, Saha BB (2017) Thermal analysis during turning of AZ31 magnesium alloy under dry and cryogenic conditions. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91:2855–2868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9893-5CrossRef

26.

Sada SO, Ikpeseni SC (2021) Evaluation of ANN and ANFIS modeling ability in the prediction of AISI 1050 steel machining performance. Heliyon 7:e06136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06136CrossRef

27.

Kabil AO, Kaynak Y (2020) Optimization of cutting parameters for sustainable machining of titanium Ti-5553 alloy using genetic algorithm. Acad Platf J Eng Sci 8–2:310–315. https://doi.org/10.21541/apjes.629374

28.

Nouari M, Makich H (2014) On the physics of machining titanium alloys: interactions between cutting parameters, microstructure and tool wear. Metals (Basel) 4:335–358. https://doi.org/10.3390/met4030335CrossRef

29.

Devillez A, Le Coz G, Dominiak S, Dudzinski D (2011) Dry machining of Inconel 718, workpiece surface integrity. J Mater Process Technol 211:1590–1598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.04.011CrossRef

30.

Joshi S, Pawar P, Tewari A, Joshi SS (2014) Tool wear mechanisms in machining of three titanium alloys with increasing β -phase fraction. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 228:1090–1103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405414522796CrossRef

31.

Bayraktar Ş, Afyon F (2020) Machinability properties of Al–7Si, Al–7Si–4Zn and Al–7Si–4Zn–3Cu alloys. J Brazilian Soc Mech Sci Eng 42:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-02281-xCrossRef

32.

Dhanalakshmi S, Rameshbabu T (2020) Comparative study of parametric influence on wet and dry machining of LM 25 aluminium alloy. Mater Today Proc 39:48–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.101CrossRef

33.

Uddin GM, Joyia FM, Ghufran M, Khan SA, Raza MA, Faisal M, Arafat SM, Zubair SWH, Jawad M, Zafar MQ, Irfan M, Waseem B, Chaudhry IA, Zeid I (2021) Comparative performance analysis of cemented carbide, TiN, TiAlN, and PCD coated inserts in dry machining of Al 2024 alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 112:1461–1481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06315-5CrossRef

34.

Ji M, Xu J, Chen M, Mansori M (2020) Effects of different cooling methods on the specific energy consumption when drilling CFRP/Ti6Al4V stacks. Procedia Manuf 43:95–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.02.118CrossRef

35.

Khadtare AN, Pawade RS, Joshi S (2020) Surface integrity studies for straight and inclined hole in micro-drilling of thermal barrier coated Inconel 718: a turbine blade application. Precis Eng 66:166–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2020.07.010CrossRef

36.

Sandeep reddy AV, Ajay kumar S, Jagadesh T (2020) The influence of graphite, MoS₂ and blasocut lubricant on hole and chip geometry during peck drilling of aerospace alloy. Mater Today Proc 24:690–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.323CrossRef

37.

Bayraktar Ş, Demir O (2020) Processing of T6 heat-treated Al-12Si-0.6Mg alloy. Mater Manuf Process 35:354–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2020.1732412CrossRef

38.

Shukla A, Kotwani A, Unune DR (2020) Performance comparison of dry, flood and vegetable oil based minimum quantity lubrication environments during CNC milling of aluminium 6061. Mater Today Proc 21:1483–1488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.060CrossRef

39.

Yin Z, Hao X, Peng H, Yuan J (2022) A new β-SiAlON ceramic tool prepared by microwave sintering and its cutting performance in high-speed dry machining Inconel718. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 118:3105–3117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08170-4CrossRef

40.

Leksycki K, Feldshtein E, Lisowicz J, Chudy R, Mrugalski R (2020) Cutting forces and chip shaping when finish turning of 17–4 ph stainless steel under dry, wet, and mql machining conditions. Metals (Basel) 10:1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/met10091187CrossRef

41.

Rahman MZ, Das AK, Chattopadhyaya S, Reyaz M, Raza MT, Farzeen S (2020) Regression modeling and comparative analysis on CNC wet-turning of AISI-1055 & AISI-4340 steels. Mater Today Proc 24:841–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.393CrossRef

42.

Dheeraj N, Sanjay S, Kiran Bhargav K, Jagadesh T (2019) Investigations into solid lubricant filled textured tools on hole geometry and surface integrity during drilling of aluminium alloy. Mater Today Proc 26:991–997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.01.163CrossRef

43.

Kaynak Y, Robertson SW, Karaca HE, Jawahir IS (2015) Progressive tool-wear in machining of room-temperature austenitic NiTi alloys: the influence of cooling/lubricating, melting, and heat treatment conditions. J Mater Process Technol 215:95–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.07.015CrossRef

44.

Yıldırım ÇV (2020) Investigation of hard turning performance of eco-friendly cooling strategies: cryogenic cooling and nanofluid based MQL. Tribol Int 144:106127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2019.106127CrossRef

45.

Pereira O, Celaya A, Urbikaín G, Rodríguez A, Fernández-Valdivielso A, de Lacalle LN (2020) CO₂ cryogenic milling of Inconel 718: cutting forces and tool wear. J Mater Res Technol 9:8459–8468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.05.118CrossRef

46.

Khanna N, Pusavec F, Agrawal C, Krolczyk GM (2020) Measurement and evaluation of hole attributes for drilling CFRP composites using an indigenously developed cryogenic machining facility. Meas J Int Meas Confed 154:107504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2020.107504CrossRef

47.

Khanna N, Agrawal C, Gupta MK, Song Q (2020) Tool wear and hole quality evaluation in cryogenic drilling of Inconel 718 superalloy. Tribol Int 143:106084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2019.106084CrossRef

48.

Koklu U, Coban H (2020) Effect of dipped cryogenic approach on thrust force, temperature, tool wear and chip formation in drilling of AZ31 magnesium alloy. J Mater Res Technol 9:2870–2880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.01.038CrossRef

49.

Gong L, Bertolini R, Ghiotti A, He N, Bruschi S (2020) Sustainable turning of Inconel 718 nickel alloy using MQL strategy based on graphene nanofluids. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 108:3159–3174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05626-xCrossRef

50.

Abas M, Sayd L, Akhtar R, Khalid QS, Khan AM, Pruncu CI (2020) Optimization of machining parameters of aluminum alloy 6026–T9 under MQL-assisted turning process. J Mater Res Technol 9:10916–10940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.07.071CrossRef

51.

Sarikaya M, Güllü A (2015) Multi-response optimization of minimum quantity lubrication parameters using Taguchi-based grey relational analysis in turning of difficult-to-cut alloy Haynes 25. J Clean Prod 91:347–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.020CrossRef

52.

Kulkarni HB, Nadakatti MM, Kulkarni SC, Kulkarni RM (2019) Investigations on effect of nanofluid based minimum quantity lubrication technique for surface milling of Al7075-T6 aerospace alloy. Mater Today Proc 27:251–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.10.127CrossRef

53.

Lv D, Xu J, Ding W, Fu Y, Yang C, Su H (2016) Tool wear in milling Ti40 burn-resistant titanium alloy using pneumatic mist jet impinging cooling. J Mater Process Technol 229:641–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.10.020CrossRef

54.

Garcia U, Ribeiro MV (2016) Ti6Al4V titanium alloy end milling with minimum quantity of fluid technique use. Mater Manuf Process 31:905–918. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2015.1048367CrossRef

55.

Xu J, Ji M, Paulo Davim J, Chen M, El Mansori M, Krishnaraj V (2020) Comparative study of minimum quantity lubrication and dry drilling of CFRP/titanium stacks using TiAlN and diamond coated drills. Compos Struct 234:111727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111727CrossRef

56.

Zhu Z, He B, Chen J (2020) Evaluation of tool temperature distribution in MQL drilling of aluminum 2024–T351. J Manuf Process 56:757–765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.05.029CrossRef

57.

Awale AS, Vashista M, Khan Yusufzai MZ (2020) Multi-objective optimization of MQL mist parameters for eco-friendly grinding. J Manuf Process 56:75–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.04.069CrossRef

58.

Virdi RL, Chatha SS, Singh H (2020) Performance evaluation of inconel 718 under vegetable oils based nanofluids using minimum quantity lubrication grinding. Mater Today Proc 33:1538–1545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.802CrossRef

59.

Raja M, Vijayan R, Dineshkumar P, Venkatesan M (2016) Review on nanofluids characterization, heat transfer characteristics and applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 64:163–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.079CrossRef

60.

Yu W, Xie H (2012) A review on nanofluids: preparation, stability mechanisms, and applications. J Nanomater 2012:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/435873CrossRef

61.

Jama M, Singh T, Gamaleldin SM, Koc M, Samara A, Isaifan RJ, Atieh MA (2016) Critical review on nanofluids: preparation, characterization, and applications. J Nanomater 2016:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6717624CrossRef

62.

Heris SZ, Shokrgozar M, Poorpharhang S, Shanbedi M, Noie SH (2014) Experimental study of heat transfer of a car radiator with CuO/ethylene glycol-water as a coolant. J Dispers Sci Technol 35:677–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/01932691.2013.805301CrossRef

63.

Behi M, Mirmohammadi SA (2012) Investigation on thermal conductivity, viscosity and stability of nanofluids. Master of Science Thesis EGI-2012, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), School of Industrial Engineering and Management, Department of Energy Technology, Division of Applied Thermodynamics and Refrigeration, Stockholm, Sweden.

64.

Sidik NA, Jamil MM, Japar WM, Adamu IM (2017) A review on preparation methods, stability and applications of hybrid nanofluids. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 80:1112–1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.221CrossRef

65.

He J, Sun J, Meng Y, Yan X (2019) Preliminary investigations on the tribological performance of hexagonal boron nitride nanofluids as lubricant for steel/steel friction pairs. Surf Topogr Metrol Prop 7:015022. https://doi.org/10.1088/2051-672X/ab0afbCrossRef

66.

Şirin Ş, Kıvak T (2021) Effects of hybrid nanofluids on machining performance in MQL-milling of Inconel X-750 superalloy. J Manuf Process 70:163–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.08.038CrossRef

67.

Babar H, Sajid M, Ali H (2019) Viscosity of hybrid nanofluids: a critical review. Therm Sci 23:1713–1754. https://doi.org/10.2298/tsci181128015bCrossRef

68.

Dardan E, Afrand M, Isfahani AHM (2016) Effect of suspending hybrid nano-additives on rheological behavior of engine oil and pumping power. Appl Therm Eng 109:524–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.08.103CrossRef

69.

Esfe MH, Rostamian H, Sarlak MR (2018) A novel study on rheological behavior of ZnO-MWCNT/10w40 nanofluid for automotive engines. J Mol Liq 254:406–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2017.11.135CrossRef

70.

Soltani O, Akbari M (2016) Effects of temperature and particles concentration on the dynamic viscosity of MgO-MWCNT/ethylene glycol hybrid nanofluid: experimental study. Phys E Low-Dimensional Syst Nanostructures 84:564–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2016.06.015CrossRef

71.

Ghasemi S, Karimipour A (2018) Experimental investigation of the effects of temperature and mass fraction on the dynamic viscosity of CuO-paraffin nanofluid. Appl Therm Eng 128:189–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.09.021CrossRef

72.

Esfe MH, Afrand M, Rostamian SH, Toghraie D (2017) Examination of rheological behavior of MWCNTs/ZnO-SAE40 hybrid nano-lubricants under various temperatures and solid volume fractions. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 80:384–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2016.07.011CrossRef

73.

Hu X, Yin D, Chen X, Xiang G (2020) Experimental investigation and mechanism analysis: effect of nanoparticle size on viscosity of nanofluids. J Mol Liq 314:113604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.113604CrossRef

74.

Nithiyanantham U, Zaki A, Grosu Y, González-Fernández L, Anagnostopoulos A, Navarro ME, Ding Y, Igartua JM, Faik A (2022) Effect of silica nanoparticle size on the stability and thermophysical properties of molten salts based nanofluids for thermal energy storage applications at concentrated solar power plants. J Energy Storage 51:104276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2022.104276CrossRef

75.

Kazemi I, Sefid M, Afrand M (2020) A novel comparative experimental study on rheological behavior of mono & hybrid nanofluids concerned graphene and silica nano-powders: characterization, stability and viscosity measurements. Powder Technol 366:216–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2020.02.010CrossRef

76.

Shahsavar A, Saghafian M, Salimpour MR, Shafii MB (2016) Effect of temperature and concentration on thermal conductivity and viscosity of ferrofluid loaded with carbon nanotubes. Heat Mass Transf 52:2293–2301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-015-1743-8CrossRef

77.

Ahammed N, Asirvatham LG, Wongwises S (2016) Entropy generation analysis of graphene–alumina hybrid nanofluid in multiport minichannel heat exchanger coupled with thermoelectric cooler. Int J Heat Mass Transf 103:1084–1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.07.070CrossRef

78.

Yang L, Xu J, Du K, Zhang X (2017) Recent developments on viscosity and thermal conductivity of nanofluids. Powder Technol 317:348–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2017.04.061CrossRef

79.

Baby TT, Sundara R (2011) Synthesis and transport properties of metal oxide decorated graphene dispersed nanofluids. J Phys Chem C 115:8527–8533. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp200273gCrossRef

80.

Madhesh D, Parameshwaran R, Kalaiselvam S (2014) Experimental investigation on convective heat transfer and rheological characteristics of Cu-TiO₂ hybrid nanofluids. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 52:104–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2013.08.026CrossRef

81.

Thakur A, Manna A, Samir S (2020) Multi-response optimization of turning parameters during machining of EN-24 steel with SiC nanofluids based minimum quantity lubrication. SILICON 12:71–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-019-00102-yCrossRef

82.

Hamid KA, Azmi WH, Nabil MF, Mamat R (2017) Improved thermal conductivity of TiO₂ –SiO₂ hybrid nanofluid in ethylene glycol and water mixture. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 257:012067. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/257/1/012067CrossRef

83.

Sajid MU, Ali HM (2018) Thermal conductivity of hybrid nanofluids: a critical review. Int J Heat Mass Transf 126:211–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.05.021CrossRef

84.

Chereches M, Vardaru A, Huminic G, Chereches EI, Minea AA, Huminic A (2022) Thermal conductivity of stabilized PEG 400 based nanofluids: an experimental approach. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 130:105798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2021.105798CrossRef

85.

Nfawa SR, Abu Talib AR, Basri AA, Masuri SU (2021) Novel use of MgO nanoparticle additive for enhancing the thermal conductivity of CuO/water nanofluid. Case Stud Therm Eng 27:101279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2021.101279CrossRef

86.

Loong TT, Salleh H, Khalid A, Koten H (2021) Thermal performance evaluation for different type of metal oxide water based nanofluids. Case Stud Therm Eng 27:101288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2021.101288CrossRef

87.

Nasiri A, Shariaty-Niasar M, Rashidi AM, Khodafarin R (2012) Effect of CNT structures on thermal conductivity and stability of nanofluid. Int J Heat Mass Transf 55:1529–1535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2011.11.004CrossRef

88.

Das S, Giri A, Samanta S, Kanagaraj S (2019) Role of graphene nanofluids on heat transfer enhancement in thermosyphon. J Sci Adv Mater Devices 4:163–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsamd.2019.01.005CrossRef

89.

Zhu HT, Lin YS, Yin YS (2004) A novel one-step chemical method for preparation of copper nanofluids. J Colloid Interface Sci 277:100–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2004.04.026CrossRef

90.

Kim HJ, Bang IC, Onoe J (2009) Characteristic stability of bare Au-water nanofluids fabricated by pulsed laser ablation in liquids. Opt Lasers Eng 47:532–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2008.10.011CrossRef

91.

Hwang Y, Lee JK, Lee CH, Jung YM, Cheong SI, Lee CG, Ku BC, Jang SP (2007) Stability and thermal conductivity characteristics of nanofluids. Thermochim Acta 455:70–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2006.11.036CrossRef

92.

Suresh S, Venkitaraj KP, Selvakumar P (2011) Synthesis, characterisation of Al₂O₃-Cu nano composite powder and water based nanofluids. Adv Mater Res 328–330:1560–1567. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.328-330.1560CrossRef

93.

Kim HJ, Lee SH, Lee JH, Jang SP (2015) Effect of particle shape on suspension stability and thermal conductivities of water-based bohemite alumina nanofluids. Energy 90:1290–1297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.06.084CrossRef

94.

Chakraborty S, Panigrahi PK (2020) Stability of nanofluid: a review. Appl Therm Eng 174:115259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.115259CrossRef

95.

Sharmin I, Gafur MA, Dhar NR (2020) Preparation and evaluation of a stable CNT-water based nano cutting fluid for machining hard-to-cut material. SN Appl Sci 2(4):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2416-xCrossRef

96.

Xie H, Dang S, Jiang B, Xiang L, Zhou S, Sheng H, Yang T, Pan F (2019) Tribological performances of SiO₂/graphene combinations as water-based lubricant additives for magnesium alloy rolling. Appl Surf Sci 475:847–856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.01.062CrossRef

97.

Kumar A, Kumar R, Rai A, Kumar A (2017) Novel uses of alumina-MoS₂ hybrid nanoparticle enriched cutting fluid in hard turning of AISI 304 steel. J Manuf Process 30:467–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.10.016CrossRef

98.

Kumar A, Ghosh S, Aravindan S (2019) Experimental investigations on surface grinding of silicon nitride subjected to mono and hybrid nanofluids. Ceram Int 45:17447–17466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.05.307CrossRef

99.

Rifat M, Rahman MH, Das D (2017) A review on application of nanofluid MQL in machining. In: AIP Conference Proceedings 1919 (1): 020015. AIP Publishing LLC. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5018533

100.

Amrita M, Srikant R, Sitaramaraju A, Prasad M, Krishna PV (2013) Experimental investigations on influence of mist cooling using nanofluids on machining parameters in turning AISI 1040 steel. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part J J Eng Tribol 227:1334–1346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350650113491934CrossRef

101.

Saravanakumar N, Prabu L, Karthik M, Rajamanickam A (2014) Experimental analysis on cutting fluid dispersed with silver nano particles. J Mech Sci Technol 28:645–651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-013-1192-6CrossRef

102.

Su Y, Gong L, Li B, Liu Z, Chen D (2016) Performance evaluation of nanofluid MQL with vegetable-based oil and ester oil as base fluids in turning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83:2083–2089. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7730-xCrossRef

103.

Li G, Yi S, Li N, Pan W, Wen C, Ding S (2019) Quantitative analysis of cooling and lubricating effects of graphene oxide nanofluids in machining titanium alloy Ti6Al4V. J Mater Process Technol 271:584–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.04.035CrossRef

104.

Singh T, Dureja JS, Dogra M, Bhatti MS (2018) Environment friendly machining of inconel 625 under nano-fluid minimum quantity lubrication (NMQL). Int J Precis Eng Manuf 19:1689–1697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-018-0196-7CrossRef

105.

Duc TM, Long TT, Chien TQ (2019) Performance evaluation of MQL parameters using Al₂O₃ and MoS₂ nanofluids in hard turning 90CrSi steel. Lubricants 7:40. https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants7050040CrossRef

106.

Khan MS, Sisodia MS, Gupta S, Feroskhan M, Kannan S, Krishnasamy K (2019) Measurement of tribological properties of Cu and Ag blended coconut oil nanofluids for metal cutting. Eng Sci Technol an Int J 22:1187–1192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2019.04.005CrossRef

107.

Yi S, Li J, Zhu J, Wang X, Mo J, Ding S (2020) Investigation of machining Ti-6Al-4V with graphene oxide nanofluids: tool wear, cutting forces and cutting vibration. J Manuf Process 49:35–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.09.038CrossRef

108.

Gugulothu S, Pasam VK (2019) Performance evaluation of CNT/MoS₂ hybrid nanofluid in machining for surface roughness. Int J Automot Mech Eng 16:7413–7429. https://doi.org/10.15282/ijame.16.4.2019.15.0549

109.

Jamil M, Khan AM, Hegab H, Gong L, Mia M, Gupta MK, He N (2019) Effects of hybrid Al₂O₃-CNT nanofluids and cryogenic cooling on machining of Ti–6Al–4V. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 102:3895–3909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03485-9CrossRef

110.

Kumar MS, Krishna VM (2020) An investigation on turning AISI 1018 steel with hybrid biodegradeable nanofluid/MQL incorporated with combinations of CuO-Al₂O₃ nanoparticles. Mater Today Proc 24:1577–1584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.478CrossRef

111.

Kumar MS, Krishna VM, Varun A (2020) Investigation on influence of hybrid biodegradable nanofluids (CuO-ZnO) on surface roughness in turning AISI 1018 steel. Mater Today Proc 24:1570–1576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.477CrossRef

112.

Khan AM, Gupta MK, Hegab H, Jamil M, Mia M, He N, Song Q, Liu Z, Pruncu C (2020) Energy-based cost integrated modelling and sustainability assessment of Al-GnP hybrid nanofluid assisted turning of AISI52100 steel. J Clean Prod 257:120502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120502CrossRef

113.

Amrita M, Srikant RR, Sitaramaraju AV (2014) Performance evaluation of nanographite-based cutting fluid in machining process. Mater Manuf Process 29:600–605. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2014.893060CrossRef

114.

Amrita M, Shariq SA, Manoj GC (2014) Experimental investigation on application of emulsifier oil based nano cutting fluids in metal cutting process. Procedia Eng 97:115–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.231CrossRef

115.

Sayuti M, Sarhan AAD, Salem F (2014) Novel uses of SiO₂ nano-lubrication system in hard turning process of hardened steel AISI4140 for less tool wear, surface roughness and oil consumption. J Clean Prod 67:265–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.052CrossRef

116.

Gupta MK, Sood PK, Sharma VS (2016) Optimization of machining parameters and cutting fluids during nano-fluid based minimum quantity lubrication turning of titanium alloy by using evolutionary techniques. J Clean Prod 135:1276–1288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.184CrossRef

117.

Raju RA, Andhare A, Sahu NK (2017) Performance of multi-walled carbon nanotube-based nanofluid in turning operation. Mater Manuf Process 32:1490–1496. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2017.1279291CrossRef

118.

Behera BC, Chetan SD, Ghosh S, Rao PV (2017) Spreadability studies of metal working fluids on tool surface and its impact on minimum amount cooling and lubrication turning. J Mater Process Technol 244:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.01.016CrossRef

119.

Mahboob Ali MA, Azmi AI, Mohd Khalil AN, Leong KW (2017) Experimental study on minimal nanolubrication with surfactant in the turning of titanium alloys. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92:117–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0133-4CrossRef

120.

Anamalai K, Samylingam KAL, Samykano KKM, Ramasamy GND (2019) Multi-objective optimization on the machining parameters for bio-inspired nanocoolant. J Therm Anal Calorim 135(2):1533–1544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7693-xCrossRef

121.

Shuang Y, John M, Songlin D (2019) Experimental investigation on the performance and mechanism of graphene oxide nanofluids in turning Ti-6Al-4V. J Manuf Process 43:164–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.05.005CrossRef

122.

Yi S, Li N, Solanki S, Mo J, Ding S (2019) Effects of graphene oxide nanofluids on cutting temperature and force in machining Ti-6Al-4V. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 103:1481–1495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03625-1CrossRef

123.

Shokoohi Y, Shekarian E (2016) Application of nanofluids in machining processes - a review. J Nanosci Technol 2:59–63. https://www.jacsdirectory.com/journal-of-nanoscience-and-technology/articleview.php?id=15. Accessed 10 Apr 2022

124.

Shokrani A, Dhokia V, Muñoz-Escalona P, Newman ST (2013) State-of-the-art cryogenic machining and processing. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 26:616–648. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2012.749531CrossRef

125.

Chatha SS, Pal A, Singh T (2016) Performance evaluation of aluminium 6063 drilling under the influence of nanofluid minimum quantity lubrication. J Clean Prod 137:537–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.139CrossRef

126.

Huang WT, Wu DH, Chen JT (2016) Robust design of using nanofluid/MQL in micro-drilling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85:2155–2161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7382-xCrossRef

127.

Liew PJ, Yahaya MR, Salleh MS, Izamshah R, Wang J (2018) Experimental investigation of drilling process using nanofluid as coolant. J Adv Manuf Technol 12:11–22

128.

Muthuvel S, Naresh Babu M, Muthukrishnan N (2018) Copper nanofluids under minimum quantity lubrication during drilling of AISI 4140 steel. Aust J Mech Eng 00:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14484846.2018.1486694CrossRef

129.

Babu MN, Muthukrishnan N (2020) Experimental analysis in drilling of AA 5052 using copper nanofluids under minimum quantity lubrication. Aust J Mech Eng 18:S15–S24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14484846.2018.1455267CrossRef

130.

Khanafer K, Eltaggaz A, Deiab I, Agarwal H, Abdul-latif A (2020) Toward sustainable micro-drilling of Inconel 718 superalloy using MQL-Nanofluid. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 107:3459–3469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05112-4CrossRef

131.

Nam JS, Kim DH, Chung H, Lee SW (2015) Optimization of environmentally benign micro-drilling process with nanofluid minimum quantity lubrication using response surface methodology and genetic algorithm. J Clean Prod 102:428–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.057CrossRef

132.

Garg A, Sarma S, Panda BN, Zhang J, Gao L (2016) Study of effect of nanofluid concentration on response characteristics of machining process for cleaner production. J Clean Prod 135:476–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.122CrossRef

133.

Mosleh M, Ghaderi M, Shirvani KA, Belk J, Grzina DJ (2017) Performance of cutting nanofluids in tribological testing and conventional drilling. J Manuf Process 25:70–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2016.11.001CrossRef

134.

Salimi-Yasar H, Heris SZ, Shanbedi M, Amiri A, Kameli A (2017) Experimental investigation of thermal properties of cutting fluid using soluble oil-based TiO₂ nanofluid. Powder Technol 310:213–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2016.12.078CrossRef

135.

Mosleh M, Shirvani K, Smith S, Belk J, Lipczynski G (2019) A study of minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) by nanofluids in orbital drilling and tribological testing. J Manuf Mater Process 3:5. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp3010005CrossRef

136.

Pal A, Chatha SS, Sidhu HS (2020) Experimental investigation on the performance of MQL drilling of AISI 321 stainless steel using nano-graphene enhanced vegetable-oil-based cutting fluid. Tribol Int 151:106508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2020.106508CrossRef

137.

Şirin E, Kıvak T, Yıldırım ÇV (2021) Effects of mono/hybrid nanofluid strategies and surfactants on machining performance in the drilling of Hastelloy X. Tribol Int 157:106894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2021.106894CrossRef

138.

Sanchez JA, Pombo I, Alberdi R, Izquierdo B, Ortega N, Plaza S, Martinez-Toledano J (2010) Machining evaluation of a hybrid MQL-CO₂ grinding technology. J Clean Prod 18:1840–1849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.07.002CrossRef

139.

Emami M, Sadeghi M, Sarhan A (2013) Minimum quantity lubrication in grinding process of zirconia (ZrO₂) engineering ceramic. Int J Mining Metall Mech Eng 1:1–4. http://www.isaet.org/images/extraimages/P513561.pdf. Accessed 10 Apr 2022

140.

Tu HX, Jun G, Hien BT, Hung LX, Tung LA, Pi VN (2018) Determining optimum parameters of cutting fluid in external grinding of 9CrSi steel using Taguchi technique. Int J Mech Eng 5:1–5. https://doi.org/10.14445/23488360/IJME-V5I6P101

141.

Wang S, Li C, Zhang D, Jia D, Zhang Y (2014) Modeling the operation of a common grinding wheel with nanoparticle jet flow minimal quantity lubrication. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 74:835–850. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6032-zCrossRef

142.

Setti D, Sinha MK, Ghosh S, Rao PV (2015) Performance evaluation of Ti-6Al-4V grinding using chip formation and coefficient of friction under the influence of nanofluids. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 88:237–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2014.10.005CrossRef

143.

Li B, Li C, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Jia D, Yang M, Zhang N, Wu Q, Han Z, Sun K (2017) Heat transfer performance of MQL grinding with different nanofluids for Ni-based alloys using vegetable oil. J Clean Prod 154:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.213CrossRef

144.

Dambatta YS, Sayuti M, Sarhan AAD, Ab Shukor H, Derahman NA, Manladan SM (2019) Prediction of specific grinding forces and surface roughness in machining of AL6061-T6 alloy using ANFIS technique. Ind Lubr Tribol 71:309–317. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILT-03-2018-0098CrossRef

145.

Wang Y, Li C, Zhang Y, Yang M, Zhang X, Zhang N, Dai J (2017) Experimental evaluation on tribological performance of the wheel/workpiece interface in minimum quantity lubrication grinding with different concentrations of Al₂O₃ nanofluids. J Clean Prod 142:3571–3583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.110CrossRef

146.

Zhang Y, Li C, Jia D, Zhang D, Zhang X (2015) Experimental evaluation of the lubrication performance of MoS₂/CNT nanofluid for minimal quantity lubrication in Ni-based alloy grinding. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 99:19–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2015.09.003CrossRef

147.

Zhang X, Li C, Zhang Y, Jia D, Li B, Wang Y, Yang M, Hou Y, Zhang X (2016) Performances of Al₂O₃/SiC hybrid nanofluids in minimum-quantity lubrication grinding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 86:3427–3441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8453-3CrossRef

148.

De Oliveira D, Da Silva RB, Gelamo RV (2019) Influence of multilayer graphene platelet concentration dispersed in semi-synthetic oil on the grinding performance of Inconel 718 alloy under various machining conditions. Wear 426–427:1371–1383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2019.01.114CrossRef

149.

de Paiva RL, de Souza RR, de Oliveira LR, Bandarra Filho EP, Gonçalves Neto LM, Gelamo RV, da Silva RB (2020) Experimental study of the influence of graphene platelets on the performance of grinding of SAE 52100 steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 110:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05866-xCrossRef

150.

de Souza RR, de Paiva RL, Gelamo RV, Machado AR, da Silva RB (2021) Study on grinding of inconel 625 and 718 alloys with cutting fluid enriched with multilayer graphene platelets. Wear 476:203697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2021.203697CrossRef

151.

Prabhu S, Vinayagam BK (2013) Analysis of surface characteristics by electrolytic in-process dressing (ELID) technique for grinding process using single wall carbon nano Ttube-based nanofluids. Arab J Sci Eng 38:1169–1178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-012-0355-6CrossRef

152.

Mao C, Zhang J, Huang Y, Zou H, Huang X, Zhou Z (2013) Investigation on the effect of nanofluid parameters on MQL grinding. Mater Manuf Process 28:436–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2013.763970CrossRef

153.

Jia D, Li C, Zhang D, Zhang Y, Zhang X (2014) Experimental verification of nanoparticle jet minimum quantity lubrication effectiveness in grinding. J Nanoparticle Res 16:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-014-2758-7CrossRef

154.

Mao C, Huang Y, Zhou X, Gan H, Zhang J, Zhou Z (2014) The tribological properties of nanofluid used in minimum quantity lubrication grinding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 71:1221–1228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5576-7CrossRef

155.

Zhang Y, Li C, Jia D, Zhang D, Zhang X (2015) Experimental evaluation of MoS₂ nanoparticles in jet MQL grinding with different types of vegetable oil as base oil. J Clean Prod 87:930–940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.027CrossRef

156.

ManojKumar K, Ghosh A (2015) Synthesis of MWCNT nanofluid and evaluation of its potential besides soluble oil as micro cooling-lubrication medium in SQL grinding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 77:1955–1964. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6587-8CrossRef

157.

Zhang D, Li C, Zhang Y, Jia D, Zhang X (2015) Experimental research on the energy ratio coefficient and specific grinding energy in nanoparticle jet MQL grinding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 78:1275–1288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6722-6CrossRef

158.

Zhang D, Li C, Jia D, Zhang Y, Zhang X (2015) Specific grinding energy and surface roughness of nanoparticle jet minimum quantity lubrication in grinding. Chinese J Aeronaut 28:570–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2014.12.035CrossRef

159.

Prabhu S, Uma M, Vinayagam BK (2015) Surface roughness prediction using Taguchi-fuzzy logic-neural network analysis for CNT nanofluids based grinding process. Neural Comput Appl 26:41–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-014-1696-8CrossRef

160.

Zhang Y, Li C, Jia D, Li B, Wang Y, Yang M, Hou Y, Zhang X (2016) Experimental study on the effect of nanoparticle concentration on the lubricating property of nanofluids for MQL grinding of Ni-based alloy. J Mater Process Technol 232:100–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.01.031CrossRef

161.

Li B, Li C, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Yang M, Jia D, Zhang N, Wu Q (2017) Effect of the physical properties of different vegetable oil-based nanofluids on MQLC grinding temperature of Ni-based alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89:3459–3474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9324-7CrossRef

162.

Wang Y, Li C, Zhang Y, Li B, Yang M, Zhang X, Guo S, Liu G, Zhai M (2017) Comparative evaluation of the lubricating properties of vegetable-oil-based nanofluids between frictional test and grinding experiment. J Manuf Process 26:94–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.02.001CrossRef

163.

Sinha MK, Madarkar R, Ghosh S, Rao PV (2017) Application of eco-friendly nanofluids during grinding of Inconel 718 through small quantity lubrication. J Clean Prod 141:1359–1375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.212CrossRef

164.

Singh H, Sharma VS, Singh S, Dogra M (2019) Nanofluids assisted environmental friendly lubricating strategies for the surface grinding of titanium alloy: Ti6Al4V-ELI. J Manuf Process 39:241–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.02.004CrossRef

165.

Gao T, Li C, Jia D, Zhang Y, Yang M, Wang X, Cao H, Li R, Ali HM, Xu X (2020) Surface morphology assessment of CFRP transverse grinding using CNT nanofluid minimum quantity lubrication. J Clean Prod 277:123328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123328CrossRef

166.

Qu S, Gong Y, Yang Y, Wang W, Liang C, Han B (2020) An investigation of carbon nanofluid minimum quantity lubrication for grinding unidirectional carbon fibre-reinforced ceramic matrix composites. J Clean Prod 249:119353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119353CrossRef

167.

Peng R, He X, Tong J, Tang X, Wu Y (2021) Application of a tailored eco-friendly nanofluid in pressurized internal-cooling grinding of Inconel 718. J Clean Prod 278:123498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123498CrossRef

168.

Kim JS, Kim JW, Kim YC, Lee SW (2016) Experimental study on environmentally-friendly micro end-milling process of Ti-6Al-4V using nanofluid minimum quantity lubrication with chilly gas. In: International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference 49903: V002T05A006. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1115/MSEC2016-8748

169.

Kim JS, Kim JW, Lee SW (2017) Experimental characterization on micro-end milling of titanium alloy using nanofluid minimum quantity lubrication with chilly gas. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91:2741–2749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9965-6CrossRef

170.

Li M, Yu T, Li H, Yang L, Shi J, Wang W (2019) Research on surface integrity in graphene nanofluid MQL milling of TC21 alloy. Int J Abras Technol 9:49–59. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJAT.2019.097973CrossRef

171.

Sahid NSM, Rahman MM, Kadirgama K, Ramasamy D, Maleque MA, Noor MM (2017) Experimental investigation on the performance of the TiO₂ and ZnO hybrid nanocoolant in ethylene glycol mixture towards AA6061-T6 machining. Int J Automot Mech Eng 14:3913–3926. https://doi.org/10.15282/ijame.14.1.2017.8.0318

172.

Jamil M, Khan AM, Hegab H, Gupta MK, Mia M, He N, Zhao G, Song Q, Liu Z (2020) Milling of Ti–6Al–4V under hybrid Al₂O₃-MWCNT nanofluids considering energy consumption, surface quality, and tool wear: a sustainable machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 107:4141–4157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05296-9CrossRef

173.

Yuan S, Hou X, Wang L, Chen B (2018) Experimental investigation on the compatibility of nanoparticles with vegetable oils for nanofluid minimum quantity lubrication machining. Tribol Lett 66:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-018-1059-1CrossRef

174.

Sayuti M, Ming O, Sarhan AAD, Hamdi M (2014) Investigation on the morphology of the machined surface in end milling of aerospace AL6061-T6 for novel uses of SiO₂ nanolubrication system. J Clean Prod 66:655–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.058CrossRef

175.

Sayuti M, Sarhan AAD, Tanaka T, Hamdi M, Saito Y (2013) Cutting force reduction and surface quality improvement in machining of aerospace duralumin AL-2017-T4 using carbon onion nanolubrication system. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 65:1493–1500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4273-2CrossRef

176.

Rahmati B, Sarhan AAD, Sayuti M (2014) Morphology of surface generated by end milling AL6061-T6 using molybdenum disulfide (MoS₂) nanolubrication in end milling machining. J Clean Prod 66:685–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.048CrossRef

177.

Sayuti M, Sarhan AAD, Hamdi M (2013) An investigation of optimum SiO₂ nanolubrication parameters in end milling of aerospace Al6061-T6 alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67:833–849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4527-zCrossRef

178.

Rahmati B, Sarhan AAD, Sayuti M (2014) Investigating the optimum molybdenum disulfide (MoS₂) nanolubrication parameters in CNC milling of AL6061-T6 alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 70:1143–1155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5334-xCrossRef

179.

Songmei Y, Xuebo H, Guangyuan Z, Amin M (2017) A novel approach of applying copper nanoparticles in minimum quantity lubrication for milling of Ti-6Al-4V. Adv Prod Eng Manag 12:139–150. https://doi.org/10.14743/apem2017.2.246

180.

Minh DT, The LT, Bao NT (2017) Performance of Al₂O₃ nanofluids in minimum quantity lubrication in hard milling of 60Si2Mn steel using cemented carbide tools. Adv Mech Eng 9:1687814017710618. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814017710618CrossRef

181.

Zhou C, Guo X, Zhang K, Cheng L, Wu Y (2019) The coupling effect of micro-groove textures and nanofluids on cutting performance of uncoated cemented carbide tools in milling Ti-6Al-4V. J Mater Process Technol 271:36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.03.021CrossRef

182.

Liew PJ, Maisarah KO, Juoi JM, Wang J (2019) Milling of titanium alloy using hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) nanofluid as a coolant. J Adv Manuf Technol 13:61–71

183.

Dong PQ, Duc TM, Tuan NM, Long TT, Van Thanh D, Van Truong N (2020) Improvement in the hard milling of AISI D2 steel under the MQCL condition using emulsion-dispersed MoS₂ nanosheets. Lubricants 8:1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/LUBRICANTS8060062CrossRef

184.

Duan Z, Li C, Zhang Y, Dong L, Bai X, Yang M, Jia D, Li R, Cao H, Xuefeng X (2021) Milling surface roughness for 7050 aluminum alloy cavity influenced by nozzle position of nanofluid minimum quantity lubrication. Chinese J Aeronaut 34:33–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2020.04.029CrossRef

185.

Sen B, Mia M, Mandal UK, Mondal SP (2020) Synergistic effect of silica and pure palm oil on the machining performances of Inconel 690: a study for promoting minimum quantity nano doped-green lubricants. J Clean Prod 258:120755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120755CrossRef

186.

Liew PJ, Shaaroni A, Abd Razak J, Kasim MS, Sulaiman MA (2017) Optimization of cutting condition in the turning of AISI D2 steel by using carbon nanofiber nanofluid. Int J Appl Eng Res 12:2243–2252. https://www.ripublication.com/ijaer17/ijaerv12n10_17.pdf. Accessed 10 Apr 2022

187.

Barewar SD, Kotwani A, Chougule SS, Unune DR (2021) Investigating a novel Ag/ZnO based hybrid nanofluid for sustainable machining of inconel 718 under nanofluid based minimum quantity lubrication. J Manuf Process 66:313–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.04.017CrossRef

188.

Junankar AA, Parate SR, Dethe PK, Dhote NR, Gadkar DG, Gadkar DD, Gajbhiye SA (2021) Optimization of bearing steel turning parameters under CuO and ZnO nanofluid-MQL using MCDM hybrid approach. Mater Today Proc 47:4292–4297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.589CrossRef

189.

Huang WT, Chen JT (2020) Application of intelligent modeling methods to enhance the effectiveness of nanofluid / micro lubrication in microdeep drilling holes machining. J Adv Mech Des Syst Manuf 14: JAMDSM0099. https://doi.org/10.1299/jamdsm.2020jamdsm0099

190.

Chen L, Xie H, Li Y, Yu W (2008) Nanofluids containing carbon nanotubes treated by mechanochemical reaction. Thermochim Acta 477:21–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2008.08.001CrossRef

191.

Choi C, Yoo HS, Oh JM (2008) Preparation and heat transfer properties of nanoparticle-in-transformer oil dispersions as advanced energy-efficient coolants. Curr Appl Phys 8:710–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2007.04.060CrossRef

192.

Kumar LH, Kazi SN, Masjuki HH, Zubir MNM (2022) A review of recent advances in green nanofluids and their application in thermal systems. Chem Eng J 429:132321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.132321CrossRef

Titel: Recent progress on the application of nanofluids and hybrid nanofluids in machining: a comprehensive review
verfasst von: Maisarah Kursus
Pay Jun Liew
Nor Azwadi Che Sidik
Jingsi Wang
Publikationsdatum: 02.06.2022
Verlag: Springer London
Erschienen in: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology / Ausgabe 3-4/2022
Print ISSN: 0268-3768
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09409-4

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3-4/2022

A high-precision non-uniform rational B-spline interpolator based on S-shaped feedrate scheduling

In-house processing of 3D printable polyetheretherketone (PEEK) filaments and the effect of fused deposition modeling parameters on 3D-printed PEEK structures

Simulation and experimental research on nickel-based coating prepared by jet electrodeposition at different scanning speeds

Revealing the excellent properties of minimal surface lattice structures based on additive manufacturing through the principle of least action

A regional averaging method for predicting peen forming effectiveness using combined finite element simulations

A nano-MQL grinding of single-crystal nickel-base superalloy using a textured grinding wheel

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten