Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 2/2014

01.05.2014 | Original Paper

Assessment of socioeconomic vulnerability to landslides using an indicator-based approach: methodology and case studies

verfasst von: U. M. K. Eidsvig, A. McLean, B. V. Vangelsten, B. Kalsnes, R. L. Ciurean, S. Argyroudis, M. G. Winter, O. C. Mavrouli, S. Fotopoulou, K. Pitilakis, A. Baills, J.-P. Malet, G. Kaiser

Erschienen in: Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment | Ausgabe 2/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The severity of the impact of a natural hazard on a society depends on, among other factors, the intensity of the hazard and the exposure and resistance ability of the elements at risk (e.g., persons, buildings and infrastructures). Social conditions strongly influence the vulnerability factors for both direct and indirect impact and therefore control the possibility to transform the occurrence of a natural hazard into a natural disaster. This article presents a model to assess the relative socioeconomic vulnerability to landslides at the local to regional scale. The model applies an indicator-based approach. The indicators represent the underlying factors that influence a community’s ability to prepare for, deal with, and recover from the damage and loss associated with landslides. The proposed model includes indicators that characterize the demographic, social and economic setting as well as indicators representing the degree of preparedness, effectiveness of the response and capacity to recover. Although this model focuses primarily on the indirect losses, it could easily be extended to include physical indicators accounting for the direct losses. Each indicator is individually ranked from 1 (lowest vulnerability) to 5 (highest vulnerability) and weighted, based on its overall degree of influence. The final vulnerability estimate is formulated as a weighted average of the individual indicator scores. The proposed model is applied for six case studies in Europe. The case studies demonstrate that the method gives a reasonable ranking of the vulnerability. The practical experience achieved through the case studies shows that the model is straightforward for users with knowledge on landslide locations and with access to local census data.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Birkmann J (2006) Indicators and criteria for measuring vulnerability: theoretical bases and requirements. In: Birkmann J (ed) Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: towards disaster resilient societies, United Nations University Press, Tokyo, Japan Birkmann J (2006) Indicators and criteria for measuring vulnerability: theoretical bases and requirements. In: Birkmann J (ed) Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: towards disaster resilient societies, United Nations University Press, Tokyo, Japan
Zurück zum Zitat Cardona OD (2003) Indicators for risk management: methodological fundamentals, information and indicators program for disaster risk management, IADB/ECLAC/IDEA Cardona OD (2003) Indicators for risk management: methodological fundamentals, information and indicators program for disaster risk management, IADB/ECLAC/IDEA
Zurück zum Zitat Carreňo ML, Cardona OD, Barbat A (2007a) A disaster risk management performance index. Nat Hazards 41:1–20CrossRef Carreňo ML, Cardona OD, Barbat A (2007a) A disaster risk management performance index. Nat Hazards 41:1–20CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Carreňo ML, Cardona OD, Barbat A (2007b) Urban seismic risk evaluation: a holistic approach. Nat Hazards 40:137–172CrossRef Carreňo ML, Cardona OD, Barbat A (2007b) Urban seismic risk evaluation: a holistic approach. Nat Hazards 40:137–172CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat CIMNE (2009) Methods and indicator systems for assessing vulnerability and risk: detailed literature review. Deliverable to WT 1.2, MOVE (methods for the improvement of vulnerability assessment in Europe) CIMNE (2009) Methods and indicator systems for assessing vulnerability and risk: detailed literature review. Deliverable to WT 1.2, MOVE (methods for the improvement of vulnerability assessment in Europe)
Zurück zum Zitat Committee on Assessing the Costs of Natural Disasters (1999) The impacts of natural disasters: a framework for loss estimation, committee on assessing the costs of natural disasters, National Research Council, Washington, United States of America. http://www.nap.edu/catalog/6425.html Committee on Assessing the Costs of Natural Disasters (1999) The impacts of natural disasters: a framework for loss estimation, committee on assessing the costs of natural disasters, National Research Council, Washington, United States of America. http://​www.​nap.​edu/​catalog/​6425.​html
Zurück zum Zitat Corominas J, Copons R, Moya J, Vilaplana J, Maltimir J, Amigó J (2005) Quantitative assessment of the residual risk in a rock fall protected area. Landslides 2:343–357CrossRef Corominas J, Copons R, Moya J, Vilaplana J, Maltimir J, Amigó J (2005) Quantitative assessment of the residual risk in a rock fall protected area. Landslides 2:343–357CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Corominas J, van Westen C, Frattini P, Cascini L, Malet JP, Fotopoulou S, Catani F, van den Eeckhaut M, Mavrouli O-C, Agliardi F, Pitilakis K, Winter MG, Pastor M, Ferlisi SS, Tofani V, Hervás J, Smith J (2013) Recommendations for the quantitative assessment of landslide risk. Bull Eng Geol Environ. doi:10.1007/s10064-013-0538-8 Corominas J, van Westen C, Frattini P, Cascini L, Malet JP, Fotopoulou S, Catani F, van den Eeckhaut M, Mavrouli O-C, Agliardi F, Pitilakis K, Winter MG, Pastor M, Ferlisi SS, Tofani V, Hervás J, Smith J (2013) Recommendations for the quantitative assessment of landslide risk. Bull Eng Geol Environ. doi:10.​1007/​s10064-013-0538-8
Zurück zum Zitat Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, Shirley LW (2003) Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Q 84(2):242–261CrossRef Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, Shirley LW (2003) Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Q 84(2):242–261CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dwyer A, Zoppou C, Nielsen O, Day S, Roberts S (2004) Quantifying social vulnerability: a methodology for identifying those at risk to natural hazards, Australian Government, Geoscience Australia Dwyer A, Zoppou C, Nielsen O, Day S, Roberts S (2004) Quantifying social vulnerability: a methodology for identifying those at risk to natural hazards, Australian Government, Geoscience Australia
Zurück zum Zitat Heinimann HR (1999) Risikoanalyse bei gravitativen Naturgefahren—Fallbeispiele und Daten, Umwelt-Materialen 107/I, Bern, 1999 Heinimann HR (1999) Risikoanalyse bei gravitativen Naturgefahren—Fallbeispiele und Daten, Umwelt-Materialen 107/I, Bern, 1999
Zurück zum Zitat Kappos AJ, Panagopoulos G, Sextos AG, Papanikolaou VK, Stylianidis KC (2010) Development of comprehensive earthquake loss scenarios for a Greek and a Turkish city—structural aspects. Earthq Struct 1(2):197–214CrossRef Kappos AJ, Panagopoulos G, Sextos AG, Papanikolaou VK, Stylianidis KC (2010) Development of comprehensive earthquake loss scenarios for a Greek and a Turkish city—structural aspects. Earthq Struct 1(2):197–214CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat King D, MacGregor C (2000) Using social indicators to measure community vulnerability to natural hazards. Aust J Emerg Manag 15(3):52–57 King D, MacGregor C (2000) Using social indicators to measure community vulnerability to natural hazards. Aust J Emerg Manag 15(3):52–57
Zurück zum Zitat Li Z, Nadim F, Huang H, Uzielli M, Lacasse S (2010) Quantitative vulnerability estimation for scenario-based landslide hazards. Landslides 7(2):125–134CrossRef Li Z, Nadim F, Huang H, Uzielli M, Lacasse S (2010) Quantitative vulnerability estimation for scenario-based landslide hazards. Landslides 7(2):125–134CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Malet J-P, Laigle D, Remaître A, Maquaire O (2005) Triggering conditions and mobility of debris-flows associated to complex earthflows. Geomorphology 66(1–4):215–235CrossRef Malet J-P, Laigle D, Remaître A, Maquaire O (2005) Triggering conditions and mobility of debris-flows associated to complex earthflows. Geomorphology 66(1–4):215–235CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nadim F, Kjekstad O, Peduzzi P, Herold C, Jaedicke C (2006) Global landslide and avalanche hotspots. Landslides 3(2):159–174CrossRef Nadim F, Kjekstad O, Peduzzi P, Herold C, Jaedicke C (2006) Global landslide and avalanche hotspots. Landslides 3(2):159–174CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Papathoma-Köhle M, Neuhäuser B, Ratzinger K, Wenzel H, Dominey-Howes D (2007) Elements at risk as a framework for assessing the vulnerability of communities to landslides. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 7:765–779CrossRef Papathoma-Köhle M, Neuhäuser B, Ratzinger K, Wenzel H, Dominey-Howes D (2007) Elements at risk as a framework for assessing the vulnerability of communities to landslides. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 7:765–779CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Papathoma-Köhle M, Kappes MS, Keiler M, Glade T (2011) Physical vulnerability assessment for alpine hazards: state of the art and future needs future needs. Nat Hazards 58(2):645–680CrossRef Papathoma-Köhle M, Kappes MS, Keiler M, Glade T (2011) Physical vulnerability assessment for alpine hazards: state of the art and future needs future needs. Nat Hazards 58(2):645–680CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pitilakis K, Anastasiadis A, Kakderi K, Manakou M, Manou D, Alexoudi M, Fotopoulou S, Argyroudis S, Senetakis K (2011) Development of comprehensive earthquake loss scenarios for a Greek and a Turkish city: seismic hazard, geotechnical and lifeline aspects. Earthq Struct 2(3):207–232CrossRef Pitilakis K, Anastasiadis A, Kakderi K, Manakou M, Manou D, Alexoudi M, Fotopoulou S, Argyroudis S, Senetakis K (2011) Development of comprehensive earthquake loss scenarios for a Greek and a Turkish city: seismic hazard, geotechnical and lifeline aspects. Earthq Struct 2(3):207–232CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Puissant A, Van Den Eeckhaut M, Malet JP, Maquaire O (2013) Landslide consequence analysis: a region-scale indicator-based methodology. Landslides J Int Consort on Landslides (in press). doi:10.1007/s10346-013-0429-x Puissant A, Van Den Eeckhaut M, Malet JP, Maquaire O (2013) Landslide consequence analysis: a region-scale indicator-based methodology. Landslides J Int Consort on Landslides (in press). doi:10.​1007/​s10346-013-0429-x
Zurück zum Zitat Steinführer A, De Marchi B, Kuhlicke C, Scolobig A, Tapsell S, Tunstall S (2009) Vulnerability, resilience and social constructions of flood risk in exposed communities. FLOODsite report T11-07-12. http://www.floodsite.net Steinführer A, De Marchi B, Kuhlicke C, Scolobig A, Tapsell S, Tunstall S (2009) Vulnerability, resilience and social constructions of flood risk in exposed communities. FLOODsite report T11-07-12. http://​www.​floodsite.​net
Zurück zum Zitat Taubenböck H, Post J, Roth A, Zosseder K, Strunz G, Dech S (2008) A conceptual vulnerability and risk framework as outline to identify capabilities of remote sensing. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 8:409–420CrossRef Taubenböck H, Post J, Roth A, Zosseder K, Strunz G, Dech S (2008) A conceptual vulnerability and risk framework as outline to identify capabilities of remote sensing. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 8:409–420CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Uzielli M, Nadim F, Lacasse S, Kaynia AM (2008) A conceptual framework for quantitative estimation of physical vulnerability to landslides. Eng Geol 102:251–256CrossRef Uzielli M, Nadim F, Lacasse S, Kaynia AM (2008) A conceptual framework for quantitative estimation of physical vulnerability to landslides. Eng Geol 102:251–256CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Assessment of socioeconomic vulnerability to landslides using an indicator-based approach: methodology and case studies
verfasst von
U. M. K. Eidsvig
A. McLean
B. V. Vangelsten
B. Kalsnes
R. L. Ciurean
S. Argyroudis
M. G. Winter
O. C. Mavrouli
S. Fotopoulou
K. Pitilakis
A. Baills
J.-P. Malet
G. Kaiser
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2014
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment / Ausgabe 2/2014
Print ISSN: 1435-9529
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-9537
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-014-0571-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2014

Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 2/2014 Zur Ausgabe