nach oben

Cellulose

Erschienen in:

26.09.2020 | Original Research

Influence of bacterial nanocellulose surface modification on calcium phosphates precipitation for bone tissue engineering

verfasst von: A. Cañas-Gutiérrez, E. Martinez-Correa, D. Suárez-Avendaño, D. Arboleda-Toro, C. Castro-Herazo

Erschienen in: Cellulose | Ausgabe 18/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Bacterial nanocellulose (BNC) is a nano fibrillar polymer, which is biostable and non-resorbable when inside the human body. It has excellent biocompatibility and a microstructure with high mechanical strength, and if processed correctly, can mimic the extra-cellular matrix architecture. BNC, modified with bone-like minerals such as calcium phosphates, can improve cell adhesion and promote the formation of new bone tissues. As a result of the need for three-dimensional (3D) porous scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration, this study evaluated the effect of calcium phosphate mineralization process on BNC and (2,2,6,6-Tetramethylpiperidin-1-yl)oxyl (TEMPO)-oxidized BNC scaffolds, to understand the influence of hydroxyl or carboxylate groups on the nucleation and growth of apatite crystals. The results showed 3D scaffolds with controlled microporosity, between 50 and 350 µm, and interconnected pores. The porous morphology of the TEMPO-oxidized BNC scaffolds varied significantly with the oxidation time and only remained preserved after 60 min of the TEMPO-mediated oxidation. BNC and TEMPO-oxidized BNC scaffolds were used to compare two different mineralization treatments. The growth of homogeneously distributed microcrystals was observed in the unmodified BNC scaffolds, whereas heterogeneously distributed microcrystals were observed in the TEMPO-oxidized BNC scaffolds because of the oxidation treatment which affected the continuity of the surface by fracturing some fibers. Also, in vitro cell studies revealed good cellular adhesion and high cell viability in the modified and unmodified BNC scaffolds. Most of the modifications seemed adequate for cellular adhesion.

Graphic abstract

Vorheriger Artikel Hydrophobic modification of bacterial cellulose using oxygen plasma treatment and chemical vapor deposition

Nächster Artikel Low cost membrane of wood nanocellulose obtained by mechanical defibrillation for potential applications as wound dressing

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Aguiar H, Chiussi S, López-Álvarez M et al (2018) Structural characterization of bioceramics and mineralized tissues based on Raman and XRD techniques. Ceram Int 44:495–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.09.203CrossRef

Akhlaghi SP, Berry RC, Tam KC (2013) Surface modification of cellulose nanocrystal with chitosan oligosaccharide for drug delivery applications. Cellulose 20:1747–1764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-9954-yCrossRef

Backdahl H, Esguerra M, Delbro D et al (2008) Engineering microporosity in bacterial cellulose scaffolds. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2:320–330. https://doi.org/10.1002/termCrossRefPubMed

Busuioc C, Stroescu M, Stoica-Guzun A et al (2016) Fabrication of 3D calcium phosphates based scaffolds using bacterial cellulose as template. Ceram Int 42:15449–15458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.06.196CrossRef

Cañas AI, Delgado JP, Gartner C (2016) Biocompatible scaffolds composed of chemically crosslinked chitosan and gelatin for tissue engineering. J Appl Polym Sci 133:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.43814CrossRef

Cheung CW, Porter JF, McKay G (2000) Elovich equation and modified second-order equation for sorption of cadmium ions onto bone char. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 75:963–970. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4660(200011)75:11<963:AID-JCTB302>3.0.CO;2-ZCrossRef

Chiaoprakobkij N, Sanchavanakit N, Subbalekha K et al (2011) Characterization and biocompatibility of bacterial cellulose/alginate composite sponges with human keratinocytes and gingival fibroblasts. Carbohydr Polym 85:548–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.03.011CrossRef

Choi MO, Kim Y (2012) Fabrication of gelatin / calcium phosphate composite nanofibrous membranes by biomimetic mineralization. Int J Biol Macromol 50:1188–1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2012.04.001CrossRefPubMed

Davies E, Muller KH, Wong WC et al (2014) Citrate bridges between mineral platelets in bone. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111:E1354–E1363. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1315080111CrossRefPubMed

de Oliveira Barud HG, da Silva RR, da Silva BH et al (2016) A multipurpose natural and renewable polymer in medical applications: bacterial cellulose. Carbohydr Polym 153:406–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.07.059CrossRefPubMed

Drouet C (2013) Apatite formation: why it may not work as planned, and how to conclusively identify apatite compounds. Biomed Res Int

Ferreira AM, Gentile P, Chiono V, Ciardelli G (2012) Collagen for bone tissue regeneration. Acta Biomater 8:3191–3200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.06.014CrossRefPubMed

Figueiredo M, Fernando A, Martins G et al (2010) Effect of the calcination temperature on the composition and microstructure of hydroxyapatite derived from human and animal bone. Ceram Int 36:2383–2393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2010.07.016CrossRef

Frohbergh ME, Katsman A, Botta GP et al (2012) Biomaterials Electrospun hydroxyapatite-containing chitosan nano fi bers crosslinked with genipin for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 33:9167–9178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.09.009CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Glimcher MJ (1998) The nature of the mineral phase in bone: biological and clinical implications. In: Metabolic bone disease and clinically related disorders. Woodhead Publishing Limited, pp 23–50

Gonte RR, Balasubramanian K, Mumbrekar JD (2013) Porous and cross-linked cellulose beads for toxic metal ion removal: Hg(II) ions. J Polym 2013:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/309136CrossRef

Hafsteinsdóttir EG, White DA, Gore DB (2013) Effects of freeze e thaw cycling on metal-phosphate formation and stability in single and multi-metal systems. Environ Pollut 175:168–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.01.007CrossRefPubMed

Hameed BH, Tan IAW, Ahmad AL (2008) Adsorption isotherm, kinetic modeling and mechanism of 2,4,6-trichlorophenol on coconut husk-based activated carbon. Chem Eng J 144:235–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2008.01.028CrossRef

He M, Chang C, Peng N, Zhang L (2012) Structure and properties of hydroxyapatite/cellulose nanocomposite films. Carbohydr Polym 87:2512–2518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.11.029CrossRef

Ho YS, McKay G (1999a) The sorption of lead(II) ions on peat. Water Res 33:578–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00207-3CrossRef

Ho YS, McKay G (1999b) Pseudo-second order model for sorption processes. Process Biochem 34:451–465. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.7b00090CrossRef

Holzwarth JM, Ma PX (2011) Biomimetic nanofibrous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 32:9622–9629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.09.009CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hong L, Wang YL, Jia SR et al (2006) Hydroxyapatite/bacterial cellulose composites synthesized via a biomimetic route. Mater Lett 60:1710–1713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2005.12.004CrossRef

Hutchens SA, Benson RS, Evans BR et al (2006) Biomimetic synthesis of calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite in a natural hydrogel. Biomaterials 27:4661–4670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.04.032CrossRefPubMed

Karageorgiou V, Kaplan D (2005) Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials 26:5474–5491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002CrossRefPubMed

Lai C, Sheng L, Liao S et al (2013) Surface characterization of TEMPO-oxidized bacterial cellulose. Surf Interface Anal 45:1673–1679. https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.5306CrossRef

Lasdon LS, Waren A., Jain A, Rather M (1976) Design and testing of a generalized reduce gradient code for nonlinear programming

Legros R, Balmain N, Bonel G (1987) Age-related changes in mineral of rat and bovine cortical bone. Calcif Tissue Int 41:137–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02563793CrossRefPubMed

Li SH, Liu Q, De Wijn JR et al (1997) In vitro calcium phosphate formation on a natural composite material, bamboo. Biomaterials 18:389–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(96)00122-6CrossRefPubMed

Liu H, Peng H, Wu Y et al (2013) The promotion of bone regeneration by nano fi brous hydroxyapatite/ chitosan scaffolds by effects on integrin-BMP/ Smad signaling pathway in BMSCs. Biomaterials 34:4404–4417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.02.048CrossRefPubMed

Lu M, Zhang Y, Guan X et al (2014) Thermodynamics and kinetics of adsorption for heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions onto surface amino-bacterial cellulose. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(14)63271-4CrossRef

Luo H, Xiong G, Zhang C et al (2015) Surface controlled calcium phosphate formation on three-dimensional bacterial cellulose-based nano fibers. Mater Sci Eng C 49:526–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.01.053CrossRef

Madhumathi K, Binulal NS, Nagahama H et al (2009) Preparation and characterization of novel B-chitin-hydroxyapatite composite membranes for tissue engineering applications. Int J Biol Macromol 44:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2008.09.013CrossRefPubMed

Madurantakam PA, Rodriguez IA, Cost CP et al (2009) Multiple factor interactions in biomimetic mineralization of electrospun scaffolds. Biomaterials 30:5456–5464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.06.043CrossRefPubMed

Mathew M, Brown WE, Schroeder LW, Dickens B (1988) Crystal structure of octacalcium bis(hydrogenphosphate) tetrakis(phosphate)pentahydrate, Ca8(HP04)2(PO4)4.5H2O. J Crystallogr Spectrosc Res 18:235–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01194315CrossRef

Mizuno M, Shindo M, Kobayashi D et al (1997) Osteogenesis by bone marrow stromal cells maintained on type I collagen matrix gels in vivo. Bone 20:101–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/s8756-3282(96)00349-3CrossRefPubMed

Moreau JL, Caccamese JF, Coletti DP et al (2007) Tissue engineering solutions for cleft palates. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 65:2503–2511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2007.06.648CrossRefPubMed

Morimoto S, Anada T, Honda Y, Suzuki O (2012) Comparative study on in vitro biocompatibility of synthetic octacalcium phosphate and calcium phosphate ceramics used clinically. Biomed Mater. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-6041/7/4/045020CrossRefPubMed

Nge TT, Nogi M, Yano H, Sugiyama J (2010) Microstructure and mechanical properties of bacterial cellulose/chitosan porous scaffold. Cellulose 17:349–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-009-9394-xCrossRef

Nge TT, Sugiyama J (2006) Surface functional group dependent apatite formation on bacterial cellulose microfibrils network in a simulated body fluid. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 33:97–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.aCrossRef

Nge TT, Sugiyama J (2013) Biomimetic mineralization of apatite on bacterial cellulose. In: Gama M, Gatenholm P, Klemm D (eds) Bacterial nanocellulose. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 217–238

Osorio M, Fernández-Morales P, Gañán P et al (2019) Development of novel three-dimensional scaffolds based on bacterial nanocellulose for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: Effect of processing methods, pore size, and surface area. J Biomed Mater Res - Part A 107:348–359. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36532CrossRef

Park M, Lee D, Shin S, Hyun J (2015) Effect of negatively charged cellulose nanofibers on the dispersion of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles for scaffolds in bone tissue engineering. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces 130:222–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.04.014CrossRefPubMed

Reznikov N, Bilton M, Lari L et al (2018) Fractal-like hierarchical organization of bone begins at the nanoscale. Science (80-) 360:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2189CrossRef

Shahabi S, Najafi F, Majdabadi A et al (2014) Effect of gamma irradiation on structural and biological properties of a PLGA-PEG-hydroxyapatite composite. Sci World J. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/420616CrossRef

Sharif F, Ur Rehman I, Muhammad N, MacNeil S (2016) Dental materials for cleft palate repair. Mater Sci Eng C 61:1018–1028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.12.019CrossRef

Shi S, Chen S, Zhang X et al (2008) Biomimetic mineralization synthesis of calcium-deficient carbonate-containing hydroxyapatite in a three-dimensional network of bacterial cellulose. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 84:285–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.2037CrossRef

Stevens MM (2008a) Biomaterials for bone tissue engineering. Mater Today 11:18–25CrossRef

Stevens MM (2008b) Biomaterials for bone Materials that enhance bone regeneration have a wealth of potential. Bone 11:18–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(08)70086-5CrossRef

Tampieri A, Sandri M, Landi E et al (2008) Design of graded biomimetic osteochondral composite scaffolds. Biomaterials 29:3539–3546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.05.008CrossRefPubMed

Teeri TT, Brumer H, Daniel G, Gatenholm P (2007) Biomimetic engineering of cellulose-based materials. Trends Biotechnol 25:299–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2007.05.002CrossRefPubMed

Vetter U, Eanes ED, Kopp JB et al (1991) Changes in apatite crystal size in bones of patients with osteogenesis imperfecta. Calcif Tissue Int 49:248–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02556213CrossRefPubMed

Wan Y, Hong L, Jia S et al (2006) Synthesis and characterization of hydroxyapatite–bacterial cellulose nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 66:1825–1832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.11.027CrossRef

Wan YZ, Huang Y, Yuan CD et al (2007) Biomimetic synthesis of hydroxyapatite/bacterial cellulose nanocomposites for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng C 27:855–864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2006.10.002CrossRef

Wu CN, Fuh SC, Lin SP et al (2018) TEMPO-Oxidized Bacterial Cellulose Pellicle with Silver Nanoparticles for Wound Dressing. Biomacromol 19:544–554. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.7b01660CrossRef

Yin N, Chen SY, Ouyang Y et al (2011) Biomimetic mineralization synthesis of hydroxyapatite bacterial cellulose nanocomposites. Prog Nat Sci Mater Int 21:472–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0071(12)60085-9CrossRef

Yunus Basha R, Sampath SK, Doble M (2015) Design of biocomposite materials for bone tissue regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C 57:452–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.07.016CrossRef

Zaborowska M, Bodin A, Bäckdahl H et al (2010) Microporous bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for bone regeneration. Acta Biomater 6:2540–2547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.01.004CrossRefPubMed

Zhang R, Ma PX (2004) Biomimetic polymer/apatite composite scaffolds for mineralized tissue engineering. Macromol Biosci 4:100–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.200300017CrossRefPubMed

Zhao F, Yin Y, Lu WW et al (2002) Preparation and histological evaluation of biomimetic three-dimensional hydroxyapatite/chitosan-gelatin network composite scaffolds. Biomaterials 23:3227–3234. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00077-7CrossRefPubMed

Zhou H, Lee J (2011) Nanoscale hydroxyapatite particles for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 7:2769–2781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2011.03.019CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Influence of bacterial nanocellulose surface modification on calcium phosphates precipitation for bone tissue engineering
verfasst von: A. Cañas-Gutiérrez
E. Martinez-Correa
D. Suárez-Avendaño
D. Arboleda-Toro
C. Castro-Herazo
Publikationsdatum: 26.09.2020
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Cellulose / Ausgabe 18/2020
Print ISSN: 0969-0239
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-882X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03470-6

Springer Professional

Abstract

Graphic abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 18/2020

The current status of the enzyme-mediated isolation and functionalization of nanocelluloses: production, properties, techno-economics, and opportunities

Cocoa shell: an industrial by-product for the preparation of suspensions of holocellulose nanofibers and fat

Strong silica-nanocellulose anisotropic composite foams combine low thermal conductivity and low moisture uptake

Effect of nanofiber addition on the physical–mechanical properties of chemimechanical pulp handsheets for packaging

Oxidative treatments for cellulose nanofibers production: a comparative study between TEMPO-mediated and ammonium persulfate oxidation

Lignocellulosic nanofibers for the reinforcement of brown line paper in industrial water systems