Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies 1/2020

06.05.2019

Blended learning in computing education: It’s here but does it work?

verfasst von: Ellen F. Monk, Kevin R. Guidry, Kathleen Langan Pusecker, Thomas W. Ilvento

Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies | Ausgabe 1/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Blended learning, a combination of face-to-face and computer-assisted pedagogy, is gaining acceptance at universities as an alternative learning experience. Modern technology has given faculty new ways to incorporate active learning and increase student engagement in their courses. Although the broad history of technology-enhanced coursework has demonstrated that student learning is usually very comparable to what occurs in traditional coursework, recent studies focusing specifically on blended learning in totally redesigned classes report positive results. Were those positive results due to the online blending or to the redesign of the class? To answer this question and other limitations and challenges in past studies, the authors present their unique research that measures learning in a blended undergraduate management information systems course where identical classes were compared, one being all face-to-face and one being one-third online. By varying only course modality, this research answers the question of whether blended learning is a superior learning environment in an undergraduate MIS class, a second-level MIS class covering ERP, business processes, databases, advanced spreadsheets, and data analytics. Collecting both quantitative and qualitative data, the authors use a critical realism lens to create a mechanism for learning. Quantitative data, analyzed by multiple regression models and qualitative data, analyzed by content analysis lead to the outcome that learning is comparable to traditional coursework, grade-wise, but students prefer face-to-face class time. It also reveals that self-regulatory skills are evident, confirming that blended learning can aid in the construction of learning.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Huneidi, A., & Schreurs, J. (2013). Constructivism based blended learning in higher education, world summit on knowledge society 2011. CCIS, 278, 581–591. Al-Huneidi, A., & Schreurs, J. (2013). Constructivism based blended learning in higher education, world summit on knowledge society 2011. CCIS, 278, 581–591.
Zurück zum Zitat Arbaugh, J. B., M. R. Godfrey, M. Johnson, B. L. Pollack, B. Niendorf, & Wresch, W. (2009). Research in online and blended learning in the business disciplines: Key findings and possible future directions, Internet and Higher Education. 12, 71–87 Arbaugh, J. B., M. R. Godfrey, M. Johnson, B. L. Pollack, B. Niendorf, & Wresch, W. (2009). Research in online and blended learning in the business disciplines: Key findings and possible future directions, Internet and Higher Education. 12, 71–87
Zurück zum Zitat Alrushiedat, N., & Olfman, L. (2013). Aiding participation and engagement in a blended learning environment. Journal of Information Systems Education, 24(2), 133–145. Alrushiedat, N., & Olfman, L. (2013). Aiding participation and engagement in a blended learning environment. Journal of Information Systems Education, 24(2), 133–145.
Zurück zum Zitat Biggs, J. B. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university (2nd ed.). London: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press. Biggs, J. B. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university (2nd ed.). London: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Bliuc, A., Goodyear, P., & Ellis, R. (2007). Research focus and methodological choices in studies into students’ experiences of blended learning in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 10(1), 231–244.CrossRef Bliuc, A., Goodyear, P., & Ellis, R. (2007). Research focus and methodological choices in studies into students’ experiences of blended learning in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 10(1), 231–244.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (2005). The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local design. San Francisco: Pfeiffer. Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (2005). The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local design. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
Zurück zum Zitat Bower, M., Dalgarno, B., Kennedy, G. E., Lee, M. J. W., & Kenney, J. (2015). Design and implementation factors in blended synchronous learning environments: Outcomes from a cross-case analysis. Computers & Education, 86, 1–17.CrossRef Bower, M., Dalgarno, B., Kennedy, G. E., Lee, M. J. W., & Kenney, J. (2015). Design and implementation factors in blended synchronous learning environments: Outcomes from a cross-case analysis. Computers & Education, 86, 1–17.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Broadbent, J. (2017). Comparing online and blended learner’s self-regulated learning strategies and academic performance. Internet and Higher Education, 33, 24–32.CrossRef Broadbent, J. (2017). Comparing online and blended learner’s self-regulated learning strategies and academic performance. Internet and Higher Education, 33, 24–32.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bygstad, B. & Munkvold, B. E. (2011). In search of mechanisms. conducting a critical realist data analysis, thirty second international conference on information systems, 6 December 2011 Shanghai: ICIS. Bygstad, B. & Munkvold, B. E. (2011). In search of mechanisms. conducting a critical realist data analysis, thirty second international conference on information systems, 6 December 2011 Shanghai: ICIS.
Zurück zum Zitat Castle, S. R., & McGuire, C. J. (2010). An analysis of student self-assessment of online blended, and face-to-face learning environments: Implications for sustainable education delivery, international education studies. 3(3):36-40. Castle, S. R., & McGuire, C. J. (2010). An analysis of student self-assessment of online blended, and face-to-face learning environments: Implications for sustainable education delivery, international education studies. 3(3):36-40.
Zurück zum Zitat Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation Design & Analysis Issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation Design & Analysis Issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing.
Zurück zum Zitat Cunningham, D. J. (1992). Assessing constructions and constructing assessments: A dialogue. In T. M. Duffy & D. H. Jonassen (Eds.), Constructivism and the technology of instruction a conversation (pp. 35–44). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cunningham, D. J. (1992). Assessing constructions and constructing assessments: A dialogue. In T. M. Duffy & D. H. Jonassen (Eds.), Constructivism and the technology of instruction a conversation (pp. 35–44). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Zurück zum Zitat Danermark, B., Ekstrom, M., Jakobsen, L., & Karlsson, J. C. (2002). Explaining society: Critical realism in the social sciences. London: Routledge. Danermark, B., Ekstrom, M., Jakobsen, L., & Karlsson, J. C. (2002). Explaining society: Critical realism in the social sciences. London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat De Corte, E. (2003). Transfer as the productive use of acquired knowledge, skills, and motivations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(12), 142–146.CrossRef De Corte, E. (2003). Transfer as the productive use of acquired knowledge, skills, and motivations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(12), 142–146.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Demirer, V., & Sahin, I. (2009). Effect of blended learning environment on transfer of learning: An experimental study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29, 518–529.CrossRef Demirer, V., & Sahin, I. (2009). Effect of blended learning environment on transfer of learning: An experimental study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29, 518–529.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Du, C. (2011). A Comparison of Traditional And Blended Learning In Introductory Principles of Accounting Course, American Journal of Business Education. 4(9), 1–10 Du, C. (2011). A Comparison of Traditional And Blended Learning In Introductory Principles of Accounting Course, American Journal of Business Education. 4(9), 1–10
Zurück zum Zitat Duffy, T. M., & Jonassen, D. H. (1992). Constructivism: New implications for instructional technology. In T. M. Duffy & D. H. Jonassen (Eds.), Constructivism and the technology of instruction a conversation. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Duffy, T. M., & Jonassen, D. H. (1992). Constructivism: New implications for instructional technology. In T. M. Duffy & D. H. Jonassen (Eds.), Constructivism and the technology of instruction a conversation. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Zurück zum Zitat EL-Deghaidy, H., & Nouby, A. (2008). Effectiveness of a blended e-learning cooperative approach in an Egyptian teacher-education programme. Computers & Education, 51(3), 988–1006.CrossRef EL-Deghaidy, H., & Nouby, A. (2008). Effectiveness of a blended e-learning cooperative approach in an Egyptian teacher-education programme. Computers & Education, 51(3), 988–1006.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ellis, R. A., & Bliuc, A. (2016). An exploration into first-year university students’ approaches to inquiry and online learning technologies in blended environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(5), 970–980.CrossRef Ellis, R. A., & Bliuc, A. (2016). An exploration into first-year university students’ approaches to inquiry and online learning technologies in blended environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(5), 970–980.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ellis, R. A., Pardo, A., & Han, F. (2016). Quality in blended learning environments – Significant differences in how students approach learning collaborations. Computers & Education, 102(102), 90–102.CrossRef Ellis, R. A., Pardo, A., & Han, F. (2016). Quality in blended learning environments – Significant differences in how students approach learning collaborations. Computers & Education, 102(102), 90–102.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Farley, A., Jain, A., & Thomson, D. (2011). Blended learning in finance: Comparing student perceptions of lectures, tutorials and online learning environments across different year levels. Economic Papers, 30(1), 99–108.CrossRef Farley, A., Jain, A., & Thomson, D. (2011). Blended learning in finance: Comparing student perceptions of lectures, tutorials and online learning environments across different year levels. Economic Papers, 30(1), 99–108.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. (2013). Institutional change and leadership associated with blended learning innovation: Two case studies. Internet and Higher Education, 18(18), 24–28.CrossRef Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. (2013). Institutional change and leadership associated with blended learning innovation: Two case studies. Internet and Higher Education, 18(18), 24–28.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gomez, L. A. O., & Duart, J. M. (2012). A hybrid approach to university subject learning activities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 259–271.CrossRef Gomez, L. A. O., & Duart, J. M. (2012). A hybrid approach to university subject learning activities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 259–271.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Graham, C. R., Woodfield, W., & Harrison, J. B. (2013). A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 18(18), 4–14.CrossRef Graham, C. R., Woodfield, W., & Harrison, J. B. (2013). A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 18(18), 4–14.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hadjerrouit, S. (2008). Towards a blended learning model for teaching and learning computer programming: A case study. Informatics in Education., 7(2), 181–210. Hadjerrouit, S. (2008). Towards a blended learning model for teaching and learning computer programming: A case study. Informatics in Education., 7(2), 181–210.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamilton, J., & Tee, S. W. (2010). Smart utilization of tertiary instructional modes. Computers & Education, 54(54), 1036–1053.CrossRef Hamilton, J., & Tee, S. W. (2010). Smart utilization of tertiary instructional modes. Computers & Education, 54(54), 1036–1053.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hamilton, J., & Tee, S. W. (2013). Blended teaching and learning: A two-way systems approach. Higher Education Research and Development, 32(5), 748–764.CrossRef Hamilton, J., & Tee, S. W. (2013). Blended teaching and learning: A two-way systems approach. Higher Education Research and Development, 32(5), 748–764.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hartono, E., Monk, E.F., & Serva, M. (2015). Rethinking the introduction to computing class: Follow-up and reporting results from a blended-learning model, AIS educator association 17th Annual Conference (AISEA), June 2015, Colorado Springs, Colorado. Hartono, E., Monk, E.F., & Serva, M. (2015). Rethinking the introduction to computing class: Follow-up and reporting results from a blended-learning model, AIS educator association 17th Annual Conference (AISEA), June 2015, Colorado Springs, Colorado.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones, N., Chew, E., Jones, C., & Lau, A. (2009). Over the worst or at the eye of the storm? Education and Training, 51(1), 6–22.CrossRef Jones, N., Chew, E., Jones, C., & Lau, A. (2009). Over the worst or at the eye of the storm? Education and Training, 51(1), 6–22.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Keith, N. K., & Simmers, C. S. (2013). Adapting the marketing educational environment for multi-cultural millennials: The Chinese experience. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal., 17(3), 83–92. Keith, N. K., & Simmers, C. S. (2013). Adapting the marketing educational environment for multi-cultural millennials: The Chinese experience. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal., 17(3), 83–92.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuh, G. D. (2008). High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Washington, DC: AAC&U. Kuh, G. D. (2008). High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Washington, DC: AAC&U.
Zurück zum Zitat Lindorff, M., & McKeown, T. (2013). An aid to transition? The perceived utility of online resources for on-campus first year management students. Education and Training, 55(4/5), 414–428.CrossRef Lindorff, M., & McKeown, T. (2013). An aid to transition? The perceived utility of online resources for on-campus first year management students. Education and Training, 55(4/5), 414–428.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lopez-Perez, M. V., Perez-Lopez, M. C., & Rodriguez-Ariza, L. (2011). Blended learning in higher education: Students’ perceptions and their relation to outcomes. Computers & Education, 56(56), 818–826.CrossRef Lopez-Perez, M. V., Perez-Lopez, M. C., & Rodriguez-Ariza, L. (2011). Blended learning in higher education: Students’ perceptions and their relation to outcomes. Computers & Education, 56(56), 818–826.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lopez-Perez, M. V., Perez-Lopez, M. C., Rodriguez-Ariza, L., & Argente-Linares, E. (2013). The influence of the use of technology on student outcomes in a blended learning context. Education Technical Research Development., 61(61), 625–638.CrossRef Lopez-Perez, M. V., Perez-Lopez, M. C., Rodriguez-Ariza, L., & Argente-Linares, E. (2013). The influence of the use of technology on student outcomes in a blended learning context. Education Technical Research Development., 61(61), 625–638.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Manwaring, K., Larsen, R., Graham, C. R., Henrie, C. R., & Halverson, L. R. (2017). Investigating student engagement in blended learning settings using experience sampling and structural equation modeling. The Internet and Higher Education., 35(35), 21–33.CrossRef Manwaring, K., Larsen, R., Graham, C. R., Henrie, C. R., & Halverson, L. R. (2017). Investigating student engagement in blended learning settings using experience sampling and structural equation modeling. The Internet and Higher Education., 35(35), 21–33.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Martyn, M. (2003). The hybrid online model: Good practice. Educause Quarterly, 1, 18–23. Martyn, M. (2003). The hybrid online model: Good practice. Educause Quarterly, 1, 18–23.
Zurück zum Zitat McKenzie, W. A., Perini, E., Rohlf, V., Toukhsati, S., Conduit, R., & Sanson, G. (2013). A blended learning lecture delivery model for large and diverse undergraduate cohorts. Computers & Education, 64(64), 116–126.CrossRef McKenzie, W. A., Perini, E., Rohlf, V., Toukhsati, S., Conduit, R., & Sanson, G. (2013). A blended learning lecture delivery model for large and diverse undergraduate cohorts. Computers & Education, 64(64), 116–126.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115, 1–47. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115, 1–47.
Zurück zum Zitat Mingers, J. (2001). Combining IS research methods: Towards a pluralist methodology. Information Systems Research, 12(3), 240–259.CrossRef Mingers, J. (2001). Combining IS research methods: Towards a pluralist methodology. Information Systems Research, 12(3), 240–259.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Orlikowski, W. J., & Baroudi, J. J. (1991). Studying information Technology in Organizations: Research approaches and assumptions. Information Systems Research, 2(1), 1–28.CrossRef Orlikowski, W. J., & Baroudi, J. J. (1991). Studying information Technology in Organizations: Research approaches and assumptions. Information Systems Research, 2(1), 1–28.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Osgerby, J. (2013). Students’ perceptions of the introduction of a blended learning environment: An exploratory case study. Accounting Education: An International Journal., 22(1), 85–99.CrossRef Osgerby, J. (2013). Students’ perceptions of the introduction of a blended learning environment: An exploratory case study. Accounting Education: An International Journal., 22(1), 85–99.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Owston, R. (2013). Blended learning policy and implementation: Introduction to the special issue. Internet and Higher Education, 18, 1–3.CrossRef Owston, R. (2013). Blended learning policy and implementation: Introduction to the special issue. Internet and Higher Education, 18, 1–3.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Owston, R., York, D., & Murtha, S. (2013). Student perceptions and achievement in a university blended learning strategic initiative. Internet and Higher Education, 18, 38–46.CrossRef Owston, R., York, D., & Murtha, S. (2013). Student perceptions and achievement in a university blended learning strategic initiative. Internet and Higher Education, 18, 38–46.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Phillips, D. C. (1995). The good, the bad, and the ugly: The many faces of constructivism. Educational Researcher, 24(7), 5–12.CrossRef Phillips, D. C. (1995). The good, the bad, and the ugly: The many faces of constructivism. Educational Researcher, 24(7), 5–12.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sayer, A. (1992). Method in social science: A realist Approach. London: Routledge. Sayer, A. (1992). Method in social science: A realist Approach. London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith, M. L. (2006). Overcoming theory-practice inconsistencies: Critical realism and information systems research. Information and Organization, 16, 191–211.CrossRef Smith, M. L. (2006). Overcoming theory-practice inconsistencies: Critical realism and information systems research. Information and Organization, 16, 191–211.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Stockwell, B. R., Stockwell, M. S., Cennamo, M., & Jiang, E. (2015). Blended learning improves science education. Cell., 162, 933–936.CrossRef Stockwell, B. R., Stockwell, M. S., Cennamo, M., & Jiang, E. (2015). Blended learning improves science education. Cell., 162, 933–936.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tynan, B., Ryan, Y., & Lamont-Mills, A. (2013). Examining workload models in online and blended teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(1), 1–10. Tynan, B., Ryan, Y., & Lamont-Mills, A. (2013). Examining workload models in online and blended teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(1), 1–10.
Zurück zum Zitat Yudko, E., Hirokawa, R., & Chi, R. (2008). Attitudes, beliefs, and attendance in a hybrid course. Computers & Education, 50(50), 1217–1227.CrossRef Yudko, E., Hirokawa, R., & Chi, R. (2008). Attitudes, beliefs, and attendance in a hybrid course. Computers & Education, 50(50), 1217–1227.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zhu, Y., Au, W., & Yates, G. (2016). University students’ self-control and self-regulated learning in a blended course. Internet and Higher Education, 30, 54–62.CrossRef Zhu, Y., Au, W., & Yates, G. (2016). University students’ self-control and self-regulated learning in a blended course. Internet and Higher Education, 30, 54–62.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Blended learning in computing education: It’s here but does it work?
verfasst von
Ellen F. Monk
Kevin R. Guidry
Kathleen Langan Pusecker
Thomas W. Ilvento
Publikationsdatum
06.05.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Education and Information Technologies / Ausgabe 1/2020
Print ISSN: 1360-2357
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7608
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09920-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2020

Education and Information Technologies 1/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner