nach oben

Education and Information Technologies

Erschienen in:

28.06.2021

Trends and development in research on computational thinking

verfasst von: Mehmet Tekdal

Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies | Ausgabe 5/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

As computational thinking (CT) has gained more attention as a research topic in the recent decade, a paper to identify trends and development in CT research would be timely and critical to understand the current research landscape and to guide future research endeavors. In this context, this study revealed the change in research trends in the field of CT in the last twelve years with the method of bibliometric mapping analysis. The relevant literature was searched in the SCOPUS database and 321 journal articles were identified. The VOSviewer software was used for analysis of the retrieved dataset. The findings of the study showed that (1) the research on computational thinking is an emerging area that has grown exponentially since the 2013s, (2) the literature in this area has been produced as a result of national and international collaboration of researchers in several institutions and countries, mostly in the United States, (3) the CT research is predominantly published in journals specializing in educational technology and feeds from information generated in education, computing, and social sciences, (4) research topics contributing to the CT literature are grouped under three themes: Integrating CT into Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) education, experimental studies on assessing CT skills, and discussing on definition of CT and CT skills, and (5) the CT has the general nature of an emerging discipline that is not yet mature, and will continue to evolve in the future. Overall, this work provides the current state of the art in this field and a research direction for future research. It is hoped that this study will accelerate the research in the field, guide new studies and contribute to the development of the field.

Vorheriger Artikel The Impact of SRA-Programming on Computational Thinking in a Visual Oriented Programming Environment

Nächster Artikel Developing student connectedness under remote learning using digital resources: A systematic review

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Agbo, F. J., Oyelere, S. S., Suhonen, J., & Adewumi, S. (2019). A systematic review of computational thinking approach for programming education in higher education institutions. In Proceedings of the 19th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3364510.3364521

Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2020). Developing young children’s computational thinking with educational robotics: An interaction effect between gender and scaffolding strategy. Computers in Human Behavior, 105, 105954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.018CrossRef

Atmatzidou, S., & Demetriadis, S. (2016). Advancing students’ computational thinking skills through educational robotics: A study on age and gender relevant differences [Article]. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 75, 661–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2015.10.008CrossRef

Barana, A., Conte, A., Fissore, C., Floris, F., Marchisio, M., & Sacchet, M. (2019). The creation of animated graphs to develop computational thinking and support STEM education. In Maple Conference Springer, Cham. 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41258-6_14

Barr, D., Harrison, J., & Conery, L. (2011). Computational thinking: A digital age skill for everyone. Learning & Leading with Technology, 38(6), 20–23.

Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: What is Involved and what is the role of the computer science education community? Acm Inroads, 2(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1145/1929887.1929905CrossRef

Basu, S., Biswas, G., & Kinnebrew, J. S. (2017). Learner modeling for adaptive scaffolding in a computational thinking-based science learning environment. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 27(1), 5–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-017-9187-0https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-017-9187-0

Basu, S., Biswas, G., Sengupta, P., Dickes, A., Kinnebrew, J. S., & Clark, D. (2016). Identifying middle school students’ challenges in computational thinking-based science learning. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 11(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-016-0036-2CrossRef

Bell, J., & Bell, T. (2018). Integrating computational thinking with a music education context. Informatics in Education, 17(2), 151–166. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2018.09

Benakli, N., Kostadinov, B., Satyanarayana, A., & Singh, S. (2017). Introducing computational thinking through hands-on projects using R with applications to calculus, probability and data analysis. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(3), 393–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2016.1254296CrossRef

Bers, M. U., Flannery, L., Kazakoff, E. R., & Sullivan, A. (2014). Computational thinking and tinkering: Exploration of an early childhood robotics curriculum. Computers & Education, 72, 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.020CrossRef

Bers, M. U. (2010). The TangibleK robotics program: Applied computational thinking for young children. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 12(2), 1–20.

Bundy, A. (2007). Computational thinking is pervasive. Journal of Scientific and Practical Computing, 1(2), 67–69.

Chen, G., Shen, J., Barth-Cohen, L., Jiang, S., Huang, X., & Eltoukhy, M. (2017). Assessing elementary students’ computational thinking in everyday reasoning and robotics programming. Computers & Education, 109, 162–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.001CrossRef

Chen, P., Tian, Y., Zhou, W., & Huang, R. (2018). A systematic review of computational thinking: Analysing research hot spots and trends by CiteSpace. In the 26th International Conference on Computers in Education. Philippines: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.

Chou, P. N. (2020). Using ScratchJr to Foster Young Children’s Computational Thinking Competence: A Case Study in a Third-Grade Computer Class. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(3), 570–595. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119872908MathSciNetCrossRef

Durak, H. Y. (2020). The effects of using different tools in programming teaching of secondary school students on engagement, computational thinking and reflective thinking skills for problem solving. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 25(1), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9391-yCrossRef

Durak, H. Y., & Saritepeci, M. (2018). Analysis of the relation between computational thinking skills and various variables with the structural equation model. Computers & Education, 116, 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.09.004CrossRef

Durak, H. Y., Yilmaz, F. G. K., & Yilmaz, R. (2019). Computational Thinking, Programming Self-Efficacy, Problem Solving and Experiences in the Programming Process Conducted with Robotic Activities. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(2), 173–197. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.554493

Ehsan, H., Rehmat, A. P., & Cardella, M. E. (2020). Computational thinking embedded in engineering design: Capturing computational thinking of children in an informal engineering design activity. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1–24 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09562-5

Fagerlund, J., Häkkinen, P., Vesisenaho, M., & Viiri, J. (2020). Computational thinking in programming with scratch in primary schools: A systematic review. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(1), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22255CrossRef

Gadanidis, G., Clements, E., & Yiu, C. (2018). Group theory, computational thinking, and young mathematicians. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 20(1), 32–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2018.1403542CrossRef

Garneli, V., & Chorianopoulos, K. (2018). Programming video games and simulations in science education: Exploring computational thinking through code analysis. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(3), 386–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1337036CrossRef

Garneli, V., & Chorianopoulos, K. (2019). The effects of video game making within science content on student computational thinking skills and performance. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 16(4), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-11-2018-0097CrossRef

Gretter, S., & Yadav, A. (2016). Computational thinking and media & information literacy: An integrated approach to teaching twenty-first century skills. TechTrends, 60(5), 510–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0098-4CrossRef

Grover, S. (2017). Assessing algorithmic and computational thinking in K-12: Lessons from a middle school classroom. In Emerging research, practice, and policy on computational thinking Springer, 269–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52691-1_17

Grover, S., Basu, S., Bienkowski, M., Eagle, M., Diana, N., & Stamper, J. (2017). A framework for using hypothesis-driven approaches to support data-driven learning analytics in measuring computational thinking in block-based programming environments. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 17(3), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3105910CrossRef

Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K–12: A review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12463051CrossRef

Hallinger, P., & Kovačević, J. (2019). A bibliometric review of research on educational administration: Science mapping the literature, 1960 to 2018. Review of Educational Research, 89(3), 335–369. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319830380CrossRef

Hallinger, P., & Wang, R. (2020). The evolution of simulation-based learning across the disciplines, 1965–2018: A science map of the literature. Simulation & Gaming, 51(1), 9–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878119888246CrossRef

Hsu, T. C., Chang, S. C., & Hung, Y. T. (2018). How to learn and how to teach computational thinking: Suggestions based on a review of the literature. Computers & Education, 126, 296–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.004CrossRef

Hutchins, N. M., Biswas, G., Maróti, M., Lédeczi, Á., Grover, S., Wolf, R., & McElhaney, K. (2020). C2STEM: A system for synergistic learning of physics and computational thinking. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(1), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09804-9CrossRef

Ilic, U., Haseski, H. İ, & Tugtekin, U. (2018). Publication Trends over 10 Years of Computational Thinking Research. Contemporary Educational Technology, 9(2), 131–153.CrossRef

Irgens, G. A., Dabholkar, S., Bain, C., Woods, P., Hall, K., Swanson, H., & Wilensky, U. (2020). Modeling and Measuring High School Students’ Computational Thinking Practices in Science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(1), 137–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09811-1CrossRef

Israel, M., & Lash, T. (2020). From classroom lessons to exploratory learning progressions: Mathematics+ computational thinking. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(3), 362–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1674879CrossRef

Kalelioğlu, F., Gülbahar, Y., & Kukul, V. (2016). A Framework for Computational Thinking Based on a Systematic Research Review. Baltic Journal of Modern Computing, 4(3), 583.

Ketelhut, D. J., Mills, K., Hestness, E., Cabrera, L., Plane, J., & McGinnis, J. R. (2020). Teacher change following a professional development experience in integrating computational thinking into elementary science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(1), 174–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09798-4CrossRef

Kim, K. (2006). Measuring international research collaboration of peripheral countries: Taking the context into consideration [Article]. Scientometrics, 66(2), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0017-0CrossRef

Kordaki, M., Kakavas, P., Chova, L., Martinez, A., & Torres, I. (2017). Digital tools used for the development of computational thinking in primary education: a ten year systematic literature review [Proceedings Paper]. 9th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (Edulearn17), 6346–6356. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2017.2437

Korkmaz, Ö., & Xuemei, B. A. İ. (2019). Adapting computational thinking scale (CTS) for Chinese high school students and their thinking scale skills level. Participatory Educational Research, 6(1), 10–26. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.19.2.6.1

Korkmaz, Ö., Çakir, R., & Özden, M. Y. (2017). A validity and reliability study of the computational thinking scales (CTS). Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.005

Kules, B. (2016). Computational thinking is critical thinking: Connecting to university discourse, goals, and learning outcomes. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 53(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2016.14505301092CrossRef

Lee, I., Martin, F., & Apone, K. (2014). Integrating computational thinking across the K–8 curriculum. Acm Inroads, 5(4), 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1145/2684721.2684736CrossRef

Lee, I., Martin, F., Denner, J., Coulter, B., Allan, W., Erickson, J., & Werner, L. (2011). Computational thinking for youth in practice. Acm Inroads, 2(1), 32–37. https://doi.org/10.1145/1929887.1929902CrossRef

Lye, S. Y., & Koh, J. H. L. (2014). Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12?. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.012

Lyon, J. A., & J. Magana, A. (2020). Computational thinking in higher education: A review of the literature. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 28(5), 1174-1189. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22295CrossRef

Malyn-Smith, J., & Lee, I. (2012). Application of the occupational analysis of computational thinking-enabled STEM professionals as a program assessment tool. Journal of Computational Science Education, 3(1), 2–10. https://doi.org/10.22369/issn.2153-4136/3/1/1

Martins-Pacheco, L. H., da Cruz Alves, N., & von Wangenheim, C. G. (2019). Educational Practices in Computational Thinking: Assessment, Pedagogical Aspects, Limits, and Possibilities: A Systematic Mapping Study. In International Conference on Computer Supported Education Springer, Cham., May). 442–466.

Mohaghegh, D. M., & McCauley, M. (2016). Computational thinking: The skill set of the 21st century. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, 7(3), 1524–1530.

Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis [Article]. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5CrossRef

Moreno-León, J., Robles, G., & Román-González, M. (2017). Towards data-driven learning paths to develop computational thinking with scratch. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, 8(1), 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1109/TETC.2017.2734818CrossRef

Nouri, J., Zhang, L., Mannila, L., & Norén, E. (2020). Development of computational thinking, digital competence and 21st century skills when learning programming in K-9. Education Inquiry, 11(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2019.1627844CrossRef

ORCID. (2021). Jeannette Wing (0000–0002–1013–1990) - ORCID | Connecting Research and Researchers. Retrieved from: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1013-1990

Palts, T., & Pedaste, M. (2020). A model for developing computational thinking skills. Informatics in Education, 19(1), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.15388/INFEDU.2020.06

Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: children, computers, and powerful ideas Basic Books. Inc. New York, NY.

Papert, S. (1996). An exploration in the space of mathematics educations. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 1(1), 95–123.

Pei, C., Weintrop, D., & Wilensky, U. (2018). Cultivating computational thinking practices and mathematical habits of mind in lattice land. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 20(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2018.1403543CrossRef

Pérez-Marín, D., Hijón-Neira, R., Bacelo, A., & Pizarro, C. (2020). Can computational thinking be improved by using a methodology based on metaphors and scratch to teach computer programming to children? Computers in Human Behavior, 105, 105849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.027CrossRef

Relkin, E., de Ruiter, L., & Bers, M. U. (2020). TechCheck: Development and validation of an unplugged assessment of computational thinking in early childhood education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29, 482–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09831-xCrossRef

Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Monroy-Hernández, A., Rusk, N., Eastmond, E., Brennan, K., & Kafai, Y. (2009). Scratch: Programming for all. Communications of the ACM, 52(11), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1145/1592761.1592779CrossRef

Rich, K. M., Yadav, A., & Larimore, R. A. (2020). Teacher implementation profiles for integrating computational thinking into elementary mathematics and science instruction. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 3161–3188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10115-5CrossRef

Rijke, W. J., Bollen, L., Eysink, T. H., & Tolboom, J. L. (2018). Computational thinking in primary school: An examination of abstraction and decomposition in different age groups. Informatics in Education, 17(1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2018.05

Rodríguez del Rey, Y. A., Cawanga Cambinda, I. N., Deco, C., Bender, C., Avello-Martínez, R., & Villalba-Condori, K. O. (2021). Developing computational thinking with a module of solved problems. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(3), 506–516. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22214CrossRef

Roig-Vila, R., & Moreno-Isac, V. (2020). Computational thinking in education. Bibliometric and thematic analysis [Article]. Red-Revista De Educacion a Distancia, 20(63), Article ARTN 05. https://doi.org/10.6018/red.402621

Román-González, M., Pérez-González, J. C., & Jiménez-Fernández, C. (2017). Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the Computational Thinking Test. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 678–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.047CrossRef

Rubinstein, A., & Chor, B. (2014). Computational thinking in life science education. PLoS Computational Biology, 10(11), e1003897. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003897CrossRef

Sáez-López, J. M., Román-González, M., & Vázquez-Cano, E. (2016). Visual programming languages integrated across the curriculum in elementary school: A two year case study using “Scratch” in five schools. Computers & Education, 97, 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.003CrossRef

Sengupta, P., Kinnebrew, J. S., Basu, S., Biswas, G., & Clark, D. (2013). Integrating computational thinking with K-12 science education using agent-based computation: A theoretical framework. Education and Information Technologies, 18(2), 351–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-012-9240-xCrossRef

Sırakaya, M., Alsancak Sırakaya, D., & Korkmaz, Ö. (2020). The impact of STEM attitude and thinking style on computational thinking determined via structural equation modeling. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29, 561–572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09836-6CrossRef

Shell, D. F., & Soh, L. K. (2013). Profiles of motivated self-regulation in college computer science courses: Differences in major versus required non-major courses. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(6), 899–913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9437-9

Shute, V. J., Sun, C., & Asbell-Clarke, J. (2017). Demystifying computational thinking. Educational Research Review, 22, 142–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.003CrossRef

Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24 (4), 265–269. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406

So, HJ., Jong, M.SY. & Liu, CC. (2020). Computational Thinking Education in the Asian Pacific Region. Asia-Pacific Edu Res, 29, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00494-w

Sun, L., Hu, L., Yang, W., Zhou, D., & Wang, X. (2020). STEM learning attitude predicts computational thinking skills among primary school students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12493CrossRef

Sung, W., Ahn, J., & Black, J. B. (2017). Introducing computational thinking to young learners: Practicing computational perspectives through embodiment in mathematics education. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 22(3), 443–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-017-9328-xCrossRef

Swaid, S. I. (2015). Bringing computational thinking to STEM education. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 3657–3662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.761CrossRef

Tang, K. Y., Chou, T. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2020). A content analysis of computational thinking research: An international publication trends and research typology. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29(1), 9-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00442-8CrossRef

Tang, X., Yin, Y., Lin, Q., Hadad, R., & Zhai, X. (2020b). Assessing computational thinking: A systematic review of empirical studies [Review]. Computers & Education, 148, Article ARTN 103798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103798

Tikva, C., & Tambouris, E. (2020). Mapping Computational Thinking through Programming in K-12 Education: A Conceptual Model based on a Systematic Literature Review. Computers & Education, 162, 104083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104083CrossRef

Turchi, T., Fogli, D., & Malizia, A. (2019). Fostering computational thinking through collaborative game-based learning. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 78(10), 13649–13673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-7229-9CrossRef

Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing bibliometric networks. In: Ding Y., Rousseau R., Wolfram D. (eds) Measuring Scholarly Impact. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13

Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2013). Vosviewer Manual. Leiden: Univeristeit Leiden, 1(1), 1–53.

Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Good, J., Mishra, P., & Yadav, A. (2015). Computational thinking in compulsory education: Towards an agenda for research and practice [Article]. Education and Information Technologies, 20(4), 715–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9412-6CrossRef

Waterman, K. P., Goldsmith, L., & Pasquale, M. (2020). Integrating computational thinking into elementary science curriculum: An examination of activities that support students’ computational thinking in the service of disciplinary learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09801-yCrossRef

Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(1), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9581-5CrossRef

Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M. S., Orton, K., Trouille, L., Jona, K., & Wilensky, U. (2014). Interactive assessment tools for computational thinking in high school STEM classrooms. In: Reidsma D., Choi I., Bargar R. (eds) Intelligent Technologies for Interactive Entertainment. INTETAIN 2014. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 136. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08189-2_3

Weintrop, D., & Wilensky, U. (2017). Comparing block-based and text-based programming in high school computer science classrooms. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 18(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3089799CrossRef

Wei, X., Lin, L., Meng, N., Tan, W., & Kong, S. C. (2021). The effectiveness of partial pair programming on elementary school students’ computational thinking skills and self-efficacy. Computers & Education, 160, 104023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104023CrossRef

Werner, L., Denner, J., Campe, S., & Kawamoto, D. C. (2012, February). The fairy performance assessment: Measuring computational thinking in middle school. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM technical symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 215–220). https://doi.org/10.1145/2157136.2157200

Wilkerson-Jerde, M. H. (2014). Construction, categorization, and consensus: Student generated computational artifacts as a context for disciplinary reflection. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(1), 99–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9327-0CrossRef

Wilensky, U., Brady, C. E., & Horn, M. S. (2014). Fostering computational literacy in science classrooms. Communications of the ACM, 57(8), 24–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/2633031CrossRef

Wing, J. M. (2021). CV for Jeannette M. Wing. Retrieved from: https://www.cs.columbia.edu/~wing/resume.html

Wing, J. (2011). Research notebook: Computational thinking—What and why. The Link Magazine, 6.

Wing, J. (2017). Computational thinking’s influence on research and education for all. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(2), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.17471/2499-4324/922

Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366(1881), 3717–3725. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0118MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215CrossRef

Witherspoon, E. B., Higashi, R. M., Schunn, C. D., Baehr, E. C., & Shoop, R. (2017). Developing computational thinking through a virtual robotics programming curriculum. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 18(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3104982CrossRef

Wolz, U., Stone, M., Pearson, K., Pulimood, S. M., & Switzer, M. (2011). Computational thinking and expository writing in the middle school. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 11(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/1993069.1993073CrossRefMATH

Wolz, U., Stone, M., Pulimood, S. M., & Pearson, K. (2010). Computational thinking via interactive journalism in middle school. In Proceedings of the 41st acm technical symposium on computer science education, 239–243. https://doi.org/10.1145/1734263.1734345

White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327–355.

Yadav, A., Gretter, S., Good, J., & McLean, T. (2017). Computational thinking in teacher education. In Emerging research, practice, and policy on computational thinking (pp. 205-220). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52691-1_13

Yadav, A., Krist, C., Good, J., & Caeli, E. N. (2018). Computational thinking in elementary classrooms: Measuring teacher understanding of computational ideas for teaching science. Computer Science Education, 28(4), 371–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2018.1560550CrossRef

Yadav, A., Stephenson, C., & Hong, H. (2017b). Computational thinking for teacher education. Communications of the ACM, 60(4), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1145/2994591CrossRef

Yadav, A., Hong, H., & Stephenson, C. (2016). Computational Thinking for All: Pedagogical Approaches to Embedding 21st Century Problem Solving in K-12 Classrooms [Article]. TechTrends, 60(6), 565–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0087-7CrossRef

Yadav, A., Mayfield, C., Zhou, N., Hambrusch, S., & Korb, J. T. (2014). Computational thinking in elementary and secondary teacher education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 14(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/2576872CrossRef

Yadav, A., Zhou, N., Mayfield, C., Hambrusch, S., Korb, J., Cortina, T., Walker, E., King, L., Musicant, D., & McCann, L. (2011). Introducing Computational Thinking in Education Courses [Proceedings Paper]. Sigcse 11: Proceedings of the 42nd Acm Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 465–470. https://doi.org/10.1145/1953163.1953297

Yağcı, M. (2019). A valid and reliable tool for examining computational thinking skills. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 929–951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9801-8CrossRef

Yin, Y., Hadad, R., Tang, X., Lin, Q. (2019). Improving and assessing computational thinking in maker activities: The integration with physics and engineering learning Journal of Science Education and Technology 1–26 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09794-8

Zhang, L., & Nouri, J. (2019). A systematic review of learning computational thinking through Scratch in K-9 [Review]. Computers & Education, 141, Article UNSP 103607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103607

Titel: Trends and development in research on computational thinking
verfasst von: Mehmet Tekdal
Publikationsdatum: 28.06.2021
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies / Ausgabe 5/2021
Print ISSN: 1360-2357
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7608
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10617-w

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2021

Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate teaching technologies into their classrooms: Examining the effects of teaching environments based on open-ended, hands-on and authentic tasks

Factors contributing to teachers’ acceptance intention of gamified learning tools in secondary schools: An exploratory study

Research on mobile learning in a teaching information service system based on a big data driven environment

Modeling learners’ self-concept in Chinese descriptive writing based on the affordances of a virtual reality-supported environment

Developing Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) through Technology-Enhanced Content and Language-Integrated Learning (T-CLIL) Instruction

Learning management systems and technology acceptance models: A systematic review

Premium Partner