Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Marketing Letters 3/2012

01.09.2012

How consumers use product reviews in the purchase decision process

verfasst von: Sungha Jang, Ashutosh Prasad, Brian T. Ratchford

Erschienen in: Marketing Letters | Ausgabe 3/2012

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper uses individual level data to examine the influence of product reviews in different stages of the consumer’s purchase decision process. Specifically, a two-stage model consisting of consideration set formation and choice is posited, where the consumer can incorporate information from product reviews in each stage. The model is estimated using an online panel survey about hotel choice. We find that (1) consumers use product reviews more in the consideration set stage and less in the choice stage, (2) Bayesian updating of prior perceived quality better explains how consumers use product reviews compared to two competing updating methods, and (3) the monetary value of a unit increase in the mean of product reviews is computed. Our results suggest that managers should make product review information (their number, average, and variance) available from the beginning of the search process and encourage satisfied customers to write reviews.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Andrews, R. L., & Srinivasan, T. C. (1995). Studying consideration effects in empirical choice models using scanner panel data. Journal of Marketing Research, 32(1), 30–41.CrossRef Andrews, R. L., & Srinivasan, T. C. (1995). Studying consideration effects in empirical choice models using scanner panel data. Journal of Marketing Research, 32(1), 30–41.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D. (2006). The effect of word of mouth on sales: online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), 345–354.CrossRef Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D. (2006). The effect of word of mouth on sales: online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), 345–354.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Edwards, Y. D., & Allenby, G. M. (2003). Multivariate analysis of multiple response data. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(3), 321–334.CrossRef Edwards, Y. D., & Allenby, G. M. (2003). Multivariate analysis of multiple response data. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(3), 321–334.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Erdem, T., & Keane, M. P. (1996). Decision-making under uncertainty: capturing dynamic brand choice processes in turbulent consumer goods markets. Marketing Science, 15(1), 1–20.CrossRef Erdem, T., & Keane, M. P. (1996). Decision-making under uncertainty: capturing dynamic brand choice processes in turbulent consumer goods markets. Marketing Science, 15(1), 1–20.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gensh, D. H. (1987). A two-stage disaggregate attribute choice model. Marketing Science, 6(3), 223–239.CrossRef Gensh, D. H. (1987). A two-stage disaggregate attribute choice model. Marketing Science, 6(3), 223–239.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gilbride, T. J., & Allenby, G. M. (2004). A choice model with conjunctive, disjunctive, and compensatory screening rules. Marketing Science, 23(3), 391–406.CrossRef Gilbride, T. J., & Allenby, G. M. (2004). A choice model with conjunctive, disjunctive, and compensatory screening rules. Marketing Science, 23(3), 391–406.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Horowitz, J. L., & Louviere, J. J. (1995). What is the role of consideration sets in choice modeling? International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12, 39–54.CrossRef Horowitz, J. L., & Louviere, J. J. (1995). What is the role of consideration sets in choice modeling? International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12, 39–54.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Koop, G. (2003). Bayesian econometrics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Koop, G. (2003). Bayesian econometrics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu, Y. (2006). Word of mouth for movies: its dynamics and impact on box office revenue. Journal of Marketing, 70(3), 74–89.CrossRef Liu, Y. (2006). Word of mouth for movies: its dynamics and impact on box office revenue. Journal of Marketing, 70(3), 74–89.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mehta, N., Rajiv, S., & Srinivasan, K. (2003). Price uncertainty and consumer search: a structural model of consideration set formation. Marketing Science, 22(1), 58–84.CrossRef Mehta, N., Rajiv, S., & Srinivasan, K. (2003). Price uncertainty and consumer search: a structural model of consideration set formation. Marketing Science, 22(1), 58–84.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Roberts, J. H., & Lattin, J. M. (1991). Development and testing of a model of consideration set composition. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(4), 429–440.CrossRef Roberts, J. H., & Lattin, J. M. (1991). Development and testing of a model of consideration set composition. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(4), 429–440.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Roberts, J. H., & Urban, G. L. (1988). Modeling multiattribute utility, risk, and belief dynamics for new consumer durable brand choice. Management Science, 34(2), 167–185.CrossRef Roberts, J. H., & Urban, G. L. (1988). Modeling multiattribute utility, risk, and belief dynamics for new consumer durable brand choice. Management Science, 34(2), 167–185.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sun, M. (2012). How does the variance of product ratings matter? Management Science, 58(4), 696–707.CrossRef Sun, M. (2012). How does the variance of product ratings matter? Management Science, 58(4), 696–707.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Van Nierop, E., Bronnenberg, B., Paap, R., Wedel, M., & Franses, P. H. (2010). Retrieving unobserved consideration sets from household panel data. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(1), 63–74.CrossRef Van Nierop, E., Bronnenberg, B., Paap, R., Wedel, M., & Franses, P. H. (2010). Retrieving unobserved consideration sets from household panel data. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(1), 63–74.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
How consumers use product reviews in the purchase decision process
verfasst von
Sungha Jang
Ashutosh Prasad
Brian T. Ratchford
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2012
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Marketing Letters / Ausgabe 3/2012
Print ISSN: 0923-0645
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-059X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-012-9191-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2012

Marketing Letters 3/2012 Zur Ausgabe