nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.06.2015

Platforms: a multiplicity of research opportunities

verfasst von: S. Sriram, Puneet Manchanda, Mercedes Esteban Bravo, Junhong Chu, Liye Ma, Minjae Song, Scott Shriver, Upender Subramanian

Erschienen in: Marketing Letters | Ausgabe 2/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Platforms refer to intermediaries that facilitate economic interaction between two sets of agents wherein the decisions of one set of agents are likely to have an effect on the other via direct and/or indirect externalities. Given their nature, platforms need to find the appropriate balance between the competing objectives of agents and act as catalysts by facilitating the beneficial effects of externalities. In this paper, we discuss the current theoretical and empirical literature on two-sided platforms. We then identify three dimensions that offer opportunities to advance the empirical literature: (a) unanswered theoretical and conceptual questions, (b) data-related opportunities, and (c) methodological challenges.

Vorheriger Artikel Advancing research on loyalty programs: a future research agenda

Nächster Artikel The relative impact of gratitude and transactional satisfaction on post-complaint consumer response

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

If there is only one intermediary, then agents are “single-homing,” else they are “multi-homing.” Participation and profitability are different in these two settings (discussed later in detail).

Ackerberg, D. A., & Gowrisankaran, G. (2006). Quantifying equilibrium network externalities in the ACH banking industry. RAND Journal of Economics, 37(3), 738–761.CrossRef

Argentesi, E., & Filistrucchi, L. (2007). Estimating market power in a two-sided market: the case of newspapers. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(7), 1247–1266.CrossRef

Armstrong, M. (2006). Competition in two-sided markets. RAND Journal of Economics, 37(3), 668–691.CrossRef

Bergemann, D., & Bonatti, A. (2011). Targeting in advertising markets: implications for offline vs. online media. The Rand Journal of Economics, 42, 414–443.CrossRef

Berry, S. (1992). Estimation of a model of entry in the airline industry. Econometrica, 60(4), 889–917.CrossRef

Besen, S., & Johnson, L. (1986). Compatibility standards, competition, and innovation in the broadcasting industry, Rand Corporation.

Bresnahan, T., & Reiss, P. (1991). Empirical models of discrete games. Journal of Econometrics, 48, 57–81.CrossRef

Cabral, L., & Hortacsu, A. (2010). The dynamics of seller reputation: evidence from ebay. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 58(1), 54–78.CrossRef

Caillaud, B., & Jullien, B. (2003). Chicken & egg: competition among intermediation service providers. RAND Journal of Economics, 34(2), 309–328. Summer 2003.CrossRef

Chandra, A., & Collard-Wexler, A. (2009). Mergers in two-sided markets: an application to the Canadian newspaper industry. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 18(4), 1045–1070.CrossRef

Chen, Y., & Xie, J. (2007). Cross-market network effect with asymmetric customer loyalty: implications for competitive advantage. Marketing Science, 26(1), 52–66.CrossRef

Chu, J., & Manchanda, P. (2013). Quantifying cross-network effects in online C2C platforms, Working Paper.

Clements, M. T., & Ohashi, H. (2005). Indirect network effects and the product cycle: video games in the U.S., 1994–2002. Journal of Industrial Economics, 53(4), 515–542.CrossRef

Dewenter, R., Haucaup, J., & Wenzel, T. (2011). Semi-collusion in media markets. International Review of Law and Economics, 31(2011), 92–98.CrossRef

Dubé, J.-P. H., Hitsch, G. J., & Chintagunta, P. K. (2010). Tipping and concentration in markets with indirect network effects. Marketing Science, 29(2), 216–249.CrossRef

Esteban-Bravo, M., & Vidal-Sanz, J. (2013). A nonlinear product differentiation model à la cournot: a new look at the newspaper industry Working Paper.

Evans, D. S. (2003). The antitrust economics of multi-sided platform markets. Yale Journal on Regulation, 20(2), 325–381.

Evans, D., & Schmalensee, R. (2008). Markets with two-sided platforms, Issues in Competition Law and Policy.

Fan, Y. (2013). Ownership consolidation and product quality: a study of the U.S. daily newspaper market, American Economic Review, Forthcoming.

Farrell, J., & Klemperer, P. (2007). Coordination and lock-in: competition with switching costs and network effects. Handbook of Industrial Organization, 3, 1967–2072.CrossRef

Filistrucchi, L., Klein, T. J., & Michielsen, T. O. (2012). Assessing unilateral merger effects in a two-sided market: an application to the Dutch daily newspaper market. Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 8(2), 297–329.CrossRef

Gandal, N., Kende, M., & Rob, R. (2000). The dynamics of technological adoption in hardware/software systems: the case of compact disc players. RAND Journal of Economics, 31(1), 43–61.CrossRef

Handel, B., Hendel, I., & Whinston, M. (2013). Equilibria in health exchanges: adverse selection vs. reclassification risk, Working paper.

Hagiu, A. (2006). Pricing and commitment by two‐sided platforms. The RAND Journal of Economics, 37(3), 720–737.CrossRef

Hagiu, A. (2007). Merchant or two-sided platform? Review of Network Economics, 6(2), 115–133.CrossRef

Hagiu, & Spulber. (2013). First-party content and coordination in two-sided markets. Forthcoming. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy.

Hagiu, & Wright. (2011). Multi-sided platforms. HBS Working paper.

Hagiu, & Wright. (2013). Marketplace or re-seller. HBS Working paper.

Kaiser, U., & Wright, J. (2006). Price structure in two-sided markets: evidence from the magazine industry. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24(1), 1–28.CrossRef

Lee, R. S., & Pakes, A. (2009). Multiple equilibria and selection by learning in an applied setting. Economic Letters, 104(1), 13–16.CrossRef

Lemley, M. A., & McGowan, D. (1998). Legal implications of network economic effects. California Law Review, 86(3), 479–611.CrossRef

Liu, H. (2010). Dynamics of pricing in the video game console market: skimming or penetration? Journal of Marketing Research, 47(2), 428–443.CrossRef

Ma, L., Srinivasan, K., Sun, B. (2013). Dynamics of production and linking at content websites, Working Paper.

Manski, C., & Pepper, J. (2000). Monotone instrumental variables: with an application to the returns to schooling. Econometrica, 68(4), 997–1010.CrossRef

Manski, C., & Pepper, J. (2009). More on monotone instrumental variables. The Econometrics Journal, 12, S200–S216.CrossRef

Nair, H., Chintagunta, P., & Dube, J.-P. (2004). Empirical analysis of indirect network effects in the market for personal digital assistants. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 2, 23–58.CrossRef

Pattabhiramaiah, A., Sriram, S., & Sridhar, S. (2013). Rising prices under declining preferences: the case of the U.S. print newspaper industry, Working Paper.

Resnick, P., & Zeckhauser, R. (2002). Trust among strangers in Internet transactions: empirical analysis of eBay’s reputation system. Advances in Applied Microeconomics, 11, 127–157.

Resnick, P., Zeckhauser, R., Swanson, J., & Lockwood, K. (2006). The value of reputation on eBay: a controlled experiment. Experimental Economics, 9(2), 79–101.CrossRef

Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J. (2003). Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), 990–1029.CrossRef

Ruhmer, I. (2011). Platform collusion in two-sided markets, Working Paper, Mannheim University, http://www.vwl.uni-mannheim.de/gk/ruhmer/Ruhmer 2011.pdf.

Rysman, M. (2004). Competition between networks: a study of the market for yellow pages. The Review of Economic Studies, 71(2), 483–512.CrossRef

Rysman, M. (2009). The economics of two-sided markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(3), 125–143.CrossRef

Seamans, R., & Zhu, F. (2013). Responses to entry in multi-sided markets: the impact of craigslist on local newspapers, Management Science, Forthcoming.

Shriver, S. (2013). Network effects in alternative fuel adoption: empirical analysis of the market for ethanol, Discussion paper, Columbia University.

Shriver, S., Nair, H., & Hofstetter, R. (2013). Social ties and user-generated content: evidence from an online social network. Management Science, 59(6), 1425–1443.CrossRef

Song, M. (2013). Estimating platform market power in two-sided markets with an application to magazine advertising, Working Paper.

Sridhar, S., & Sriram, S. (2013). Is online newspaper advertising cannibalizing print advertising? Working paper.

Subramanian, U., & Rao, R.C. (2013). An equilibrium analysis of daily deal strategies and consumer learning of merchant quality, Working paper.

Tucker, C., & Zhang, J. (2010). Growing two-sided networks by advertising the user base: a field experiment. Marketing Science, 29(5), 805–814.CrossRef

Wilbur, K. C. (2008). A two-sided, empirical model of television advertising and viewing markets. Marketing Science, 27(3), 356–378.CrossRef

Yao, S., & Mela, C. F. (2008). Online auction demand. Marketing Science, 27(5), 861–885.CrossRef

Titel: Platforms: a multiplicity of research opportunities
verfasst von: S. Sriram
Puneet Manchanda
Mercedes Esteban Bravo
Junhong Chu
Liye Ma
Minjae Song
Scott Shriver
Upender Subramanian
Publikationsdatum: 01.06.2015
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Marketing Letters / Ausgabe 2/2015
Print ISSN: 0923-0645
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-059X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-014-9314-1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2015

Multiplicity of equilibria and information structures in empirical games: challenges and prospects

The relationship between consumer characteristics and willingness to pay for general online content: Implications for content providers considering subscription-based business models

When deal depth doesn't matter: How handedness consistency influences consumer response to horizontal versus vertical price comparisons

The relative impact of gratitude and transactional satisfaction on post-complaint consumer response

Impact of satisfaction with e-retailers’ touch points on purchase behavior: the moderating effect of search and experience product type

A simple heuristic for obtaining pareto/NBD parameter estimates