Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Small Business Economics 3/2014

01.03.2014

Size, R&D productivity and Decision Styles

verfasst von: José Lejarraga, Ester Martinez-Ros

Erschienen in: Small Business Economics | Ausgabe 3/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

We extend the size–innovation debate by incorporating decision-making style as a relevant factor in the innovation process. We propose that the size of firms affects the scale and quality of product innovation through the adoption of different decision-making styles. Using the literature on cognition, we conceptualize decision-making style as the degree to which firms rely on analytical information for decision making during the R&D process. Using longitudinal data of Spanish firms, we show that, as firms increase in size, they rely more extensively on analytical decision tools for the innovation activity. Additionally, we show that the size of firms is negatively related to product innovation productivity in terms of scale and positively related to the quality, and that these relationships are mediated by firms’ reliance on analytical decision-making style. We discuss theoretical and managerial implications for innovation research and practice.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
Empirically, in this study, we focus on product innovation counts as a measure of scale and on licensing revenues as an approximation of quality. The choice of these variables is discussed in “Methodology and data”.
 
2
See Appendix for more detailed information on the construction of this composite variable.
 
3
Results are available from the authors.
 
4
Results are available from the authors.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Acs, Z., & Audretsch, D. (1990). Innovation and small firms. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRef Acs, Z., & Audretsch, D. (1990). Innovation and small firms. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Agor, W. A. (1989). Intuition in organizations. Newbury Park: Sage. Agor, W. A. (1989). Intuition in organizations. Newbury Park: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahuja, G., & Katila, R. (2001). Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 197–220.CrossRef Ahuja, G., & Katila, R. (2001). Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 197–220.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ahuja, G., & Lampert, C. M. (2001). Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough innovations. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 521–543.CrossRef Ahuja, G., & Lampert, C. M. (2001). Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough innovations. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 521–543.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Alvarez, S., & Barney, J. (2005). How entrepreneurs organize firms under conditions of uncertainty. Journal of Management, 31, 776–793.CrossRef Alvarez, S., & Barney, J. (2005). How entrepreneurs organize firms under conditions of uncertainty. Journal of Management, 31, 776–793.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Arora, A., & Fosfuri, A. (2003). Licensing the market for technology. Journal of Economic Behavior Organization, 52, 277–295.CrossRef Arora, A., & Fosfuri, A. (2003). Licensing the market for technology. Journal of Economic Behavior Organization, 52, 277–295.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Arora, A., & Gambardella, A. (2010). Ideas for rent: An overview of markets for technology. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19, 775–803.CrossRef Arora, A., & Gambardella, A. (2010). Ideas for rent: An overview of markets for technology. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19, 775–803.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Baron, R. (1998). Cognitive mechanisms in entrepreneurship: Why and when entrepreneurs think differently from other people. Journal of Business Venturing, 13, 275–294.CrossRef Baron, R. (1998). Cognitive mechanisms in entrepreneurship: Why and when entrepreneurs think differently from other people. Journal of Business Venturing, 13, 275–294.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Baron, R., & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.CrossRef Baron, R., & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Beneito, P. (2003). Choosing among alternative technological strategies: An empirical analysis of formal sources of innovation. Research Policy, 32, 693–713.CrossRef Beneito, P. (2003). Choosing among alternative technological strategies: An empirical analysis of formal sources of innovation. Research Policy, 32, 693–713.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Blundell, R., Griffith, R., & Van Reenen, J. (1995). Dynamic count data models of technological innovation. Economic Journal, 105, 333–344.CrossRef Blundell, R., Griffith, R., & Van Reenen, J. (1995). Dynamic count data models of technological innovation. Economic Journal, 105, 333–344.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bound, J., Cummings, C., Griliches, Z., Hall, B., & Adam, J. (1984). Who does R&D and who patents? In Z. Griliches (Ed.), R&D patents and productivity (pp. 339–374). Chicago: University of Chicago Press for the NBER. Bound, J., Cummings, C., Griliches, Z., Hall, B., & Adam, J. (1984). Who does R&D and who patents? In Z. Griliches (Ed.), R&D patents and productivity (pp. 339–374). Chicago: University of Chicago Press for the NBER.
Zurück zum Zitat Busenitz, L. W., & Barney, J. (1997). Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large corporations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 9–30.CrossRef Busenitz, L. W., & Barney, J. (1997). Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large corporations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 9–30.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (1999). Dual process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford. Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (1999). Dual process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford.
Zurück zum Zitat Cockburn, I. M., Henderson, R. M., & Stern, S. (2000). Untangling the origins of competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal (Special Issue), 21, 1123–1145. Cockburn, I. M., Henderson, R. M., & Stern, S. (2000). Untangling the origins of competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal (Special Issue), 21, 1123–1145.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen, W. M. (1995). Empirical studies of innovative activity. In P. Stoneman (Ed.), Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change (pp. 182–264). Boston: Blackwell. Cohen, W. M. (1995). Empirical studies of innovative activity. In P. Stoneman (Ed.), Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change (pp. 182–264). Boston: Blackwell.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen, W. M., & Klepper, S. (1996). Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries: The case of the process and product R&D. Review of Economics and Statistics, 78, 232–243.CrossRef Cohen, W. M., & Klepper, S. (1996). Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries: The case of the process and product R&D. Review of Economics and Statistics, 78, 232–243.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.CrossRef Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Crawford, C. M. (1992). The hidden costs of accelerated product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 9, 188–199.CrossRef Crawford, C. M. (1992). The hidden costs of accelerated product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 9, 188–199.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dane, E., & Pratt, M. (2007). Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making. Academy of Management Review, 32, 33–54.CrossRef Dane, E., & Pratt, M. (2007). Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making. Academy of Management Review, 32, 33–54.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Diggle, P. J., Heagerty, P., Liang, K. Y., & Zeger, S. L. (2002). Analysis of longitudinal data (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Diggle, P. J., Heagerty, P., Liang, K. Y., & Zeger, S. L. (2002). Analysis of longitudinal data (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Dimasi, J. A., Grabowski, H. G., & Vernon, J. (1995). R&D costs, innovative output and firm size in the pharmaceutical industry. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 2, 201–219.CrossRef Dimasi, J. A., Grabowski, H. G., & Vernon, J. (1995). R&D costs, innovative output and firm size in the pharmaceutical industry. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 2, 201–219.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Making fast strategic decisions in high velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 543–576.CrossRef Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Making fast strategic decisions in high velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 543–576.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Eisenhardt, K. M. (1990). Speed and strategic choice: How managers accelerate decision making. California Management Review, 32, 39–54. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1990). Speed and strategic choice: How managers accelerate decision making. California Management Review, 32, 39–54.
Zurück zum Zitat Eisenhardt, K. M, & Zbaracki, M. J. (1992). Strategic decision making. Strategic Management Journal, 13(special issue), 17–37. Eisenhardt, K. M, & Zbaracki, M. J. (1992). Strategic decision making. Strategic Management Journal, 13(special issue), 17–37.
Zurück zum Zitat Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49, 709–724.CrossRef Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49, 709–724.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ethiraj, S. K., Kale, P., Krishnan, M. S., & Singh, J. V. (2005). Where do capabilities come from and how do they matter? A study in the software services industry. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 25–45.CrossRef Ethiraj, S. K., Kale, P., Krishnan, M. S., & Singh, J. V. (2005). Where do capabilities come from and how do they matter? A study in the software services industry. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 25–45.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fiegenbaum, A., & Karnani, A. (1991). Output flexibility: A competitive advantage for small firms. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 101–114.CrossRef Fiegenbaum, A., & Karnani, A. (1991). Output flexibility: A competitive advantage for small firms. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 101–114.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Forbes, D. (2005). Are some entrepreneurs more overconfident than others? Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 623–640.CrossRef Forbes, D. (2005). Are some entrepreneurs more overconfident than others? Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 623–640.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gallini, N. T. (1984). Deterrence by market sharing: A strategic incentive for licensing. American Economic Review, 74, 931–941. Gallini, N. T. (1984). Deterrence by market sharing: A strategic incentive for licensing. American Economic Review, 74, 931–941.
Zurück zum Zitat Greene, W. (1999). Econometric Analysis (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall. Greene, W. (1999). Econometric Analysis (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Zurück zum Zitat Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A., & Tratejnberg, M. (2005). Market value and patent citations. Rand Journal of Economics, 36, 16–38. Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A., & Tratejnberg, M. (2005). Market value and patent citations. Rand Journal of Economics, 36, 16–38.
Zurück zum Zitat Hammond, K. (1996). Human judgment and social policy: Irreducible uncertainty, inevitable error, unavoidable injustice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hammond, K. (1996). Human judgment and social policy: Irreducible uncertainty, inevitable error, unavoidable injustice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Hausman, J. A., Hall, B., & Griliches, Z. (1984). Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents R&D relationship. Econometrica, 52, 909–937.CrossRef Hausman, J. A., Hall, B., & Griliches, Z. (1984). Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents R&D relationship. Econometrica, 52, 909–937.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Henderson, R., & Cockburn, I. (1997). Firm size and research productivity in drug discovery. In S. Jacobzone (Ed.), La Santé: Trajectoires d’avenir. Paris: INSEE. Henderson, R., & Cockburn, I. (1997). Firm size and research productivity in drug discovery. In S. Jacobzone (Ed.), La Santé: Trajectoires d’avenir. Paris: INSEE.
Zurück zum Zitat Hodgkinson, G. P., & Clarke, I. (2007). Exploring the cognitive significance of organizational strategizing: A dual-process framework and research agenda. Human Relations, 60, 243–255.CrossRef Hodgkinson, G. P., & Clarke, I. (2007). Exploring the cognitive significance of organizational strategizing: A dual-process framework and research agenda. Human Relations, 60, 243–255.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hogarth, R. (2005). Deciding analytically or trusting your intuition? The advantages and disadvantages of analytic and intuitive thought. In T. Betsch & S. Haberstroh (Eds.), The routines of decision making (pp. 67–83). Mahwah: Earlbaum. Hogarth, R. (2005). Deciding analytically or trusting your intuition? The advantages and disadvantages of analytic and intuitive thought. In T. Betsch & S. Haberstroh (Eds.), The routines of decision making (pp. 67–83). Mahwah: Earlbaum.
Zurück zum Zitat Houghton, S. M., Simon, M., Aquino, K., & Goldberg, C. B. (2000). No safety in numbers. Group and Organization Management, 25, 325–354.CrossRef Houghton, S. M., Simon, M., Aquino, K., & Goldberg, C. B. (2000). No safety in numbers. Group and Organization Management, 25, 325–354.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Huang, X., Soutar, G., & Brown, A. (2002). New product development processes in small and medium-sized enterprises: Some Australian evidence. Journal of Small Business Management, 40, 27–42.CrossRef Huang, X., Soutar, G., & Brown, A. (2002). New product development processes in small and medium-sized enterprises: Some Australian evidence. Journal of Small Business Management, 40, 27–42.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Keh, H. T., Foo, M. D., & Lim, B. C. (2002). Opportunity evaluation under risky conditions: The cognitive processes of entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27, 125–149.CrossRef Keh, H. T., Foo, M. D., & Lim, B. C. (2002). Opportunity evaluation under risky conditions: The cognitive processes of entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27, 125–149.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Khatri, N., & Ng, H. A. (2000). The role of intuition in strategic decision making. Human Relations, 53, 57–86.CrossRef Khatri, N., & Ng, H. A. (2000). The role of intuition in strategic decision making. Human Relations, 53, 57–86.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 131–150.CrossRef Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 131–150.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Levinthal, D., & March, J. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(special issue), 95–112. Levinthal, D., & March, J. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(special issue), 95–112.
Zurück zum Zitat Lieberman, M., & Montgomery, D. (1998). First-mover (dis)advantages: Retrospective and link with the resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 41–54. Lieberman, M., & Montgomery, D. (1998). First-mover (dis)advantages: Retrospective and link with the resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 41–54.
Zurück zum Zitat Lindsay, W. M., & Rue, L. W. (1980). Impact of the organization environment on the long-range planning process: A contingency view. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 385–404.CrossRef Lindsay, W. M., & Rue, L. W. (1980). Impact of the organization environment on the long-range planning process: A contingency view. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 385–404.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mariani, M., & Romanelli, M. (2007). “Stacking” and “picking” inventions: The patenting behavior of European inventors. Research Policy, 36, 1128–1142.CrossRef Mariani, M., & Romanelli, M. (2007). “Stacking” and “picking” inventions: The patenting behavior of European inventors. Research Policy, 36, 1128–1142.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mathieu, J. E., DeShon, R. P., & Bergh, D. D. (2008). Mediational inferences in organizational research: Then, now and beyond. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 203–223.CrossRef Mathieu, J. E., DeShon, R. P., & Bergh, D. D. (2008). Mediational inferences in organizational research: Then, now and beyond. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 203–223.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McDonald, R. P. (1996). Path analysis with composite variables. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 31, 239–270. McDonald, R. P. (1996). Path analysis with composite variables. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 31, 239–270.
Zurück zum Zitat McKelvey, R., & Zavoina, W. (1975). A statistical analysis of ordinal level dependent variables. Journal Mathematical Sociology, 4, 103–120.CrossRef McKelvey, R., & Zavoina, W. (1975). A statistical analysis of ordinal level dependent variables. Journal Mathematical Sociology, 4, 103–120.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Merz, G., & Sauber, M. (1995). Profiles of managerial activities in small firms. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 551–564.CrossRef Merz, G., & Sauber, M. (1995). Profiles of managerial activities in small firms. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 551–564.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Miller, D., Droge, C., & Toulouse, J. M. (1988). Strategic process and content as mediators between organizational context and structure. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 544–569.CrossRef Miller, D., Droge, C., & Toulouse, J. M. (1988). Strategic process and content as mediators between organizational context and structure. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 544–569.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Myers, D. G. (2002). Intuition: Its powers and perils. New Haven: Yale University Press. Myers, D. G. (2002). Intuition: Its powers and perils. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Narin, F., Noma, E., & Perry, R. (1987). Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength. Research Policy, 16, 143–155.CrossRef Narin, F., Noma, E., & Perry, R. (1987). Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength. Research Policy, 16, 143–155.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Nooteboom, B. (1994). Innovation and diffusion in small firms: Theory and evidence. Small Business Economics, 6, 327–347.CrossRef Nooteboom, B. (1994). Innovation and diffusion in small firms: Theory and evidence. Small Business Economics, 6, 327–347.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ocasio, W. (1997). Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue, 18, 187–206.CrossRef Ocasio, W. (1997). Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue, 18, 187–206.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pavitt, K., Robson, M., & Townsend, J. (1987). The size distribution of innovating firms in the UK: 1945–1983. Journal of Industrial Economics, 35, 297–316.CrossRef Pavitt, K., Robson, M., & Townsend, J. (1987). The size distribution of innovating firms in the UK: 1945–1983. Journal of Industrial Economics, 35, 297–316.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rockett, K. (1990). Choosing the competition and patent licensing. RAND Journal of Economics, 21, 161–171.CrossRef Rockett, K. (1990). Choosing the competition and patent licensing. RAND Journal of Economics, 21, 161–171.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ryan, S. D., Harrison, D. A., & Schkade, L. L. (2002). Information-technology investment decisions: When do cost and benefits in the social subsystem matter? Journal of Management Information Systems, 19, 85–127.CrossRef Ryan, S. D., Harrison, D. A., & Schkade, L. L. (2002). Information-technology investment decisions: When do cost and benefits in the social subsystem matter? Journal of Management Information Systems, 19, 85–127.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sadler-Smith, E. (2004). Cognitive style and the management of small and medium sized enterprises. Organization Studies, 25, 155–181.CrossRef Sadler-Smith, E. (2004). Cognitive style and the management of small and medium sized enterprises. Organization Studies, 25, 155–181.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Santamaría, L., Nieto, M. J., & Barge-Gil, A. (2009). Beyond formal R&D: Taking advantage of other sources of innovation in low- and medium-technology industries. Research Policy, 38, 507–517.CrossRef Santamaría, L., Nieto, M. J., & Barge-Gil, A. (2009). Beyond formal R&D: Taking advantage of other sources of innovation in low- and medium-technology industries. Research Policy, 38, 507–517.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Santarelli, E., & Piergiovanni, R. (1996). Analyzing literature-based innovation output indicators: The Italian experience. Research Policy, 25, 689–712.CrossRef Santarelli, E., & Piergiovanni, R. (1996). Analyzing literature-based innovation output indicators: The Italian experience. Research Policy, 25, 689–712.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Santarelli, E., & Sterlacchini, A. (1990). Innovation, formal vs. informal R&D, and firm size: Some evidence from Italian manufacturing firms. Small Business Economics, 2, 223–228.CrossRef Santarelli, E., & Sterlacchini, A. (1990). Innovation, formal vs. informal R&D, and firm size: Some evidence from Italian manufacturing firms. Small Business Economics, 2, 223–228.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Scherer, F. (1965). Firm size, market structure, opportunity, and the output of patented inventions. American Economic Review, 55, 1097–1125. Scherer, F. (1965). Firm size, market structure, opportunity, and the output of patented inventions. American Economic Review, 55, 1097–1125.
Zurück zum Zitat Scherer, F. (1983). R&D and declining productivity growth. American Economic Review, 73, 215–218. Scherer, F. (1983). R&D and declining productivity growth. American Economic Review, 73, 215–218.
Zurück zum Zitat Scherer, F., & Ross, D. (1990). Industrial market structure and economic performance. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Scherer, F., & Ross, D. (1990). Industrial market structure and economic performance. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Zurück zum Zitat Schoenecker, T., & Swanson, L. (2002). Indicators of firm technological capability: Validity and performance implications. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49, 36–45.CrossRef Schoenecker, T., & Swanson, L. (2002). Indicators of firm technological capability: Validity and performance implications. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49, 36–45.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schunk, D., & Betsch, C. (2005). Explaining heterogeneity in utility functions by individual differences in decision modes. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27, 386–401.CrossRef Schunk, D., & Betsch, C. (2005). Explaining heterogeneity in utility functions by individual differences in decision modes. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27, 386–401.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shapiro, S., & Spence, M. T. (1997). Managerial intuition: A conceptual and operational framework. Business Horizons, 40, 63–68.CrossRef Shapiro, S., & Spence, M. T. (1997). Managerial intuition: A conceptual and operational framework. Business Horizons, 40, 63–68.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Simon, M., & Houghton, S. (1999). Cognitive biases, risk perception, and venture formation: How individuals decide to start companies. Journal of Business Venturing, 15, 113–134.CrossRef Simon, M., & Houghton, S. (1999). Cognitive biases, risk perception, and venture formation: How individuals decide to start companies. Journal of Business Venturing, 15, 113–134.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Simon, M., & Houghton, S. (2003). The relationship between overconfidence and the introduction of risky products: Evidence from a field study. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 139–149.CrossRef Simon, M., & Houghton, S. (2003). The relationship between overconfidence and the introduction of risky products: Evidence from a field study. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 139–149.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sine, W., Haveman, H., & Tolbert, P. (2005). Risky business? Entrepreneurship in the new independent power sector. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 200–232. Sine, W., Haveman, H., & Tolbert, P. (2005). Risky business? Entrepreneurship in the new independent power sector. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 200–232.
Zurück zum Zitat Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3–22.CrossRef Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3–22.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Smeltzer, L. R., Fann, G. L., & Nikoliasen, V. N. (1988). Environmental scanning practices in small business. Journal of Small Business Management, 26, 55–62. Smeltzer, L. R., Fann, G. L., & Nikoliasen, V. N. (1988). Environmental scanning practices in small business. Journal of Small Business Management, 26, 55–62.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith, K. G., Gannon, M. J., Grimm, C., & Mitchell, T. R. (1988). Decision making behavior in smaller entrepreneurial and larger professionally managed firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 3, 223–232.CrossRef Smith, K. G., Gannon, M. J., Grimm, C., & Mitchell, T. R. (1988). Decision making behavior in smaller entrepreneurial and larger professionally managed firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 3, 223–232.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sorenson, O. (2003). Interdependence and adaptability: Organizational learning and the long-term effect of integration. Management Science, 49, 446–463.CrossRef Sorenson, O. (2003). Interdependence and adaptability: Organizational learning and the long-term effect of integration. Management Science, 49, 446–463.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, strategic partnering, licensing, and public policy. Research Policy, 16, 285–305.CrossRef Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, strategic partnering, licensing, and public policy. Research Policy, 16, 285–305.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tether, B. S. (1998). Small and large firms: Sources of unequal innovations? Research Policy, 27, 725–745.CrossRef Tether, B. S. (1998). Small and large firms: Sources of unequal innovations? Research Policy, 27, 725–745.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tether, B. S. (2000). Small firms, innovation and employment creation in Britain and Europe: A question of expectations… Technovation, 20, 109–113. Tether, B. S. (2000). Small firms, innovation and employment creation in Britain and Europe: A question of expectations… Technovation, 20, 109–113.
Zurück zum Zitat Tushman, M. L., & Romanelli, E. (1985). Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 7, pp. 171–222). Greenwich: JAI Press. Tushman, M. L., & Romanelli, E. (1985). Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 7, pp. 171–222). Greenwich: JAI Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Wally, S., & Baum, J. R. (1994). Personal and structural determinants of the pace of strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 932–956.CrossRef Wally, S., & Baum, J. R. (1994). Personal and structural determinants of the pace of strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 932–956.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Size, R&D productivity and Decision Styles
verfasst von
José Lejarraga
Ester Martinez-Ros
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Small Business Economics / Ausgabe 3/2014
Print ISSN: 0921-898X
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0913
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9495-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2014

Small Business Economics 3/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner