nach oben

Small Business Economics

Erschienen in:

26.07.2019

The Digital Entrepreneurial Ecosystem—a critique and reconfiguration

verfasst von: Abraham K. Song

Erschienen in: Small Business Economics | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Sussan and Acs (Small Business Economics, 49(1), 55–73, 2017) proposed the “Digital Entrepreneurial Ecosystem” (DEE), a novel framework to guide our understanding of entrepreneurship in the digital age. By integrating literatures on digital ecosystem and entrepreneurial ecosystem, they brought to attention the importance of examining entrepreneurship as an outcome of interactions between biotic and abiotic entities represented by four concepts: Digital User Citizenship, Digital Entrepreneurship, Digital Infrastructure Governance, and Digital Marketplace. This paper revisits, critiques, and refines the framework through the following reconfigurations: (1) Digital User Citizenship is reintroduced as a heterogeneous group of users differentiated by their primary activity, as either consumers or producers. (2) Digital Technology Entrepreneurship encompasses all agents that build complementary products and services connecting to platforms. (3) Digital Multi-sided Platform is the intermediary for transaction of goods and services, and also a medium of knowledge exchanges that enables and facilitates experimentation, entrepreneurial innovation, and value creation. The main contribution of the paper is in the reconfigurations that clearly lay the ground for a more sustainable DEE—one in which user privacy is protected, platform efficiency enhanced, market competition encouraged, and digital infrastructure secured.

Vorheriger Artikel The entrepreneurship premium

Nächster Artikel Entrepreneurial experimentation: a key function in systems of innovation

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Jacobides et al. (2018) summarize the ecosystems literature in three: business ecosystem centered on a focal firm and its environment, innovation ecosystem centered on a particular innovation, and platform ecosystem organized around a platform. The distinction between knowledge and innovation ecosystems is in that the former is about knowledge exploration and the latter about co-creation of innovation (Valkokari 2015). The distinction between business and knowledge ecosystems are in that the objective of the former is in enhancing customer value while the latter knowledge generation (Clarysse et al. 2014). Another important distinction to keep in mind is the disciplines (e.g., sociology, strategy, information science, economics and so on) that drive these research streams.

Its focus on cooperation rather than competition marks a subtle but a substantive departure from comparable literatures in strategy and regional development. Strategy literature, such as clusters (Porter 1998), focuses on a firm’s value creation, value capture, and competitive advantage. Regional development literature, such as industrial districts (Markusen 1996), attempts to explain differences in aggregate regional performances.

Entrepreneurial ecosystems are, in a sense, related to business ecosystems when considering plausible evidence that suggests higher rate of spinoffs or spinouts in geographies with large “anchor” firms that act as a seedbed for nascent entrepreneurs (Zahra and Nambisan 2012).

Porter and Heppelmann (2015) identify three waves of information technology-driven (IT) changes. The first wave, during 1950s and 1970s, automated individual activities in the value chain. The second wave, during the 1980s and 1990s, has been driven by the rise of the internet. The first two waves gave rise to large productivity gains and growth across the economy through the transformation of the value chain. In the current third wave, they argue, IT is transforming not the process but the product itself. Smart products collect data that are used strategically for a competitive advantage.

For the purpose of this paper, platforms, digital platforms, and Digital Multi-sided Platforms are terms used interchangeably.

In the supply-side economies, average cost decrease with scale while in the demand-side economies (more commonly known as network effects), average revenue increases with scale (Shapiro and Varian 1998). Hence, industries dominated by network effects can command increasing returns to scale (Arthur 1989).

Agents include app developers and all other third-party individuals that build complementary products and services connecting to platforms.

https://www.engadget.com/2011/02/08/nokia-ceo-stephen-elop-rallies-troops-in-brutally-honest-burnin/. (Accessed December 3, 2018). Discussion of competition based on platform-centric ecosystems dates back to Katz and Shapiro (1994).

Liebowitz and Margolis (1994) differentiate the term network effects from network externality, which provide a useful distinction. In network effects, the benefit of an additional user on existing users is internalized but in network externalities, it is not.

According to Fang (2002), the scope of study for e-government includes the following interactions: Government-to-Citizen (G2C), Citizen-to-Government (C2G), Government-to-Business (G2B), Business-to-Government (B2G), Government-to-Government (G2G), Government-to-Nonprofit (G2N), Non-profit-to-Government (N2G), and Government-to-Employee (G2E).

There is a large literature in economics on market design that studies a variety of incentives and disincentives; also, topics related to search costs, pricing, allocation mechanisms, and reputation systems (Athey and Luca 2019).

Terms like “User entrepreneurship” have emerged to describe end-users such as hobbyists, who accidentally discover opportunities while using the product (Shah and Tripas 2007; Haefliger et al. 2010). In the DEE framework, “User entrepreneurship” indicates an occupational choice characterized by a transition from Digital User Citizenship to Digital Technology Entrepreneurship.

Razak v. Uber Technologies Inc., U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Case No. 2:16-cv-00573.

To best of my knowledge, this distinction between supply-side platform users and demand-side platform users is first proposed by Eisenmann et al. (2009).

see https://techterms.com/definition/api (Accessed December 3, 2018).

see https://eugdpr.org/ (Accessed December 3, 2018)

A unicorn is a privately held startup valued at $1 billion or more.

Abraham, K., Haltiwanger, J., Sandusky, K., & Spletzer, J. (2018). Measuring the gig economy: Current knowledge and open issues (no. w24950). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w24950.

Acemoglu, D., & Johnson, S. (2005). Unbundling institutions. Journal of Political Economy, 113(5), 949–995. https://doi.org/10.1086/432166.

Acs, Z. J., Autio, E., & Szerb, L. (2014). National systems of entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications. Research Policy, 43(3), 476–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.016.

Acs, Z. J., Estrin, S., Mickiewicz, T., & Szerb, L. (2018). Entrepreneurship, institutional economics, and economic growth: An ecosystem perspective. Small Business Economics, 51(2), 501–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0013-9.

Acs, Z.J., Parsons, W., Tracy, S., (2008). High-impact firms: Gazelles revisited (no. 328). The Office of Advocacy, U.S. Small Business Administration, Washington, DC 20037.

Acs, Z. J., Stam, E., Audretsch, D. B., & O’Connor, A. (2017). The lineages of the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach. Small Business Economics, 49(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9864-8.

Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316678451.

Adner, R. (2006). Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2006/04/match-your-innovation-strategy-to-your-innovation-ecosystem.

Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3), 306–333. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.821.

Arthur, W. B. (1989). Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. The Economic Journal, 99(394), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.2307/2234208.

Athey, S., & Luca, M. (2019). Economists (and economics) in tech companies. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(1), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.33.1.209.

Audretsch, D. B., Cunningham, J. A., Kuratko, D. F., Lehmann, E. E., & Menter, M. (2018). Entrepreneurial ecosystems: Economic, technological, and societal impacts. The Journal of Technology Transfer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9690-4.

Autio, E., & Thomas, L. D. W. (2014). Innovation ecosystem. In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Management. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Autio, E., Nambisan, S., Thomas, L. D. W., & Wright, M. (2018). Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 72–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1266.

Bahrami, H., & Evans, S. (1995). Flexible re-cycling and high-technology entrepreneurship. California Management Review, 37(3), 62–90.

Bailetti, T. (2012). Technology entrepreneurship: Overview, definition, and distinctive aspects. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(2), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/520.

Baldwin, C., Hienerth, C., & von Hippel, E. (2006). How user innovations become commercial products: A theoretical investigation and case study. Research Policy, 35(9), 1291–1313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.012.

Baller, S., Dutta, S., & Lanvin, B. (2016). The global information technology report 2016: innovating in the digital economy. Retrieved from http://www.deslibris.ca/ID/10090686

Baumol, W. J. (1996). Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(94)00014-X.

Beckman, C., Eisenhardt, K., Kotha, S., Meyer, A., & Rajagopalan, N. (2012). Technology entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 6(2), 89–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1134.

Belanger, F., Hiller, J. S., & Smith, W. J. (2002). Trustworthiness in electronic commerce: The role of privacy, security, and site attributes. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11(3), 245–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8687(02)00018-5.

Berthon, P. R., Pitt, L. F., McCarthy, I., & Kates, S. M. (2007). When customers get clever: Managerial approaches to dealing with creative consumers. Business Horizons, 50(1), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2006.05.005.

Boley, H., & Chang, E. (2007). Digital ecosystems: Principles and semantics. In Inaugural IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies. Cairns Australia.

Bresnahan, T. F., & Trajtenberg, M. (1995). General purpose technologies ‘engines of growth’? Journal of Econometrics, 65(1), 83–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01598-T.

Bresnahan, T. F., Davis, J. P., & Yin, P.-L. (2015). Economic value creation in mobile applications. In The Changing Frontier: Rethinking Science and Innovation Policy (pp. 233–286). University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226286860.001.0001.

Burtch, G., Carnahan, S., & Greenwood, B. N. (2018). Can you gig it? An empirical examination of the gig economy and entrepreneurial activity. Management Science, 64(12), 5497–5520. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2916.

Cavallo, A., Ghezzi, A., & Balocco, R. (2018). Entrepreneurial ecosystem research: Present debates and future directions. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-018-0526-3.

Chatterji, A., Glaeser, E., & Kerr, W. (2014). Clusters of entrepreneurship and innovation. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 14, 129–166. https://doi.org/10.1086/674023.

Chen, H., Gompers, P., Kovner, A., & Lerner, J. (2010). Buy local? The geography of venture capital. Journal of Urban Economics, 67(1), 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2009.09.013.

Christensen, C. M., & Bower, J. L. (1996). Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management Journal, 17(3), 197–218. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199603)17:3<197::AID-SMJ804>3.0.CO;2-U.

Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Bruneel, J., & Mahajan, A. (2014). Creating value in ecosystems: Crossing the chasm between knowledge and business ecosystems. Research Policy, 43(7), 1164–1176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.04.014.

Claussen, J., Kretschmer, T., & Mayrhofer, P. (2013). The effects of rewarding user engagement: The case of Facebook apps. Information Systems Research, 24(1), 186–200. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1120.0467.

Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405. https://doi.org/10.2307/2626876.

Cohen, B. (2006). Sustainable valley entrepreneurial ecosystems. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.428.

Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (2000). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. In R. L. Cross & S. B. Israelit (Eds.), Strategic learning in a knowledge economy (pp. 39–67). Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-7223-8.50005-8.

Cooke, P. (2016). The virtues of variety in regional innovation systems and entrepreneurial ecosystems. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-016-0036-x.

Cramer, J., & Krueger, A. B. (2016). Disruptive change in the taxi business: The case of Uber. American Economic Review, 106(5), 177–182. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20161002.

Delgado, M., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2010). Clusters and entrepreneurship. Journal of Economic Geography, 10(4), 495–518. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbq010.

Delmar, F., Davidsson, P., & Gartner, W. B. (2003). Arriving at the high-growth firm. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 189–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00080-0.

de Reuver, M., Sørensen, C., & Basole, R. C. (2018). The digital platform: A research agenda. Journal of Information Technology, 33(2), 124–135. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41265-016-0033-3.

Dini, P., Iqani, M., & Mansell, R. (2011). The (im)possibility of interdisciplinarity: Lessons from constructing a theoretical framework for digital ecosystems. Culture, Theory and Critique, 52(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735784.2011.621668.

Dobson, P. W., & Inderst, R. (2008). The waterbed effect: Where buying and selling power come together the future of monopoly and monopolization symposium. Wisconsin Law Review, 2008, 331–358.

Doganova, L., & Eyquem-Renault, M. (2009). What do business models do? Research Policy, 38(10), 1559–1570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.08.002.

Dreischmeier, R., Close, Karalee, & Trichet Philippe. (2015). The digital imperative. In BCG Perspectives (pp. 2–6). The Boston Consulting Group.

Easley, D., & Kleinberg, J. (2010). Networks, crowds, and markets: Reasoning about a highly connected world. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Eckhardt, J. T., & Shane, S. A. (2003). Opportunities and entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 29(3), 333–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630302900304.

Eisenmann, T. R., Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. (2009). Opening platforms: How, when and why? In Platforms, markets and innovation (pp. 131–162).

Eisenmann, T., Parker, G., & Alstyne, M. W. V. (2006). Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard Business Review, 84(10), 92–101.

Ekbia, H. R. (2009). Digital artifacts as quasi-objects: Qualification, mediation, and materiality. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(12), 2554–2566. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21189.

Erdogan, B., Kant, R., Miller, A., & Sprague, K. (2016). Grow fast or die slow: Why unicorns are staying private. In McKinsey & Company Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/high-tech/our-insights/grow-fast-or-die-slow-why-unicorns-are-staying-private.

Evans, D. S., & Leighton, L. S. (1989). Some empirical aspects of entrepreneurship. The American Economic Review, 79(3), 519–535.

Evans, D. S., & Schmalensee, R. (2007). The industrial organization of markets with two-sided platforms. Competition Policy International, 3(1), 30.

Evans, D. S., & Schmalensee, R. (2016). Matchmakers: The new economics of multisided platforms. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business Review Press.

Evans, P. C., & Basole, R. C. (2016). Revealing the API ecosystem and enterprise strategy via visual analytics. Communications of the ACM, 59(2), 26–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/2856447.

Evans, P. C. and Gawer, A. (2016) The rise of the platform enterprise: A global survey, the emerging platform economy series no. 1, the Center for Global Enterprise: http://thecge.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/PDF-WEB-Platform-Survey_01_12.pdf

Fang, Z. (2002). E-government in digital era: Concept, practice, and development. International Journal of The Computer, The Internet, and Management, 10(2), 1–22.

Feld, B. (2012). Startup communities: Building an entrepreneurial ecosystem in your city. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Feldman, M. P. (2001). The entrepreneurial event revisited: Firm formation in a regional context. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 861–891. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/10.4.861.

Florida, R. L. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class: and how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life New York. NY: Basic Books.

Garud, R., & Karnøe, P. (2003). Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 32(2), 277–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00100-2.

Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2008). How companies become platform leaders. MIT Sloan Management Review; Cambridge, 49(2), 28–35.

Ghazawneh, A., & Henfridsson, O. (2013). Balancing platform control and external contribution in third-party development: The boundary resources model. Information Systems Journal, 23(2), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2012.00406.x.

Giones, F., & Brem, A. (2017). Digital technology entrepreneurship: A definition and research agenda. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(5) Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2984542.

Glaeser, E. L., Kerr, W. R., & Ponzetto, G. A. M. (2010). Clusters of entrepreneurship. Journal of Urban Economics, 67(1), 150–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2009.09.008.

Goodwin, T. (2015, March 3). The battle is for the customer interface. Retrieved September 25, 2018, from http://social.techcrunch.com/2015/03/03/in-the-age-of-disintermediation-the-battle-is-all-for-the-customer-interface/

Haefliger, S., Jäger, P., & von Krogh, G. (2010). Under the radar: Industry entry by user entrepreneurs. Research Policy, 39(9), 1198–1213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.07.001.

Hagiu, A., & Wright, J. (2018). The status of workers and platforms in the sharing economy. Working Paper, 17.

Hess, C., & Ostrom, E. (2011). Understanding knowledge as a commons: from theory to practice (1st MIT press pbk. ed). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Hoffman, R., & Yeh, C. (2018). Blitzscaling: The lightning-fast path to building multi-billion-dollar scaleups (First ed.). New York: Currency.

Hurst, E., & Pugsley, B. W. (2011). What do small businesses do? (Brookings papers on economic activity) (pp. 73–118).

Hwang, V. W., & Horowitt, G. (2012). The rainforest: The secret to building the next Silicon Valley. Los Altos Hills, Calif: Regenwald.

Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004, March 1). Strategy as ecology. Harvard Business Review, (March 2004). Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2004/03/strategy-as-ecology

Isenberg, D. (2010). The big idea: How to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard Business Review, June, 1 https://hbr.org/2010/06/the-big-idea-how-to-start-an-entrepreneurial-revolution.

Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2255–2276. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2904.

Jovanovic, B., & Rousseau, P. L. (2005). General purpose technologies. In P. Aghion & S. N. Durlauf (Eds.), Handbook of Economic Growth (Vol. 1, pp. 1181–1224). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0684(05)01018-X.

Kallinikos, J., Aaltonen, A., & Marton, A. (2013). The ambivalent ontology of digital artifacts. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 37(2), 357–370.

Karakas, F. (2009). Welcome to world 2.0: The new digital ecosystem. Journal of Business Strategy, 30(4), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/02756660910972622.

Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C. (1994). Systems competition and network effects. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(2), 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.8.2.93.

Khan, L. M. (2017). Amazon’s antitrust paradox. Yale Law Journal, 126, 710–805.

Kirzner, I. M. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Kutcher, E., Nottebohm, O., & Sprague, K. (2016). Sustaining growth in technology companies. In McKinsey & Company Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/high-tech/our-insights/grow-fast-or-die-slow.

Lafuente, E., Szerb, L., & Acs, Z. J. (2016). Country level efficiency and national systems of entrepreneurship: A data envelopment analysis approach. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(6), 1260–1283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9440-9.

Li, W., Badr, Y., & Biennier, F. (2012). Digital ecosystems: Challenges and prospects. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Management of Emergent Digital EcoSystems - MEDES ‘12 (p. 117). Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2457276.2457297.

Liebowitz, S. J., & Margolis, S. E. (1994). Network externality: An uncommon tragedy. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(2), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.8.2.133.

Lüthje, C., Herstatt, C., & von Hippel, E. (2005). User-innovators and “local” information: The case of mountain biking. Research Policy, 34(6), 951–965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.005.

Lycett, M. (2013). ‘Datafication’: Making sense of (big) data in a complex world. European Journal of Information Systems, 22(4), 381–386. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2013.10.

Mack, E., & Mayer, H. (2016). The evolutionary dynamics of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Urban Studies, 53(10), 2118–2133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015586547.

MacMillan, D. (2014, January 3). Andreessen: Bubble Believers “Don’t Know What They’re Talking About.” Wall street journal. Retrieved from https://www.wsj.com/articles/andreessen-bubble-believers-8216don8217t-know-what-they8217re-talking-about8217-1388771427

Malecki, E. J. (2018). Entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial ecosystems. Geography Compass, 12(3), e12359. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12359.

Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., & Agarwal, J. (2004). Internet users’ information privacy concerns (IUIPC): The construct, the scale, and a causal model. Information Systems Research, 15(4), 336–355. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1040.0032.

Malone, T. W., Yates, J., & Benjamin, R. I. (1987). Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies. Communications of the ACM, 30(6), 484–497. https://doi.org/10.1145/214762.214766.

Markusen, A. (1996). Sticky places in slippery space: A typology of industrial districts. Economic Geography, 72(3), 293. https://doi.org/10.2307/144402.

Mars, M. M., Bronstein, J. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2012). The value of a metaphor. Organizational Dynamics, 41(4), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2012.08.002.

Mason, C., & Brown, D. R. (2014). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth oriented entrepreneurship. OECD LEED Programme and the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs on Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Growth Oriented Entrepreneurship, The Hague, Netherlands., 38.

Mason, R. O. (1986). Four ethical issues of the information age. MIS Quarterly, 10(1), 5–12.

McAfee, A., & Brynjolfsson, E. (2017). Machine, platform, crowd: Harnessing our digital future (First ed.). New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

McCann, P., & Acs, Z. J. (2011). Globalization: Countries, cities and multinationals. Regional Studies, 45(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2010.505915.

McIntyre, D. P., & Srinivasan, A. (2017). Networks, platforms, and strategy: Emerging views and next steps. Strategic Management Journal, 38(1), 141–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2596.

Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, (May–June 1993). Retrieved from https://hbr.org/1993/05/predators-and-prey-a-new-ecology-of-competition

Nambisan, S. (2017). Digital entrepreneurship: Toward a digital technology perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(6), 1029–1055. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12254.

Nambisan, S., & Zahra, S. A. (2016). The role of demand-side narratives in opportunity formation and enactment. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 5, 70–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2016.05.001.

Nambisan, S., Siegel, D., & Kenney, M. (2018). On open innovation, platforms, and entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(3), 354–368. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1300.

Nanda, R., & Rhodes-Kropf, M. (2016). Financing entrepreneurial experimentation. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 16, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1086/684983.

Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

Norberg, P. A., Horne, D. R., & Horne, D. A. (2007). The privacy paradox: Personal information disclosure intentions versus behaviors. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 41(1), 100–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2006.00070.x.

North, D. C. (1990). A transaction cost theory of politics. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2(4), 355–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692890002004001.

Oh, H., Rizo, C., Enkin, M., Jadad, A., Powell, J., & Pagliari, C. (2005). What is eHealth (3): A systematic review of published definitions. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7.1.e1.

Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. W. (2004). Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. In Organization science, 15(1), 5–21. Retrieved from: JSTOR.

Parker, G. G., Van Alstyne, M. W., & Choudary, S. P. (2016a). Pipelines, platforms, and the new rules of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 94(4), 16.

Parker, G., Van Alstyne, M., & Choudary, S. P. (2016b). Platform revolution: How networked markets are transforming the economy and how to make them work for you (First ed.). New York: W. W. NORTON & COMPANY.

Parker, S. C. (2009). The economics of entrepreneurship. In Cambridge, UK. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Pasquale, F. (2016). Two narratives of platform capitalism feature: Essays from the law and inequality conference. Yale Law & Policy Review, 35, 309–320.

Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, (November-December 1998). Retrieved from https://hbr.org/1998/11/clusters-and-the-new-economics-of-competition

Porter, M. E., & Heppelmann, J. E. (2015). How smart, connected products are transforming companies. Harvard Business Review, (October 2015). Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2015/10/how-smart-connected-products-are-transforming-companies

Priem, R. L., Li, S., & Carr, J. C. (2012). Insights and new directions from demand-side approaches to technology innovation, entrepreneurship, and strategic management research. Journal of Management, 38(1), 346–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311429614.

Qian, H., & Acs, Z. J. (2013). An absorptive capacity theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 40(2), 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9368-x.

Ritter, J. R. (2014) “Initial public offerings: Updated statistics.”

Ritzer, G., & Jurgenson, N. (2010). Production, consumption, prosumption: the nature of capitalism in the age of the digital ‘prosumer.’ Journal of Consumer Culture, 10(1), 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540509354673.

Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J. (2003). Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), 990–1029.

Rogers, D. L. (2016). The digital transformation playbook: Rethink your business for the digital age. New York: Columbia Business School Pub.

Rysman, M. (2009). The economics of two-sided markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(3), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.23.3.125.

Sassen, S. (1994). Cities in a world economy. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Pine Forge Press.

Saxenian, A. (1996). Regional advantage: culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 (8. Print). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University press.

Schilling, M. A. (2002). Technology success and failure in winner-take-all markets: The impact of learning orientation, timing, and network externalities. The Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 387–398. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069353.

Schumpeter, J. (1911). The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press.

Shah, S. K., & Tripsas, M. (2007). The accidental entrepreneur: The emergent and collective process of user entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1–2), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.15.

Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791611.

Shapiro, C., & Varian, H. R. (1998). Information rules: A strategic guide to the network economy. Boston, Mass: Harvard Business School Press.

Spigel, B. (2017). The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12167.

Srinivasan, A., & Venkatraman, N. (2018). Entrepreneurship in digital platforms: A network-centric view: Entrepreneurship in digital platforms: A network-centric view. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 54–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1272.

Stam, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: A sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759–1769. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484.

Stam, E., & Spigel, B. (2018). Entrepreneurial ecosystems. In R. Blackburn, D. De Clercq, & J. Heinonen, The SAGE Handbook of Small Business and Entrepreneurship (pp. 407–421). 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road London EC1Y 1SP: SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473984080.n21 .

Stone, B. (2017). The upstarts: How Uber, Airbnb, and the killer companies of the new Silicon Valley are changing the world (First ed.). New York: Little, Brown and Company.

Sundararajan, A. (2016). The sharing economy: the end of employment and the rise of crowd-based capitalism. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Sussan, F., & Acs, Z. J. (2017). The digital entrepreneurial ecosystem. Small Business Economics, 49(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9867-5.

Tansley, A. G. (1935). The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms. Ecology, 16(3), 284–307. https://doi.org/10.2307/1930070.

Tapscott, D., & Williams, A. D. (2010). Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything (expanded ed., paperback ed). New York, NY: Portfolio/Penguin.

Taylor, P. J. (2004). World city network: A global urban analysis. In London. New York: Routledge.

Teece, D. J. (2018). Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: Enabling technologies, standards, and licensing models in the wireless world. Research Policy, 47(8), 1367–1387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.01.015.

Terranova, T. (2000). Free labor: Producing culture for the digital economy. Social Text, 18(2), 33–58.

Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B., & Bush, A. A. (2010). Research commentary—Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 675–687. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0323.

Valkokari, K. (2015). Business, innovation, and knowledge ecosystems: How they differ and how to survive and thrive within them. Technology Innovation Management Review; Ottawa, 5(8), 17–24.

Van Alstyne, M. W., Parker, G. G., & Choudary, S. P. (2016). Pipelines, platforms, and the new rules of strategy. Harvard Business Review, (April 2016). Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2016/04/pipelines-platforms-and-the-new-rules-of-strategy

Van Dijck, J. (2009). Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content. Media, Culture & Society, 31(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443708098245.

von Briel, F., Davidsson, P., Recker, J. (2018). Digital technologies as external enablers of new venture creation in the IT hardware sector. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42, 47–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258717732779.

Weil, P., & Woerner, S.,. L. (2015). Thriving in an increasingly digital ecosystem. MIT Sloan Management Review, 56(4), 27–34.

West, J., & Lakhani, K. R. (2008). Getting clear about communities in open innovation. Industry and Innovation, 15(2), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710802033734.

West, J., & Mace, M. (2010). Browsing as the killer app: Explaining the rapid success of Apple’s iPhone. Telecommunications Policy, 34(5), 270–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2009.12.002.

Yin, P.-L., Davis, J. P., & Muzyrya, Y. (2014). Entrepreneurial innovation: Killer apps in the iPhone ecosystem. American Economic Review, 104(5), 255–259. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.5.255.

Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010). Research commentary: The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 724–735.

Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.6587995.

Zahra, S. A., & Nambisan, S. (2012). Entrepreneurship and strategic thinking in business ecosystems. Business Horizons, 55(3), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.12.004.

Titel: The Digital Entrepreneurial Ecosystem—a critique and reconfiguration
verfasst von: Abraham K. Song
Publikationsdatum: 26.07.2019
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Small Business Economics / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0921-898X
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0913
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00232-y

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

Boyan Jovanovic: recipient of the 2019 Global Award for Entrepreneurship Research

The impact of business-support services on firm performance: a meta-analysis

R&D tax incentives in EU countries: does the impact vary with firm size?

Early internationalization patterns and export market persistence: a pseudo-panel data analysis

Investigating social media as a firm’s signaling strategy through an IPO

Does rural entrepreneurship pay?

Premium Partner