Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Social Indicators Research
Erschienen in: Social Indicators Research 1/2019

30.04.2018

Income Inequality, Distributive Justice Beliefs, and Happiness in China: Evidence from a Nationwide Survey

verfasst von: Jiawen Huang

Erschienen in: Social Indicators Research | Ausgabe 1/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Recently, increasing numbers of scholars have given attention to the mechanism connecting income inequality and happiness. This paper uses a multilevel model to verify the effect of income inequality at the city level on happiness and its moderating effect in China. It is found that income inequality is highly correlated to individual happiness. In the context of the transition China, people are inclined to report more happiness in places where income inequality is lower, after controlling for a number of demographic variables and economic factors. Moreover, this negative effect is relatively robust and significant, regardless of estimates with different covariates. It is worth noting that personal distributive justice beliefs play a momentous role in happiness. Specifically, as an effective social psychological mechanism, they can alleviate the negative effects of income inequality on happiness. A vital implication of the findings for social policy is that the model of economic development should be based on equity and justice and become a consistent source of happiness in this transitional period in China.
Vorheriger Artikel Partisan Conflict and Income Inequality in the United States: A Nonparametric Causality-in-Quantiles Approach
Nächster Artikel Wage Inequality and Wage Mobility in Turkey

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Fußnoten
1
Data sources: Official website of World Values Survey. http://​www.​worldvaluessurve​y.​org/​.
 
2
Ibid.
 
3
See The report on China's rule of law in 2014 written by Li and Tian (2014).
 
4
See The annual report on the social mentality of China written by Wang (2013).
 
5
Since CLDS only made statistics on the educational level of the respondents who received formal education, the cases of non-formal education were automatically treated as missing values; this paper excluded cases who did not receive formal education in the sample.
 
6
The concept of ‘city’ in this study refers to the prefectural city, which is an administrative division of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that ranks below a province and above a county. It includes a main central urban area (a city in the usual sense) and its surrounding rural area.
 
7
In the calculation of income inequality, this study used the variable of income reported by respondents from the raw data of CLDS, including 116 cities with 16,000 cases after removing missing value of income variable.
 
8
The formulas of R 1 2 and R 2 2 referring to Multilevel Modeling were derived from Luke (2004).
 
9
In this study, income inequality and its squares were intended to be included at the same time in the analysis of the happiness model, but no significant correlation was found between them and happiness. Thus, the results of that model were not reported.
 
Literatur
Abdel-Khalek, A. M. (2006). Measuring happiness with a single-item scale. Social Behavior and Personality, 34(2), 139–150.CrossRef
Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 267–299). New York: Academic Press.CrossRef
Ahn, H., Roll, S. J., Zeng, W., Frey, J. J., Reiman, S., & Ko, J. (2016). Impact of income inequality on workers’ life satisfaction in the U.S.: A multilevel analysis. Social Indicators Research, 128(3), 1–17.CrossRef
Alesina, A., Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2004). Inequality and happiness: Are Europeans and Americans different? Journal of Public Economics, 88(9), 2009–2042.CrossRef
Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRef
Ballas, D., Dorling, D., Nakaya, T., Tunstall, H., Hanaoka, K., & Hanibuchi, T. (2016). Happiness, social cohesion and income inequalities in Britain and Japan. CWiPP Working Paper Series, No. 7.
Bellù, L. G., & Liberati, P. (2006). Inequality analysis: The Gini index. New York: Food and Agriculture Organization.
Berg, M., & Veenhoven, R. (2010). Income inequality and happiness in 119 nations. In B. Greve (Ed.), Social policy and happiness in Europe (pp. 174–194). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. (2008). Is well-being U-shaped over the life cycle? Social Science and Medicine, 66(8), 1733–1749.CrossRef
Bradburn, N. M., & Caplovitz, D. (1965). Reports of happiness. Chicago: Aldine.
Brockner, J., Wiesenfeld, B. M., & Martin, C. L. (1995). Decision frame, procedural justice, and survivors’ reactions to job layoffs. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63(1), 59–68.CrossRef
Chung, J. H., Lai, H., & Ming, X. (2006). Mounting challenges to governance in China: Surveying collective protestors, religious sects and criminal organizations. The China Journal, 56, 1–31.CrossRef
Clark, A. E., & D’Ambrosio, C. (2015). Attitudes to income inequality: Experimental and survey evidence. In A. B. Atkinson & F. Bourguignon (Eds.), Handbook of income distribution (pp. 1147–1208). Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co.
Clark, A. E., & Oswald, A. J. (2002). A simple statistical method for measuring how life events affect happiness. International Journal of Epidemiology, 31(6), 1139–1144.CrossRef
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Conceição, P., & Ferreira, P. M. (2000). A young person’s guide to the Theil index: Suggestive intuitive interpretations and exploring analytical applications. UTIP Working Paper, No. 14.
Dalbert, C. (2009). Belief in a just world. In M. R. Leary & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 288–297). New York: Guilford Press.
Deltas, G. (2003). The small-sample bias of the Gini coefficient: Results and implications for empirical research. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(1), 226–234.CrossRef
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302.CrossRef
Ding, N., & Wang, Y. (2008). Household income mobility in China and its decomposition. China Economic Review, 19(3), 373–380.CrossRef
DiPrete, A. T., & Forristal, J. D. (1994). Multilevel models: Methods and substance. Annual Review of Sociology, 20, 331–357.CrossRef
Earley, P., & Lind, E. A. (1987). Procedural justice and participation in task selection: The role of control in mediating justice judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1148–1160.CrossRef
Easterlin, R. A. (2001). Income and happiness: Towards a unified theory. The Economic Journal, 111(473), 465–484.CrossRef
Ebert, U., & Welsch, H. (2009). How do Europeans evaluate income distributions? An assessment based on happiness surveys. Review of Income and Wealth, 55(3), 801–819.CrossRef
Firebaugh, G., & Schröder, M. B. (2009). Does your neighbor’s income affect your happiness? American Journal of Sociology, 115(3), 805–831.CrossRef
Gong, H., Leigh, A., & Meng, X. (2012). Intergenerational income mobility in urban China. Income and Wealth, 58(3), 481–503.CrossRef
Grosfeld, I., & Senik, C. (2010). The emerging aversion to inequality: Evidence from subjective data. Economics of Transition, 18(1), 1–26.CrossRef
Hagerty, M. R. (2000). Social comparisons of income in one’s community: Evidence from national surveys of income and happiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 764–771.CrossRef
Helliwell, J. F., & Huang, H. (2008). How’s your government? International evidence linking good government and well-being. British Journal of Political Science, 38, 595–619.CrossRef
Hirschman, A. O., & Rothschild, M. (1973). The changing tolerance for income inequality in the course of economic development with a mathematical appendix. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(4), 544–566.CrossRef
Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. (2001). The Confucius connection: from cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics, 16(4), 5–21.CrossRef
Huang, J., Wu, S., & Deng, S. (2016). Relative income, relative assets, and happiness in urban China. Social Indicators Research, 126(3), 971–985.CrossRef
Im, D. K. (2014). Attitudes and beliefs about distributive justice in China. Dissertations & Theses, Harvard University.
Jiang, S., Lu, M., & Sato, H. (2012). Identity, inequality, and happiness: Evidence from urban China. World Development, 40(6), 1190–1200.CrossRef
Joshanloo, M., & Weijers, D. (2016). Religiosity moderates the relationship between income inequality and life satisfaction across the globe. Social Indicators Research, 128(2), 1–20.CrossRef
Kawachi, I., & Kennedy, B. P. (1997). The relationship of income inequality to mortality: Does the choice of indicator matter? Social Science and Medicine, 45(7), 1121–1127.CrossRef
Khor, N., & Pencavel, J. (2006). Income mobility of individuals in China and the United States. Economics of Transition, 14(3), 417–458.CrossRef
Knight, J., Song, L., & Gunatilaka, R. (2009). Subjective well-being and its determinants in rural China. China Economic Review, 20(4), 635–649.CrossRef
Kushlev, K., Dunn, E. W., & Lucas, R. E. (2015). Higher income is associated with less daily sadness but not more daily happiness. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 6(5), 483–489.CrossRef
Layte, R. (2012). The association between income inequality and mental health: Testing status anxiety, social capital, and neo-materialist explanations. European Sociological Review, 28(4), 498–511.CrossRef
Leamer, E. E. (1983). Let’s take the con out of econometrics. The American Economic Review, 73(1), 31–43.
Levy, R. (2011). Myth of the social volcano: Perceptions of inequality and distributive injustice in contemporary China (book review). Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 38(1), 196–198.
Li, L., & Tian, H. (2014). The report on China’s rule of law in 2014. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press. (in Chinese).
Li, Q. (2005). New trends in the changes in social stratification in today’s China. Social Sciences in China, 4, 123–136.
Lu, M., & Gao, H. (2011). Labour market transition, income inequality and economic growth in China. International Labour Review, 150(1–2), 101–126.CrossRef
Lucas, T. (2009). Justifying outcomes versus processes: Distributive and procedural justice beliefs as predictors of positive and negative affectivity. Current Psychology, 28(4), 249–265.CrossRef
Lucas, T., Zhdanova, T., Wendorf, C. A., & Sheldon, A. (2013). Procedural and distributive justice beliefs for self and others: Multilevel associations with life satisfaction and self-rated health. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(4), 1325–1341.CrossRef
Luke, D. A. (2004). Multilevel modeling. New York: Sage Publications.CrossRef
McBride, M. (2001). Relative-income effects on subjective well–being in the cross-section. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 45(3), 251–278.CrossRef
Morawetz, D., Ety, A., Bin Nun, G., Felous, L., Gariplerden, Y., Harris, H., et al. (1977). Income distribution and self-rated happiness: Some empirical evidence. Economic Journal, 87(347), 511–522.CrossRef
Neckerman, K. M., & Torche, F. (2007). Inequality: Causes and consequences. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 335–357.CrossRef
Ohtake, F., & Tomioka, J. (2004). Who supports redistribution? Japanese Economic Review, 55(4), 333–354.CrossRef
Oishi, S., & Kesebir, S. (2015). Income inequality explains why economic growth does not always translate to an increase in happiness. Psychological Science, 26(10), 1630–1638.CrossRef
Oishi, S., Kesebir, S., & Diener, E. (2011). Income inequality and happiness. Psychological Science, 22(9), 1095–1100.CrossRef
Oshio, T., & Kobayashi, M. (2010). Income inequality, perceived happiness, and self-rated health: Evidence from nationwide surveys in Japan. Social Science and Medicine, 70(9), 1358–1366.CrossRef
Oshio, T., & Kobayashi, M. (2011). Area-level income inequality and individual happiness: Evidence from Japan. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(4), 633–649.CrossRef
Ott, J. (2005). Level and inequality of happiness in nations: Does greater happiness of a greater number imply greater inequality in happiness? Journal of Happiness Studies, 6(4), 397–420.CrossRef
Pei, X., & Rodriguez, E. (2006). Provincial income inequality and self-reported health status in China during 1991–7. Journal of Epidemiology Community Health, 60, 1065–1069.CrossRef
Rözer, J., & Kraaykamp, G. (2013). Income inequality and subjective well-being: A cross-national study on the conditional effects of individual and national characteristics. Social Indicators Research, 113(3), 1009–1023.CrossRef
Schneider, S. M. (2016). Income inequality and subjective wellbeing: Trends, challenges, and research directions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(4), 1719–1739.CrossRef
Schwarze, J., & Härpfer, M. (2007). Are people inequality-averse, and do they prefer distribution by the state? Evidence from German longitudinal data on life satisfaction. Journal of Socio-Economics, 36(2), 233–249.CrossRef
Senik, C. (2004). When information dominates comparison: Learning from Russian subjective panel data. Journal of Public Economics, 88(3), 2099–2123.CrossRef
Sutton, R. M., & Douglas, K. M. (2005). Justice for all, or just for me? More support for self-other differences in just world beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(3), 637–645.CrossRef
Tomes, N. (1986). Income distribution, happiness and satisfaction: A direct test of the interdependent preferences model. Journal of Economic Psychology, 7(4), 425–446.CrossRef
Tsou, M., & Liu, J. (2001). Happiness and domain satisfaction in Taiwan. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2(3), 269–288.CrossRef
Veenhoven, R. (1991). Is happiness relative? Social Indicators Research, 24(1), 1–34.CrossRef
Veenhoven, R., Ehrhardt, J., Ho, M. S. D., & de Vries, A. (1993). Studies in socio-cultural transformation, No. 2. Happiness in nations: Subjective appreciation of life in 56 nations 1946–1992.  Rotterdam, Netherlands: Erasmus University Rotterdam. http://​psycnet.​apa.​org/​record/​1994-97239-000.
Wang, J. X. (2013). The annual report on the social mentality of China. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press. (in Chinese).
Wang, P., Pan, J., & Luo, Z. (2015). The impact of income inequality on individual happiness: Evidence from China. Social Indicators Research, 121(2), 1–23.CrossRef
Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (Eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(4), 664–678.CrossRef
Weiss, H. M., Suckow, K., & Cropanzano, R. (1999). Effects of justice conditions on discrete emotions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(5), 786–794.CrossRef
Whyte, M. K. (2010). Myth of the social volcano: Perceptions of inequality and distributive injustice in contemporary China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Whyte, M. K., & Han, C. (2008). Popular attitudes toward distributive injustice: Beijing and Warsaw compared. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 13(1), 29–51.CrossRef
Wiseman, V., Lagarde, M., Batura, N., et al. (2017). Measuring inequalities in the distribution of the Fiji health workforce. International Journal for Equity in Health, 16(1), 115–122.CrossRef
Wu, X. G. (2009). Income inequality and distributive justice: A comparative analysis of Mainland China and Hong Kong. China Quarterly, 200, 1033–1052.CrossRef
Yitzhaki, S. (1979). Relative deprivation and the Gini coefficient. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 93(2), 321–324.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Income Inequality, Distributive Justice Beliefs, and Happiness in China: Evidence from a Nationwide Survey
verfasst von
Jiawen Huang
Publikationsdatum
30.04.2018
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Social Indicators Research / Ausgabe 1/2019
Print ISSN: 0303-8300
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0921
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1905-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2019

Social Indicators Research 1/2019 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

A Well-Being Indicator for the Italian Provinces

Discussion and comments

Is Freedom Just About the Absence of Inhibitions, or Also About the Availability of Options?

OriginalPaper

Wage Inequality and Wage Mobility in Turkey

OriginalPaper

Linking Food Security with Household’s Adaptive Capacity and Drought Risk: Implications for Sustainable Rural Development

OriginalPaper

The Truly Vulnerable: Integrating Wealth into the Measurement of Poverty and Social Policy Effectiveness

OriginalPaper

Social Capital and Health in China: Evidence from the Chinese General Social Survey 2010

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise