Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Theory and Decision 2/2016

21.05.2015

Risk aversion, prudence, and asset allocation: a review and some new developments

verfasst von: Michel M. Denuit, Louis Eeckhoudt

Erschienen in: Theory and Decision | Ausgabe 2/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the composition of an optimal portfolio made of two dependent risky assets. The investor is first assumed to be a risk-averse expected utility maximizer, and we recover the existing conditions under which all these investors hold at least some percentage of their portfolio in one of the assets. Then, we assume that the decision maker is not only risk-averse, but also prudent and we obtain new minimum demand conditions as well as intuitively appealing interpretations for them. Finally, we consider the general case of investor’s preferences exhibiting risk apportionment of any order and we derive the corresponding minimum demand conditions. As a byproduct, we obtain conditions such that an investor holds either a positive quantity of one of the assets (positive demand condition) or a proportion greater than 50 % (i.e., the “50 % rule”).

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
Kimball (1990) coined the term prudence in his analysis of savings under future income risk. However, as indicated by Kimball (1990), this question had already been analyzed earlier, e.g., by Drèze and Modigliani (1972), Sandmo (1970), and Leland (1968).
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Chiu, W. H. (2005). Degree of downside risk aversion and self-protection. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 36, 93–101. Chiu, W. H. (2005). Degree of downside risk aversion and self-protection. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 36, 93–101.
Zurück zum Zitat Clark, E., & Jokung, O. (1999). A note on asset proportions, stochastic dominance, and the 50 % rule. Management Science, 45, 1724–1727.CrossRef Clark, E., & Jokung, O. (1999). A note on asset proportions, stochastic dominance, and the 50 % rule. Management Science, 45, 1724–1727.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Denuit, M., Huang, R., & Tzeng, L. (2015). Almost expectation and excess dependence notions. Theory and Decision, in press. Denuit, M., Huang, R., & Tzeng, L. (2015). Almost expectation and excess dependence notions. Theory and Decision, in press.
Zurück zum Zitat Denuit, M., & Rey, B. (2010). Prudence, temperance, edginess, and risk apportionment as decreasing sensitivity to detrimental changes. Mathematical Social Sciences, 60, 137–143.CrossRef Denuit, M., & Rey, B. (2010). Prudence, temperance, edginess, and risk apportionment as decreasing sensitivity to detrimental changes. Mathematical Social Sciences, 60, 137–143.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Drèze, J., & Modigliani, F. (1972). Consumption decision under uncertainty. Journal of Economic Theory, 5, 308–335.CrossRef Drèze, J., & Modigliani, F. (1972). Consumption decision under uncertainty. Journal of Economic Theory, 5, 308–335.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Eeckhoudt, L., & Schlesinger, H. (2006). Putting risk in its proper place. American Economic Review, 96, 280–289.CrossRef Eeckhoudt, L., & Schlesinger, H. (2006). Putting risk in its proper place. American Economic Review, 96, 280–289.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fagart, M. C., & Sinclair-Desgagné, B. (2007). Ranking contingent monitoring systems. Management Science, 53, 1501–1509.CrossRef Fagart, M. C., & Sinclair-Desgagné, B. (2007). Ranking contingent monitoring systems. Management Science, 53, 1501–1509.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hadar, J., & Seo, T. K. (1988). Asset proportions in optimal portfolios. Review of Economic Studies, 55, 459–468.CrossRef Hadar, J., & Seo, T. K. (1988). Asset proportions in optimal portfolios. Review of Economic Studies, 55, 459–468.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Leland, H. (1968). Saving and uncertainty: The precautionary demand for saving. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 82, 465–473.CrossRef Leland, H. (1968). Saving and uncertainty: The precautionary demand for saving. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 82, 465–473.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kimball, M. S. (1990). Precautionary savings in the small and in the large. Econometrica, 58, 53–73.CrossRef Kimball, M. S. (1990). Precautionary savings in the small and in the large. Econometrica, 58, 53–73.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Li, J. (2011). The demand for a risky asset in the presence of a background risk. Journal of Economic Theory, 146, 372–391.CrossRef Li, J. (2011). The demand for a risky asset in the presence of a background risk. Journal of Economic Theory, 146, 372–391.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sandmo, A. (1970). The effect of uncertainty on saving decisions. Review of Economic Studies, 37, 353–360.CrossRef Sandmo, A. (1970). The effect of uncertainty on saving decisions. Review of Economic Studies, 37, 353–360.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shalit, H., & Yitzhaki, S. (1994). Marginal conditional stochastic dominance. Management Science, 40, 670–684.CrossRef Shalit, H., & Yitzhaki, S. (1994). Marginal conditional stochastic dominance. Management Science, 40, 670–684.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wright, R. (1987). Expectation dependence of random variables, with an application in portfolio theory. Theory and Decision, 22, 111–124.CrossRef Wright, R. (1987). Expectation dependence of random variables, with an application in portfolio theory. Theory and Decision, 22, 111–124.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yitzhaki, S., & Olkin, I. (1991). Concentration indices and concentration curves. In: Stochastic Orders and Decision under Risk, AMS Lecture Notes-Monograph Series, 19 (pp. 380–392). Yitzhaki, S., & Olkin, I. (1991). Concentration indices and concentration curves. In: Stochastic Orders and Decision under Risk, AMS Lecture Notes-Monograph Series, 19 (pp. 380–392).
Metadaten
Titel
Risk aversion, prudence, and asset allocation: a review and some new developments
verfasst von
Michel M. Denuit
Louis Eeckhoudt
Publikationsdatum
21.05.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Theory and Decision / Ausgabe 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0040-5833
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7187
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-015-9503-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2016

Theory and Decision 2/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner