Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Water Resources Management 1/2017

29.11.2016

Fuzzy Hybrid MCDM Model for Ranking the Agricultural Water Demand Management Strategies in Arid Areas

verfasst von: Mohammad Ebrahim Banihabib, Mohammad Hadi Shabestari

Erschienen in: Water Resources Management | Ausgabe 1/2017

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this paper, a fuzzy Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) model is proposed for considering the uncertainty of expert’s opinion in decision making of agricultural water demand management. The performance of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) model was evaluated, and the hybrid model of Modified Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (MTOPSIS) and AHP are introduced in non-fuzzy, MTOPSIS-AHP (MTAHP), and Fuzzy MTOPSIS-AHP (FMTAHP) setting, and the result of them were compared. Sensitivity analyses of tested fuzzy MCDM model was carried out in 3 separate steps of aggregation of individual fuzzy judgments, fuzzy distances values for fuzzification and ranking of fuzzy numbers. In this research, Coefficient of Variation (CV) index of final rates was proposed to evaluate the performance of MCDM models. The results of this paper showed that the geometric mean method is better for aggregation of individual fuzzy judgments. The results showed that non-fuzzy proposed model, MTAHP provided better ranking resolution among tested non-fuzzy MCDM models and only the proposed FMTAHP model significantly increased the CV index of final rates and improve the results resolution. Finally, the proposed MTAHP and FMTAHP models introduced as the best models for ranking alternatives by high resolution in non-fuzzy and fuzzy environment, respectively.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Afshar A et al (2011) Fuzzy TOPSIS multi-criteria decision analysis applied to Karun reservoirs system. Water Resour Manag 25(2):545–563CrossRef Afshar A et al (2011) Fuzzy TOPSIS multi-criteria decision analysis applied to Karun reservoirs system. Water Resour Manag 25(2):545–563CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Azarnivand A et al (2014) Extended fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach in water and environmental management (case study: Lake Urmia Basin, Iran). Environ Earth Sci 73(1):13–26CrossRef Azarnivand A et al (2014) Extended fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach in water and environmental management (case study: Lake Urmia Basin, Iran). Environ Earth Sci 73(1):13–26CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Banihabib ME et al (2015) A new framework for strategic planning to stabilize a shrinking lake. Lake and Reservoir Management 31(1):31–43CrossRef Banihabib ME et al (2015) A new framework for strategic planning to stabilize a shrinking lake. Lake and Reservoir Management 31(1):31–43CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brunelli M, Mezei J (2013) How different are ranking methods for fuzzy numbers? A numerical study. Int J Approx Reason 54(5):627–639CrossRef Brunelli M, Mezei J (2013) How different are ranking methods for fuzzy numbers? A numerical study. Int J Approx Reason 54(5):627–639CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Buckley JJ (1985) Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst 17(3):233–247CrossRef Buckley JJ (1985) Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst 17(3):233–247CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Calizaya A et al (2010) Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) for integrated water resources management (IWRM) in the Lake Poopo Basin, Bolivia. Water Resour Manag 24(10):2267–2289CrossRef Calizaya A et al (2010) Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) for integrated water resources management (IWRM) in the Lake Poopo Basin, Bolivia. Water Resour Manag 24(10):2267–2289CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chang W (1981) Ranking of fuzzy utilities with triangular membership functions. Proc. Int. Conf. on Policy Anal. and Inf, Systems Chang W (1981) Ranking of fuzzy utilities with triangular membership functions. Proc. Int. Conf. on Policy Anal. and Inf, Systems
Zurück zum Zitat Chang D-Y (1996) Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. Eur J Oper Res 95(3):649–655CrossRef Chang D-Y (1996) Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. Eur J Oper Res 95(3):649–655CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chen C-T (2000) Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst 114(1):1–9CrossRef Chen C-T (2000) Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst 114(1):1–9CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chen C-T et al (2006) A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management. Int J Prod Econ 102(2):289–301CrossRef Chen C-T et al (2006) A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management. Int J Prod Econ 102(2):289–301CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chen VY et al (2011) Fuzzy MCDM approach for selecting the best environment-watershed plan. Appl Soft Comput 11(1):265–275CrossRef Chen VY et al (2011) Fuzzy MCDM approach for selecting the best environment-watershed plan. Appl Soft Comput 11(1):265–275CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Huicheng Z et al (1999) A multi-objective fuzzy pattern recognition model for assessing groundwater vulnerability based on the DRASTIC system. Hydrol Sci J 44(4):611–618CrossRef Huicheng Z et al (1999) A multi-objective fuzzy pattern recognition model for assessing groundwater vulnerability based on the DRASTIC system. Hydrol Sci J 44(4):611–618CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hwang, C.-L. and K. Yoon (1981). Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems. Multiple Objective Decision Making, Methods and Applications: A State-of-the-Art Survey 164. Hwang, C.-L. and K. Yoon (1981). Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems. Multiple Objective Decision Making, Methods and Applications: A State-of-the-Art Survey 164.
Zurück zum Zitat Junior FRL et al (2014) A comparison between fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection. Appl Soft Comput 21:194–209CrossRef Junior FRL et al (2014) A comparison between fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection. Appl Soft Comput 21:194–209CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Li P et al (2012) Groundwater quality assessment based on rough sets attribute reduction and TOPSIS method in a semi-arid area, China. Environ Monit Assess 184(8):4841–4854CrossRef Li P et al (2012) Groundwater quality assessment based on rough sets attribute reduction and TOPSIS method in a semi-arid area, China. Environ Monit Assess 184(8):4841–4854CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mikhailov L (2004) A fuzzy approach to deriving priorities from interval pairwise comparison judgements. Eur J Oper Res 159(3):687–704CrossRef Mikhailov L (2004) A fuzzy approach to deriving priorities from interval pairwise comparison judgements. Eur J Oper Res 159(3):687–704CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pandey, M., et al. (2012). New Aggregation Operator for Triangular Fuzzy Numbers based on the Arithmetic Means of the Slopes of the L-and R-Membership Functions. Submitted for Publication. Pandey, M., et al. (2012). New Aggregation Operator for Triangular Fuzzy Numbers based on the Arithmetic Means of the Slopes of the L-and R-Membership Functions. Submitted for Publication.
Zurück zum Zitat Ren, L., et al. (2007). Comparative analysis of a novel M-TOPSIS method and TOPSIS. Applied Mathematics Research eXpress 2007: abm005. Ren, L., et al. (2007). Comparative analysis of a novel M-TOPSIS method and TOPSIS. Applied Mathematics Research eXpress 2007: abm005.
Zurück zum Zitat Saaty TL (1990) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 48(1):9–26CrossRef Saaty TL (1990) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 48(1):9–26CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sadeghi Ravesh MH et al (2011) Application of sensitivity analysis for assessment of de-desertification alternatives in the Central Iran by using Triantaphyllou method. Environ Monit Assess 179(1):31–46CrossRef Sadeghi Ravesh MH et al (2011) Application of sensitivity analysis for assessment of de-desertification alternatives in the Central Iran by using Triantaphyllou method. Environ Monit Assess 179(1):31–46CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Srdjevic B, Medeiros YDP (2008) Fuzzy AHP assessment of water management plans. Water Resour Manag 22(7):877–894CrossRef Srdjevic B, Medeiros YDP (2008) Fuzzy AHP assessment of water management plans. Water Resour Manag 22(7):877–894CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Srdjevic B et al (2004) An objective multi-criteria evaluation of water management scenarios. Water Resour Manag 18(1):35–54CrossRef Srdjevic B et al (2004) An objective multi-criteria evaluation of water management scenarios. Water Resour Manag 18(1):35–54CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tsakiris G, Spiliotis M (2011) Planning against long term water scarcity: a fuzzy Multicriteria approach. Water Resour Manag 25(4):1103–1129CrossRef Tsakiris G, Spiliotis M (2011) Planning against long term water scarcity: a fuzzy Multicriteria approach. Water Resour Manag 25(4):1103–1129CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Van Laarhoven P, Pedrycz W (1983) A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst 11(1):199–227 Van Laarhoven P, Pedrycz W (1983) A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst 11(1):199–227
Zurück zum Zitat Xuesen L et al (2009) Consideration of trends in evaluating inter-basin water transfer alternatives within a fuzzy decision making framework. Water Resour Manag 23(15):3207–3220CrossRef Xuesen L et al (2009) Consideration of trends in evaluating inter-basin water transfer alternatives within a fuzzy decision making framework. Water Resour Manag 23(15):3207–3220CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yager, R. (1979). Ranking fuzzy subsets over the unit interval. Decision and Control including the 17th Symposium on Adaptive Processes, 1978 I.E. conference on, IEEE Yager, R. (1979). Ranking fuzzy subsets over the unit interval. Decision and Control including the 17th Symposium on Adaptive Processes, 1978 I.E. conference on, IEEE
Zurück zum Zitat Yager R (1980) On choosing between fuzzy subsets. Kybernetes 9(2):151–154CrossRef Yager R (1980) On choosing between fuzzy subsets. Kybernetes 9(2):151–154CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yager RR (1981) A procedure for ordering fuzzy subsets of the unit interval. Inf Sci 24(2):143–161CrossRef Yager RR (1981) A procedure for ordering fuzzy subsets of the unit interval. Inf Sci 24(2):143–161CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yang, X-l., et al. (2013). Application of a triangular fuzzy AHP approach for flood risk evaluation and response measures analysis. Nat Hazards 68(2): 657–674. Yang, X-l., et al. (2013). Application of a triangular fuzzy AHP approach for flood risk evaluation and response measures analysis. Nat Hazards 68(2): 657–674.
Metadaten
Titel
Fuzzy Hybrid MCDM Model for Ranking the Agricultural Water Demand Management Strategies in Arid Areas
verfasst von
Mohammad Ebrahim Banihabib
Mohammad Hadi Shabestari
Publikationsdatum
29.11.2016
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Water Resources Management / Ausgabe 1/2017
Print ISSN: 0920-4741
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1650
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1544-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

Water Resources Management 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe