Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A
Erschienen in: Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A 8/2020

11.06.2020

A Descriptive Model on the Grain Size Dependence of Deformation and Martensitic Transformation in Austenitic Stainless Steel

verfasst von: Arka Mandal, Swapnil Morankar, Mainak Sen, Santigopal Samanta, Shiv Brat Singh, Debalay Chakrabarti

Erschienen in: Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A | Ausgabe 8/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

A descriptive model is presented on the austenite grain size dependence of deformation and martensitic transformation upon tensile loading of a metastable 301L grade austenitic stainless steel. Cold rolling and subsequent short-duration annealing of the as-received coarse-grained material at 973 K to 1023 K (700 °C to 750 °C) resulted in a mixed microstructure consisting of fine and ultra-fine grains (UFG) that showed a more pronounced γ → ε-martensite and γ → twin formation (precursors of α′-martensitic transformation) and finally more α′-martensite in the tensile-tested specimen. Whereas their coarse-grained (CG) counterpart facilitates only the former reaction, which eventually leads to less severe martensitic transformation in CG than that in UFG. The evolution of texture under tensile deformation is simulated using visco-plastic self-consistent (VPSC) model and compared with the experimental data obtained from interrupted tensile tests. Besides a thermodynamic approach, microstructural characterization using optical and electron microscopy (scanning and transmission), electron backscattered diffraction, nanoindentation, and transmission Kikuchi diffraction studies were realized to establish a mechanistic explanation on the grain size dependence of austenite stability against deformation-induced martensitic transformation.
Vorheriger Artikel Effect of Thermo-mechanical Treatment on High Temperature Tensile Properties and Ductile–Brittle Transition Behavior of Modified 9Cr-1Mo Steel
Nächster Artikel The Role of Base Metal Chromium in Determining the TLPB Behavior of Ni-Based Alloys Using a Boron-Containing Braze

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
T.G. Langdon: Acta Mater., 2013, vol. 61, pp. 7035–59.
2.
R.Z. Valiev: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1997, vol. 234–236, pp. 59–66.
3.
J.W. Morris, Jr., Z. Guo, C.R. Krenn, and Y.-H. Kim: ISIJ Int., 2001, vol. 41, pp. 599–611.
4.
E. Ma: JOM, 2006, vol. 58, pp. 49–53.
5.
.S. Sun, L.X. Du, J. Hu, H. Xie, H.Y. Wu, and R.D.K. Misra: Mater. Charact., 2015, vol. 110, pp. 228–35.
6.
C. Lei, X. Deng, X. Li, Z. Wang, G. Wang, and R.D.K. Misra: J. Alloys Compd., 2016, vol. 689, pp. 718–25.
7.
K. Datta, R. Delhez, P.M. Bronsveld, J. Beyer, H.J.M. Geijselaers, and J. Post: Acta Mater., 2009, vol. 57, pp. 3321–6.
8.
P. Jacques, Q. Furnémont, A. Mertens, and F. Delannay: Philos. Mag. A Phys. Condens. Matter, Struct. Defects Mech. Prop., 2001, vol. 81, pp. 1789–812.
9.
G.B. Olson and M. Cohen: J. Less-Common Met., 1972, vol. 28, pp. 107–18.
10.
A.F. Padilha, R.L. Plaut, and P.R. Rios: ISIJ Int., 2003, vol. 43, pp. 135–43.
11.
V.S.A. Challa, R.D.K. Misra, M.C. Somani, and Z.D. Wang: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2016, vol. 649, pp. 153–7.
12.
G.E. Dieter: Mechanical Metallurgy, 3rd edn., Mc Graw-Hill Book Co., New York, 1961.
13.
P.M. Ahmedabadi, V. Kain, and A. Agrawal: Mater. Des., 2016, vol. 109, pp. 466–75.
14.
Y.F. Shen, X.X. Li, X. Sun, Y.D. Wang, and L. Zuo: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2012, vol. 552, pp. 514–22.
15.
O. Grässel, L. Krüger, G. Frommeyer, and L.W. Meyer: Int. J. Plast., 2000, vol. 16, pp. 1391–409.
16.
Y.F. Shen, N. Jia, Y.D. Wang, X. Sun, L. Zuo, and D. Raabe: Acta Mater., 2015, vol. 97, pp. 305–15.
17.
S. Kibey, J.B. Liu, D.D. Johnson, and H. Sehitoglu: Acta Mater., 2007, vol. 55, pp. 6843–51.
18.
G.B. Olson and M. Cohen: Metall. Trans. A, 1975, vol. 6, pp. 791–5.
19.
H.K. Sung, S.Y. Shin, B. Hwang, C.G. Lee, N.J. Kim, and S. Lee: Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2011, vol. 42, pp. 1827–35.
20.
E. Jimenez-Melero, N.H. Van Dijk, L. Zhao, J. Sietsma, S.E. Offerman, J.P. Wright, and S. Van Der Zwaag: Scr. Mater., 2007, vol. 56, pp. 421–4.
21.
Y. Matsuoka, T. Iwasaki, N. Nakada, and T. Tsuchiyama: ISIJ Int., 2013, vol. 53, pp. 1224–30.
22.
M.H. Cai, W.J. Zhu, N. Stanford, L.B. Pan, Q. Chao, and P.D. Hodgson: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2016, vol. 653, pp. 35–42.
23.
Y.S. Jung, Y.K. Lee, D.K. Matlock, and M.C. Mataya: Met. Mater. Int., 2011, vol. 17, pp. 553–6.
24.
M.M. Wang, C.C. Tasan, D. Ponge, A. Kostka, and D. Raabe: Acta Mater., 2014, vol. 79, pp. 268–81.
25.
M. Shirdel, H. Mirzadeh, and M.H. Parsa: Mater. Charact., 2015, vol. 103, pp. 150–61.
26.
J.-J. Fundenberger and B. Beausir: 2015.
27.
J. Talonen, P. Nenonen, G. Pape, and H. Hänninen: Metall. Mater. Trans. A., 2005, vol. 36A, pp. 421–32.
28.
ASTM Standard E8/E8M-16a: in Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2016.
29.
R.E. Schramm and R.P. Reed: Metall. Trans. A, 1975, vol. 6, pp. 1345–51.
30.
M.F. de Campos, S.A. Loureiro, D. Rodrigues, M.C.A. da Silva, and N.B. de Lima: Mater. Sci. Forum, 2008, vol. 591, pp. 3–7.
31.
H. Hu: Texture Cryst. Solids, 1980, vol. 4, pp. 111–27.
32.
R.D.K. Misra, V.S.A. Challa, P.K.C. Venkatsurya, Y.F. Shen, M.C. Somani, and L.P. Karjalainen: Acta Mater., 2015, vol. 84, pp. 339–48.
33.
F. Vanderschaeve, R. Taillard, and J. Foct: J. Mater. Sci., 1995, vol. 30, pp. 6035–46.
34.
M.C. Somani, P. Juntunen, L.P. Karjalainen, R.D.K. Misra, and A. Kyröläinen: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2009, vol. 40, pp. 729–44.
35.
C.X. Huang, G. Yang, C. Wang, Z.F. Zhang, and S.D. Wu: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2011, vol. 42, pp. 2061–71.
36.
N. Tsuchida, H. Masuda, Y. Harada, K. Fukaura, Y. Tomota, and K. Nagai: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2008, vol. 488, pp. 446–52.
37.
S. Morito, X. Huang, T. Furuhara, T. Maki, and N. Hansen: Acta Mater., 2006, vol. 54, pp. 5323–31.
38.
Y. Estrin and A. Vinogradov: Acta Mater., 2013, vol. 61, pp. 782–817.
39.
N. Kamikawa, X. Huang, N. Tsuji, and N. Hansen: Acta Mater., 2009, vol. 57, pp. 4198–208.
40.
Ma, J.E. Jin, and Y.K. Lee: Scr. Mater., 2005, vol. 52, pp. 1311–5.
41.
C. Garion: Cracow University of Technology, 2003.
42.
S. Tirekar, H.R. Jafarian, and A.R. Eivani: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2017, vol. 684, pp. 120–6.
43.
K.G. Samuel, S.L. Mannan, and P. Rodriguez: Acta Met., 1988, vol. 36, pp. 2323–7.
44.
B.D. Cullity and S.R. Stock: Elements of X-Ray Diffraction, 3rd edn., Prentice-Hall, New York, 2001.
45.
Y. Kim, T.H. Ahn, D.W. Suh, and H.N. Han: Scr. Mater., 2015, vol. 104, pp. 13–6.
46.
C.X. Huang, G. Yang, Y.L. Gao, S.D. Wu, and S.X. Li: J. Mater. Res., 2007, vol. 22, pp. 724–9.
47.
Y. Tian, A. Borgenstam, and P. Hedström: J. Alloys Compd., 2018, vol. 766, pp. 131–9.
48.
R.D.K. Misra, S. Nayak, P.K.C. Venkatasurya, V. Ramuni, M.C. Somani, and L.P. Karjalainen: Met. Mater. Trans. A, 2010, vol. 41, pp. 2162–74.
49.
C. Celada-casero, H. Kooiker, M. Groen, J. Post, and D. San-martin: Metals (Basel)., 2017, vol. 7, pp. 1–15.
50.
S. Sabooni, F. Karimzadeh, M.H. Enayati, and A.H.W. Ngan: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2015, vol. 636, pp. 221–30.
51.
W.-S. Lee and C.-F. Lin: Scr. Mater., 2000, vol. 43, pp. 777–82.
52.
R.D.K. Misra, J.S. Shah, S. Mali, P.K.C.V. Surya, M.C. Somani, and L.P. Karjalainen: Mater. Sci. Technol., 2013, vol. 29, pp. 1185–92.
53.
A. Kisko, A.S. Hamada, J. Talonen, D. Porter, and L.P. Karjalainen: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2016, vol. 657, pp. 359–70.
54.
A. Järvenpää, M. Jaskari, J. Man, and L.P. Karjalainen: Mater. Charact., 2017, vol. 127, pp. 12–26.
55.
B. RaviKumar, A.K. Singh, S. Das, and D.K. Bhattacharya: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2004, vol. 364, pp. 132–9.
56.
M. Eskandari: Res. Dev. Mater. Sci., 2018, vol. 6, pp. 1–2.
57.
Łuksza, M. Rumiński, W. Ratuszek, and M. Blicharski: J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2006, vol. 177, pp. 555–60.
58.
N. Tsuji, Y. Ito, Y. Saito, and Y. Minamino: Scr. Mater., 2002, vol. 47, pp. 893–9.
59.
S. Kang, J.G. Jung, M. Kang, W. Woo, and Y.K. Lee: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2016, vol. 652, pp. 212–20.
60.
L. Fu, Z. Li, H. Wang, W. Wang, and A. Shan: Scr. Mater., 2012, vol. 67, pp. 297–300.
61.
S. Gao, Y. Bai, R. Zheng, Y. Tian, W. Mao, A. Shibata, and N. Tsuji: Scr. Mater., 2019, vol. 159, pp. 28–32.
62.
J.D. Eshelby: Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A., 1957, vol. 241, pp. 376–96.
63.
C. Tome, G.R. Canova, U.F. Kocks, N. Christodoulou, and J.J. Jonas: Acta Met., 1984, vol. 32, pp. 1637–53.
64.
B.A. Mohammed: Michigan State University, 2017.
65.
S.M. Hasan, A. Ghosh, D. Chakrabarti, and S.B. Singh: Met. Mater. Trans. A, 2020, pp. 1–19.
66.
R.A. Lebensohn and C.N. Tomé: Acta Metall. Mater., 1993, vol. 41, pp. 2611–24.
67.
G.P. Kang, K. Lee, Y.H. Kim, S.J. Park, and K.S. Shin: Met. Mater. Int., 2017, vol. 23, pp. 930–9.
68.
R.K. Ray, P. Chapellier, and J.J. Jonas: Textures Microstruct., 1990, vol. 12, pp. 141–53.
69.
H.S. Yang, J.H. Jang, H.K.D.H. Bhadeshia, and D.W. Suh: Calphad Comput. Coupling Phase Diagrams Thermochem., 2012, vol. 36, pp. 16–22.
70.
T. Angel: J. Iron Steel Inst., 1954, vol. 177, pp. 165–74.
71.
E.Y. Kim, W.C. Woo, Y.U. Heo, B.S. Seong, J.Y. Choi, and S.H. Choi: Int. J. Plast., 2016, vol. 79, pp. 48–67.
72.
L. Kaufman and M. Cohen: Prog. Met. Phys., 1958, vol. 7, pp. 165–246.
73.
S. Curtze and V.T. Kuokkala: Acta Mater., 2010, vol. 58, pp. 5129–41.
74.
A. Dumay, J.P. Chateau, S. Allain, S. Migot, and O. Bouaziz: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2008, vol. 483–484, pp. 184–7.
75.
S. Allain, J.P. Chateau, O. Bouaziz, S. Migot, and N. Guelton: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2004, vol. 387–389, pp. 158–62.
76.
M.C. Park, K.N. Kim, J.Y. Yun, G.S. Shin, and S.J. Kim: Tribol. Lett., 2014, vol. 54, pp. 51–8.
77.
E.I. Galindo-Nava and P.E.J. Rivera-Díaz-del-Castillo: Acta Mater., 2017, vol. 128, pp. 120–34.
78.
J.W. Brooks, M.H. Loretto, and R.E. Smallman: Acta Metall., 1979, vol. 27, pp. 1839–47.
79.
D.T. Pierce: PhD Thesis, 2014, p. 167.
80.
J. Talonen and H. Hänninen: Acta Mater., 2007, vol. 55, pp. 6108–18.
81.
G.B. Olson and M. Cohen: Metall. Trans. A, 1976, vol. 7, pp. 1897–904.
82.
D.T. Pierce, J.A. Jiménez, J. Bentley, D. Raabe, C. Oskay, and J.E. Wittig: Acta Mater., 2014, vol. 68, pp. 238–53.
83.
I. Karaman, H. Sehitoglu, H.J. Maier, and Y.I. Chumlyakov: Acta Mater., 2001, vol. 49, pp. 3919–33.
84.
Y. Tian: KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2018.
85.
Z. Nishiyama: Martensitic Transformation, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2012.
86.
M. BigdeliKarimi, H. Arabi, A. Khosravani, and J. Samei: J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2008, vol. 203, pp. 349–54.
Metadaten
Titel
A Descriptive Model on the Grain Size Dependence of Deformation and Martensitic Transformation in Austenitic Stainless Steel
verfasst von
Arka Mandal
Swapnil Morankar
Mainak Sen
Santigopal Samanta
Shiv Brat Singh
Debalay Chakrabarti
Publikationsdatum
11.06.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A / Ausgabe 8/2020
Print ISSN: 1073-5623
Elektronische ISSN: 1543-1940
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-020-05861-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2020

Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A 8/2020 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Effects of Zn on Microstructure Modification and Mechanical Properties Improvement of Al-Si-Cu-Mg Alloys

OriginalPaper

Fabrication and Characterization of Nanostructured AACVD Thin Films on 316L SS as Surface Protective Layers in Simulated Body Fluid

OriginalPaper

Detailed In Situ Hot Stage Transmission Electron Microscope Observations of the Localized Pinning of a Mobile Ferrite-Austenite Interface in a Fe-C-Mn Alloy by a Single Oxidic Particle

OriginalPaper

Determining Thermophysical Properties of Normal and Metastable Liquid Zr-Fe Alloys by Electrostatic Levitation Method

OriginalPaper

Effects of Defect Development During Displacive Austenite Reversion on Strain Hardening and Formability

Communication

Evolution of Transient Nature Nanoscale Softening During Martensite Tempering

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise