nach oben

Quality of Life Research

Erschienen in:

08.06.2019

Longitudinal measurement invariance of the Satisfaction With Life Scale in adolescence

verfasst von: Igor Esnaola, Manuel Benito, Iratxe Antonio-Agirre, Inge Axpe, Margarita Lorenzo

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 10/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Purpose

The main purpose of this research was to examine the longitudinal measurement invariance of the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) in adolescence.

Method

The sample was composed by 484 adolescents from Spain, 46.7% were males. All participants belonged to six academic levels from Grade 7 to Grade 12, and answered the questionnaires at two different times: at the beginning (M_age1 = 14.95, SD₁ = 1.81) and at the end of the school year (M_age2 = 15.61, SD₂ = 1.81). The reliability of the scale was obtained through Cronbach’s alpha, Guttman lambda, and MacDonald’s Omega total. The multiple group confirmatory factor analysis (MGCFA) was used to examine the fit of the unifactorial model to data and to test the measurement of longitudinal invariance of the scale across two time points (at the beginning T1, and the end T2, of the academic year), and the time points and groups (gender and age).

Results

The values of the single-factor SWLS structure were T1 (CFI₁ = 1.000, TLI₁ = .997, RMSEA₁ = .080, and SRMR₁ = .028), and T2 (CFI₂ = .997, TLI₂ = .995, RMSEA₂ = .032, and SRMR₂ = .034). On the other hand, values of the reliability and composite reliability when analyzing both time points together as well as separately were as follows: Cronbach’s alpha = .86, Guttman’s lambda = .84, McDonald’s Omega total = .89. Results confirmed the longitudinal invariance of SWLS. The differences in gender and age were not significant and the small differences across time points showed that the means of the latent factor remained the same over time in both variables.

Conclusion

The present study confirmed the single-factor structure of the SWLS in Spanish adolescents, as well as a good reliability and composite reliability. The full longitudinal measurement invariance was also found and there were negligible differences across time points considering gender and age. If these findings are further replicated, the scale could be used to compare the life satisfaction across two time points considering different age and gender groups.

Vorheriger Artikel Measurement properties of PROMIS short forms for pain and function in orthopedic foot and ankle surgery patients

Nächster Artikel Prediction of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) using PROMIS-29 in a national sample of lumbar spine surgery patients

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.CrossRefPubMed

Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. E. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276.CrossRef

Emerson, S. D., Guhn, M., & Gadermann, A. M. (2017). Measurement invariance of the Satisfaction With Life Scale: Reviewing three decades of research. Quality of Life Research, 26, 2251–2264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1552-2.CrossRefPubMed

Atienza, F. L., Balaguer, I., Corte-Real, N., & Fonseca, A. M. (2016). Factorial invariance of the Satisfaction With Life Scale in adolescents from Spain and Portugal. Psicothema, 28, 353–356. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2016.1.CrossRef

Atienza, F. L., Pons, D., Balaguer, I., & García-Merita, M. L. (2000). Propiedades psicométricas de la escala de satisfacción con la vida en adolescentes. Psicothema, 12, 331–336.

Bai, X., Wu, C., Zheng, R., & Ren, X. (2011). The psychometric evaluation of the Satisfaction With Life Scale using a nationally representative sample of China. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-010-9186-x.CrossRef

Clench-Aas, J., Nes, R. B., Dalgard, O. D., & Aarø, L. E. (2011). Dimensionality and measurement invariance in the Satisfaction With Life Scale in Norway. Quality of Life Research, 20, 1307–1317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9859-x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Esnaola, I., Benito, M., Antonio-Agirre, I., Freeman, J., & Sarasa, M. (2017). Measurement invariance of the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) by country, gender and age. Psicothema, 29, 596–601. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2016.394.CrossRefPubMed

Glaesmer, H., Grande, G., Braehler, E., & Roth, M. (2011). The German version of the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 27, 127–132. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000058.CrossRef

10.

Moksnes, U. K., Løhre, A., Byrn, D. G., & Haugan, G. (2014). Satisfaction With Life Scale in adolescents: Evaluation of factor structure and gender invariance in a Norwegian sample. Social Indicators Research, 118, 657–671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0451-3.CrossRef

11.

Silva, A. D., Taveira, M. C., Marques, C., & Gouveia, V. V. (2015). Satisfaction With Life Scale among adolescents and young adults in Portugal: Extending evidence of construct validity. Social Indicators Research, 92, 489–496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0587-9.CrossRef

12.

Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 164–172. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.5.2.164.CrossRef

13.

Wu, C. H., Chen, L. H., & Tsai, Y. M. (2009). Longitudinal invariance analysis of the Satisfaction With Life Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 396–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.11.002.CrossRef

14.

Jovanović, V. (2016). The validity of the Satisfaction With Life Scale in adolescents and a comparison with single-item life satisfaction measures: A preliminary study. Quality of Life Research, 25, 3173–3180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1331-5.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Pons, D., Atienza, F. L., Balaguer, I., & García-Merita, M. L. (2000). Satisfaction With Life Scale: Analysis of factorial invariance for adolescents and elderly persons. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 91, 62–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2012.707778.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Tomás, J. M., Gutiérrez, M., Sancho, P., & Romero, I. (2015). Measurement invariance of the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) by gender and age in Angola. Personality and Individual Differences, 85, 182–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.008.CrossRef

17.

Timmons, A. C. (2010). Establishing factorial invariance for multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis. KUant Guide, 22.1. Retrieved from http://crmda.dept.ku.edu/resources/kuantguides/22.Factorial_Invariance_Guide.pdf.

18.

Meredith, W., & Teresi, J. A. (2006). An essay on measurement and factorial invariance. Medical Care, 44, S69–S77. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000245438.73837.89.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5.CrossRef

20.

Wu, A. D., Li, Z., & Zumbo, B. (2007). Decoding the meaning of factorial invariance and updating the practice of multi-group confirmatory factor analysis: A demonstration with TIMSS data. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 12, 1–26.

21.

Atienza, F. L., Balaguer, I., & García-Merita, M. L. (2003). Satisfaction With Life Scale: Analysis of factorial invariance across sexes. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1255–1260. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00332-X.CrossRef

22.

Siedlecki, K. L., Tucker-Drob, E. M., Oishi, S., & Salthouse, T. A. (2008). Life satisfaction across adulthood: Different determinants at different ages? The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3, 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760701834602.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Hultell, D., & Gustavsson, J. P. (2008). A psychometric evaluation of the Satisfaction With Life Scale in a Swedish nationwide sample of university students. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1070–1079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.10.030.CrossRef

24.

Jovanović, V. (2017). Measurement invariance of the Serbian version of the Satisfaction With Life Scale across age, gender, and time. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000410.CrossRef

25.

Gana, K., Bailly, N., Saada, Y., Joulain, M., & Alaphilippe, D. (2013). Does life satisfaction change in old age: Results from an 8-year longitudinal study. The Journals of Gerontology B, 68, 540–552. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbs093.CrossRef

26.

Salmela-Aro, K., & Tuominen-Soini, H. (2010). Adolescents’ life satisfaction during the transition to post-comprehensive education: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 683–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-009-9156-3.CrossRef

27.

Salmela-Aro, K., & Tynkkynen, L. (2010). Trajectories of life satisfaction across the transition to post-compulsory education: Do adolescents follow different pathways? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 870–881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-009-9464-2.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Shek, D. T. L., & Liu, T. T. (2014). Life satisfaction in junior secondary school students in Hong Kong: A 3-year longitudinal study. Social Indicator Research, 117, 777–794. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0398-4.CrossRef

29.

Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002.CrossRef

30.

Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

31.

Moreira, P. S., Santos, N., Castanho, T., Amorim, L., Portugal-Nunes, C., Sousa, N., et al. (2018). Longitudinal measurement invariance of memory performance and executive functioning in healthy aging. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204012.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

32.

Hawes, S. W., Byrd, A. L., Kelley, S. E., Gonzalez, R., Edens, J. F., & Pardini, D. A. (2018). Psychopathic features across development: Assessing longitudinal invariance among Caucasian and African American youths. Journal of Research in Personality, 73, 180–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2018.02.003.CrossRef

33.

Widaman, K. F., Ferrer, E., & Conger, R. D. (2010). Factorial invariance within longitudinal structural equation models: Measuring the same construct across time. Child Development Perspectives, 4(1), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00110.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

34.

Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford.

35.

Liu, Y., Millsap, R. E., West, S. G., Tein, J. Y., Tanaka, R., & Grimm, K. J. (2017). Testing measurement invariance in longitudinal data with ordered-categorical measures. Psychological Methods, 22(3), 486–506.CrossRef

36.

Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14, 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834.CrossRef

37.

Hirschfeld, G., & von Brachel, R. (2014). Multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis in R: A tutorial in measurement invariance with continuous and ordinal indicators. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 19, 1–12.CrossRef

38.

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.CrossRef

39.

Hancock, G. R. (2001). Effect size, power, and sample size determination for structured means modeling and mimic approaches to between-groups hypothesis testing of means on a single latent construct. Psychometrika, 66, 373–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294440.CrossRef

40.

Muthén, B., & Kaplan, D. (1985). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38, 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1985.tb00832.x.CrossRef

41.

Siddall, J., Huebner, E. S., & Jiang, X. (2013). A prospective study of differential sources of school-related social support and adolescent global life satisfaction. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 83, 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajop.12006.CrossRefPubMed

42.

Suldo, S. M., Bateman, L. P., & Gelley, C. D. (2014). Understanding and promoting school satisfaction in children and adolescents. In M. J. Furlong, R. Gilman, & E. S. Huebner (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology in schools (2nd ed., pp. 365–380). New York: Routledge.

43.

Weber, M., & Huebner, E. S. (2015). Early adolescents’ personality and life satisfaction: A closer look at global vs. domain-specific satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 83, 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.03.042.CrossRef

44.

Porubanova-Norquist, M. (2012). Character as a predictor of life satisfaction in Czech adolescent sample: 3-Year follow-up study. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 231–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.03.022.CrossRef

Titel: Longitudinal measurement invariance of the Satisfaction With Life Scale in adolescence
verfasst von: Igor Esnaola
Manuel Benito
Iratxe Antonio-Agirre
Inge Axpe
Margarita Lorenzo
Publikationsdatum: 08.06.2019
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 10/2019
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02224-7

Springer Professional

Abstract

Purpose

Method

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2019

Evaluation of the responsiveness of Short Form-12 Health Survey version 2 (SF-12v2) in Chinese patients with hypertension in primary care

Prediction of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) using PROMIS-29 in a national sample of lumbar spine surgery patients

Appraising the quality of tools used to record patient-reported outcomes in users of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC): a systematic review

Self-stigma predicts lower quality of life in Chinese American breast cancer survivors: exploring the mediating role of intrusive thoughts and posttraumatic growth

The effect of team collaboration and continuity of care on health and disability among rehabilitation patients: a longitudinal survey-based study from western Norway

Appraisal as a unifying theory of response shift: continuing the conversation

Premium Partner