nach oben

Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management

Erschienen in:

01.06.2022 | ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Mechanical, durability and microstructural assessment of geopolymer concrete incorporating fine granite waste powder

verfasst von: Rajat Saxena, Trilok Gupta, Ravi K. Sharma, Salman Siddique

Erschienen in: Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management | Ausgabe 5/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This research investigation has mainly focused on the development of cementless concrete, i.e., geopolymer concrete, along with the reutilization of industrial fine granite waste powder (FGWP). FGWP was re-utilized as fractional substitution of natural fine sand (NFS) in the manufacturing of geopolymer concrete in varying amounts—0%, 5%, 10%, 15% and 20%. Mechanical performance evaluation tests like compressive strength test, flexural strength test and static modulus of elasticity test were carried out in this research study to investigate the influence of fractional substitution of NFS by FGWP. Impact energy of geopolymer concrete samples was also evaluated using drop weight test. Durability characteristics of geopolymer concrete were assessed through ultra-sonic pulse velocity (UPV), water absorption test, water permeability test and carbonation test. Micro-structural analysis was also carried out using scanning electron microscope (SEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD). For environmental impact assessment, embodied energy (EB-E) and embodied carbon dioxide (EB-CO₂) were determined through ecological analysis. Test outcomes reflected that incorporation of FGWP up to 15% proved very propitious and enhanced mechanical strength properties and durability characteristics of geopolymer concrete.

Vorheriger Artikel Roles of various composts based on phosphate flotation waste, phosphogypsum and cactus in improving the tolerance of tomato plants to drought stress

Nächster Artikel Life cycle environmental benefit and waste-to-energy potential of municipal solid waste management scenarios in Indonesia

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Saxena R, Gupta T, Sharma RK, et al (2020) Assessment of mechanical and durability properties of concrete containing PET waste. Scientia Iranica 27:1–9. https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2018.20334

Kumar N, Kumar P, Kumar S et al (2017) Properties of concrete containing polished granite waste as partial substitution of coarse aggregate. Constr Build Mater 151:158–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.081CrossRef

Gupta T, Kothari S, Siddique S et al (2019) Influence of stone processing dust on mechanical, durability and sustainability of concrete. Constr Build Mater 223:918–927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.188CrossRef

Saeed M, Javed U, Arsalan R et al (2020) Sustainable incorporation of waste granite dust as partial replacement of sand in autoclave aerated concrete. Constr Build Mater 250:118878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118878CrossRef

Sadek DM, El-attar MM, Ali HA, Student M (2016) Reusing of marble and granite powders in self-compacting concrete for sustainable development. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.044CrossRef

Gupta RK, Gupta RK (2018) Cutting tool for marble and granite: a review. In: IOP Conference Series: materials science and engineering 377(1):012126). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/377/1/012126

Goutam R, Kulkarni VV, Pitroda JR, Patel CG (2019) Experimental studies on rubber mould paver block with granite chips. J Emerg Technol Innov Res 6(5):19–31. https://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR1905803.pdf

Gautam L, Kumar Jain J, Jain A, Kalla P (2022) Valorization of bone-china ceramic powder waste along with granite waste in self-compacting concrete. Constr Build Mater 315:125730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125730CrossRef

Mashaly AO, Shalaby BN, Rashwan MA (2018) Performance of mortar and concrete incorporating granite sludge as cement replacement. Constr Build Mater 169:800–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.046CrossRef

10.

Jain A, Gupta R, Chaudhary S (2019) Performance of self-compacting concrete comprising granite cutting waste as fine aggregate. Constr Build Mater 221:539–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.104CrossRef

11.

Saxena R, Siddique S, Gupta T et al (2018) Impact resistance and energy absorption capacity of concrete containing plastic waste. Constr Build Mater 176:415–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.019CrossRef

12.

Siddique S, Shrivastava S, Chaudhary S (2018) Durability properties of bone china ceramic fine aggregate concrete. Constr Build Mater 173:323–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.262CrossRef

13.

Bellum RR, Muniraj K, Indukuri CSR, Madduru SRC (2020) Investigation on performance enhancement of fly ash-GGBFS based graphene geopolymer concrete. J Build Eng 32:101659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101659CrossRef

14.

Muhammed A, El-feky MS, Kohail M, Nasr EAR (2019) Performance of geopolymer concrete containing recycled rubber. Constr Build Mater 207:136–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.121CrossRef

15.

Ganesan N, Abraham R, Deepa Raj S (2015) Durability characteristics of steel fibre reinforced geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater 93:471–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.06.014CrossRef

16.

Ghosh R, Sagar SP, Kumar A et al (2018) Estimation of geopolymer concrete strength from ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) using high power pulser. J Build Eng 16:39–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2017.12.009CrossRef

17.

Saxena R, Gupta T (2022) Assessment of mechanical, durability and microstructural properties of geopolymer concrete containing ceramic tile waste. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-022-01353-5CrossRef

18.

Adak D, Sarkar M, Mandal S (2017) Structural performance of nano-silica modified fly-ash based geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater 135:430–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.111CrossRef

19.

Hassan A, Mourad AI, Rashid Y, Ismail N (2019) Energy and Buildings Thermal and structural performance of geopolymer concrete containing phase change material encapsulated in expanded clay. Energy Build 191:72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.03.005CrossRef

20.

Bhogayata AC, Arora NK (2019) Utilization of metalized plastic waste of food packaging articles in geopolymer concrete. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 21(4):1014–1026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-019-00859-9CrossRef

21.

Gupta T, Chaudhary S, Sharma RK (2014) Assessment of mechanical and durability properties of concrete containing waste rubber tire as fine aggregate. Constr Build Mater 73:562–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.102CrossRef

22.

Upadhyaya S, Nanda B (2020) Effect of granite dust as partial replacement to natural sand on strength and ductility of reinforced concrete beams. J Inst Eng Ser A 101(4):669–677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40030-020-00472-2CrossRef

23.

Lal K, Sancheti G, Kumar L (2020) Durability performance of waste granite and glass powder added concrete. Constr Build Mater 252:119075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119075CrossRef

24.

Bhogayata A, Dave SV, Arora NK (2020) Utilization of expanded clay aggregates in sustainable lightweight geopolymer concrete. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 22:1780–1792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-020-01066-7CrossRef

25.

Gupta T, Chaudhary S, Sharma RK (2016) Mechanical and durability properties of waste rubber fiber concrete with and without silica fume. J Clean Prod 112:702–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.081CrossRef

26.

Bajpai R, Choudhary K, Srivastava A et al (2020) Environmental impact assessment of fly ash and silica fume based geopolymer concrete. J Clean Prod 254:120147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120147CrossRef

27.

Shahmansouri AA, Bengar HA, Ghanbari S (2020) Compressive strength prediction of eco-efficient GGBS-based geopolymer concrete using GEP method. J Build Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101326CrossRef

28.

Kabir SMF, Ikeora MO, Görtz CPB (2020) Preparation and properties of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete with alkaline waste water obtained from foundry sand regeneration process. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 22(5):1434–1443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-020-01032-3CrossRef

29.

Ghannam S, Najm H, Vasconez R (2016) Experimental study of concrete made with granite and iron powders as partial replacement of sand. Sustain Mater Technol 9:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2016.06.001CrossRef

30.

Aarthi K, Arunachalam K (2017) Durability studies on fibre reinforced self compacting. J Clean Prod 174:247–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.270CrossRef

31.

Savadkoohi MS, Reisi M (2020) Environmental protection based sustainable development by utilization of granite waste in reactive powder concrete. J Clean Prod 266:121973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121973CrossRef

32.

Cordeiro GC, De Alvarenga LMSC, Rocha CAA (2016) Rheological and mechanical properties of concrete containing crushed granite fine aggregate. Constr Build Mater 111:766–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.178CrossRef

33.

Jain A, Chaudhary S, Gupta R (2022) Mechanical and microstructural characterization of fly ash blended self-compacting concrete containing granite waste. Constr Build Mater 314:125480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125480CrossRef

34.

Prokopski G, Marchuk V, Huts A (2020) Case studies in construction materials the effect of using granite dust as a component of concrete mixture. Case Stud Constr Mater 13:e00349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2020.e00349CrossRef

35.

Rashwan MA, Al BTM, Mashaly AO, Khalil MM (2020) Behaviour of fresh and hardened concrete incorporating marble and granite sludge as cement replacement. J Build Eng 32:101697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101697CrossRef

36.

Srinivas K, Vijaya SK, Jagadeeswari K (2020) Materials today : proceedings concrete with ceramic and granite waste as coarse aggregate. Mater Today Proc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.521CrossRef

37.

Patil MV, Patil YD (2020) Materials today: proceedings effect of copper slag and granite dust as sand replacement on the properties of concrete. Mater Today Proc 43:1666–1677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.029CrossRef

38.

Gao X, Yuan B, Yu QL et al (2017) Characterization and application of municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) bottom ash and waste granite powder in alkali activated slag. J Clean Prod 164:410–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.218CrossRef

39.

Khan I, Xu T, Castel A et al (2019) Risk of early age cracking in geopolymer concrete due to restrained shrinkage. Constr Build Mater 229:116840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116840CrossRef

40.

Detphan S, Chindaprasirt P (2009) Preparation of fly ash and rice husk ash geopolymer. Int J Miner Metall Mater 16:720–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1674-4799(10)60019-2CrossRef

41.

Vafaei M, Allahverdi A (2016) High strength geopolymer binder based on waste-glass powder. Adv Powder Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2016.09.034CrossRef

42.

Bahador A, Esparham A, Jamshidi M (2020) Physical and mechanical properties of fiber reinforced metakaolin-based geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater 251:118965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118965CrossRef

43.

Zhao R, Yuan Y, Cheng Z et al (2019) Freeze-thaw resistance of class F fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater 222:474–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.166CrossRef

44.

Xie J, Chen W, Wang J et al (2019) Coupling effects of recycled aggregate and GGBS/metakaolin on physicochemical properties of geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater 226:345–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.311CrossRef

45.

Castel A, Foster SJ (2015) Bond strength between blended slag and class F fly ash geopolymer concrete with steel reinforcement. Cem Concr Res 72:48–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.02.016CrossRef

46.

Deb PS, Nath P, Sarker PK (2014) The effects of ground granulated blast-furnace slag blending with fly ash and activator content on the workability and strength properties of geopolymer concrete cured at ambient temperature. Mater Des 62:32–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.05.001CrossRef

47.

Mayhoub OA, Nasr EAR, Ali Y, Kohail M (2020) Properties of slag based geopolymer reactive powder concrete. Ain Shams Eng J 12(1):99–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.08.013CrossRef

48.

Flores N, Rico J, Mohammed MS (2018) Cleaner production of one-part white geopolymer cement using pre-treated wood biomass ash and diatomite. J Clean Prod 209:1420–1428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.137CrossRef

49.

Liu Y, Shi C, Zhang Z et al (2020) Mechanical and fracture properties of ultra-high performance geopolymer concrete: effects of steel fiber and silica fume. Cem Concr Compos. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103665CrossRef

50.

Ma C, Zawawi A, Omar W (2018) Structural and material performance of geopolymer concrete: a review. Constr Build Mater 186:90–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.111CrossRef

51.

Albitar M, Mohamed Ali MS, Visintin P, Drechsler M (2015) Effect of granulated lead smelter slag on strength of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater 83:128–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.009CrossRef

52.

BIS:1199 (1959) Methods of sampling and analysis of concrete. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India

53.

ASTM:C642-13 (2013) Standard test method for density, absorption, and voids in hardened concrete. ASTM International

54.

BIS:516 (1959) Methods of tests for strength of concrete. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India

55.

ASTM:C469 (2014) Standard test method for static modulus of elasticity and Poisson’s ratio of concrete in compression. ASTM International

56.

DIN:1048 (1991) Testing concrete: testing of hardened concrete specimens prepared in mould, Part 5. Deutsches Institut fur Normung, Berlin

57.

BIS:13311-1 (1992) Method of non-destructive testing of concrete, Part 1: ultrasonic pulse velocity, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India

58.

Yan P, Fang Q, Zhang J et al (2019) Experimental and mesoscopic investigation of spherical ceramic particle concrete under static and impact loading. Int J Impact Eng 128:37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.01.013CrossRef

59.

RILEM CPC-18 (1988) Measurement of hardened concrete carbonation depth. RILEM Recommendations, materials and structures

60.

Ohno M, Li VC (2018) An integrated design method of engineered geopolymer composite. Cem Concr Compos 88:73–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.02.001CrossRef

61.

Gicala M, Ostrowski K, Stefaniuk D et al (2020) Potential use of granite waste sourced from rock processing for the application as coarse aggregate in high-performance self-compacting concrete. Constr Build Mater 238:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117794CrossRef

62.

Amudhavalli NK, Sivasankar S, Shunmugasundaram M, Kumar AP (2020) Characteristics of granite dust concrete with m-sand as replacement of fine aggregate composites. Mater Today Proc 27:1401–1406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.771CrossRef

63.

Li H, Huang F, Cheng G et al (2016) Effect of granite dust on mechanical and some durability properties of manufactured sand concrete. Constr Build Mater 109:41–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.01.034CrossRef

64.

Thomas FK (2010) Study on the effect of granite powder on concrete properties. Proc Inst Civil Eng Constr Mater 163(2):63–70. https://doi.org/10.1680/coma.2010.163CrossRef

65.

Jain A, Gupta R, Chaudhary S (2020) Sustainable development of self-compacting concrete by using granite waste and fly ash. Constr Build Mater 262:120516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120516CrossRef

66.

Vijayalakshmi M, Sekar ASS, Ganesh G (2013) Strength and durability properties of concrete made with granite industry waste. Constr Build Mater 46:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.04.018CrossRef

67.

Lim JBP, Gnana B, Gurupatham A, Roy K (2021) Effect of super absorbent polymer on microstructural and mechanical properties of concrete blends using granite pulver. Struct Concr 22:898–915. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201900419CrossRef

68.

Kumar GS, Mishra AK (2021) Influence of granite fine powder on the performance of cellular light weight concrete. J Build Eng 40:102707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102707CrossRef

69.

Singh S, Khan S, Tech B et al (2016) Performance of sustainable concrete containing granite cutting waste. J Clean Prod 119:86–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.008CrossRef

70.

Singh S, Nagar R, Agrawal V (2016) Performance of granite cutting waste concrete under adverse exposure conditions. J Clean Prod 127:172–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.034CrossRef

71.

Mehta A, Siddique R (2017) Sulfuric acid resistance of fly ash based geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater 146:136–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.077CrossRef

Titel: Mechanical, durability and microstructural assessment of geopolymer concrete incorporating fine granite waste powder
verfasst von: Rajat Saxena
Trilok Gupta
Ravi K. Sharma
Salman Siddique
Publikationsdatum: 01.06.2022
Verlag: Springer Japan
Erschienen in: Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management / Ausgabe 5/2022
Print ISSN: 1438-4957
Elektronische ISSN: 1611-8227
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-022-01439-0

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2022

Biofiltration of fugitive methane emissions from landfills using scum from municipal wastewater treatment plants as alternative substrate

Drivers and barriers to a circular economy adoption: a sector perspective on rare earth magnets

Evaluation of urban solid-waste generation and safety consciousness of waste collectors amidst COVID-19 pandemic

Recovery of platinum and synthesis of glass–ceramic from spent automotive catalyst via co-treatment process with coal fly ash

A qualitative descriptive case study on home medical waste management in Brazil

Investigation of gamma ray absorption levels of composites produced from copper mine tailings, fly ash, and brick dust