nach oben

Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management

Erschienen in:

15.09.2022 | ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Methane production potential from anaerobic digestion of plant biomass residues and food waste as substrates

verfasst von: Betina Ludwig Navarro, Adriana Zemiani Challiol, Mauricio Aparecido Bortoloti, Emília Kiyomi Kuroda, Fernando Fernandes

Erschienen in: Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management | Ausgabe 6/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This research aimed to evaluate the production of biogas from anaerobic digestion (AD) using swine manure inoculum associated with different substrates: food scraps (FW), grass clippings (GR), and lentils (DW). The digestion of FW alone and co-digestion (co-AD) of FW with GR or DW were studied with biomass after pretreatment by drying. The evaluation of the methane production potential was performed in a bench-scale experiment using the biochemical methane potential (BMP) test in batch mode. The inoculum-to-substrate ratio used was 1:2. After 54 days of incubation, the IN + FW condition presented the highest accumulated methane production, reaching 369.71 NmLCH4 g VS⁻¹, also the maximum methane content in the biogas (76%). The FW co-AD condition with FD was the best among the biomass treatments, it accumulated 347.24 NmLCH4 g VS⁻¹ of methane, and its biogas content reached a maximum percentage of 70%. The Gompertz kinetic model was satisfied in all treatments. The maximum methane generation estimated by fitting the model curves was similar to the methane production verified in the experiment. Statistical analyses indicated that the co-AD of the FW with the pre-treated DW (IN:FW + DD) or not (IN:FW + FD) showed no significant difference in methane production. Furthermore, the pre-treated GR substrate (IN:FW + DG) did not increase the methane production efficiency, as well as the condition without pretreatment of GR (IN:FW + FG).

Vorheriger Artikel Household disposal of pharmaceuticals: attitudes and risk perception in a UK sample

Nächster Artikel Mechanical and thermo-physical characterization of mortars made with uncontaminated marine sediments

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

FAO – Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations (2019) Food losses and waste in Latin America and the Caribbean. Newsletter 3:2016

Montecchio D, Gallipoli A, Gianico A et al (2017) Biomethane potential of food waste: modeling the effects of mild thermal pretreatment and digestion temperature. Environ Technol 38(11):1452–1464. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2016.1233293CrossRef

Galbiatti AJ, Caramelo AD, Silva FG et al (2010) Estudo qualiquantitativo do biogás produzido por substratos em biodigestores tipo batelada. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 14(4):432–437. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-43662010000400013CrossRef

Míchal P, Švehla P, Plachý V et al (2016) Anaerobic digestion of grass: the effect of temperature applied during the storage of substrate on the methane production. Environ Technol 38(13–14):1716–1724. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2016.1241305CrossRef

Montusiewicz A, Lebiocka M, Rozej A, Zacharska E et al (2010) Freezing/thawing effects on anaerobic digestion of mixed sewage sludge. Bioresour Technol 101(10):3466–3473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.12.125CrossRef

Mata-Alvarez J, Macé S, Llabrés P (2000) Anaerobic digestion of organic solid wastes. An overview of research achievements and perspectives. Bioresour Technol 74:3–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00023-7CrossRef

Bouallagui H, Lahdheb H, Romdan EB et al (2009) Improvement of fruit and vegetable waste anaerobic digestion performance and stability with co-substrates addition. J Environ Manage 90(5):1844–1849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.002CrossRef

Lisboa MS, Lansing S (2013) Characterizing food waste substrates for co-digestion through biochemical methane potential (BMP) experiments. Waste Manage 33(12):2664–2669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2013.09.004CrossRef

Cu TTT, Nguyen TX, Triolo JM et al (2015) Biogas production from Vietnamese animal manure, plant residues and organic waste: influence of biomass composition on methane yield. Asian Australas J Anim Sci 28:280–289. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.14.0312CrossRef

10.

Xu J, Deshusses MA (2015) Fermentation of swine wastewater-derived duckweed for biohydrogen production. Int J Hydrog Energy 40:7028–7036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.03.166CrossRef

11.

Triolo JM, Lene P, Qu H et al (2012) Biochemical methane potential and anaerobic biodegradability of non-herbaceous and herbaceous phytomass in biogas production. Bioresour Technol 125:226–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.08.079CrossRef

12.

Alvira P, Tomás-Pejó E, Ballesteros M, Negro MJ (2010) Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: a review. Bioresour Technol 2010(101):4851–4861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.093CrossRef

13.

Silva GA, Morais Junior JA, Rocha ER (2016) Proposta de procedimento operacional padrão para o teste do Potencial Bioquímico do Metano aplicado a resíduos sólidos urbanos. Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental 21(1):11–16. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-41520201600100134484CrossRef

14.

APHA, Awwa, WEF (2012) Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater, 22nd edn. American Public Health Association, Washington

15.

FAO, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2002) Food and Nutrition Paper 77: Food Energy (Methods of Analysis and Conversin Factors).

16.

Instituto Adolfo Lutz (2008) Métodos físico-químicos para análise de alimentos/coordenadores Odair Zenebon, Neus Sadocco Pascuet e Paulo Tiglea—São Paulo: Instituto Adolfo Lutz.

17.

Owen WF, Stuckey DC, Healy Jr JB et al (1978) Bioassay for monitoring biochemical methane potential and anaerobic toxicity. Water Res 13:485–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(79)90043-5CrossRef

18.

Raposo F, La Rubiade MA, Fernández-Cegrí V et al (2011) Anaerobic digestion of solid organic substrates in batch mode: an overview relating to methane yields and experimental procedures. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16(1):861–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.09.008CrossRef

19.

Holliger C, Alves M, Andrade D, Angelidaki I, Astals S (2016) Towards a standardization of biomethane potential tests. Water Sci Technol 74(11):2515–2522. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2016.336CrossRef

20.

Borth PLB, Perin JKH, Torrecilhas AR, Pan NC, Kuroda EK, Fernandes F (2021) Biochemical methane potential of food and garden waste co-digestion with variation in solid content and inoculum: substrate ratio. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage 23(5):1974–1983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-021-01270-zCrossRef

21.

Chernicharo CAL (2007) Reatores anaeróbios – Princípios do tratamento biológico de águas residuárias, vol 5. Departamento de Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental; Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte

22.

Oliveira LRG, Santos Filho DA, Vasconcelos KC et al (2018) Methanization potential of anaerobic biodigestion of solid food waste. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 22(1):69–73. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v22n1p69-73CrossRef

23.

Angelidaki I, Alves M, Bolzonella D et al (2019) Defining the biomethane potential (BMP) of solid organic wastes and energy crops: a proposed protocol for batch assays. Water Sci Technol 59(5):927–934. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2009.040CrossRef

24.

Holliger C, Laclos HF, Hack G (2017) Methane production of full-scale anaerobic digestion plants calculated from substrate’s biomethane potentials compares well with the one measured on-site. Front Energy Res 5(12):1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2017.00012CrossRef

25.

Maciel FJ, Jucá JFT (2011) Evaluation of landfill gas production and emissions in a MSW large-scale experimental cell in Brazil. Waste Manage 31:966–977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.01.030CrossRef

26.

Labatut RA, Angenent LT, Scott NR (2011) Biochemical methane potential and biodegradability of complex organic substrates. Bioresour Technol 102(3):2255–2264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.035CrossRef

27.

Strömberg S, Nistor M, Liu J (2014) Towards eliminating systematic errors caused by the experimental conditions in Biochemical Methane Potential (BMP) tests. Waste Manage 34:1939–1948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.07.018CrossRef

28.

Abu-Reesh IM (2014) Kinetics of anaerobic digestion of labaneh whey in a batch reactor. Afr J Biotech 13(16):1745–1755. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2013.13310CrossRef

29.

Zhao C, Yan H, Liu Y et al (2016) Bio-energy conversion performance, biodegradability, and kinetic analysis of different fRAit residues during discontinuous anaerobic digestion. Waste Manage 52:295–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.03.028CrossRef

30.

Bidone FRA, Povinelli J (1999) Conceitos básicos de resíduos sólidos. São Paulo: EESC/Universidade de São Paulo. 1999, 120 p.

31.

Weiland P (2010) Biogas production: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 85:849–860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-009-2246-7CrossRef

32.

Metcalf E, Eddy M (2003) Wastewater engineering: treatment and reuse, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 1819

33.

Gu Y, Chen X, Liu Z, Zhou X, Zhang Y (2014) Effect of inoculum sources on the anaerobic digestion of rice straw. Bioresour Technol 158:149–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.02.011CrossRef

34.

Gerardi MH (2003) The microbiology of anaerobic digesters. John Wiley & Sons Inc, Hoboken, p 177CrossRef

35.

Mayer F, Gerin PA, Noo A et al (2014) Assessment of energy crops alternative to maize for biogas production in the greater region. Bioresour Technol 166:358–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.05.054CrossRef

36.

Yoon Y, Lee S, Kim K et al (2018) Study of anaerobic co-digestion on wastewater treatment sludge and food waste leachate using BMP test. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 20:283–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-017-0581-9CrossRef

37.

Li Y, Li L, Sun Y, Yuan Z (2018) Bioaugmentation strategy for enhancing anaerobic digestion of high C/N ratio feedstock with methanogenic enrichment culture. Bioresour Technol 261:188–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.02.069CrossRef

38.

Deublein D, Steinhauser A (2008) Biogas from waste and renewable resources. WILEY-VCH, WeinheimCrossRef

39.

Jingura RM, Kamusoko R (2017) Methods for determination of biomethane potential of feedstocks: a review. Biofuel Res J 14:573–586. https://doi.org/10.18331/BRJ2017.4.2.3CrossRef

40.

Sawatdeenaranat C, Surendra KC, Takara D et al (2015) Anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass: challenges and opportunities. Bioresour Technol 178:178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.09.103CrossRef

41.

Kesaano M (2011) Sustainable management of duckweed biomass grown for nutrient control in municipal wastewaters. Utah State University, Master of Science, p 96

42.

Li C, Feng J, Bai X, et al. (2018) Duckweed (Lemna minor) is a novel natural inducer of cellulase production in Trichoderma reesei. PeerJ Preprints. J Biosci Bioeng 127(4):486–491. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2018.09.017.

43.

Sánchez C (2009) Lignocellulosic residues: biodegradation and bioconversion by fungi. Biotechnol Adv 27:185–194CrossRef

44.

Toyama T, Hanaoka T, Tanaka Y et al (2018) Comprehensive evaluation of nitrogen removal rate and biomass, ethanol, and methane production yields by combination of four major duckweeds and three types of wastewater effluent. Bioresour Technol 250:464–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.11.054CrossRef

45.

Chandra R, Takeuchi H, Hasegawa T (2012) Methane production from lignocellulosic agricultural crop wastes: a review in context to second generation of biofuel production. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16(3):1462–1476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.11.035CrossRef

46.

Yadav D, Barbora L, Borda D et al (2016) An assessment of duckweed as a potential lignocellulosic feedstock for biogas production. Int Biodeterior Biodegr 119:253–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.09.007CrossRef

47.

Rodriguez C, Alaswad A, Benyounis KY et al (2017) Pretreatment techniques used in biogas production from grass. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 68(2):1193–1204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.02.022CrossRef

48.

Zahan Z, Maazuza Z, Othman T, Muster H (2018) Anaerobic digestion/co-digestion kinetic potentials of different agro-industrial wastes: a comparative batch study for C/N optimisation. Waste Manag 71:663–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.08.014CrossRef

49.

Oliveira LRG, dos Santos Filho DA, Fraga TJM et al (2021) Avaliação cinética e modelagem da produção de biogás por digestão anaeróbica de resíduos alimentares e lodo de esgoto aclimatado. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 23:1646–1656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-021-01248-xCrossRef

50.

Kafle GK, Kim SH, Sung KY (2012) Ensiling of fish industry waste for biogas production: a lab scale evaluation of Biochemical Methane Potential (BMP) and kinetics. Bioresour Technol 127:326–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.09.032CrossRef

Titel: Methane production potential from anaerobic digestion of plant biomass residues and food waste as substrates
verfasst von: Betina Ludwig Navarro
Adriana Zemiani Challiol
Mauricio Aparecido Bortoloti
Emília Kiyomi Kuroda
Fernando Fernandes
Publikationsdatum: 15.09.2022
Verlag: Springer Japan
Erschienen in: Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management / Ausgabe 6/2022
Print ISSN: 1438-4957
Elektronische ISSN: 1611-8227
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-022-01496-5

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2022

Reclaimed rockwool fibers for thermally stable palm oil-based polyurethane foam

Biostabilization process of undersized fraction of municipal solid waste with biochar addition

Characteristics of PVC pyrolysis products under electric field

Recycling of Tannery (chrome) sludge into sludge biochar (SB) /TiO2 nanocomposite via chemical activation through hydrothermal pre-treatment

Pozzolanic activity enhancement of magnesium-rich nickel slag and geopolymer preparation

Reuse of wood ash from biomass combustion in non-structural concrete: mechanical properties, durability, and eco-efficiency