Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Technology, Knowledge and Learning 2/2015

01.07.2015 | Original research

Middle School Students’ Writing and Feedback in a Cloud-Based Classroom Environment

verfasst von: Binbin Zheng, Joshua Lawrence, Mark Warschauer, Chin-Hsi Lin

Erschienen in: Technology, Knowledge and Learning | Ausgabe 2/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Individual writing and collaborative writing skills are important for academic success, yet are poorly taught in K-12 classrooms. This study examines how sixth-grade students (n = 257) taught by two teachers used Google Docs to write and exchange feedback. We used longitudinal growth models to analyze a large number of student writing samples (n = 3,537) as they changed across individual writing sessions (n = 18,146), and multiple regression analyses to relate writing quantity and types of feedback to changes in students’ standardized test scores. Additionally, student survey data and content analysis of students’ writing samples were used to contextualize and interpret students’ writing patterns. Overall, students had a positive attitude towards using Google Docs for editing and for the provision and receipt of feedback. They received various types of feedback from both their teachers and peers, but most were direct in character and in the areas of mechanics and grammar errors. However, neither students’ writing quantity nor their types of feedback on Google Docs was associated with their writing achievement. Our findings suggest that cloud-based technology could be integrated into K-12 classrooms to support students’ writing and editing, and to engage students in collaborative writing and improve interactions between writers and readers.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Aydin, Z., & Yildiz, S. (2014). Using Wikis to promote collaborative EFL writing. Language Learning & Technology, 18(1), 160–180. Aydin, Z., & Yildiz, S. (2014). Using Wikis to promote collaborative EFL writing. Language Learning & Technology, 18(1), 160–180.
Zurück zum Zitat Calkins, L. (1994). The art of teaching writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. Calkins, L. (1994). The art of teaching writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Zurück zum Zitat Calvo, R. A., Stephen, T. O. R., Jones, J., Yacef, K., & Reimann, P. (2011). Collaborative writing support tools on the cloud. IEEE Transaction on Learning Technologies, 4(1), 88–97.CrossRef Calvo, R. A., Stephen, T. O. R., Jones, J., Yacef, K., & Reimann, P. (2011). Collaborative writing support tools on the cloud. IEEE Transaction on Learning Technologies, 4(1), 88–97.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chamberlain, A. B. (2010). Synchronous computer-mediated collaborative writing in the ESL classroom. (Master of Arts), Michigan State University. Chamberlain, A. B. (2010). Synchronous computer-mediated collaborative writing in the ESL classroom. (Master of Arts), Michigan State University.
Zurück zum Zitat Chao, Y.-C. J., & Lo, H.-C. (2009). Students’ perceptions of Wiki-based collaborative writing for learners of English as a foreign language. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(4), 395–411. doi:10.1080/10494820903298662.CrossRef Chao, Y.-C. J., & Lo, H.-C. (2009). Students’ perceptions of Wiki-based collaborative writing for learners of English as a foreign language. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(4), 395–411. doi:10.​1080/​1049482090329866​2.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chaulk, N. (1994). Comparing teacher and student response to written work. TESOL Quarterly, 28(1), 181–188.CrossRef Chaulk, N. (1994). Comparing teacher and student response to written work. TESOL Quarterly, 28(1), 181–188.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cho, K., & Cho, M.-H. (2007). Self-awareness in a computer supported collaborative learning environment. In D. Schuler (Ed.), Online communities and social computing (Vol. 4564, pp. 284–291). Berlin: Springer.CrossRef Cho, K., & Cho, M.-H. (2007). Self-awareness in a computer supported collaborative learning environment. In D. Schuler (Ed.), Online communities and social computing (Vol. 4564, pp. 284–291). Berlin: Springer.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cho, K., & Schunn, C. D. (2007). Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system. Computers & Education, 48(3), 409–426.CrossRef Cho, K., & Schunn, C. D. (2007). Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system. Computers & Education, 48(3), 409–426.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Conner, N. (2008). Google Apps: The missing manual. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media. Conner, N. (2008). Google Apps: The missing manual. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.
Zurück zum Zitat Couture, B., & Rymer, J. (1991). Discourse interaction between writer and supervisor: A primary collaboration in workplace writing. In M. M. Lay & W. M. Karis (Eds.), Collaborative writing in industry: Investigations in theory and practice (pp. 87–108). Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing Company. Couture, B., & Rymer, J. (1991). Discourse interaction between writer and supervisor: A primary collaboration in workplace writing. In M. M. Lay & W. M. Karis (Eds.), Collaborative writing in industry: Investigations in theory and practice (pp. 87–108). Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing Company.
Zurück zum Zitat Dalke, A., Cassidy, K., Grobstein, P., & Blank, D. (2007). Emergent pedagogy: Learning to enjoy the uncontrollable—and make it productive. Journal of Educational Change, 8(2), 111–130.CrossRef Dalke, A., Cassidy, K., Grobstein, P., & Blank, D. (2007). Emergent pedagogy: Learning to enjoy the uncontrollable—and make it productive. Journal of Educational Change, 8(2), 111–130.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ede, L. S., & Lunsford, A. A. (1992). Singular Texts/Plural Authors: Perspectives on collaborative writing. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. Ede, L. S., & Lunsford, A. A. (1992). Singular Texts/Plural Authors: Perspectives on collaborative writing. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Ellis, R. (2009). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELTJ, 63(2), 97–107.CrossRef Ellis, R. (2009). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELTJ, 63(2), 97–107.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Elola, I., & Oskoz, A. (2010). Collaborative writing: Fostering foreign language and writing conventions development. Language Learning & Technology, 14(3), 51–71. Elola, I., & Oskoz, A. (2010). Collaborative writing: Fostering foreign language and writing conventions development. Language Learning & Technology, 14(3), 51–71.
Zurück zum Zitat Fallahi, C. R., Wood, R. M., Austad, C. S., & Fallahi, H. A. (2006). A program for improving undergraduate psychology students’ basic writing skills. Teaching of Psychology, 33(3), 171–175.CrossRef Fallahi, C. R., Wood, R. M., Austad, C. S., & Fallahi, H. A. (2006). A program for improving undergraduate psychology students’ basic writing skills. Teaching of Psychology, 33(3), 171–175.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Flower, L., Hayes, J., Carey, L., Schriver, K., & Stratman, J. (1986). Detection, diagnosis, and the strategies of revision. College Composition and Communication, 37(1), 16–55.CrossRef Flower, L., Hayes, J., Carey, L., Schriver, K., & Stratman, J. (1986). Detection, diagnosis, and the strategies of revision. College Composition and Communication, 37(1), 16–55.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ge, Z.-g. (2011). Exploring e-learners’ perceptions of net-based peer-reviewed English writing. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(1), 75–91. doi:10.1007/s11412-010-9103-7.CrossRef Ge, Z.-g. (2011). Exploring e-learners’ perceptions of net-based peer-reviewed English writing. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(1), 75–91. doi:10.​1007/​s11412-010-9103-7.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Geoffrey, A. C. (2001). Forming the collective mind: A contextual exploration of large-scale collaborative writing in industry. New York: Hampton Press. Geoffrey, A. C. (2001). Forming the collective mind: A contextual exploration of large-scale collaborative writing in industry. New York: Hampton Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Godwin-Jones, R. (2003). Blogs and Wikis: Environments for on-line collaboration. Language learning and technology, 7(2), 12–16. Godwin-Jones, R. (2003). Blogs and Wikis: Environments for on-line collaboration. Language learning and technology, 7(2), 12–16.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldberg, A., Russell, M., & Cook, A. (2003). The effects of computers on student writing: A meta-analysis of studies from 1992 to 2002. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2(1). Goldberg, A., Russell, M., & Cook, A. (2003). The effects of computers on student writing: A meta-analysis of studies from 1992 to 2002. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2(1).
Zurück zum Zitat Graham, S., & Herbert, M. A. (2010). Writing to read: Evidence for how writing can improve reading, a Carnegie Corporation time to act report. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellence Education. Graham, S., & Herbert, M. A. (2010). Writing to read: Evidence for how writing can improve reading, a Carnegie Corporation time to act report. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellence Education.
Zurück zum Zitat Han, Z. H. (2002). Rethinking the role of corrective feedback in communicative language teaching. RELC Journal, 33(1), 1–34.CrossRef Han, Z. H. (2002). Rethinking the role of corrective feedback in communicative language teaching. RELC Journal, 33(1), 1–34.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hayes, J. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In C. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications (pp. 1–27). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Hayes, J. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In C. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications (pp. 1–27). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Zurück zum Zitat Jago, C. (2001). Cohesive writing: Why concept is not enough. Portsmouth, NJ: Heinemann. Jago, C. (2001). Cohesive writing: Why concept is not enough. Portsmouth, NJ: Heinemann.
Zurück zum Zitat Kessler, G., Bikowski, D., & Boggs, J. (2012). Collaborative writing among second language learners in academic web-based projects. Language Learning & Technology, 16(1), 91–109. Kessler, G., Bikowski, D., & Boggs, J. (2012). Collaborative writing among second language learners in academic web-based projects. Language Learning & Technology, 16(1), 91–109.
Zurück zum Zitat Li, X., Chu, S. K. W., & Ki, W. W. (2014). The effects of a wiki-based collaborative process writing pedagogy on writing ability and attitudes among upper primary school students in Mainland China. Computers & Education, 77, 151–169. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.019.CrossRef Li, X., Chu, S. K. W., & Ki, W. W. (2014). The effects of a wiki-based collaborative process writing pedagogy on writing ability and attitudes among upper primary school students in Mainland China. Computers & Education, 77, 151–169. doi:10.​1016/​j.​compedu.​2014.​04.​019.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Pihlajamäki, H. (2003). Can a collaborative network environment enhance essay-writing processes? British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1), 17–30. doi:10.1111/1467-8535.d01-3.CrossRef Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Pihlajamäki, H. (2003). Can a collaborative network environment enhance essay-writing processes? British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1), 17–30. doi:10.​1111/​1467-8535.​d01-3.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nagelhout, E. (1999). Pre-professional practices in the technical writing classroom: Promoting multiple literacies through research. Technical Communication Quarterly, 8(3), 285–299.CrossRef Nagelhout, E. (1999). Pre-professional practices in the technical writing classroom: Promoting multiple literacies through research. Technical Communication Quarterly, 8(3), 285–299.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). The nation's report card: Writing 2011 (NCES 2012-470). Washington, D.C.: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). The nation's report card: Writing 2011 (NCES 2012-470). Washington, D.C.: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
Zurück zum Zitat Oishi, L. (2007). Working together: Google Apps goes to school. Technology & Learning, 27(9), 46–47. Oishi, L. (2007). Working together: Google Apps goes to school. Technology & Learning, 27(9), 46–47.
Zurück zum Zitat Parker, K. R., & Chao, J. T. (2007). Wiki as a teaching tool. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 3, 57–72. Parker, K. R., & Chao, J. T. (2007). Wiki as a teaching tool. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 3, 57–72.
Zurück zum Zitat Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2003). The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Review of General Psychology, 7(1), 84–107.CrossRef Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2003). The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Review of General Psychology, 7(1), 84–107.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Robb, T., Ross, S. M., & Shortreed, I. (1986). Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality. TESOL Quarterly, 20(1), 83–95.CrossRef Robb, T., Ross, S. M., & Shortreed, I. (1986). Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality. TESOL Quarterly, 20(1), 83–95.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Salvatori, M. (1985). The dialogical nature of basic reading and writing. In D. Bartholomae & A. Petrosky (Eds.), Facts, artifacts and counterfacts: Theory and method for a reading and writing course (pp. 137–166). Upper Montclair: NJ: Boynton. Salvatori, M. (1985). The dialogical nature of basic reading and writing. In D. Bartholomae & A. Petrosky (Eds.), Facts, artifacts and counterfacts: Theory and method for a reading and writing course (pp. 137–166). Upper Montclair: NJ: Boynton.
Zurück zum Zitat Sheppard, K. (1992). Two feedback types: Do they make a difference? RELC Journal, 23(1), 103–110.CrossRef Sheppard, K. (1992). Two feedback types: Do they make a difference? RELC Journal, 23(1), 103–110.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press. Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 153–173.CrossRef Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 153–173.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honor of H.G. Widdowson (pp. 125–144). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honor of H.G. Widdowson (pp. 125–144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Tierney, R., & Shanahan, T. (1991). Research on the reading/writing relationship: Interactions, transactions, and outcomes. In P. E. Pearson, M. Barr & P. B. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research Volume II (pp. 246-280). New York: Longman. Tierney, R., & Shanahan, T. (1991). Research on the reading/writing relationship: Interactions, transactions, and outcomes. In P. E. Pearson, M. Barr & P. B. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research Volume II (pp. 246-280). New York: Longman.
Zurück zum Zitat Vigil, N. A., & Oller, J. W. (1976). Rule fossilization: A tentative model. Language Learning, 26(2), 281–295.CrossRef Vigil, N. A., & Oller, J. W. (1976). Rule fossilization: A tentative model. Language Learning, 26(2), 281–295.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wang, H.-C. (2009). Weblog-mediated peer editing and some pedagogical recommendations: A case study. The JALT CALL Journal, 5(2), 29–44. Wang, H.-C. (2009). Weblog-mediated peer editing and some pedagogical recommendations: A case study. The JALT CALL Journal, 5(2), 29–44.
Zurück zum Zitat Woo, M., Chu, S., Ho, A., & Li, X. (2011). Using a wiki to scaffold primary-school students’ collaborative writing. Educational Technology & Society, 14(1), 43–54. Woo, M., Chu, S., Ho, A., & Li, X. (2011). Using a wiki to scaffold primary-school students’ collaborative writing. Educational Technology & Society, 14(1), 43–54.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(3), 179–200.CrossRef Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(3), 179–200.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yeh, S.-W., Lo, J.-J., & Huang, J.-J. (2011). Scaffolding collaborative technical writing with procedural facilitation and synchronous discussion. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(3), 397–419. doi:10.1007/s11412-011-9117-9.CrossRef Yeh, S.-W., Lo, J.-J., & Huang, J.-J. (2011). Scaffolding collaborative technical writing with procedural facilitation and synchronous discussion. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(3), 397–419. doi:10.​1007/​s11412-011-9117-9.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang, S. (2008). Assessing the impact of peer revision on English writing of tertiary EFL learners. Teaching English in China, 31(2), 47–54. Zhang, S. (2008). Assessing the impact of peer revision on English writing of tertiary EFL learners. Teaching English in China, 31(2), 47–54.
Metadaten
Titel
Middle School Students’ Writing and Feedback in a Cloud-Based Classroom Environment
verfasst von
Binbin Zheng
Joshua Lawrence
Mark Warschauer
Chin-Hsi Lin
Publikationsdatum
01.07.2015
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Technology, Knowledge and Learning / Ausgabe 2/2015
Print ISSN: 2211-1662
Elektronische ISSN: 2211-1670
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-014-9239-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2015

Technology, Knowledge and Learning 2/2015 Zur Ausgabe

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.