Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Actuarial Journal 1/2023

11.01.2023 | Letter

Model selection with Gini indices under auto-calibration

verfasst von: Mario V. Wüthrich

Erschienen in: European Actuarial Journal | Ausgabe 1/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The Gini index does not give a strictly consistent scoring function. Therefore, simply maximizing the Gini index may lead to a wrong model choice. The main issue is that the Gini index is a rank-based score that is not calibration-sensitive. We show that the Gini index allows for strictly consistent scoring if we restrict it to the class of auto-calibrated regression models. That is, on the class of auto-calibrated models we know that the true model maximizes the Gini index.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
The continuity condition is a comparably weak assumption, e.g., it suffices to have one continuous covariate component and a strictly monotone regression function in that component; see Section 2.2 of Denuit et al. [4].
 
2
In (2.2) we assume that Y has a continuous distribution \(F_Y\), otherwise the denominator in (2.2) needs to be replaced by the term \({\mathbb {E}}[|Y-Z|]/(4{\mathbb {E}}[Y])\), where Z is an independent copy of Y, see also (4.1), below. For a continuous distribution \(F_Y\) the two terms in the denominator are then equivalent.
 
Literatur
1.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ciatto N, Verelst H, Trufin J, Denuit M (2022) Does autocalibration improve goodness of lift? Eur Actuar J, in press Ciatto N, Verelst H, Trufin J, Denuit M (2022) Does autocalibration improve goodness of lift? Eur Actuar J, in press
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Denuit M, Charpentier A, Trufin J (2021) Autocalibration and Tweedie-dominance for insurance pricing in machine learning. Insurance 101:485–497MathSciNetMATH Denuit M, Charpentier A, Trufin J (2021) Autocalibration and Tweedie-dominance for insurance pricing in machine learning. Insurance 101:485–497MathSciNetMATH
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Denuit M, Sznajder D, Trufin J (2019) Model selection based on Lorenz and concentration curves, Gini indices and convex order. Insurance 89:128–139MathSciNetMATH Denuit M, Sznajder D, Trufin J (2019) Model selection based on Lorenz and concentration curves, Gini indices and convex order. Insurance 89:128–139MathSciNetMATH
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Denuit M, Trufin J (2021) Lorenz curve, Gini coefficient, and Tweedie dominance for autocalibrated predictors. LIDAM Discussion Paper ISBA 2021/36 Denuit M, Trufin J (2021) Lorenz curve, Gini coefficient, and Tweedie dominance for autocalibrated predictors. LIDAM Discussion Paper ISBA 2021/36
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Dimitriadis T, Fissler T, Ziegel JF (2020) The efficiency gap. arXiv, 2010.14146 Dimitriadis T, Fissler T, Ziegel JF (2020) The efficiency gap. arXiv, 2010.14146
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Engelmann B, Hayden E, Tasche D (2003) Testing rating accuracy. Risk 16(1):82–86 Engelmann B, Hayden E, Tasche D (2003) Testing rating accuracy. Risk 16(1):82–86
8.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Frees EW, Meyers G, Cummings AD (2013) Insurance ratemaking and a Gini index. J Risk Insur 81:335–366CrossRef Frees EW, Meyers G, Cummings AD (2013) Insurance ratemaking and a Gini index. J Risk Insur 81:335–366CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Gini C (1912) Variabilità e Mutuabilità. Contributo allo Studio delle Distribuzioni e delle Relazioni Statistiche. C, Cuppini, Bologna Gini C (1912) Variabilità e Mutuabilità. Contributo allo Studio delle Distribuzioni e delle Relazioni Statistiche. C, Cuppini, Bologna
12.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Lorenz MO (1905) Methods of measuring the concentration of wealth. Publ Am Stat Assoc 9(70):209–219 Lorenz MO (1905) Methods of measuring the concentration of wealth. Publ Am Stat Assoc 9(70):209–219
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Menon AK, Jiang X, Vembu S, Elkan C, Ohno-Machado L (2012) Predicting accurate probabilities with ranking loss. ICML’12: Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Machine Learning, 659–666 Menon AK, Jiang X, Vembu S, Elkan C, Ohno-Machado L (2012) Predicting accurate probabilities with ranking loss. ICML’12: Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Machine Learning, 659–666
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Newson R (2002) Parameters behind “nonparametric’’ statistics: Kendall’s tau, Somers’ D and median differences. Stata J 2(1):45–64CrossRef Newson R (2002) Parameters behind “nonparametric’’ statistics: Kendall’s tau, Somers’ D and median differences. Stata J 2(1):45–64CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat So B, Boucher J, Valdez E (2021) Cost-sensitive multi-class AdaBoost for understanding driving behavior based on telematics. ASTIN Bull 51(3):719–751MathSciNetCrossRefMATH So B, Boucher J, Valdez E (2021) Cost-sensitive multi-class AdaBoost for understanding driving behavior based on telematics. ASTIN Bull 51(3):719–751MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Somers RH (1962) A new asymmetric measure of association for ordinal variables. Am Sociol Rev 27(6):799–811CrossRef Somers RH (1962) A new asymmetric measure of association for ordinal variables. Am Sociol Rev 27(6):799–811CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Tasche D (2006) Validation of internal rating systems and PD estimates. arXiv:0606071 Tasche D (2006) Validation of internal rating systems and PD estimates. arXiv:0606071
21.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Wüthrich MV, Merz M (2023) Statistical foundations of actuarial learning and its applications. Springer Actuarial Wüthrich MV, Merz M (2023) Statistical foundations of actuarial learning and its applications. Springer Actuarial
Metadaten
Titel
Model selection with Gini indices under auto-calibration
verfasst von
Mario V. Wüthrich
Publikationsdatum
11.01.2023
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Actuarial Journal / Ausgabe 1/2023
Print ISSN: 2190-9733
Elektronische ISSN: 2190-9741
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13385-022-00339-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2023

European Actuarial Journal 1/2023 Zur Ausgabe