nach oben

Computational Mechanics

Erschienen in:

03.01.2022 | Original Paper

Multi-frequency model reduction for uncertainty quantification in computational vibroacoutics

verfasst von: J. Reyes, C. Desceliers, C. Soize, L. Gagliardini

Erschienen in: Computational Mechanics | Ausgabe 3/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This work is devoted to the vibroacoustics of complex systems over a broad-frequency band of analysis. The considered system is composed of a complex structure coupled with an internal acoustic cavity. On one hand, the global displacements are associated with the main stiff part and on the other hand, the local displacements are associated with the preponderant vibrations of the flexible subparts. Such complex structures induce interweaving of these two types of displacements, which introduce an overlap of the usual three frequency bands (low-, medium- and high-frequency bands (LF, MF, and HF). A reduced-order computational vibroacoustic model is constructed by using a classical modal analysis with the elastic and acoustic modes. Nevertheless, the dimension of such reduced-order model (ROM) is still important when there is an overlap for each one of the three frequency bands. A multi-frequency reduced-order model is then constructed for the structure over the LF, MF, and HF bands. The strategy is based on a multilevel projection consisting in introducing three reduced-order bases that are obtained by using a spatial filtering methodology. To filter out the local displacements in the structure, a set of global shape functions is introduced. In addition, a classical ROM using acoustic modes is carried out for the acoustic cavity. Then, the coupling between the multilevel ROM and the acoustic ROM is presented. A nonparametric probabilistic modeling is then proposed to take into account the model uncertainties induced by modeling errors that increase with the frequency. The proposed approach is applied to a large-scale computational vibroacoustic model of a car.

Vorheriger Artikel A component-free Lagrangian finite element formulation for large strain elastodynamics

Nächster Artikel An optimality criteria method hybridized with dual programming for topology optimization under multiple constraints by moving asymptotes approximation

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Durand J, Soize C, Gagliardini L (2008) Structural-acoustic modeling of automotive vehicles in presence of uncertainties and experimental identification and validation. J Acoust Soc Am 123(3):1513–1525. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2953316CrossRef

Arnoux A, Batou A, Soize C, Gagliardini L (2013) Stochastic reduced order computational model of structures having numerous local elastic modes in low frequency dynamics. J Sound Vib 332(16):3667–3680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2013..02.019CrossRef

Arnoux A, Soize C, Gagliardini L (2013) Reduced-order computational model for low-frequency dynamics of automobiles. Adv Mech Eng 31036:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/310362CrossRef

Gagliardini L (2014) Dispersed vibroacoustic responses of industrial products: what are we able to predict? In The 26th international conference on noise and vibration engineering (ISMA2014), Leuven, 15–17 September 2003-01-1555, 17–37

Bucher I, Braun S (1997) Left eigenvectors: extraction from measurements and physical interpretation. J Appl Mech ASME 64(1):97–105MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

Hansen P (1987) The truncated svd as a method for regularization. BIT Numer Math 27(4):534–553MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

Guyan R (1965) Reduction of stiffness and mass matrices. AIAA J 3(2):380–380CrossRef

Guyan R (1992) A method for selecting master dof in dynamic substructuring using the Guyan condensation method. Comput Struct 45(5–6):941–946

Guyan R (1980) Flexural wave-propagation behavior of lumped mass approximations. Comput Struct 12(6):805–812MATHCrossRef

10.

Chan H, Cai C, Cheung Y (1993) High convergence order finite elements with lumped mass matrix. J Sound Vib 165(2):193–207MATHCrossRef

11.

Jensen M (1996) Convergence studies of dynamic analysis by using the finite element method with lumped mass matrix. Int J Numer Methods Eng 139(11):1879–1888MATHCrossRef

12.

Langley R, Bremner P (1999) A hybrid method for the vibration analysis of complex structural-acoustic systems. J Acoust Soc Am 105(3):1657–1671CrossRef

13.

Ji L, Mace B, Pinnington R (2006) A mode-based approach for the mid-frequency vibration analysis of coupled long- and short-wavelength structures. J Sound Vib 289(1–2):148–170CrossRef

14.

Hahn Y, Kikuchi N (2005) Identification of global modeshape from a few nodal eigenvectors using simple free-form deformation. Eng Comput 21(2):115–128CrossRef

15.

Guyader J (2009) Characterization and reduction of dynamic models of vibrating systems with high modal density. J Sound Vib 328(4–5):488–506CrossRef

16.

Guyader J (1990) Modal sampling method for the vibration study of systems of high modal density. J Acoust Soc Am 88(5):2269–2276CrossRef

17.

Noor A, Anderson M, Greene W (1978) Continuum models for beam- and platelike-lattice structures. AIAA J 16(12):1219–1228CrossRef

18.

Planchard J (1985) Vibrations of nuclear fuel assemblies: a simplified model. Nucl Eng Des 86(3):383–391MathSciNetCrossRef

19.

Sigrits J, Broc D (2008) Dynamic analysis of a tube bundle with fluid-structure interaction modelling using a homogenisation method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197(9–12):1080–1099MathSciNetMATH

20.

Craig R (1985) A Review of time domain and frequency domain component mode synthesis method in combined experimental-analytical modeling of dynamic structural systems. D.R. Martinez and A.K. Miller, New York

21.

de Klerk D, Rixen D, Voormeeren S (2008) General framework for dynamic substructuring: history, review, and classification of techniques. AIAA J 4:1169–1181CrossRef

22.

Leung A (1993) Dynamic stiffness and substructures. Springer, BerlinCrossRef

23.

Ohayon R, Soize C, Sampaio R (2014) Variational-based reduced-order model in dynamic substructuring of coupled structures through a dissipative physical interface: recent advances. Arch Comput Methods Eng 21(3):321–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-014-9107-yMathSciNetCrossRefMATH

24.

Argyris J, Kelsey S (1959) The analysis of fuselages of arbitrary cross-section and taper: a DSIR sponsored research program on the development and application of the matrix force method and the digital computer. Aircr Eng Aerosp Technol 31(3):62–74CrossRef

25.

Przemieniecki J (1963) Matrix structural analysis of substructures. AIAA J 1(1):138–147CrossRef

26.

Irons B (1965) Structural eigenvalue problems—elimination of unwanted variables. AIAA J 3(5):961–962

27.

Hurty W (1960) Vibrations of structural systems by component mode synthesis. J Eng Mech ASCE 86(4):51–70

28.

Hurty W (1965) Dynamic analysis of structural systems using component modes. AIAA J 3(4):678–685CrossRef

29.

Craig R, Bampton M (1968) Coupling of substructures for dynamic analyses. AIAA J 6(7):1313–1319MATHCrossRef

30.

Bathe K, Gracewski S (1981) On nonlinear dynamic analysis using substructuring and mode superposition. Comput Struct 13(5):699–707MATHCrossRef

31.

Farhat C, Geradin M (1994) On a component mode synthesis method and its application to incompatible substructures. Comput Struct 51(5):459–473MATHCrossRef

32.

Meirovitch L, Hale A (1981) On the substructure synthesis method. AIAA J 19(7):940–947CrossRef

33.

Meirovitch L, Kwak M (1991) Rayleigh-ritz based substructure synthesis for flexible multibody systems. AIAA J 29(10):1709–1719MATHCrossRef

34.

Voormeeren S, van der Valk P, Rixen D (2011) Generalized methodology for assembly and reduction of component models for dynamic substructuring. AIAA J 49(5):1010–1020CrossRef

35.

Voormeeren S, van der Valk P, Rixen D (1971) Vibration analysis of structures by component mode substitution. AIAA J 9(7):1255–1261CrossRef

36.

R.MacNeal,Vibration analysis of structures by component mode substitution, Computers & Structures 1 (4)(1971) 581–601

37.

Rubin S (1975) Improved component-mode representation for structural dynamic analysis. AIAA J 13(8):995–1006MATHCrossRef

38.

Markovic D, Park K, Ibrahimbegovic A (2007) Reduction of substructural interface degrees of freedom in flexibility-based component mode synthesis. Int J Numer Methods Eng 70(2):163–180MATHCrossRef

39.

Ohayon R, Sampaio R, Soize C (1997) Dynamic substructuring of damped structures using singular value decomposition. J Appl Mech ASME 64(2):292–298MATHCrossRef

40.

Park K, Park Y (2004) Dynamic substructuring of damped structures using singular value decomposition. AIAA J 42(6):1236–1245. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2787306CrossRef

41.

Rixen D (2004) A dual Craig–Bampton method for dynamic substructuring. J Comput Appl Math 168(1–2):383–391MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

42.

Soize C (2017) Uncertainty quantification. An accelerated course with advanced applications in computational engineering. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54339-0

43.

Ibrahim R (1985) Parametric random vibration. Wiley, New YorkMATH

44.

Beck J, Katafygiotis L (1998) Updating models and their uncertainties—I: Bayesian statistical framework. J Eng Mech ASCE 124(4):455–461CrossRef

45.

Mace R, Worden W, Manson G (2005) Uncertainty in structural dynamics. J Sound Vib 288(3):431–790CrossRef

46.

Schuëller G, Pradlwarter H (2009) Uncertain linear systems in dynamics: retrospective and recent developments by stochastic approaches. Eng Struct 31(11):2507–2517CrossRef

47.

Soize C (2013) Stochastic modeling of uncertainties in computational structural dynamics—recent theoretical advances. J Sound Vib 332(10):2379–2395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2011.10.010CrossRef

48.

Schuëller G (2005) Computational methods in stochastic mechanics and reliability analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 194(12–16):1251–1795

49.

Schuëller G (2005) Uncertainties in structural mechanics and analysis—computational methods. Comput Struct 83(14):1031–1150CrossRef

50.

Schuëller G (2006) Developments in stochastic structural mechanics. Arch Appl Mech 75(10–12):755–773MATHCrossRef

51.

Deodatis G, Spanos P (2008) Computational stochastic mechanics. Probab Eng Mech 23(2–3):103–346CrossRef

52.

Ghanem R (1991) Stochastic finite elements: a spectral approach, Revised. Dover Publications, New YorkMATHCrossRef

53.

Soize C, Ghanem R (2004) Physical systems with random uncertainties: chaos representations with arbitrary probability measure. SIAM J Sci Comput 26(2):395–410. https://doi.org/10.1137/S1064827503424505

54.

Le Maitre O, Knio O (2010) Spectral methods for uncerainty quantification with applications to computational fluid dynamics. Springer, HeidelbergMATH

55.

Ghanem R, Higdon D, Owhadi H (2017) Handbook of uncertainty quantification. Springer, Cham

56.

Bui-Thanh T, Willcox K, Ghattas O (2008) Parametric reduced-order models for probabilistic analysis of unsteady aerodynamic applications. AIAA J 46(10):2520–2529CrossRef

57.

Degroote J, Vierendeels J, Willcox K (2010) Interpolation among reduced-order matrices to obtain parameterized models for design, optimization and probabilistic analysis. Int J Numer Methods Eng 63(2):207–230MathSciNetMATH

58.

Marzouk Y, Najm H, Rahn L (2007) Stochastic spectral methods for efficient Bayesian solution of inverse problems. J Comput Phys 224(2):560–586MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

59.

Galbally D, Fidkowski K, Willcox K, Ghattas O (2010) Non-linear model reduction for uncertainty quantification in large scale inverse problems. Int J Numer Methods Eng 81(12):1581–1608MathSciNetMATH

60.

Lieberman C, Willcox K, Ghattas O (2010) Parameter and state model reduction for large scale statistical inverse problems. SIAM J Sci Comput 32(5):2523–2542MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

61.

Nouy A, Soize C (2014) Random field representations for stochastic elliptic boundary value problems and statistical inverse problems. Eur J Appl Math 25(3):339–373. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0956792514000072MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

62.

Cui T, Marzouk Y, Willcox K (2015) Data-driven model reduction for the Bayesian solution of inverse problems. Int J Numer Methods Eng 102(5):966–990MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

63.

Soize C (2017) Random vectors and random fields in high dimension: parametric model-based representation, identification from data, and inverse problems. In: Ghanem R, Higdon D, Owhadi H (eds) Handbook of uncertainty quantification, vol 2, Springer, Cham, Ch. 26, pp 883–936. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11259-6_30-1

64.

Soize C (2000) A nonparametric model of random uncertainties for reduced matrix models in structural dynamics. Probab Eng Mech 15(3):277–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-8920(99)00028-4CrossRef

65.

Shannon C (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 27(3):379–423MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

66.

Jaynes E (1957) Information theory and statistical mechanics. Phys Rev 106(4):620MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

67.

Mignolet M, Soize C (2008) Nonparametric stochastic modeling of linear systems with prescribed variance of several natural frequencies. Probab Eng Mech 23(2–3):267–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2007.12.027CrossRef

68.

Soize C (2017) Random matrix models and nonparametric method for uncertainty quantification. In: Ghanem R, Higdon D, Owhadi H (eds) Handbook of uncertainty quantification, vol 1, Springer, Cham, pp 219–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11259-6_5-1

69.

Chen C, Duhamel D, Soize C (2006) Probabilistic approach for model and data uncertainties and its experimental identification in structural dynamics: case of composite sandwich panels. J Sound Vib 294(1–2):64–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2005.10.013CrossRef

70.

Capillon R, Desceliers C, Soize C (2016) Uncertainty quantification in computational linear structural dynamics for viscoelastic composite structures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 305:154–172MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

71.

Soize C, Chebli H (2003) Random uncertainties model in dynamic substructuring using a nonparametric probabilistic model. J Eng Mech ASCE 129(4):449–457. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2003)129:4(449)CrossRef

72.

Mignolet M, Soize C, Avalos J (2013) Nonparametric stochastic modeling of structures with uncertain boundary conditions/coupling between substructures. AIAA J 51(6):1296–1308. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J051555

73.

Arnst M, Clouteau D, Chebli H, Othman R, Degrande G (2006) A non-parametric probabilistic model for ground-borne vibrations in buildings. Probab Eng Mech 21(1):18–34CrossRef

74.

Ohayon RCS (2014) Advanced computational vibroacoustics—reduced-order models and uncertainty quantification. Cambridge University Press, New York

75.

Capiez-Lernout E, Soize C (2008) Robust design optimization in computational mechanics. J Appl Mech ASME 75(2):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2775493CrossRef

76.

Arnst M, Soize C (2019) Identification and sampling of Bayesian posteriors of high-dimensional symmetric positive-definite matrices for data-driven updating of computational models. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 352:300–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2019.04.025MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

77.

Mignolet M, Soize C (2008) Stochastic reduced order models for uncertain geometrically nonlinear dynamical systems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197(45–48):3951–3963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2008.03.032MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

78.

Capiez-Lernout E, Soize C, MP M (2014) Post-buckling nonlinear static and dynamical analyses of uncertain cylindrical shells and experimental validation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 271(1):210–230MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

79.

Soize C, Farhat C (2016) Uncertainty quantification of modeling errors for nonlinear reduced-order computational models using a nonparametric probabilistic approach. Int J Numer Methods Eng 30(2016):96

80.

Ezvan O, Batou A, Soize C (2015) Multilevel reduced-order computational model in structural dynamics for the low-and medium-frequency ranges. Comput Struct 160:111–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2015.08.007CrossRef

81.

Ezvan O, Batou A, Soize C, Gagliardini L (2017) Multilevel model reduction for uncertainty quantification in computational structural dynamics. Comput Mech 59(2):219–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-016-1348-1MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

82.

Ohayon R, Soize C (1998) Structural acoustics and vibration. Academic Press, San DiegoMATH

Titel: Multi-frequency model reduction for uncertainty quantification in computational vibroacoutics
verfasst von: J. Reyes
C. Desceliers
C. Soize
L. Gagliardini
Publikationsdatum: 03.01.2022
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Computational Mechanics / Ausgabe 3/2022
Print ISSN: 0178-7675
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0924
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-021-02109-y

Neuer Inhalt

Bildnachweise

VDI-Icon, Profil Icon, inhalt2, Springer Professional Modul/© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, Die Gewinner und Laudatoren des Sustainability Award in Automotive 2024/© Uli Regenscheit | ATZlive, Search Icon, Banner Hanser, Suresh Vittal/© Alteryx, Additiv gefertigte Teile/© Marina_Skoropadskaya | Getty Images | iStock, Warnschild "Land unter"/© Bluedesign / Fotolia, Zeitschrift Wissensmanagement Cover, PatentFit-Logo/© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ATZ-Webinar: Prototypenfreie Entwicklung durch Offline- und Driver-in-the-Loop-HiL-Tests /© (c) VI-grade, chassis.tech plus 2023/© [M] ATZlive / TÜV SÜD PRODUCT SERVICE GMBH, adäsion-Webinar-Matinee/© krystiannawrocki_ Getty Images

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2022

Combining spectral and POD modes to improve error estimation of numerical model reduction for porous media

A Bayesian multiscale CNN framework to predict local stress fields in structures with microscale features

Crystal plasticity model of residual stress in additive manufacturing using the element elimination and reactivation method

Goal-oriented error estimation and h-adaptive finite elements for hyperelastic micromorphic continua

An optimality criteria method hybridized with dual programming for topology optimization under multiple constraints by moving asymptotes approximation

Stable node-based smoothed finite element method for 3D contact problems

Neuer Inhalt

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.