Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Wireless Personal Communications
Erschienen in: Wireless Personal Communications 1/2021

28.06.2021

Multi-Objective Optimization in WSN: Opportunities and Challenges

verfasst von: Omkar Singh, Vinay Rishiwal, Rashmi Chaudhry, Mano Yadav

Erschienen in: Wireless Personal Communications | Ausgabe 1/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) plays a significant role in the field of surveillance, monitoring the real time applications. Regardless its strong ability to handle such tasks, it is difficult to maintain a trade-off between the conflicting goals of network lifetime, transmission delay, high coverage and packet loss. Various solutions have been proposed by the researchers to address these issues comprising the solution in real-time network scenarios. This paper delivers a brief analysis of the solutions addressing recent research problems in WSN comprising conflicting goals, i.e. multi-objective optimization (MOO) technique. Firstly, an illustration of key optimization objective in WSNs is given which constitutes existing issues such as power control, rate control ant routing. Then, an elaboration of various objective functions used in MOO with its merits and demerits is also provided. Later, existing approaches for improving optimizing metric, applications performance of existing approaches and proposed architecture have been discussed.
Vorheriger Artikel Mitigation of Malicious Flooding in Software Defined Networks Using Dynamic Access Control List
Nächster Artikel Distributed Uneven Clustering Mechanism for Energy Efficient WSN

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Deepa, O., & Suguna, J. (2017). An optimized QoS-based clustering with multipath routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. JKSU-Computer and Information Sciences, 13, 1–12.
2.
Zhou, Z., Xu, J., Zhang, Z., Lei, F., & Fang, W. (2017). Energy-efficient optimization for concurrent compositions of WSN services. IEEE Acess, 17, 1–15.
3.
Na, W., & Tianhua, W. (2016). A trusted QoS routing model for wireless sensor networks. In ICCSE (pp. 627–630).
4.
More, A., & Raisinghani, V. (2017). A survey on energy efficient coverage protocols in wireless sensor networks. Journal of King Saud University – Computer and Information Sciences, 29, 428–448.CrossRef
5.
Li, H., & Lin, Z. (2017). Study on location of wireless sensor network node in forest environment. ICICT, 107, 697–704.
6.
Arasu, K., & Ganesan, R. (2018). Effective implementation of energy aware routing for wireless sensor network. PMME, 5, 1186–1193.
7.
Migabo, M., Djouani, K., Olwal, T. O., & Kurien, A. M. (2017). A survey on energy efficient network coding for multi-hop routing in wireless sensor networks. FNC, 94, 288–294.
8.
Ansane, A. A., & Satao, R. A. (2017). A survey on various multipath routing protocols in wireless sensor networks. CCV, 79, 610–615.
9.
Patnai, S. (2016). Energy management in wireless sensor network using PEGASIS. ICCC, 92, 207–212.
10.
Mahidhar, R., & Raut, A. (2017). A survey on scheduling schemes with security in wireless sensor networks. ICISP, 78, 756–762.
11.
Elshrkawey, M., Elsherif, S. M., & Wahed, M. E. (2018). An enhancement approach for reducing the energy consumption in wireless sensor networks. Journal of King Saud University Computer and Information Sciences, 30, 259–267.CrossRef
12.
H. Sandor, P. haller and Z Gal, “Performance Analysis of Wireless Sensor Networks”, INTER-ENG, vol. 19, pp. 842–849, 2016.
13.
Kakhandki, A. L., Hublikar, S., & Kumar, P. (2018). Energy efficient selective hop selection optimization to maximize lifetime of wireless sensor network. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 57, 711–718.CrossRef
14.
Lu, Y., Zhang, T., He, E., & Comşa, I. S. (2018). Self-learning-based data aggregation scheduling policy in wireless sensor networks. Journal of Sensors, 18, 1–12.
15.
Ferrandis, T. D., Blanes, J. S., Climent, S. S., Sempere-Paya, V., & Vera-Pérez, J. (2018). Deploy&Forget wireless sensor networks for itinerant applications. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 56, 27–40.CrossRef
16.
Tawalbeh, L. A., Hashish, S., & Tawalbeh, H. (2017). Quality of service requirements and challenges in generic WSN infrastructures. SCE, 109, 1116–1121.
17.
Arora, V. K., Sharma, V., & Sachdeva, M. (2018). On QoS evaluation for ZigBee incorporated wireless sensor network (IEEE 802.15.4) using mobile sensor nodes. Journal of King Saud University Computer and Information Sciences, 13, 1–9.
18.
Ahlwat, P., & Dave, M. (2018). An attack model based highly secure key management scheme for wireless sensor networks. ICSCC, 125, 201–207.
19.
Padmaja, P., & Marutheswar, G. V. (2018). Energy efficient data aggregation in wireless sensor networks. PMME, 5, 388–396.
20.
Snigth, I., & Gosain, D. (2016). Energy analysis for trajectory based sink mobility in WSN. IMCIP, 54, 118–126.
21.
Achour, A., Deru, L., & Deprez, J. C. (2018). Mobility management for wireless sensor networks a state-of-the-art. IUPT, 52, 1101–1107.
22.
Manikandan, S., & Chinadurai, M. (2021). Effective energy adaptive and consumption in wireless sensor network using distributed source coding and sampling techniques. Wireless Personal Communications, 118, 1393–1404.CrossRef
23.
Fei, Z., Li, B., Yang, S., Xing, C., Chen, H., & Hanzo, L. (2016). A survey of multi-objective optimization in wireless sensor networks: Metrics, algorithms and open problems. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 111, 1–38.
24.
Ebhota, V. C., & Srivasatva, V. M. (2021). Performance analysis of learning rate parameter on prediction of signal power loss for network optimization and better generalization. Wireless Personal Communications, 118, 1111–1128.CrossRef
25.
Li, H., & Lin, Z. (2018). Study on location of wireless sensor networks in P.Padmaja and G.V.Marutheswar. PMME, 5, 388–396.
26.
Maheshawri, M., & Karthika, R. A. (2021). A novel QoS based secure unequal clustering protocol with intrusion detection system in wireless sensor networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 118, 1535–1557.CrossRef
27.
Jiang, A., & Zheng, L. (2018). An effective hybrid routing algorithm in WSN: Ant colony optimization in combination with hop count minimization. MDPI, 28, 1–17.
28.
Kumar, R., & Venkatesh, I. (2018). SDN-based QOS-aware multipath routing mechanism using openstac. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 118(20), 357–364.
29.
Sendra, S., Parra, L., Lloret, J., & Khan, S. (2017). Systems and algorithms for wireless sensor networks based on animal and natural behavior. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 112, 1–19.
30.
Umamaheshwari, S. (2021). Hybrid optimization model for energy efficient cloud assisted wireless sensor network. Wireless Personal Communications, 118, 873–885.CrossRef
31.
Lavangya, N., & Shankar, T. (2017). Energy optimization in wireless sensor network using NSGA-II. ARPN, 12(23), 6698–6702.
32.
Maheshwari, P., Sharma, A. K., & Verma, K. (2021). Energy efficient cluster based routing protocol for WSN using butterfly optimization algorithm and ant colony optimization. Ad Hoc Networks, 110, 1–52.CrossRef
33.
Hammoudeh, M., & Newmanb, R. (2016). Adaptive routing in wireless sensor networks: QoS optimisation for enhanced application performance. Information Fusion, 113, 1–14.
34.
Reddy, D. L., Puttamadappa, C., & Suresh, H. N. (2021). Merged glowworm swarm with ant colony optimization for energy efficient clustering and routing in wireless sensor network. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 71, 13–38.CrossRef
35.
Yahiaoui, S., Omar, M., Bouabdallah, A., Natalizio, E., & Challal, Y. (2018). An energy efficient and QoS aware routing protocol for wireless sensor and actuator networks. International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 83, 193–203.CrossRef
36.
Hao, X., Yao, N., Wang, L., & Wang, J. (2020). Joint resource allocation algorithm based on multi-objective optimization for wireless sensor networks. Applied Soft Computing, 94, 1064–1070.CrossRef
37.
Magaiaa, N., Hortab, N., Nevesb, R., Pereira, P. R., & Correia, M. (2016). A multi-objective routing algorithm for wireless multimedia sensor networks. Applied Soft Computing, 145, 1–27.
38.
Ghosal, A., Halder, S., & Das, S. K. (2020). Distributed on-demand clustering algorithm for lifetime optimization in wireless sensor networks. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 141, 129–142.CrossRef
39.
Iqbal, M., Naeem, M., Anpalagan, A., Qadri, N. N., & Imran, M. (2016). Multi-objective optimization in sensor networks: Optimization classification, applications. Computer Networks, 2016, 1–30.
40.
Phoemphon, S., So-In, C., & Leelathakul, N. (2021). Improved distance estimation with node selection localization and particle swarm optimization for obstacle-aware wireless sensor networks. Expert Systems with Applications, 175, 47–73.CrossRef
41.
Jha, S. K., & Eyong, E. M. (2017). An energy optimization in wireless sensor networks by using genetic algorithm. Telecommunications Systems, 66, 31–39.
42.
Zhang, X., Lu, X., & Zhang, X. (2020). Mobile wireless sensor network lifetime maximization by using evolutionary computing methods. Ad Hoc Networks, 101, 94–102.CrossRef
43.
Li, X., Liu, A., Xie, M., Xiong, N. N., Zeng, Z., & Cai, Z. (2018). Adaptive aggregation routing to reduce delay for multi-layer wireless sensor networks. MDPI, 18, 1–28.
44.
Younus, M. U., Khan, M. K., Anjum, M. R., Afridi, S., Arain, Z. A., & Jamali, A. A. (2021). Optimizing the lifetime of software defined wireless sensor network via reinforcement learning. IEEE Access, 9, 259–272.CrossRef
45.
Zaki, M., Al, H., & Gunay, M. (2017). Lifetime maximization by partitioning approach in wireless sensor networks. Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 15, 1–29.
46.
Tsoumanis, G., Oikonomou, K., Aissa, S., & Stavrakakis, I. (2021). Energy and distance optimization in rechargeable wireless sensor networks. Green Communications and Networking, 5, 378–391.CrossRef
47.
Mehari, M. T., De Poorter, E., Couckuyt, I., Deschrijver, D., Vermeeren, G., Plets, D., Joseph, W., Martens, L., Dhaene, T., & Moerman, I. (2016). Efficient identification of a multi-objective pareto front on a wireless experimentation facility. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2016, 1–13.
48.
Kaur, T., & Kumar, D. (2021). MACO-QCR: Multi-objective ACO-based QoS-aware cross-layer routing protocols in WSN. IEEE Sensors Journal, 21, 6775–6783.CrossRef
49.
Prasad, D. R., Naganjaneyulu, P. V., & Prasad, K. S. (2016). Energy efficient clustering in multi-hop wireless sensor networks using differential evolutionary MOPSO. IJETT, 59, 1–15.
50.
Luo, C., Satpute, M. N., Li, D., Wang, Y., Chen, W., & Wu, W. (2021). Fine-grained trajectory optimization of multiple UAVs for efficient data gathering from WSNs. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 29, 162–175.
51.
Prusty, A. R., Sethib, S., & Nayakc, A. K. (2017). Multi-objective optimality in energy efficient routing for heterogeneous wireless ad hoc sensor network with clustering. IJIDT, 11, 61–70.
52.
Zhu, Y., Gong, S., Chi, K., Li, Y., & Fang, Y. (2021). Optimizing superframe and data buffer to achieve maximum throughput for 802.15.4-based energy harvesting wireless sensor networks. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 8, 3689–3704.CrossRef
53.
Sarkar, A., & Murugan, T. S. (2016). Routing protocols for wireless sensor networks: What the literature says? Alexandria Engineering Journal, 55, 3173–3183.CrossRef
54.
Rathee, M., Kumar, S., Gandomi, A. H., Dilip, K., Balusamy, B., & Patan, R. (2021). Ant colony optimization based quality of service aware energy balancing secure routing algorithm for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 68, 170–182.CrossRef
55.
Iqbal, M., Naeem, M., Anpalagan, A., Ahmed, A., & Azam, M. (2016). Wireless sensor network optimization: Multi-objective paradigm. MDPI, 16, 17573–17609.
56.
Srinivasan, R., & Kannan, E. (2018). Energy harvesting based efficient routing scheme for wireless sensor network. Wireless Personal Communications, 101, 1457–1468.CrossRef
57.
Tan, J., Liu, A., Zhao, M., Shen, H., & Ma, M. (2018). Cross-layer design for reducing delay and maximizing lifetime in industrial wireless sensor networks. Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2018, 1–26.
58.
Yang, Q., & Yoo, S. (2018). Optimal UAV path planning: Sensing data acquisition over IoT sensor networks using multi-objective bio-inspired algorithms. IJDCN, 118, 1–4.
59.
Xua, Y., Dinga, O., & Qub, R. (2018). Hybrid multi-objective evolutionary algorithms based on decomposition for wireless sensor network coverage optimization. Applied Soft Computing, 68, 268–282.CrossRef
60.
Chun Li, S., Wang, P., & Lu, M. (2016). Jointly optimized QoS-aware virtualization and routing in software defined networks. Computer Networks, 96, 69–78.CrossRef
61.
Yogarajan, G., & Revathi, T. (2017). Improved cluster based data gathering using ant lion optimization in wireless sensor networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 2017, 1–21.
62.
Kaur, S., & Mahajan, R. (2018). Hybrid meta-heuristic optimization based energy efficient protocol for wireless sensor networks. Egyptian Informatics Journal, 66, 1–6.
63.
Yang, T., Xiangyang, X., Peng, L., Tonghui, L., & Leina, P. (2018). A secure routing of wireless sensor networks based on trust evaluation model. ICICT, 131, 1156–1163.
64.
Ramluckun, N., & Bassoo, V. (2018). Energy-efficient chain-cluster based intelligent routing technique for wireless sensor networks. Applied Computing and Informatics, 66, 1–12.
65.
Xu, Y., Ding, O., Qu, R., & Li, K. (2018). Hybrid multi-objective evolutionary algorithms based on decomposition for wireless sensor network coverage optimization. Applied Soft Computing, 66, 1–30.
66.
Shahzad, F., Sheltami, T. R., & Shakshuki, E. M. (2016). Multi-objective optimization for a reliable localization scheme in wireless sensor networks. Journal Communications and Networks, 18(5), 796–805.CrossRef
67.
Alanis, D., Botsinis, P., Babar, Z., Nguyen, H. V., Chandra, D., Ng, S. X., Hanzo, L. (2018). Quantum-aided multi-objective routing optimization using back-tracing-aided dynamic programming. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2018, 1–5.
68.
Onthachi, D., & Jayabal, S. (2017). An optimized QoS-based multipath routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. IJIES, 11(2), 49–56.CrossRef
69.
Zhang, J., & Zhang, X. (2018). “A prototype”, adaptive wireless network multiobjective optimization algorithm based on image synthesis. AIES, 225, 1–23.
70.
Alwan, H., & Agarwal, A. (2017). MQoSR: A multiobjective QoS routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. ISRN Sensor Networks, 13, 1–3.
71.
Arya, R., & Sharma, S. C. (2016). Optimization approach for energy minimization and bandwidth estimation of WSN for data centric protocols. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 17, 1–15.
72.
Cao, B., Zhao, J., Yang, P., Lv, Z., Liu, X., & Min, G. (2018). 3D multi-objective deployment of an industrial wireless sensor network for maritime applications utilizing a distributed parallel algorithm. Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 66, 1–10.
73.
Céspedes-Mota, A., Castañón, G., Martínez-Herrera, A. F., & Cárdenas-Barrón, L. E. (2018). Multiobjective optimization for a wireless ad hoc sensor distribution on shaped-bounded areas. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2018, 1–23.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
74.
Ge, Y., Wang, S., & Ma, J. (2018). Optimization on TEEN routing protocol in cognitive wireless sensor network. Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2018, 1–9.
75.
Hajizadeh, N., Jahanbazi, P., & Javidan, R. (2018). Controlled deployment in wireless sensor networks based on a novel multi objective bee swarm optimization algorithm. CSIE, 66(1–7), 2018.
76.
Han, R., Gao, Y., & Wu, C. (2018). An effective multi-objective optimization algorithm for spectrum allocations in the cognitive-radio-based internet of things. Geneal of Latex Class File, 66, 1–10.
77.
Kang, Z., Zeng, H., & Hu, H. (2017). Multi-objective optimized connectivity restoring of disjoint segments using mobile data collectors in wireless sensor network. EURASIP, 117, 1–22.
78.
Khabiri, M., & Ghaffari, A. (2017). Energy-aware clustering-based routing in wireless sensor networks using cuckoo optimization algorithm. Wireless Personal Communications, 217, 1–23.
79.
Lozano-Garzona, C., Camelob, M., Vilab, P., & Donoso, Y. (2016). A multi-objective routing algorithm for wireless mesh network in a smart cities environment. Journal of Networks, 430, 60–69.
80.
Ma, X., Dong, H., Liu, X., Jia, L., Xie, G., & Bian, Z. (2018). An optimal communications protocol for maximizing lifetime of railway infrastructure wireless monitoring network. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 66, 1–11.
Metadaten
Titel
Multi-Objective Optimization in WSN: Opportunities and Challenges
verfasst von
Omkar Singh
Vinay Rishiwal
Rashmi Chaudhry
Mano Yadav
Publikationsdatum
28.06.2021
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Wireless Personal Communications / Ausgabe 1/2021
Print ISSN: 0929-6212
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-834X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-08627-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2021

Wireless Personal Communications 1/2021 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Theoretical and Complexity Analysis of FBMC

OriginalPaper

Pilot Assisted MIMO-OFDM-IM Design for Time-Varying Underwater Acoustic Communications

OriginalPaper

Ship Detection from Highly Cluttered Images Using Convolutional Neural Network

OriginalPaper

Split Ring Inspired Tri/Dual Band PIFA Antenna for Implantable Biomedical Devices

OriginalPaper

Mitigation of Malicious Flooding in Software Defined Networks Using Dynamic Access Control List

OriginalPaper

An Image Authentication and Tampered Detection Scheme Exploiting Local Binary Pattern Along with Hamming Error Correcting Code

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise