nach oben

Erschienen in:

2017 | Supplement | Buchkapitel

22. Non-performance of the Obligation

verfasst von : İlhan Helvacı

Erschienen in: Turkish Contract Law

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

If a debtor fails to perform an obligation, in principle, as long as the performance of the obligation is possible, the creditor may only demand and sue for specific performance of that obligation. If the court accepts a lawsuit filed by a creditor against a debtor for performance of an obligation, then two possibilities arise: (1) the debtor may comply with the court order, fulfil the obligation and thereby extinguish it or (2) the debtor may fail to obey the court order, and the obligation will remain unfulfilled. In the latter case, the creditor is entitled to enforce the court order according to the provisions of the Turkish Code of Bankruptcy and Enforcement.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Natural Obligations

Nächstes Kapitel Default of the Debtor

Aybay (2011), pp. 130–142; Becker (1941), Vorbemerkungen zu art. 97–109, art. 97–101; Berger (2012), pp. 503–541, 556–562, 607–616, 624–630, 689–692; Engel (1997), pp. 697–724; Eren (2015), pp. 1027–1089, 1128–1139; Feyzioğlu (1977), pp. 160–219; Gauch et al. (2008a), pp. 203–208; Gauch et al. (2008b), pp. 69–105, 137–185; Honsell et al. (2003), Einleitung zu art. 97–109, art. 97–101; Kılıçoğlu (2013), pp. 80–86, 636–672; Nomer (2015), pp. 307–333, 376–379; Oser and Schönenberger (1929), Vorbemerkungen zum zweiten Abschnitt (97–109), art. 97–101; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), pp. 366–455; Reisoğlu (2014), pp. 344–368; Schwenzer (2009), pp. 338–345, 439–461, 474–481; Serozan (2014), pp. 130–141, 198–215, 246–263, 278–301; Tekinay et al. (1993), pp. 851–911, 972–983; Tercier (2004), pp. 203–229; Tercier et al. (2016), pp. 353–398; Thévenoz and Werro (2012), Introduction aux articles 97–109 CO, art. 97–101; von Tuhr and Escher (1974), pp. 86–131, and von Tuhr and Peter (1979), pp. 192–193.

For further explanations see Başoğlu (2012).

Performance in kind, exécution en nature.

Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 371.

Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 374. For further explanations see Kuru (2016), pp. 412–414; Pekcanıtez et al. (2013), pp. 477–478.

Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 374. For further explanations see Oğuzman et al. (2016), pp. 407–408; Steinauer (2002), p. 61.

Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 374; Oğuzman and Öz (2016), p. 596.

See Chap. 16.

Kuru (2016), p. 421; Pekcanıtez et al. (2013), p. 484; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 375.

Tekinay et al. (1993), p. 921; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 375.

Kuru (2016), p. 421; Pekcanıtez et al. (2013), p. 484.

For further explanations see Aydıncık (2013).

Kuru (2016), pp. 421–422; Pekcanıtez et al. (2013), p. 484.

Tekinay et al. (1993), pp. 923–924; Eren (2015), p. 1034; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), pp. 377–378, pp. 428–429.

Eren (2015), p. 1034; Tekinay et al. (1993), p. 924; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 429.

The specific rules relating to the bankruptcy are reserved.

Pekcanıtez et al. (2013), pp. 476–477. For further explanations see Kuru (2016), pp. 400–404.

Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 373; Reisoğlu (2014), p. 347.

For further explanations see Kuru (2016), p. 107 ff; Pekcanıtez et al. (2013), p. 182 ff.

For further explanations see Gündoğdu (2014).

Impossibilium nulla obligatio est: No-one has a legal obligation to do the impossible or there is no obligation to perform an impossible act.

If the debtor is not responsible for the impossibility of the performance, then the debtor is released from his obligation (TCO art. 136). Cases in which the debtor is not responsible for the impossibility of performance will be analysed below under Sect. 25.5.

Oğuzman and Öz (2015), pp. 411–412; Oser and Schönenberger (1929), art. 99, N. 12, N. 13.

See Sect. 5.2.5.

See Sect. 25.5.1.

Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 372.

See Sect. 31.3.2.

Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 372.

See Sect. 23.4.2.

Compare to Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 375 and fn. 36 and pp. 426–427.

Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 371.

See Sect. 22.2.1.

See Sect. 22.2.2.

See Sect. 25.5.

Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 403.

See Sect. 22.4.

For further explanations see Tercier (2003), p. 239; Thévenoz and Werro (2012), art. 248, N. 9; Tandoğan (1990), p. 374; Yavuz (2014), p. 351.

For further explanations see Gözübüyük (1957).

Oğuzman and Öz (2015), pp. 403–405.

von Tuhr and Escher (1974), § 69, IV, p. 117; Becker (1941), art. 97, N. 58; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 412.

von Tuhr and Escher (1974), § 69, IV, p. 117; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 404.

von Tuhr and Escher (1974), § 69, VII, pp. 120–121; Engel (1997), p. 467; Thévenoz and Werro (2012), art. 43, N. 33, art. 103, N. 7.

Reisoğlu (2014), p. 359; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 405.

Tekinay et al. (1993), pp. 1002–1004; Feyzioğlu (1977), p. 226; Engel (1997), p. 468; Thévenoz and Werro (2012), art. 41, N. 46, art. 103, N. 7; von Tuhr and Escher (1974), § 69, VII, pp. 121–122.

Cf. Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 412.

Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 411.

For further explanations see Nomer (1996).

Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 390; Oser and Schönenberger (1929), art. 42, N. 3–7; Becker (1941), art. 42, N. 4–5.

Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 387; Becker (1941), art. 97, N. 34–45.

Becker (1941), art. 97, N. 34; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 387.

Becker (1941), art. 97, N. 37–39; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 387.

For further explanations see Genç Arıdemir (2008).

Becker (1941), art. 97, N. 26; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), pp. 388–389; Tekinay et al. (1993), p. 857; Reisoğlu (2014), p. 356.

For further explanations see Eren (1985).

Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 380.

Tekinay et al. (1993), p. 855; Eren (2015), p. 1069; Reisoğlu (2014), p. 361; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 425.

Tekinay et al. (1993), pp. 870–872; Eren (2015), p. 1064; Reisoğlu (2014), p. 361; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 425.

For further explanations see Baysal (2012); Altınok Ormancı (2016).

Reisoğlu (2014), p. 361; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 425.

Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 467.

See Sect. 22.1.

Oğuzman and Öz (2015), pp. 467–468.

See Sect. 22.2.3.

See Chap. 23.

For further explanations see Akman (1976), Başalp (2011).

The parties to a contract are also entitled to make an agreement in advance that restricts the debtor’s liability instead of excluding it. The rules concerning non-liability agreements are also applied to these kinds of agreements.

See Sect. 5.3.2.

Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 409.

Oser and Schönenberger (1929), art. 100, N. 5.

Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 410.

For further explanations see Şenocak (1995).

Eren (2015), p. 1079; Reisoğlu (2014), pp. 364–365; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 419.

von Tuhr and Escher (1974), § 70, I, 122; Tekinay et al. (1993), p. 892; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 413; Eren (2015), p. 1073; Feyzioğlu (1977), pp. 192–193.

von Tuhr and Escher (1974), § 70, II, 123; Becker (1941), art. 101, N. 9; Engel (1997), p. 740; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), pp. 414–415; Eren (2015), p. 1074.

Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 415; Reisoğlu (2014), p. 364.

Tekinay et al. (1993), p. 896; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 417; Reisoğlu (2014), p. 364.

Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 419.

Engel (1997), p. 742; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 419; Reisoğlu (2014), p. 365; Tekinay et al. (1993), p. 896; Eren (2015), p. 1079.

Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 420.

von Tuhr and Escher (1974), § 70, III, p. 129; Becker (1941), art. 101, N. 14; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 422; Serozan (2014), p. 286, Cf. Thévenoz and Werro (2012), art. 101, N. 25–30.

Engel (1997), p. 743; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 422; Nomer (2015), p. 312.

von Tuhr and Escher (1974), § 70, I, p. 122; Engel (1997), pp. 743–744; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 422; Nomer (2015), p. 312; Tercier et al. (2016), pp. 391–392.

Engel (1997), p. 744; Nomer (2015), p. 312.

Tekinay et al. (1993), pp. 899–900; Eren (2015), p. 1085; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 423; Reisoğlu (2014), pp. 366–367.

von Tuhr and Escher (1974), § 70, V, p. 130; Oser and Schönenberger (1929), art. 101, N. 13.

For further explanations see Yalman (2006).

See Sect. 1.10.

von Tuhr and Peter (1979), § 24, VII, p. 193.

Reisoğlu (2014), p. 345; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 38; Tercier (2004), p. 125.

Oğuzman and Öz (2015), pp. 39–40, Cf. Kocayusufpaşaoğlu (2014), pp. 10–11.

Kılıçoğlu (2013), pp. 85–86; Oser and Schönenberger (1929), art. 26, art. 39.

Schwenzer (2009), p. 345; Tekinay et al. (1993), pp. 205, 979; Eren (2015), pp. 1131–1132; Ergüne (2008), pp. 115–116; von Tuhr and Peter (1979), pp. 193, 318, 404; Serozan (2014), pp. 252–255.

There is a specific rule in BGB relating to pre-contractual liability (See BGB § 311 subs. 2, 3).

See Sect. 11.1.5.

See Sect. 13.3.

Akman GS (1976) Sorumsuzluk anlaşması. Sulhi garan matbaası, İstanbul

Altınok Ormancı P (2016) Zararı azaltma külfeti. On iki levha, İstanbul

Aybay A (2011) Borçlar hukuku dersleri genel bölüm. Filiz, İstanbul

Aydıncık Ş (2013) Yapma borçlarının ifa edilmemesi ve hukuki sonuçları özellikle tbk m. 113/I kapsamında nama ifa. Vedat, İstanbul

Başalp N (2011) Sorumsuzluk anlaşmaları. On iki levha, İstanbul

Başoğlu B (2012) Türk hukukunda ve mukayeseli hukukta aynen ifa talebi. On iki levha, İstanbul

Baysal B (2012) Zarar görenin kusuru (müterafik kusur). On iki levha, İstanbul

Becker H (1941) Kommentar zum Schweizerischen Zivilgesetzbuch, vol VI, Obligationenrecht, 1. Abteilung: Allgemeine Bestimmungen, Art. 1-183. Stämpfli, Bern

Berger B (2012) Allgemeines Schuldrecht. Stämpfli, Bern

Engel P (1997) Traité des obligations en droit Suisse. Stämpfli, Bern

Eren F (1985) Sorumluluk hukuku açısından uygun illiyet bağı teorisi. Ankara üniversitesi hukuk fakültesi, Ankara

Eren F (2015) Borçlar hukuku genel hükümler. Yetkin, Ankara

Ergüne MS (2008) Olumsuz zarar. Beta, İstanbul

Feyzioğlu FN (1977) Borçlar hukuku genel hükümler, vol 2. Fakülteler, İstanbul

Gauch P, Schluep WR, Emmenegger S (2008a) Schweizerisches Obligationenrecht, Allgemeiner Teil, vol 2. Schulthess, Zürich

Gauch P, Schluep WR, Schmid J (2008b) Schweizerisches Obligationenrecht, Allgemeiner Teil, vol 1. Schulthess, Zürich

Genç Arıdemir A (2008) Sözleşmeye aykırılıktan doğan manevi tazminat. On iki levha, İstanbul

Gözübüyük AP (1957) Hukuki mesuliyet bakımından mücbir sebepler ve beklenmeyen haller. Kazancı, Ankara

Gündoğdu F (2014) Borca aykırılık hallerinden kusurlu ifa imkânsızlığı ve hukuki sonuçları. On iki levha, İstanbul

Honsell H, Vogt NP, Wiegand W (eds) (2003) Basler Kommentar zum Schweizerischen Privatrecht, Obligationenrecht 1: Art. 1-529 OR. Helbing Lichtenhahn, Basel

Kocayusufpaşaoğlu N (2014) Borçlar hukuku genel bölüm, vol 1 (Kocayusufpaşaoğlu/Hatemi/Serozan/Arpacı). Filiz, İstanbul

Kılıçoğlu AM (2013) Borçlar hukuku genel hükümler. Turhan, İstanbul

Kuru B (2016) İstinaf sistemine göre yazılmış icra ve iflas hukuku. Legal, İstanbul

Nomer HN (1996) Haksız fiil sorumluluğunda maddi tazminatın belirlenmesi. Beta, İstanbul

Nomer HN (2015) Borçlar hukuku genel hükümler. Beta, İstanbul

Oğuzman K, Öz T (2015) Borçlar hukuku genel hükümler, vol 1. Vedat, İstanbul

Oğuzman K, Öz T (2016) Borçlar hukuku genel hükümler, vol 2. Vedat, İstanbul

Oğuzman K, Seliçi Ö, Oktay Özdemir S (2016) Eşya hukuku. Filiz, İstanbul

Oser H, Schönenberger W (1929) Kommentar zum Schweizerischen Zivilgesetzbuch, Volume V: Das Obligationenrecht, Erster Halbband: Art. 1-183. Schulthess, Zürich

Pekcanıtez H, Atalay O, Sungurtekin Özkan M, Özekes M (2013) İcra ve iflas hukuku. Yetkin, Ankara

Reisoğlu S (2014) Türk borçlar hukuku genel hükümler. Beta, İstanbul

Schwenzer I (2009) Schweizerisches Obligationenrecht, Allgemeiner Teil. Schulthess, Bern

Serozan R (2014) Borçlar hukuku genel bölüm, vol 3 (Kocayusufpaşaoğlu/Hatemi/Serozan/Arpacı). Filiz, İstanbul

Şenocak Z (1995) Borçlunun ifa yardımcılarından dolayı sorumluluğu. Dayınlarlı, Ankara

Steinauer PH (2002) Les droits réels, vol 2. Stämpfli, Bern

Tandoğan H (1990) Borçlar hukuku özel borç ilişkileri, vol I/1. Evrim, İstanbul

Tekinay SS, Akman S, Burcuoğlu H, Altop A (1993) Tekinay borçlar hukuku genel hükümler. Filiz, İstanbul

Tercier P (2004) Le droit des obligations. Schulthess, Zurich

Tercier P, Pichonnaz P, Develioğlu HM (2016) Borçlar hukuku genel hükümler. On iki levha, İstanbul

Tercier P (2003) Les contrats spéciaux. Schulthess, Zurich

Thévenoz L, Werro F (éd) (2012) Commentaire romand code des obligations 1: art. 1-529 CO. Helbing Lichtenhahn, Bâle

von Tuhr A, Escher A (1974) Allgemeiner Teil des Schweizerischen Obligationenrecht, vol 2. Schulthess, Zürich

von Tuhr A, Peter H (1979) Allgemeiner Teil des Schweizerischen Obligationenrecht, vol 1. Schulthess, Zürich

Yalman S (2006) Türk-İsviçre hukukunda sözleşme görüşmelerinden doğan sorumluluk. Seçkin, Ankara

Yavuz C (2014) Türk borçlar hukuku özel hükümler. Beta, İstanbul

Titel: Non-performance of the Obligation
verfasst von: İlhan Helvacı
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Turkish Contract Law
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60060-4

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-60061-1

Copyright-Jahr: 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60061-1_22

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner