Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Computational Mechanics
Erschienen in: Computational Mechanics 2/2014

01.08.2014 | Original Paper

NURBS- and T-spline-based isogeometric cohesive zone modeling of interface debonding

verfasst von: R. Dimitri, L. De Lorenzis, P. Wriggers, G. Zavarise

Erschienen in: Computational Mechanics | Ausgabe 2/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Cohesive zone (CZ) models have long been used by the scientific community to analyze the progressive damage of materials and interfaces. In these models, non-linear relationships between tractions and relative displacements are assumed, which dictate both the work of separation per unit fracture surface and the peak stress that has to be reached for the crack formation. This contribution deals with isogeometric CZ modeling of interface debonding. The interface is discretized with generalized contact elements which account for both contact and cohesive debonding within a unified framework. The formulation is suitable for non-matching discretizations of the interacting surfaces in presence of large deformations and large relative displacements. The isogeometric discretizations are based on non uniform rational B-splines as well as analysis-suitable T-splines enabling local refinement. Conventional Lagrange polynomial discretizations are also used for comparison purposes. Some numerical examples demonstrate that the proposed formulation based on isogeometric analysis is a computationally accurate and efficient technology to solve challenging interface debonding problems in 2D and 3D.
Vorheriger Artikel Quadratically consistent nodal integration for second order meshfree Galerkin methods
Nächster Artikel Finite element analysis of transient thermomechanical rolling contact using an efficient arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian description

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Alfano G, Crisfield MA (2001) Finite element interface models for the delamination analysis of laminated composites: mechanical and computational issues. Int J Numer Methods Eng 50:1701–1736CrossRefMATH
2.
Allix O, Ladevèze P (1992) Interlaminar interface modelling for the prediction of delamination. Compos Struct 22:235–242CrossRef
3.
Allix O, Ladevèze P, Corigliano A (1995) Damage analysis of interlaminar fracture specimens. Compos Struct 31(1):61–74CrossRef
4.
Allix O, Corigliano A (1999) Geometrical and interfacial non-linearities in the analysis of delamination in composites. Int J Solids Struct 36(15):2189–2216CrossRefMATH
5.
6.
7.
Barenblatt GI (1959) The formation of equilibrium cracks during brittle fracture. General ideas and hypotheses. Axially-symmetric cracks. J Appl Math Mech 23:622–636MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
8.
Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Cottrell JA, Evans JA, Hughes TJR, Lipton S, Scott MA, Sederberg TW (2010) Isogeometric analysis using T-splines. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199(5–8):229–263MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
9.
Bolzon G, Corigliano A (1997) A discrete formulation for elastic solids with damaging interfaces. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 140:329–359CrossRefMATH
10.
Borden MJ, Scott MA, Evans JA, Hughes TJR (2011) Isogeometric finite element data structures based on Bézier extraction of NURBS. Int J Numer Methods Eng 87:15–47MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
11.
Corigliano A (1993) Formulation, identication and use of interface models in the numerical analysis of composite delamination. Int J Solids Struct 30(20):2779–2811CrossRefMATH
12.
Cottrell JA, Hughes TJR, Bazilevs Y (2009) Isogeometric analysis: toward Integration of CAD and FEA. Wiley, New YorkCrossRef
13.
Crisfield MA, Alfano G (2002) Adaptive hierarchical enrichment for delamination fracture using a decohesive zone model. Int J Numer Methods Eng 54:1369–1390CrossRefMATH
14.
De Lorenzis L, Zavarise G (2009) Cohesive zone modeling of interfacial stresses in plated beams. Int J Solids Struct 46(24):4181–4191
15.
De Lorenzis L, Zavarise G (2009) Interfacial stress analysis and prediction of debonding for a thin plate bonded to a curved substrate. Int J Non-Linear Mech 44(4):358–370
16.
De Lorenzis L, Temizer İ, Wriggers P, Zavarise G (2011) A large deformation frictional contact formulation using NURBS-based isogeometric analysis. Int J Numer Methods Eng 87(13):1278–1300MATH
17.
De Lorenzis L, Wriggers P, Zavarise G (2012) A mortar formulation for 3D large deformation contact using NURBS-based isogeometric analysis and the augmented Lagrangian method. Comput Mech 49(1):1–20MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
18.
Deng J, Chen F, Li X, Hu C, Tong W, Yang Z, Feng Y (2008) Polynomial splines over hierarchical T-meshes. Graph Models 70:76–86CrossRef
19.
Dimitri R, De Lorenzis L, Scott MA, Wriggers P, Taylor RL, Zavarise G (2014) Isogeometric large deformation frictionless contact using T-splines. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 269:394–414CrossRefMATH
20.
Dokken T, Lyche T, Pettersen KF (2013) Polynomial splines over locally refined box-partitions. Comput Aided Geom Des 30(3):331–356MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
21.
Dörfel MR, Jüttler B, Simeon B (2010) Adaptive isogeometric analysis by local h-refinement with T-splines. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199:264–275CrossRefMATH
22.
Dugdale DS (1960) Yielding of steel sheets containing slits. J Mech Phys Solids 8:100–104CrossRef
23.
Fischer KA, Wriggers P (2005) Frictionless 2D contact formulations for finite deformations based on the mortar method. Comput Mech 36:226–244CrossRefMATH
24.
Guimatsia I, Ankersen JK, Davies GAO, Iannucci L (2009) Decohesion finite element with enriched basis functions for delamination. Compos Sci Technol 69(15–16):2616–2624CrossRef
25.
Hermes FH (2010) Process zone and cohesive element size in numerical simulations of delamination in bi-layers. MT 10.21, Eindhoven, September 24th, 2010
26.
Hughes TJR (1987) The finite element method. Linear static and dynamic finite element analysis. Prentice-hall, Englewood Cliffs
27.
Hughes TJR, Cottrell JA, Bazilevs Y (2005) Isogeometric analysis: CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry and mesh refinement. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 194:4135–4195MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
28.
Kiendl J, Bletzinger KU, Linhard J, Wüchner R (2009) Isogeometric shell analysis with Kirchhoff-Love elements. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198(49–52):3902–3914CrossRefMATH
29.
Laursen TA (2002) Computational contact and impact mechanics. Springer, BerlinMATH
30.
Lu J (2011) Isogeometric contact analysis: geometric basis and formulation for frictionless contact. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 200:726–740CrossRefMATH
31.
Matzen ME, Cichosz T, Bischoff M (2013) A point to segment contact formulation for isogeometric, NURBS based finite elements. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 255:27–39MathSciNetCrossRef
32.
Needleman A (1987) A continuum model for void nucleation by inclusion debonding. J Appl Mech 54:525–531CrossRefMATH
33.
Needleman A (1990) An analysis of tensile decohesion along an interface. J Mech Phys Solids 38(3):289–324CrossRef
34.
Nguyen-Thanh N, Nguyen-Xuan H, Bordas SP, Rabczuk T (2011) Isogeometric analysis using polynomial splines over hierarchical T-meshes for two-dimensional elastic solids. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 200(21–22):1892–1908MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
35.
Nguyen VP, Nguyen-Xuan H (2013) High-order B-splines based finite elements for delamination analysis of laminated composites. Compos Struct 102:261–275CrossRef
36.
Papadopoulos P, Jones RE, Solberg JM (1995) A novel finite element formulation for frictionless contact problems. Int J Numer Methods Eng 38:2603–2617MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
37.
Point N, Sacco E (1996) A delamination model for laminated composites. Int J Solids Struct 33(4):483–509CrossRefMATH
38.
Raju IS (1987) Calculation of strain-energy release rates with higher order and singular finite elements. Eng Fract Mech 28:251–274CrossRef
39.
Sauer R (2011) Enriched contact finite elements for stable peeling computations. Int J Numer Methods Eng 87:593–616CrossRefMATH
40.
Sauer RA, De Lorenzis L (2013) A computational contact formulation based on surface potentials. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 253:369–395CrossRef
41.
Samini M, van Dommelen JAW, Geers MGD (2009) An enriched cohesive zone model for delamination in brittle interfaces. Numer Methods Eng 80(5):609–630CrossRef
42.
Samini M, van Dommelen JAW, Geers MGD (2011) A self-adaptive finite element approach for simulation of mixed-mode delamination using cohesive zone models. Eng Fract Mech 78(10):2202–2219CrossRef
43.
Schellekens JCJ, de Borst R (1993) A non-linear finite element approach for the analysis of mode-I free edge delamination in composites. Int J Solids Struct 30:1239–1253CrossRefMATH
44.
Schillinger D, Ruess M, Zander N, Bazilevs Y, Düster A, Rank E (2012) Small and large deformation analysis with the p- and B-spline versions of the finite cell method. Comput Mech 50:445–478MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
45.
Scott MA, Borden MJ, Verhoosel CV, Sederberg TW, Hughes TJR (2011) Isogeometric finite element data structures based on Bézier extraction of T-splines. Numer Methods Eng 88(2):126–156MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
46.
Scott MA, Li X, Sederberg TW, Hughes TJR (2012) Local refinement of analysis-suitable T-splines. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 213–216:206–222MathSciNetCrossRef
47.
Sederberg TW, Zheng J, Bakenov A, Nasri A (2003) T-splines and T-NURCCSs. ACM Trans Graph 22(3):477–484
48.
Sederberg TW, Zheng J, Song X (2003) Knot intervals and multi-degree splines. Comput Aided Geom Des 20:455–468
49.
Sederberg TW, Cardon DL, Finnigan GT, North NS, Zheng J, Lyche T (2004) T-spline simplification and local refinement. ACM Trans Graph 23(3):276–283CrossRef
50.
Sederberg TW, Finnigan GT, Lin X, Ipson H (2008) Watertight trimmed NURBS, ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)—Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH, 27(3), Article No. 79, 2008
51.
52.
Temizer İ, Wriggers P, Hughes TJR (2011) Contact treatment in isogeometric analysis with NURBS. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 200(9–12):1100–1112MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
53.
Temizer İ, Wriggers P, Hughes TJR (2012) Three-dimensional mortar-based frictional contact treatment in isogeometric analysis with NURBS. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 209–212:115–128MathSciNetCrossRef
54.
Tvergaard V, Hutchinson JW (1992) The relation between crack growth resistance and fracture process parameters in elastic-plastic solids. J Mech Phys Solids 40(6):1377–1397CrossRefMATH
55.
Tvergaard V, Hutchinson JW (1993) The influence of plasticity on mixed mode interface toughness. J Mech Phys Solids 41(6):1119–1135CrossRefMATH
56.
Verhoosel CV, Scott MA, de Borst R, Hughes TJR (2011) An isogeometric approach to cohesive zone modeling. Int J Numer Meth Eng 87(1–5):336–360CrossRefMATH
57.
Vuong AV, Giannelli C, Jüttler B, Simeon B (2011) A hierarchical approach to adaptive local refinement in isogeometric analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 49–52:3554–3567CrossRef
58.
Wang W, Zhang Y, Scott MA, Hughes TJR (2011) Converting an unstructured quadrilateral mesh to a standard T-spline surface. Comput Mech 48(4):477–498MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
59.
Wei Y, Hutchinson JW (1998) Interface strength, work of adhesion and plasticity in the peel test. Int J Fract 93:315–333CrossRef
60.
61.
Zhang Y, Wang W, Hughes TJR (2012) Solid T-spline construction from boundary representations for genus-zero geometry. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 249–252:185–197MathSciNetCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
NURBS- and T-spline-based isogeometric cohesive zone modeling of interface debonding
verfasst von
R. Dimitri
L. De Lorenzis
P. Wriggers
G. Zavarise
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2014
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Computational Mechanics / Ausgabe 2/2014
Print ISSN: 0178-7675
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0924
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-014-0991-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2014

Computational Mechanics 2/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Original Paper

Direct finite element computation of non-linear modal coupling coefficients for reduced-order shell models

Original Paper

A two-scale approach for trabecular bone microstructure modeling based on computational homogenization procedure

Original Paper

Adaptive combined DE/FE algorithm for brittle fracture of plane stress problems

Original Paper

Computational homogenization of diffusion in three-phase mesoscale concrete

Original Paper

Energy-consistent time integration for nonlinear viscoelasticity

Original Paper

Sequentially-coupled space–time FSI analysis of bio-inspired flapping-wing aerodynamics of an MAV

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise