Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Theory and Decision 2/2018

06.11.2017

On nonexistence of reconsideration-proof equilibrium with state variables

verfasst von: Wataru Nozawa

Erschienen in: Theory and Decision | Ausgabe 2/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Reconsideration-proofness is a solution concept proposed by Kocherlakota (Games Econ Behav 15(1):33–54, 1996) for infinite horizon single-player problems in which time inconsistency is important. Kocherlakota’s (1996) definition has a limitation: it is not applicable to environments with state variables. The limitation is important because many time-inconsistent problems have state variables. This paper displays a natural generalization of reconsideration-proofness to environments with state variables, and shows that it leads to nonexistence in three examples. Such nonexistence contrasts with the general existence theorem obtained in environments without state variables in Kocherlakota (1996). In the first two examples, existence can be recovered with a modification in the solution concept. In the last example, nonexistence occurs even with the modified solution concept. Insights about further research are derived from these nonexistence results.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
The environment in Kocherlakota (1996) is more general than the environment without state variables in this paper in a sense, and the existence is proved for the more general environment. See Kocherlakota (1996) for more details.
 
2
Here, any strategy is SP because the current period action does not affect the utility.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Abreu, D., Pearce, D., Stacchetti, E. (1990). Toward a theory of discounted repeated games with imperfect monitoring. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1041–1063 Abreu, D., Pearce, D., Stacchetti, E. (1990). Toward a theory of discounted repeated games with imperfect monitoring. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1041–1063
Zurück zum Zitat Ales, L., & Sleet, C. (2014). Revision proofness. Journal of Economic Theory, 152, 324–355.CrossRef Ales, L., & Sleet, C. (2014). Revision proofness. Journal of Economic Theory, 152, 324–355.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Asheim, G. B. (1997). Individual and collective time-consistency. The Review of Economic Studies, 64(3), 427–443.CrossRef Asheim, G. B. (1997). Individual and collective time-consistency. The Review of Economic Studies, 64(3), 427–443.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Klein, P., Krusell, P., & Rios-Rull, J. V. (2008). Time-consistent public policy. The Review of Economic Studies, 75(3), 789–808.CrossRef Klein, P., Krusell, P., & Rios-Rull, J. V. (2008). Time-consistent public policy. The Review of Economic Studies, 75(3), 789–808.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kocherlakota, N. R. (1996). Reconsideration-proofness: A refinement for infinite horizon time inconsistency. Games and Economic Behavior, 15(1), 33–54.CrossRef Kocherlakota, N. R. (1996). Reconsideration-proofness: A refinement for infinite horizon time inconsistency. Games and Economic Behavior, 15(1), 33–54.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Krusell, P., Smith, A. (2008). Consumption-savings decisions with quasi-geometric discounting: the case with a discrete domain Working paper Krusell, P., Smith, A. (2008). Consumption-savings decisions with quasi-geometric discounting: the case with a discrete domain Working paper
Zurück zum Zitat Kydland, F.E., Prescott, E.C. (1977). Rules rather than discretion: The inconsistency of optimal plans. The Journal of Political Economy, 473–491 Kydland, F.E., Prescott, E.C. (1977). Rules rather than discretion: The inconsistency of optimal plans. The Journal of Political Economy, 473–491
Zurück zum Zitat Laibson, D. (1994). Self-control and saving. unpublished, Harvard University May Laibson, D. (1994). Self-control and saving. unpublished, Harvard University May
Zurück zum Zitat Strotz, R.H. (1955). Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. The Review of Economic Studies, 165–180 Strotz, R.H. (1955). Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. The Review of Economic Studies, 165–180
Metadaten
Titel
On nonexistence of reconsideration-proof equilibrium with state variables
verfasst von
Wataru Nozawa
Publikationsdatum
06.11.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Theory and Decision / Ausgabe 2/2018
Print ISSN: 0040-5833
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7187
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-017-9637-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2018

Theory and Decision 2/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner