Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Theory and Decision 2/2018

17.07.2017

Two simple characterizations of the Nash bargaining solution

verfasst von: Osamu Mori

Erschienen in: Theory and Decision | Ausgabe 2/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

We provide two alternative characterizations of the Nash bargaining solution. We introduce new simple axioms, strong undominatedness by the disagreement point, and egalitarian Pareto optimality. First, we prove that the Nash solution is characterized by symmetry, scale invariance, independence of irrelevant alternatives, and strong undominatedness by the disagreement point. Second, we replace the independence of irrelevant alternatives axiom with the sandwich axiom (Rachmilevitch in Theory Decis 80:427–442, 2016) and egalitarian Pareto optimality. We then demonstrate that the Nash solution is characterized by symmetry, scale invariance, strong undominatedness by the disagreement point, the sandwich axiom, and egalitarian Pareto optimality.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
For other characterizations that do not use weak Pareto optimality, see Anbarci (1998), de Clippel (2007), and Rachmilevitch (2016).
 
2
See, for example Mariotti (2000).
 
3
Although we deal with the two-person case throughout, all arguments in this paper work in the more-than-two-person case.
 
4
For \(s,r\in \mathbb {R}^{2}, s \ge r \) if \(s_{i }\ge r_{i}\) for each i , \(s > r\) if \(s_{i }\ge r_{i}\) for each i and \(s \ne r\), and \(s\gg r\) if \(s_{i }>r_{i}\) for each i.
 
5
We say that x is weakly dominated by y if \(x< y\) for \(x,y\in \mathbb {R}^{2}\).
 
6
I appreciate an anonymous reviewer’s comment.
 
7
Lemma 1 is analogous to Lemma 2 in Vartiainen (2007), which has been provided to characterize the extended Nash solution determining a solution and a reference point simultaneously.
 
8
If there was a point \(r \in \mathbb {R}^{2}\), such that \(r_{1}+r_{2 }>2\), then the convex combination of r and N(S, 0) contains a point \(u \in S\), such that \(u_{1}u_{2 }>\)1. That is a contradiction. See Nash (1950).
 
9
See Kalai and Smorodinsky (1975).
 
10
Rachmilevitch (2016) has provided a characterization of the Nash solution using the sandwich axiom (Theorem 1).
 
11
The interpretation is based on Rachmilevitch (2016).
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Anbarci, N. (1998). Simple characterizations of the Nash and Kalai Smorodinsky solutions. Theory and Decision, 45, 255–261.CrossRef Anbarci, N. (1998). Simple characterizations of the Nash and Kalai Smorodinsky solutions. Theory and Decision, 45, 255–261.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Anbarci, N., & Sun, C. (2011). Weakest collective rationality and the Nash bargaining solution. Social Choice and Welfare, 37, 425–429.CrossRef Anbarci, N., & Sun, C. (2011). Weakest collective rationality and the Nash bargaining solution. Social Choice and Welfare, 37, 425–429.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat de Clippel, G. (2007). An axiomatization of the Nash bargaining solution. Social Choice and Welfare, 29, 201–210.CrossRef de Clippel, G. (2007). An axiomatization of the Nash bargaining solution. Social Choice and Welfare, 29, 201–210.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kalai, E., & Smorodinsky, M. (1975). Other solutions to Nash’s bargaining problem. Econometrica, 43, 513–518.CrossRef Kalai, E., & Smorodinsky, M. (1975). Other solutions to Nash’s bargaining problem. Econometrica, 43, 513–518.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mariotti, M. (2000). Maximal symmetry and the Nash solution. Social Choice and Welfare, 17, 45–53.CrossRef Mariotti, M. (2000). Maximal symmetry and the Nash solution. Social Choice and Welfare, 17, 45–53.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nash, J. F. (1950). The bargaining problem. Econometrica, 18, 155–162.CrossRef Nash, J. F. (1950). The bargaining problem. Econometrica, 18, 155–162.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rachmilevitch, S. (2016). Egalitarian–utilitarian bounds in Nash’s bargaining problem. Theory and Decision, 80, 427–442.CrossRef Rachmilevitch, S. (2016). Egalitarian–utilitarian bounds in Nash’s bargaining problem. Theory and Decision, 80, 427–442.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Roth, A. E. (1977). Individual rationality and Nash’s solution to the bargaining problem. Mathematics of Operations Research, 2, 64–65.CrossRef Roth, A. E. (1977). Individual rationality and Nash’s solution to the bargaining problem. Mathematics of Operations Research, 2, 64–65.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Vartiainen, H. (2007). Collective choice with endogenous reference outcome. Games and Economic Behavior, 58, 172–180.CrossRef Vartiainen, H. (2007). Collective choice with endogenous reference outcome. Games and Economic Behavior, 58, 172–180.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Two simple characterizations of the Nash bargaining solution
verfasst von
Osamu Mori
Publikationsdatum
17.07.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Theory and Decision / Ausgabe 2/2018
Print ISSN: 0040-5833
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7187
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-017-9624-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2018

Theory and Decision 2/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner