nach oben

Water Resources Management

Erschienen in:

01.09.2016

Optimized River Stream-Flow Forecasting Model Utilizing High-Order Response Surface Method

verfasst von: Behrooz Keshtegar, Mohammed Falah Allawi, Haitham Abdulmohsin Afan, Ahmed El-Shafie

Erschienen in: Water Resources Management | Ausgabe 11/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Accurate and reliable stream-flow forecasting has a key role in water resources planning and management. Most recently, soft computing approaches have become progressively prevalent in modelling hydrological variables and most specifically stream-flows. This is due to their ability to capture the non-linearity and non-stationarity characteristics of the hydrological variables with minimum information requirements. Despite this, they present several challenges in the modelling architecture, as there is a need to establish a suitable pre-processing method for the stream-flow data and an appropriate optimization model has to be integrated in order re-adjust the weights and biases associated with the model structure. On top of that, artificial intelligent models require “trial and error” procedures in order to be properly tuned (number of hidden layers, number of neurons within the hidden layers and the type of the transfer function). However, soft computing approach experienced several problems while calibration such as over-fitting. In this research, the Response Surface Method (RSM) is improved based on high-order polynomial functions for forecasting the river stream-flow namely; High-Order Response Surface (HORS) method. Several higher orders have been examined, second, third, fourth and fifth polynomial functions in order to figure out the best fit that able to mimic the pattern of stream-flow. In order to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed model, monthly stream-flow time series data located in Aswan High Dam (AHD) has been examined. A detailed analysis of the overall statistical indicators revealed that the proposed method showed outstanding performance for monthly stream-flow forecasting at AHD. It could be concluded that the fifth order polynomial function outperforms the other orders of the polynomial functions especially with May model who achieved minimum MAE 0.12, NRMSE 0.07, MSE 0.03 and maximum SF and R² (0.97, 0.99) respectively.

Vorheriger Artikel Analysis of Spatio-temporal Characteristics and Regional Frequency of Droughts in the Southern Peninsula of India

Nächster Artikel A Species-Specific and spatially-Explicit Model for Estimating Vegetation Water Requirements in Desert Riparian Forest Zones

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Afan HA, El-Shafie A, Yaseen ZM et al (2015) ANN based sediment prediction model utilizing different input scenarios. Water Resour Manag 29:1231–1245. doi:10.1007/s11269-014-0870-1 CrossRef

Amr H, El-Shafie A, El Mazoghi H, Shehata A (2011) Artificial neural network technique for rainfall forecasting applied to Alexandria, Egypt. Int J Phys Sci 6:1306–1316

Box GEP, Jenkins GM (1970) Time series analysis, forecasting and control, 1st edn. Holden-Day, San Francisco

Cervarolo G, Mendicino G, Senatore A (2012) Re-modulating water allocation in a complex multi-reservoir system under current and climate change scenarios. Eur Water 37:47–57

Ch S, Anand N, Panigrahi BK, Mathur S (2013) Streamflow forecasting by SVM with quantum behaved particle swarm optimization. Neurocomputing 101:18–23. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2012.07.017 CrossRef

Clark MP, Rupp DE, Woods RA et al (2008) Hydrological data assimilation with the ensemble Kalman filter: use of streamflow observations to update states in a distributed hydrological model. Adv Water Resour 31:1309–1324. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.06.005 CrossRef

Danandeh Mehr A, Kahya E, Bagheri F, Deliktas E (2013) Successive-station monthly streamflow prediction using neuro-wavelet technique. Earth Sci Inf 1–13. doi: 10.1007/s12145-013-0141-3

El-Shafie A, Abdin AE, Noureldin A, Taha MR (2009) Enhancing inflow forecasting model at Aswan high dam utilizing radial basis neural network and upstream monitoring stations measurements. Water Resour Manag 23:2289–2315. doi:10.1007/s11269-008-9382-1 CrossRef

El-Shafie A, Noureldin A, Taha M et al (2012) Dynamic versus static neural network model for rainfall forecasting at Klang River Basin, Malaysia. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16:1151–1169. doi:10.5194/hess-16-1151-2012 CrossRef

Graves D, Pedrycz W (2009) Fuzzy prediction architecture using recurrent neural networks. Neurocomputing 72:1668–1678. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2008.07.009 CrossRef

Guo J, Zhou J, Qin H et al (2011) Monthly streamflow forecasting based on improved support vector machine model. Expert Syst Appl 38:13073–13081. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.114 CrossRef

Heddam S (2016) Secchi disk depth estimation from water quality parameters: artificial neural network versus multiple linear regression models? Environ Process. doi:10.1007/s40710-016-0144-4

Heddam S, Lamda H, Filali S (2016) Predicting effluent biochemical oxygen demand in a wastewater treatment plant using generalized regression neural network based approach: a comparative study. Environ Process 3:153–165. doi:10.1007/s40710-016-0129-3 CrossRef

Hipni A, El-shafie A, Najah A et al (2013) Daily forecasting of dam water levels: comparing a Support Vector Machine (SVM) model with Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS). Water Resour Manag 27:3803–3823. doi:10.1007/s11269-013-0382-4 CrossRef

Husain T (1985) Kalman filter estimation model in flood forecasting. Adv Water Resour 8:15–21. doi:10.1016/0309-1708(85)90075-2 CrossRef

Kagoda PA, Ndiritu J, Ntuli C, Mwaka B (2010) Application of radial basis function neural networks to short-term streamflow forecasting. Phys Chem Earth 35:571–581. doi:10.1016/j.pce.2010.07.021 CrossRef

Kalman RE et al (1960) A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. J Basic Eng 82:35–45. doi:10.1115/1.3662552 CrossRef

Katambara Z, Ndiritu JG (2010) A hybrid conceptual-fuzzy inference streamflow modelling for the Letaba River system in South Africa. Phys Chem Earth 35:582–595. doi:10.1016/j.pce.2010.07.032 CrossRef

Keshtegar B, Miri M (2014) Reliability analysis of corroded pipes using conjugate HL–RF algorithm based on average shear stress yield criterion. Eng Fail Anal 46:104–117CrossRef

Keshtegar B, Piri J, Kisi O (2016) A nonlinear mathematical modeling of daily pan evaporation based on conjugate gradient method. Comput Electron Agric. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2016.05.018

Kisi O (2010) Wavelet regression model for short-term streamflow forecasting. J Hydrol 389:344–353. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.06.013 CrossRef

Kontos YN, Katsifarakis KL (2012) Optimization of management of polluted fractured aquifers using genetic algorithms. Eur Water 40:31–42

Labat D (2005) Recent advances in wavelet analyses: part 1. A review of concepts. J Hydrol 314:275–288. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.04.003 CrossRef

Liu Z, Zhou P, Chen G, Guo L (2014) Evaluating a coupled discrete wavelet transform and support vector regression for daily and monthly streamflow forecasting. J Hydrol. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.06.050

Maier HR, Dandy GC (2000) Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: a review of modelling issues and applications. Environ Model Software 15:101–124CrossRef

Maier HR, Morgan N, Chow CWK (2004) Use of artificial neural networks for predicting optimal alum doses and treated water quality parameters. Environ Model Software 19:485–494. doi:10.1016/S1364-8152(03)00163-4 CrossRef

Maier HR, Kapelan Z, Kasprzyk J et al (2014) Evolutionary algorithms and other metaheuristics in water resources: current status, research challenges and future directions. Environ Model Software 62:271–299. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.09.013 CrossRef

Michas S (2014) Applications of hydroinformatics in municipal water systems. Water Util J 8:87–91

Moradkhani H, Sorooshian S, Gupta HV, Houser PR (2005) Dual state-parameter estimation of hydrological models using ensemble Kalman filter. Adv Water Resour 28:135–147. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2004.09.002 CrossRef

Nourani V, Hosseini Baghanam A, Adamowski J, Kisi O (2014) Applications of hybrid wavelet-artificial Intelligence models in hydrology: a review. J Hydrol 514:358–377. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.03.057 CrossRef

Noureldin A, El-Shafie A, Bayoumi M (2011) GPS/INS integration utilizing dynamic neural networks for vehicular navigation. Inf Fusion 12:48–57. doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2010.01.003 CrossRef

Sang Y-F (2013) A review on the applications of wavelet transform in hydrology time series analysis. Atmos Res 122:8–15. doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.11.003 CrossRef

Sanikhani H, Kisi O (2012) River flow estimation and forecasting by using two different adaptive neuro-fuzzy approaches. Water Resour Manag 26:1715–1729. doi:10.1007/s11269-012-9982-7 CrossRef

Schreider SY, Young P, Jakeman A (2001) An application of the Kalman filtering technique for streamflow forecasting in the Upper Murray Basin. Math Comput Model 33:733–743CrossRef

Singh VP, Cui H (2015) Entropy theory for streamflow forecasting. Environ Process 2:449–460. doi:10.1007/s40710-015-0080-8 CrossRef

Spiliotis M (2014) A Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) heuristic for water distribution system analysis. Water Util J 8:47–56

Terzi Ö, Ergin G (2014) Forecasting of monthly river flow with autoregressive modeling and data-driven techniques. Neural Comput Applic 25:179–188. doi:10.1007/s00521-013-1469-9 CrossRef

Tigkas D, Christelis V, Tsakiris G (2016) Comparative study of evolutionary algorithms for the automatic calibration of the Medbasin-D conceptual hydrological model. Environ Process. doi:10.1007/s40710-016-0147-1

Valipour M (2015) Long-term runoff study using SARIMA and ARIMA models in the United States. Meteorol Appl. doi:10.1002/met.1491

Valipour M, Banihabib M, Behbahani S (2012) Monthly inflow forecasting using autoregressive artificial neural network. J Appl Sci 12:2139–2147CrossRef

Wu JS, Han J, Annambhotla S, Bryant S (2005) Artificial neural networks for forecasting watershed runoff and stream flows. J Hydrol Eng 10:216–222CrossRef

Wu CL, Chau KW, Li YS (2009) Predicting monthly streamflow using data-driven models coupled with data-preprocessing techniques. Water Resour Res 45:1–23. doi:10.1029/2007WR006737 CrossRef

Zhong H, Van Overloop PJATM, Van Gelder PHAJM, Tian X (2013) The effect of four new floodgates on the flood frequency in the Dutch lower Rhine delta. European Water Resources Association (EWRA)

Titel: Optimized River Stream-Flow Forecasting Model Utilizing High-Order Response Surface Method
verfasst von: Behrooz Keshtegar
Mohammed Falah Allawi
Haitham Abdulmohsin Afan
Ahmed El-Shafie
Publikationsdatum: 01.09.2016
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Water Resources Management / Ausgabe 11/2016
Print ISSN: 0920-4741
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1650
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1397-4

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2016

Analysis of Changes in Spatial Pattern of Drought Using RDI Index in south of Iran

Enhancing Knowledge in Water Distribution Networks via Data Assimilation

A Species-Specific and spatially-Explicit Model for Estimating Vegetation Water Requirements in Desert Riparian Forest Zones

Daily Reference Evapotranspiration for Hyper-Arid to Moist Sub-Humid Climates in Inner Mongolia, China: I. Assessing Temperature Methods and Spatial Variability

Optimization of Osmotic Desalination Plants for Water Supply Networks

River Stage Forecasting Using Wavelet Packet Decomposition and Machine Learning Models