nach oben

Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance

Erschienen in:

09.01.2023 | Technical Article

Performance of ZnO-Incorporated Hydroxyapatite/Polymethyl Methacrylate Tri-Component Composite Bone Scaffolds Fabricated from Varying Sources of Hydroxyapatite

verfasst von: Emon Barua, Apurba Das, Ashish B. Deoghare, D. Pamu, Payel Deb, Sumit Das Lala, Sushovan Chatterjee

Erschienen in: Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance | Ausgabe 21/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Considering the popularity of hydroxyapatite (HA)-based scaffolds and the varied sources of HA synthesis, their impact on the properties of the developed scaffolds needs to be properly explored. Moreover, conventional gas foaming process yields scaffolds with excellent pore morphology, but with closed pores which are inadequate for efficient osteoinduction. To address these issues, porous hydroxyapatite (HA)/polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA)/zinc oxide (ZnO)-based tri-component composite scaffolds are fabricated by a novel modified gas foaming process from both chemically synthesized HA and natural HA derived from galline and bovine bone bio-wastes. The role of the varying sources of HA on the physico-chemical, mechanical and biological properties of the developed scaffolds is investigated. For this purpose, the scaffolds developed by maintaining a constant composition of HA and PMMA at 70:30 (w/w) and ZnO at 5 wt.% are characterized. The developed scaffolds show stability in their chemical properties and interconnected macro-porous network with a maximum porosity of 81.93 ± 1.2%, average pore size of 149 ± 5 μm and maximum hydraulic permeability of (2.36 ± 0.09) × 103 µm² for synthetic HA-based scaffolds. A maximum compressive strength, hardness and cell viability of 16.70 ± 0.6 MPa, 32.4 ± 0.9 HD and 98 ± 3.2%, respectively, and maximum protein adsorption are recorded for bovine bone-derived HA-based scaffolds. All the scaffolds are found to be bioactive in nature, while galline bone-derived HA-based scaffolds show maximum biodegradation with 8.1 ± 0.15% weight loss in SBF. The results obtained indicate that apart from the porosity and permeability, synthetic HA-based scaffolds reveal poor chemical, mechanical and biological properties compared to natural HA-based scaffolds. The study concludes that the properties of a composite scaffold rely significantly on the parent material (HA). Based on the extensive comparative investigation, bovine bone-derived HA-based composite scaffold is found to have improved properties for growth and proliferation of bone cells.

Vorheriger Artikel Effects of Shallow and Deep Cryogenic Treatment on Tool Flank Wear and Surface Roughness in Machining 41Cr4 Steel

Nächster Artikel Two-Way Shape Memory Effect and Viscoelastic Properties in NiTiHf Polycrystals Containing Nanosized Particles

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

S.K. Swain and S. Bhattacharyya, Preparation of High Strength Macroporous Hydroxyapatite Scaffold, Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 2013, 33(1), p 67–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2012.08.006CrossRef

S. Alonso-Sierra, R. Velázquez-Castillo, B. Millán-Malo, R. Nava, L. Bucio, A. Manzano-Ramírez, H. Cid-Luna and E.M. Rivera-Muñoz, Interconnected Porosity Analysis by 3D X-ray Microtomography and Mechanical Behavior of Biomimetic Organic-Inorganic Composite Materials, Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 2017, 80, p 45–53.CrossRef

I. Sabree, J.E. Gough and B. Derby, Mechanical Properties of Porous Ceramic Scaffolds: Influence of Internal Dimensions, Ceram. Int., 2015, 41(7), p 8425–8432.CrossRef

S. Li, J.R. De Wijn, J. Li, P. Layrolle and K. De Groot, Macroporous Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Scaffold with High Permeability/Porosity Ratio, Tissue Eng., 2003, 9(3), p 535–548.CrossRef

K. Zhang, Y. Fan, N. Dunne and X. Li, Effect of Microporosity on Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering, Regen. Biomater., 2018, 5, p 115–124.CrossRef

E. Barua, A. Das, D. Pamu, A.B. Deoghare, P. Deb, S. Das and S. Chatterjee, Effect of Thermal Treatment on the Physico-Chemical Properties of Bioactive Hydroxyapatite Derived from Caprine Bone Bio-Waste, Ceram. Int., 2019, 45, p 23265–23265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.08.023CrossRef

A. Das, A.K. Chikkala, G.P. Bharti, R.R. Behera, R.S. Mamilla, A. Khare and P. Dobbidi, Effect of Thickness on Optical and Microwave Dielectric Properties of Hydroxyapatite Films Deposited by RF Magnetron Sputtering, J. Alloys Compd., 2018, 739, p 729–736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.12.293CrossRef

P. Deb, E. Barua, A.B. Deoghare and S. Das Lala, Development of Bone Scaffold Using Puntius Conchonius Fish Scale Derived Hydroxyapatite: Physico-Mechanical and Bioactivity Evaluations, Ceram. Int., 2019, 45, p 10004–10012.CrossRef

P. Deb and A.B. Deoghare, Effect of Acid, Alkali and Alkali-Acid Treatment on Physicochemical and Bioactive Properties of Hydroxyapatite Derived from Catla Catla Fish Scales, Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 2019, 44, p 7479–7490.CrossRef

10.

C.E. Tanase, M.I. Popa and L. Verestiuc, Biomimetic Bone Scaffolds Based on Chitosan and Calcium Phosphates, Mater. Lett., 2011, 65(11), p 1681–1683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2011.02.077CrossRef

11.

J. Aerssens, S. Boonen, G. Lowet and J. Dequeker, Interspecies Differences in Bone Composition, Density, and Quality: Potential Implications for In Vivo Bone Research, Endocrinology, 1998, 139(2), p 663–670.CrossRef

12.

V.S. Kattimani, S. Kondaka and K.P. Lingamaneni, Hydroxyapatite—Past, Present, and Future in Bone Regeneration, Bone Tissue Regen. Insights, 2016, 7, p BTRI.S36138.CrossRef

13.

G. Radha, S. Balakumar, B. Venkatesan and E. Vellaichamy, A Novel Nano-Hydroxyapatite—PMMA Hybrid Scaffolds Adopted by Conjugated Thermal Induced Phase Separation (TIPS) and Wet-Chemical Approach: Analysis of Its Mechanical and Biological Properties, Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 2017, 73, p 164–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.12.133CrossRef

14.

Y. Sa, F. Yang, J.R. De Wijn, Y. Wang, J.G.C. Wolke and J.A. Jansen, Physicochemical Properties and Mineralization Assessment of Porous Polymethylmethacrylate Cement Loaded with Hydroxyapatite in Simulated Body Fluid, Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 2016, 61, p 190–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.12.040CrossRef

15.

M.S. Gezaz, S.M. Aref and M. Khatamian, Investigation of Structural Properties of Hydroxyapatite/Zinc Oxide Nanocomposites; an Alternative Candidate for Replacement in Recovery of Bones in Load-Tolerating Areas, Mater. Chem. Phys., 2019, 226, p 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.01.005CrossRef

16.

F. Geng, L. Tan, B. Zhang, C. Wu, Y. He, J. Yang and K. Yang, Study on Beta-TCP Coated Porous Mg as a Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffold Material, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2009, 25(1), p 123–129.

17.

M.A. Lopez-Heredia, J. Sohier, C. Gaillard, S. Quillard, M. Dorget and P. Layrolle, Rapid Prototyped Porous Titanium Coated with Calcium Phosphate as a Scaffold for Bone Tissue Engineering, Biomaterials, 2008, 29(17), p 2608–2615.CrossRef

18.

E. Barua, A.B. Deoghare, S. Chatterjee and P. Sapkal, Effect of ZnO Reinforcement on the Compressive Properties, In Vitro Bioactivity, Biodegradability and Cytocompatibility of Bone Sca Ff Old Developed from Bovine Bone-Derived HAp and PMMA, Ceram. Int., 2019, 45(16), p 20331–20345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.07.006CrossRef

19.

E. Barua, A.B. Deoghare, S. Chatterjee and V.R. Mate, Characterization of Mechanical and Micro-Architectural Properties of Porous Hydroxyapatite Bone Scaffold Using Green MicroAlgae as Binder, Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 2019, 44, p 7707–7722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-019-03877-9CrossRef

20.

E. Barua, A.B. Deoghare, P. Deb, S. Das Lala and S. Chatterjee, Effect of Pre-Treatment and Calcination Process on Micro-Structural and Physico-Chemical Properties of Hydroxyapatite Derived from Chicken Bone Bio-Waste, Mater. Today Proc., 2019, 15, p 188–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.04.191CrossRef

21.

P. Scherrer, Bestimmung Der Grosse Und Der Inneren Struktur von Kolloidteilchen Mittels Rontgenstrahlen, Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften, Gottingen Math Klasse, Phys, 1918, 2, p 98–100.

22.

T. Kokubo and H. Takadama, How Useful is SBF in Predicting In Vivo Bone Bioactivity?, Biomaterials, 2006, 27, p 2907–2915.CrossRef

23.

F. Ghorbani, A. Zamanian and H. Nojehdehian, Effects of Pore Orientation on In-Vitro Properties of Retinoic Acid-Loaded PLGA/Gelatin Scaffolds for Artificial Peripheral Nerve Application, Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 2017, 77, p 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.03.175CrossRef

24.

D. Sharma and R. Jha, Analysis of Structural, Optical and Magnetic Properties of Fe/Co Co-Doped ZnO Nanocrystals, Ceram. Int., 2017, 43(11), p 8488–8496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.03.201CrossRef

25.

J.K. Han, H.Y. Song, F. Saito and B.T. Lee, Synthesis of High Purity Nano-Sized Hydroxyapatite Powder by Microwave-Hydrothermal Method, Mater. Chem. Phys., 2006, 99(2–3), p 235–239.CrossRef

26.

A. Destainville, E. Champion, D. Bernache-Assollant and E. Laborde, Synthesis, Characterization and Thermal Behavior of Apatitic Tricalcium Phosphate, Mater. Chem. Phys., 2003, 80(1), p 269–277.CrossRef

27.

I. Mobasherpour, M.S. Heshajin, A. Kazemzadeh and M. Zakeri, Synthesis of Nanocrystalline Hydroxyapatite by Using Precipitation Method, J. Alloys Compd., 2007, 430(1–2), p 330–333.CrossRef

28.

S. Meejoo, W. Maneeprakorn and P. Winotai, Phase and Thermal Stability of Nanocrystalline Hydroxyapatite Prepared via Microwave Heating, Thermochim. Acta, 2006, 447(1), p 115–120.CrossRef

29.

M.E. Fleet, X. Liu and P.L. King, Accommodation of the Carbonate Ion in Apatite: An FTIR and X-ray Structure Study of Crystals Synthesized at 2-4 GPa, Am. Mineral., 2004, 89(10), p 1422–1432.CrossRef

30.

S.T. Hung, A. Bhuyan, K. Schademan, J. Steverlynck, M.D. McCluskey, G. Koeckelberghs, K. Clays and M.G. Kuzyk, Spectroscopic Studies of the Mechanism of Reversible Photodegradation of 1-Substituted Aminoanthraquinone-Doped Polymers, J. Chem. Phys., 2016 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4943963CrossRef

31.

G. Duan, C. Zhang, A. Li, X. Yang, L. Lu and X. Wang, Preparation and Characterization of Mesoporous Zirconia Made by Using a Poly (Methyl Methacrylate) Template, Nanoscale Res. Lett., 2008, 3(3), p 118–122.CrossRef

32.

J.A. Rincón-López, J.A. Hermann-muñoz, A.L. Giraldo-betancur, A. De Vizcaya-ruiz, J.M. Alvarado-orozco and J. Muñoz-saldaña, Synthesis Characterization and In Vitro Study of Synthetic and Bovine-Derived Hydroxyapatite Ceramics: A Comparison, Materials, 2018, 11(3), p 333.CrossRef

33.

A. Ruksudjarit, K. Pengpat, G. Rujijanagul and T. Tunkasiri, Synthesis and Characterization of Nanocrystalline Hydroxyapatite from Natural Bovine Bone, Curr. Appl. Phys., 2008, 8(3–4), p 270–272.CrossRef

34.

E.A. Ofudje, A.I. Adeogun, M.A. Idowu and S.O. Kareem, Synthesis and Characterization of Zn-Doped Hydroxyapatite: Scaffold Application Antibacterial and Bioactivity Studies, Heliyon, 2019, 5(5), p e01716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01716CrossRef

35.

K. Alvarez and H. Nakajima, Metallic Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration, Materials (Basel), 2009, 2(3), p 790–832.CrossRef

36.

E.D. Pellegrino and R.M. Biltz, Bone Carbonate and the Ca to P Molar Ratio, Nature, 1968, 219, p 1261–1262.CrossRef

37.

U.E. Pazzaglia, T. Congiu, F. Ranchetti, M. Salari and C.D. Orbo, Scanning Electron Microscopy Study of Bone Intracortical Vessels using an Injection and Fractured Surfaces Technique, Anat. Sci. Int., 2010, 85, p 31–37.CrossRef

38.

A. Paz, D. Guadarrama, M. Lopez, J.E. Gonzalez, N. Brizuela and J. Aragon, A Comparative Study of Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles Synthesized by Different Routes, Quim. Nova, 2012, 35(9), p 1724–1727.CrossRef

39.

W. Brigitte and J.D. Pasteris, A Mineralogical Perspective on the Apatite in Bone, Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 2005, 25, p 131–143.CrossRef

40.

M. Motskin, D.M. Wright, K. Muller, N. Kyle, T.G. Gard, A.E. Porter and J.N. Skepper, Hydroxyapatite Nano and Microparticles: Correlation of Particle Properties with Cytotoxicity and Biostability, Biomaterials, 2009, 30(19), p 3307–3317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.02.044CrossRef

41.

H. Liu, H. Yazici, C. Ergun, T.J. Webster and H. Bermek, An In Vitro Evaluation of the Ca/P Ratio for the Cytocompatibility of Nano-to-Micron Particulate Calcium Phosphates for Bone Regeneration, Acta Biomater., 2008, 4(5), p 1472–1479.CrossRef

42.

N. Kourkoumelis, I. Balatsoukas and M. Tzaphlidou, Ca/P Concentration Ratio at Different Sites of Normal and Osteoporotic Rabbit Bones Evaluated by Auger and Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy, J. Biol. Phys., 2012, 38(2), p 279–291.CrossRef

43.

J.X. Lu, B. Flautre, K. Anselme, P. Hardouin, A. Gallur, B. Descamps and B. Thierry, Role of Interconnections in Porous Bioceramics on Bone Recolonization In Vitro and In Vivo, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med., 1999, 1999(10), p 111–120.CrossRef

44.

K. Rahmani-Monfard, A. Fathi and S.M. Rabiee, Three-Dimensional Laser Drilling of Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA) Scaffold Used for Bone Regeneration, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2016, 84(9–12), p 2649–2657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7917-1CrossRef

45.

E. Skwarek, W. Janusz and D. Sternik, The Influence of the Hydroxyapatite Synthesis Method on the Electrochemical, Surface and Adsorption Properties of Hydroxyapatite, Adsorpt. Sci. Technol., 2017, 35(5–6), p 507–518.CrossRef

46.

B.P. Mahammod, E. Barua, P. Deb, A.B. Deoghare and K.M. Pandey, Investigation of Physico-Mechanical Behavior, Permeability and Wall Shear Stress of Porous HA/PMMA Composite Bone Scaffold, Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 2020, 45, p 5505–5515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-04467-wCrossRef

47.

H. Haugen, J. Will, A. Ko, U. Hopfner, J. Aigner and E. Wintermantel, Ceramic TiO 2 -Foams: Characterisation of a Potential Scaffold, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 2004, 24, p 661–668.CrossRef

48.

J. Franco, P. Hunger, M.E. Launey, A.P. Tomsia and E. Saiz, Direct Write Assembly of Calcium Phosphate Scaffolds Using a Water-Based Hydrogel, Acta Biomater., 2010, 6(1), p 218–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2009.06.031CrossRef

49.

T.R. Kyriakides, Molecular Events at Tissue-Biomaterial Interface, Host Response to Biomaterials: The Impact of Host Response on Biomaterial Selection, Elsevier, 2015.

50.

S.I. Roohani-Esfahani, S. Nouri-Khorasani, Z. Lu, R. Appleyard and H. Zreiqat, The Influence Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticle Shape and Size on the Properties of Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Scaffolds Coated with Hydroxyapatite-PCL Composites, Biomaterials, 2010, 31(21), p 5498–5509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.058CrossRef

51.

G. Hannink and J.J.C. Arts, Bioresorbability, Porosity and Mechanical Strength of Bone Substitutes: What is Optimal for Bone Regeneration?, Injury, 2011, 42(suppl. 2), p S22–S25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.008CrossRef

52.

R. Saidi, M.H. Fathi and H. Salimijazi, Fabrication and Characterization of Hydroxyapatite-Coated Forsterite Scaffold for Tissue Regeneration Applications, Bull. Mater. Sci., 2015, 38(5), p 1367–1374.CrossRef

53.

H. Ghomi, H. Edris and M.H. Fathi, Preparation of Nanostructure Hydroxyapatite Scaffold for Tissue Engineering Applications, J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol., 2011, 58, p 642–650.CrossRef

54.

Z.H. Pan, H.P. Cai, P.P. Jiang and Q.Y. Fan, Properties of a Calcium Phosphate Cement Synergistically Reinforced by Chitosan Fiber and Gelatin, J. Polym. Res., 2006, 13, p 323–327.CrossRef

55.

C. Gao, X. Hu and Y. Hong, Photografting of Poly ( Hydroxylethyl Acrylate) onto Porous Polyurethane Scaffolds to Improve Their Endothelial Cell Compatibility, J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed., 2012, 14, p 937–950.CrossRef

56.

W.H. Lee, A.V. Zavgorodniy, C.Y. Loo and R. Rohanizadeh, Synthesis and Characterization of Hydroxyapatite with Different Crystallinity: Effects on Protein Adsorption and Release, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A, 2012, 100A(6), p 1539–1549.CrossRef

57.

C.J. Wilson, R.E. Clegg, D. Ph, D.I. Leavesley, D. Ph, M.J. Pearcy and D. Ph, Mediation of Biomaterial-Cell Interactions by Adsorbed Proteins: A Review, Tissue Eng., 2005, 11(1), p 1–18.CrossRef

Titel: Performance of ZnO-Incorporated Hydroxyapatite/Polymethyl Methacrylate Tri-Component Composite Bone Scaffolds Fabricated from Varying Sources of Hydroxyapatite
verfasst von: Emon Barua
Apurba Das
Ashish B. Deoghare
D. Pamu
Payel Deb
Sumit Das Lala
Sushovan Chatterjee
Publikationsdatum: 09.01.2023
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance / Ausgabe 21/2023
Print ISSN: 1059-9495
Elektronische ISSN: 1544-1024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-022-07789-y

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 21/2023

Effect of Scanning Process and Heat Treatment on Microstructure and Mechanical Property of Inconel 718 Fabricated by Selective Laser Melting

Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Portevin–Le Chatelier Effect in Al-Mg Alloys: Effects of Solute Concentration, Temperature, and Tensile Rate

Effects of Al Content on the Microstructure, Mechanical Properties, and Oxidation Behavior of CoCrNiAlxY Middle Entropy Alloys

Ce Effects on Dynamic Recrystallization of Cu-Fe-Ti-Mg Alloys Due to Hot Compression

Correction to: Screw Extrusion Additive Manufacturing of Carbon Fiber Reinforced PA6 Tools

Warm Aging of Pre-aged AA6013 Sheet and Its Relevance to Room Temperature and Warm Forming Applications—Experimental and Modeling Analyses

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten