nach oben

TechTrends

Erschienen in:

23.06.2021 | Original Paper

Pre-Service Educators Developing a Digital Identity

verfasst von: W. Ian O’Byrne, Tracey Hunter-Doniger

Erschienen in: TechTrends | Ausgabe 4/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This article discusses a study on preservice education students and the implementation of digital identities through self-constructed websites in a technology course. Researchers investigated the process of helping educators create a create a domain of their own while they consider the role of technology and digital identities in their future classrooms. Data revealed themes that focused around building the website and building a digital identity. The researchers contend that there is a continuum of three stages that exist for students to engage in web literate practices. These stages include being consumers, curators, and creators of digital content. These stages are not meant to be viewed as a linear process, but as an opportunity to review instructional practices, and literacy strategies in learning environments.

Vorheriger Artikel Student Perspectives on Learning Experiences in a Higher Education Active Blended Learning Context

Nächster Artikel Competitive Games as Formative Assessment in Informal Science Learning: Improvement or Hindrance?

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origins and spread of nationalism (Rev. ed.). London: Verso.

Angrosino, M. V., & Mays de Pérez, K. A. (2000). Rethinking observation: From method to context. Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2, 673–702.

Baird, J. R. (1986). Improving learning through enhanced metacognition: A classroom study. European Journal of Science Education, 8(3), 263–282.CrossRef

Baker, F. W. (2016). Conversations with innovators in learning and technology: Jim groom. TechTrends, 60(2), 110–113.CrossRef

Barrett, H. C. (2007). Researching electronic portfolios and learner engagement: The REFLECT initiative. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50(6), 436–449.CrossRef

Belshaw, D. (2016) Digital literacy, identity and a domain of one’s own. Irvine, CA: DML Central. Retrieved from https://dmlcentral.net/digital-literacy-identity-domain-ones/

Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen S. K. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods. 4th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230.CrossRef

Campbell, G. (2009). A personal cyberinfrastructure. Educause Review, 44(5), 58–59.

Clark, C., Chow-Hoy, T. K., Herter, R. J., & Moss, P. A. (2001). Portfolios as sites of learning: Reconceptualizing the connections to motivation and engagement. Journal of Literacy Research, 33(2), 211–241.CrossRef

Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. Psychology Press.

Darvin, R., & Norton, B. (2015). Identity and a model of investment in applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 36–56.

Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Dezuanni, M., O’Mara, J., & Beavis, C. (2015). ‘Redstone is like electricity’: Children’s performative representations in and around Minecraft. E-learning and digital media, 12(2), 147–163.CrossRef

Freire, P., & Macedo, D. (1987). Reading the word and the world. Bergin & Garvey.

Greenhow, C., Robelia, B., & Hughes, J. E. (2009). Learning, teaching, and scholarship in a digital age: Web 2.0 and classroom research: What path should we take now? Educational Researcher, 38(4), 246–259.CrossRef

Gregorc, A. F. (1984). Style as a symptom: A phenomenological perspective. Theory Into Practice, 23(1), 51–55.

Handley, K., Sturdy, A., Fincham, R., & Clark, T. (2006). Within and beyond communities of practice: Making sense of learning through participation, identity and practice. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 641–653.CrossRef

Holland, D., Lachicotte Jr., W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Harvard University Press.

Lam, W. S. E. (2000). L2 literacy and the design of the self: A case study of a teenager writing on the internet. TESOL Quarterly, 34(3), 457–482.CrossRef

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation (Vol. 521423740). Cambridge University Press.

Maxwell, J. A. (2012). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (vol. 41). Sage publications.

McCarthey, S. J., & Moje, E. B. (2002). Identity matters. Reading Research Quarterly, 37(2), 228–238.CrossRef

Merriam, S. B. (2002). Introduction to qualitative research. Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis, 1(1), 1–17.

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.

National Council of Teachers of English, NCTE (2019) Definition of Literacy in a Digital Age. https://ncte.org/statement/nctes- definition-literacy-digital-age/.

Norton, B. (2013). Identity and language learning: Extending the conversation. Multilingual matters.

O'Byrne, W. I., & Pytash, K. E. (2017). Becoming literate digitally in a digitally literate environment of their own. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 60(5), 499–504. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.59.CrossRef

O’Byrne, W. I. (2018). Empowering Students as Critical Readers and Writers in Online Spaces, in E. Ortlieb , E. H. Cheek, Jr., P. Semingson (ed.) Best Practices in Teaching Digital Literacies (Literacy Research, Practice and Evaluation, Volume 9) Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 233–250.

O’Byrne, W. I. (2019). Educate, Empower, Advocate: Amplifying marginalized voices in a digital society. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education. Retrieved online at https://www.citejournal.org/volume-19/issue-4-19/english-language-arts/educate-empower-advocate-amplifying-marginalized-voices-in-a-digital-society/

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry: A personal, experiential perspective. Qualitative Social Work, 1(3), 261–283.

Pavlenko, A., & Norton, B. (2007). Imagined communities, identity, and English language learning. In International Handbook of English Language Teaching (pp. 669–680). Boston, MA: Springer.

Reingold, J., & Stommel, J. (2016). A brief history of domain of one’s own, part 1. Fredericksburg, VA: University of Mary Washington Division of Teaching and Learning Technologies. Retrieved from http://umwdtlt.com/a-brief-history-of-domain-of-ones-own-part-1/

Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press.

Strudler, N., & Wetzel, K. (1999). Lessons from exemplary colleges of education: Factors affecting technology integration in preservice programs. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 63–81.CrossRef

Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246.

Turner, K. H., Jolls, T., Hagerman, M. S., O’Byrne, W. I., Hicks, T., Eisenstock, B., & Pytash, K. E. (2017). Developing digital and media literacies in children and adolescents. Pediatrics, 140(supplement 2), S122-S126.

Udell, J. (2012). A domain of One’s own. Wired. Retrieved from www.wired.com/insights/2012/07/a-domain-of-ones-own

Watters, A. (2014). The monsters of education technology. Tech Gypsies Publishing. Retrieved from http://monsters.hackeducation.com

Watters, A. (2015). The web we need to give students. Retrieved from http://hackeducation.com/2015/10/19/domains

Watters, A. (2017). Why a domain of one’s own matters (for the future of knowledge). Retrieved from http://hackeducation.com/2017/04/04/domains

Yuan, L., & Powell, S. (2013). MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education.

Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3–17.CrossRef

Titel: Pre-Service Educators Developing a Digital Identity
verfasst von: W. Ian O’Byrne
Tracey Hunter-Doniger
Publikationsdatum: 23.06.2021
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: TechTrends / Ausgabe 4/2021
Print ISSN: 8756-3894
Elektronische ISSN: 1559-7075
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00617-5

Springer Professional

Pre-Service Educators Developing a Digital Identity

Abstract

Premium Partner

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2021

K12 Practitioners’ Perceptions of Learning from Failure, Creativity, and Systems Thinking: a Collective Case Study

Correction to: Don’t be Evil: Should we Use Google in Schools?

The Process of Moral Decision-Making in a Game-Based Narrative Scenario through the Experience of Future Government Workers

Community College Student Perceptions of Remote Learning Shifts Due to COVID-19

Increasing Cybersecurity Career Interest through Playable Case Studies

Visualizing Course Structure: Using Course Composition Diagrams to Reflect on Design

Premium Partner