nach oben

Erschienen in:

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

4. Proteomics of Lignocellulosic Substrates Bioconversion in Anaerobic Digesters to Increase Carbon Recovery as Methane

verfasst von : Alicia Guadalupe Talavera-Caro, María Alejandra Sánchez-Muñoz, Inty Omar Hernández-De Lira, Lilia Ernestina Montañez-Hernández, Ayerim Yedid Hernández-Almanza, Jésus Antonio Morlett-Chávez, María de las Mercedes Esparza-Perusquia, Nagamani Balagurusamy

Erschienen in: Valorisation of Agro-industrial Residues – Volume I: Biological Approaches

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Anaerobic digestion (AD) is a cost-effective treatment for management of lignocellulosic substrates, viz., agricultural wastes and animal manures, which also aids in generation of methane as biofuel. Although the application of AD technology is increasing, one of the major limitations of the process is that the rate of fermentation is higher than the rate of methanogenesis, which significantly affects process stability and methane yield. Normally, the souring of digesters can be observed after 2–4 weeks after the initiation of the volatile fatty acids accumulation, which makes it difficult for early detection and consequently resulting in acidification of digesters. Of late, metagenomic approaches are gaining importance due to their ability to reveal the microbial diversity and their dynamics in a relatively short time. However, their functional nature could not be clearly explained due to the lack of data on their activity. Recent advances in proteomic studies show its potential as a complementary technology to metagenomic studies for efficient management of digesters. Metaproteomic analyses aid in identifying a shift in metabolic paths and in metabolic networks under stress conditions. This provides insights on functionality, microbial interactions, and provides data on spatiotemporal variations and their dynamics of proteins crucial for efficient performance of the digester. Besides, this technique has led to identify novel phylotypes with novel functions among the microbial communities of the anaerobic digesters, which suggest the potential of proteomics in bioprospection of novel enzymes for industrial purposes. How proteomics along with metagenomics and transcriptomics data could aid in early detection of disturbances in the digesters helps in formulating recovery strategies as well as to increase the methane content of biogas will be discussed in this chapter.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Biological Treatment of Agro-Industrial Waste

Nächstes Kapitel Circular Economy and Agro-Industrial Wastewater: Potential of Microalgae in Bioremediation Processes

Abendroth C, Simeonov C, Peretó J, Antúnez O, Gavidia R, Luschnig O, Porcar M (2017) From grass to gas: microbiome dynamics of grass biomass acidification under mesophilic and thermophilic temperatures. Biotechnol Biofuels 10:171. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-017-0859-0 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Abram F, Gunnigle E, O’Flaherty V (2009) Optimisation of protein extraction and 2-DE for metaproteomics of microbial communities from anaerobic wastewater treatment biofilms. Electrophoresis 30:4149–4151. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.200900474 CrossRefPubMed

Abram F, Enright A-M, O’Reilly J, Botting CH, Collins G, O’Flaherty V (2011) A metaproteomic approach gives functional insights into anaerobic digestion. J Appl Microbiol 110:1550–1560. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.05011.x CrossRefPubMed

Adekunle KF, Okolie JA (2015) A review of biochemical process of anaerobic digestion. Adv Biosci Biotechnol 06:205. https://doi.org/10.4236/abb.2015.63020 CrossRef

Aguinaga Casañas MA, Rangkasenee N, Krattenmacher N, Thaller G, Metges CC, Kuhla B (2015) Methyl-coenzyme M reductase A as an indicator to estimate methane production from dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 98:4074–4083. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-9310 CrossRefPubMed

Ahring BK, Biswas R, Ahamed A, Teller PJ, Uellendahl H (2015) Making lignin accessible for anaerobic digestion by wet-explosion pretreatment. Bioresour Technol 175:182–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.10.082 CrossRefPubMed

Akuzawa M, Hori T, Haruta S, Ueno Y, Ishii M, Igarashi Y (2011) Distinctive responses of metabolically active microbiota to acidification in a thermophilic anaerobic digester. Microb Ecol 61:595–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-010-9788-1 CrossRefPubMed

Al Seadi T, Rutz D, Prassl H, Köttner M, Finsterwalder T, Volk S, Janssen R (2008) Biogas handbook. University of Southern Denmark Esbjerg, Esbjerg

Angelidaki I, Ellegaard L, Ahring BK (2003) Applications of the anaerobic digestion process. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 82:1–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45838-7_1 CrossRefPubMed

Angelidaki I, Boe K, Ellegaard L (2005) Effect of operating conditions and reactor configuration on efficiency of full-scale biogas plants. Water Sci Technol 52:189–194. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2005.0516 CrossRefPubMed

Angelidaki I, Karakashev D, Batstone DJ, Plugge CM, Stams AJM (2011) Biomethanation and its potential. Methods Enzymol 494:327–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385112-3.00016-0 CrossRefPubMed

Appels L, Lauwers J, Degrève J, Helsen L, Lievens B, Willems K, Van Impe J, Dewil R (2011) Anaerobic digestion in global bio-energy production: potential and research challenges. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15:4295–4301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.121 CrossRef

Ariunbaatar J, Panico A, Esposito G, Pirozzi F, Lens PNL (2014) Pretreatment methods to enhance anaerobic digestion of organic solid waste. Appl Energy 123:143–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.02.035 CrossRef

Barua S, Dhar BR (2017) Advances towards understanding and engineering direct interspecies electron transfer in anaerobic digestion. Bioresour Technol 244:698–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.023 CrossRefPubMed

Bize A, Cardona L, Desmond-Le Quéméner E, Battimelli A, Badalato N, Bureau C, Madigou C, Chevret D, Guillot A, Monnet V, Godon J-J, Bouchez T (2015) Shotgun metaproteomic profiling of biomimetic anaerobic digestion processes treating sewage sludge. Proteomics 15:3532–3543. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201500041 CrossRefPubMed

Bourven I, Casellas M, Buzier R, Lesieur J, Lenain J-F, Faix A, Bressolier P, Maftah C, Guibaud G (2017) Potential of DGT in a new fractionation approach for studying trace metal element impact on anaerobic digestion: the example of cadmium. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 119:188–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.11.007 CrossRef

Bräsen C, Esser D, Rauch B, Siebers B (2014) Carbohydrate metabolism in archaea: current insights into unusual enzymes and pathways and their regulation. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 78:89–175. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00041-13 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Braun R, Weiland P, Wellinger A (2008) Biogas from energy crop digestion. IEA Bioenergy Task 37:1–20

Capson-Tojo G, Ruiz D, Rouez M, Crest M, Steyer J-P, Bernet N, Delgenès J-P, Escudié R (2017) Accumulation of propionic acid during consecutive batch anaerobic digestion of commercial food waste. Bioresour Technol 245:724–733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.149 CrossRefPubMed

Carrere H, Antonopoulou G, Affes R, Passos F, Battimelli A, Lyberatos G, Ferrer I (2016) Review of feedstock pretreatment strategies for improved anaerobic digestion: from lab-scale research to full-scale application. Bioresour Technol 199:386–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.09.007 CrossRefPubMed

Cesarino I, Araújo P, Domingues Júnior AP, Mazzafera P (2012) An overview of lignin metabolism and its effect on biomass recalcitrance. Braz J Bot 35:303–311. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-84042012000400003 CrossRef

Chen Y, Cheng JJ, Creamer KS (2008) Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review. Bioresour Technol 99:4044–4064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.057 CrossRefPubMed

Chen JL, Ortiz R, Steele TWJ, Stuckey DC (2014) Toxicants inhibiting anaerobic digestion: a review. Biotechnol Adv 32:1523–1534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.10.005 CrossRefPubMed

Cheng Q, Call DF (2016) Hardwiring microbes via direct interspecies electron transfer: mechanisms and applications. Environ Sci Process Impacts 18:968–980. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6EM00219F CrossRefPubMed

Choong YY, Norli I, Abdullah AZ, Yhaya MF (2016) Impacts of trace element supplementation on the performance of anaerobic digestion process: a critical review. Bioresour Technol 209:369–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.028 CrossRefPubMed

Clement BG, Kehl LE, DeBord KL, Kitts CL (1998) Terminal restriction fragment patterns (TRFPs), a rapid, PCR-based method for the comparison of complex bacterial communities. J Microbiol Methods 31:135–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7012(97)00105-X CrossRef

Deublein S (2009) Biogas from waste and renewable resources: an introduction. Choice Rev Online 46:2682–2682. https://doi.org/10.5860/CHOICE.46-2682 CrossRef

Divya D, Gopinath LR, Merlin Christy P (2015) A review on current aspects and diverse prospects for enhancing biogas production in sustainable means. Renew Sust Energ Rev 42:690–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.055 CrossRef

Felix CR, Ljungdahl LG (1993) The cellulosome: the exocellular organelle of Clostridium. Annu Rev Microbiol 47:791–819. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.mi.47.100193.004043 CrossRefPubMed

Ferry JG (1993) Fermentation of acetate. In: Ferry JG (ed) Methanogenesis: ecology, physiology, biochemistry and genetics. Springer, Boston, pp 304–334CrossRef

Gerardi MH (2003) The microbiology of anaerobic digesters. Wiley-Intersciences, CanadaCrossRef

Gomez Camacho CE, Ruggeri B (2018) Syntrophic microorganisms interactions in anaerobic digestion (AD): a critical review in the light of increase the energy production. Chem Eng Trans 64:391–396. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1864066 CrossRef

Gujer W, Zehnder AJB (1983) Conversion processes in anaerobic digestion. Water Sci Technol 15:127–167. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1983.0164 CrossRef

Guo J, Peng Y, Ni B-J, Han X, Fan L, Yuan Z (2015) Dissecting microbial community structure and methane-producing pathways of a full-scale anaerobic reactor digesting activated sludge from wastewater treatment by metagenomic sequencing. Microb Cell Factories 14:33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-015-0218-4 CrossRef

Hagen LH, Frank JA, Zamanzadeh M, Eijsink VG, Pope PB, Horn SJ, Arntzen MØ (2017) Quantitative metaproteomics highlight the metabolic contributions of uncultured phylotypes in a thermophilic anaerobic digester. Appl Env Microbiol 83:e01955–e01916. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01955-16 CrossRef

Hanreich A, Heyer R, Benndorf D, Rapp E, Pioch M, Reichl U, Klocke M (2012) Metaproteome analysis to determine the metabolically active part of a thermophilic microbial community producing biogas from agricultural biomass. Can J Microbiol 58:917–922. https://doi.org/10.1139/w2012-058 CrossRefPubMed

Hanreich A, Schimpf U, Zakrzewski M, Schlüter A, Benndorf D, Heyer R, Rapp E, Pühler A, Reichl U, Klocke M (2013) Metagenome and metaproteome analyses of microbial communities in mesophilic biogas-producing anaerobic batch fermentations indicate concerted plant carbohydrate degradation. Syst Appl Microbiol 36:330–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2013.03.006 CrossRefPubMed

Hassa J, Maus I, Off S, Pühler A, Scherer P, Klocke M, Schlüter A (2018) Metagenome, metatranscriptome, and metaproteome approaches unraveled compositions and functional relationships of microbial communities residing in biogas plants. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102:5045–5063. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-018-8976-7 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Herbst F-A, Lünsmann V, Kjeldal H, Jehmlich N, Tholey A, von Bergen M, Nielsen JL, Hettich RL, Seifert J, Nielsen PH (2016) Enhancing metaproteomics—the value of models and defined environmental microbial systems. Proteomics 16:783–798. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201500305 CrossRefPubMed

Herrmann C, Heiermann M, Idler C (2011) Effects of ensiling, silage additives and storage period on methane formation of biogas crops. Bioresour Technol 102:5153–5161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.01.012 CrossRefPubMed

Heyer R, Kohrs F, Benndorf D, Rapp E, Kausmann R, Heiermann M, Klocke M, Reichl U (2013) Metaproteome analysis of the microbial communities in agricultural biogas plants. New Biotechnol 30:614–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2013.01.002 CrossRef

Heyer R, Kohrs F, Reichl U, Benndorf D (2015) Metaproteomics of complex microbial communities in biogas plants. Microb Biotechnol 8:749–763. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12276 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Heyer R, Benndorf D, Kohrs F, De Vrieze J, Boon N, Hoffmann M, Rapp E, Schlüter A, Sczyrba A, Reichl U (2016) Proteotyping of biogas plant microbiomes separates biogas plants according to process temperature and reactor type. Biotechnol Biofuels 9:155. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-016-0572-4 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Heyer R, Schallert K, Zoun R, Becher B, Saake G, Benndorf D (2017) Challenges and perspectives of metaproteomic data analysis. J Biotechnol 261:24–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2017.06.1201 CrossRefPubMed

Heyer R, Schallert K, Siewert C, Kohrs F, Greve J, Maus I, Klang J, Klocke M, Heiermann M, Hoffmann M, Püttker S, Calusinska M, Zoun R, Saake G, Benndorf D, Reichl U (2019) Metaproteome analysis reveals that syntrophy, competition, and phage-host interaction shape microbial communities in biogas plants. Microbiome 7:69. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-019-0673-y CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Inyang M, Gao B, Pullammanappallil P, Ding W, Zimmerman AR (2010) Biochar from anaerobically digested sugarcane bagasse. Bioresour Technol 101:8868–8872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.088 CrossRefPubMed

Isikgor FH, Becer CR (2015) Lignocellulosic biomass: a sustainable platform for the production of bio-based chemicals and polymers. Polym Chem 6:4497–4559. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5py00263j CrossRef

Jain S, Jain S, Tim Wolf I, Lee J, Wah Tong Y (2015) A comprehensive review on operating parameters and different pretreatment methodologies for anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste. Renew Sust Energ Rev 52:142–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.091 CrossRef

Jia X, Xi B-D, Li M-X, Yang Y, Wang Y (2017a) Metaproteomics analysis of the functional insights into microbial communities of combined hydrogen and methane production by anaerobic fermentation from reed straw. PLoS One 12:e0183158. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183158 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Jia X, Xi B, Li M, Liu D, Hou J, Hao Y, Meng F (2017b) Metaproteomic analysis of the relationship between microbial community phylogeny, function and metabolic activity during biohydrogen-methane coproduction under short-term hydrothermal pretreatment from food waste. Bioresour Technol 245:1030–1039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.180 CrossRefPubMed

Jiang Y, Xin F, Lu J, Dong W, Zhang W, Zhang M, Wu H, Ma J, Jiang M (2017) State of the art review of biofuels production from lignocellulose by thermophilic bacteria. Bioresour Technol 245:1498–1506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.05.142 CrossRefPubMed

Joyce A, Ijaz UZ, Nzeteu C, Vaughan A, Shirran SL, Botting CH, Quince C, O’Flaherty V, Abram F (2018) Linking microbial community structure and function during the acidified anaerobic digestion of grass. Front Microbiol 9:540. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00540 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kanwal S, Chaudhry N, Munir S, Sana H (2019) Effect of torrefaction conditions on the physicochemical characterization of agricultural waste (sugarcane bagasse). Waste Manag 88:280–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.03.053 CrossRefPubMed

Karlsson R, Gonzales-Siles L, Boulund F, Svensson-Stadler L, Skovbjerg S, Karlsson A, Davidson M, Hulth S, Kristiansson E, Moore ERB (2015) Proteotyping: proteomic characterization, classification and identification of microorganisms – a prospectus. Syst Appl Microbiol 38:246–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2015.03.006 CrossRefPubMed

Kohrs F, Heyer R, Magnussen A, Benndorf D, Muth T, Behne A, Rapp E, Kausmann R, Heiermann M, Klocke M, Reichl U (2014) Sample prefractionation with liquid isoelectric focusing enables in depth microbial metaproteome analysis of mesophilic and thermophilic biogas plants. Anaerobe 29:59–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2013.11.009 CrossRefPubMed

Kohrs F, Heyer R, Bissinger T, Kottler R, Schallert K, Püttker S, Behne A, Rapp E, Benndorf D, Reichl U (2017) Proteotyping of laboratory-scale biogas plants reveals multiple steady-states in community composition. Anaerobe 46:56–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2017.02.005 CrossRefPubMed

Kouzuma A, Kato S, Watanabe K (2015) Microbial interspecies interactions: recent findings in syntrophic consortia. Front Microbiol 6:477. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00477 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Krause L, Diaz NN, Edwards RA, Gartemann K-H, Krömeke H, Neuweger H, Pühler A, Runte KJ, Schlüter A, Stoye J, Szczepanowski R, Tauch A, Goesmann A (2008) Taxonomic composition and gene content of a methane-producing microbial community isolated from a biogas reactor. J Biotechnol 136:91–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2008.06.003 CrossRefPubMed

Lacerda CMR, Choe LH, Reardon KF (2007) Metaproteomic analysis of a bacterial community response to cadmium exposure. J Proteome Res 6:1145–1152. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr060477v CrossRefPubMed

Li Y, Zhang R, Liu X, Chen C, Xiao X, Feng L, He Y, Liu G (2013a) Evaluating methane production from anaerobic mono- and co-digestion of kitchen waste, corn stover, and chicken manure. Energy Fuel 27:2085–2091. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef400117f CrossRef

Li Y, Zhang R, Liu G, Chen C, He Y, Liu X (2013b) Comparison of methane production potential, biodegradability, and kinetics of different organic substrates. Bioresour Technol 149:565–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.09.063 CrossRefPubMed

Li R, Wu Z, Wangb Y, Ding L, Wang Y (2016) Role of pH-induced structural change in protein aggregation in foam fractionation of bovine serum albumin. Biotechnol Rep 9:46–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2016.01.002 CrossRef

Li W, Khalid H, Zhu Z, Zhang R, Liu G, Chen C, Thorin E (2018) Methane production through anaerobic digestion: participation and digestion characteristics of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin. Appl Energy 226:1219–1228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.055 CrossRef

Lin Y-W, Tuan N, Huang S-L (2016) Metaproteomic analysis of the microbial community present in a thermophilic swine manure digester to allow functional characterization: a case study. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 115:64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.06.013 CrossRef

Liu Z-H, Chen H-Z (2015) Xylose production from corn stover biomass by steam explosion combined with enzymatic digestibility. Bioresour Technol 193:345–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.06.114 CrossRefPubMed

Lü F, Bize A, Guillot A, Monnet V, Madigou C, Chapleur O, Mazéas L, He P, Bouchez T (2014) Metaproteomics of cellulose methanisation under thermophilic conditions reveals a surprisingly high proteolytic activity. ISME J 8:88–102. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2013.120 CrossRefPubMed

Madigan M, Martinko J, Dunlap PV, Clark DP (2008) Brock biology of microorganisms. Int Microbiol 11:65–73

Mata-Alvarez J, Dosta J, Romero-Güiza MS, Fonoll X, Peces M, Astals S (2014) A critical review on anaerobic co-digestion achievements between 2010 and 2013. Renew Sust Energ Rev 36:412–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.039 CrossRef

Mcinerney M, Bryant MP, Pfennig N (1979) Anaerobic bacterium that degrades fatty acids in syntrophic association with methanogens. Arch Microbiol 122:129–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00411351 CrossRef

Monlau F, Sambusiti C, Barakat A, Quéméneur M, Trably E, Steyer J-P, Carrère H (2014) Do furanic and phenolic compounds of lignocellulosic and algae biomass hydrolyzate inhibit anaerobic mixed cultures? A comprehensive review. Biotechnol Adv 32:934–951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.04.007 CrossRefPubMed

Morris R, Schauer-Gimenez A, Bhattad U, Kearney C, Struble CA, Zitomer D, Maki JS (2014) Methyl coenzyme M reductase (mcrA) gene abundance correlates with activity measurements of methanogenic H2/CO2-enriched anaerobic biomass. Microb Biotechnol 7:77–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12094 CrossRefPubMed

Mulat DG, Ward AJ, Adamsen APS, Voigt NV, Nielsen JL, Feilberg A (2014) Quantifying contribution of synthrophic acetate oxidation to methane production in thermophilic anaerobic reactors by membrane inlet mass spectrometry. Environ Sci Technol 140130145609003. https://doi.org/10.1021/es403144e

Mustafa AM, Li H, Radwan AA, Sheng K, Chen X (2018) Effect of hydrothermal and Ca(OH)2 pretreatments on anaerobic digestion of sugarcane bagasse for biogas production. Bioresour Technol 259:54–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.03.028 CrossRefPubMed

Nallathambi Gunaseelan V (1997) Anaerobic digestion of biomass for methane production: a review. Biomass Bioenergy 13:83–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(97)00020-2 CrossRef

Ortseifen V, Stolze Y, Maus I, Sczyrba A, Bremges A, Albaum SP, Jaenicke S, Fracowiak J, Pühler A, Schlüter A (2016) An integrated metagenome and-proteome analysis of the microbial community residing in a biogas production plant. J Biotechnol 231:268–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2016.06.014 CrossRefPubMed

Park J, Lee B, Shi P, Kwon H, Jeong SM, Jun H (2018) Methanol metabolism and archaeal community changes in a bioelectrochemical anaerobic digestion sequencing batch reactor with copper-coated graphite cathode. Bioresour Technol 259:398–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.03.009 CrossRefPubMed

Passaris I, Van Gaelen P, Cornelissen R, Simoens K, Grauwels D, Vanhaecke L, Springael D, Smets I (2018) Cofactor F430 as a biomarker for methanogenic activity: application to an anaerobic bioreactor system. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102:1191–1201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-017-8681-y CrossRefPubMed

Paul S, Dutta A (2018) Challenges and opportunities of lignocellulosic biomass for anaerobic digestion. Resour Conserv Recycl 130:164–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.12.005 CrossRef

Pérez-Rodríguez N, García-Bernet D, Domínguez JM (2016) Effects of enzymatic hydrolysis and ultrasounds pretreatments on corn cob and vine trimming shoots for biogas production. Bioresour Technol 221:130–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.09.013 CrossRefPubMed

Poudel BN, Paudel KP, Timilsina G, Zilberman D (2012) Providing numbers for a food versus fuel debate: an analysis of a future biofuel production scenario. Appl Econ Perspect Policy 34:637–668. https://doi.org/10.1093/aepp/pps039 CrossRef

Rahman MA, Møller HB, Saha CK, Alam MM, Wahid R, Feng L (2017) Optimal ratio for anaerobic co-digestion of poultry droppings and lignocellulosic-rich substrates for enhanced biogas production. Energy Sustain Dev 39:59–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2017.04.004 CrossRef

Ramsay IR, Pullammanappallil PC (2001) Protein degradation during anaerobic wastewater treatment: derivation of stoichiometry. Biodegradation 12:247–256. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013116728817 CrossRefPubMed

Rastogi G, Ranade DR, Yeole TY, Patole MS, Shouche YS (2008) Investigation of methanogen population structure in biogas reactor by molecular characterization of methyl-coenzyme M reductase A (mcrA) genes. Bioresour Technol 99:5317–5326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.11.024 CrossRefPubMed

Roseman S (1969) The transport of carbohydrates by a bacterial phosphotransferase system. J Gen Physiol 54:138–184. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.54.1.138 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Sasaki D, Hori T, Haruta S, Ueno Y, Ishii M, Igarashi Y (2011) Methanogenic pathway and community structure in a thermophilic anaerobic digestion process of organic solid waste. J Biosci Bioeng 111:41–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2010.08.011 CrossRefPubMed

Sawatdeenarunat C, Surendra KC, Takara D, Oechsner H, Khanal SK (2015) Anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass: challenges and opportunities. Bioresour Technol 178:178–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.09.103 CrossRefPubMed

Schink B (1997) Energetics of syntrophic cooperation in methanogenic degradation. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 61:262–280CrossRef

Schlüter A, Bekel T, Diaz NN, Dondrup M, Eichenlaub R, Gartemann K-H, Krahn I, Krause L, Krömeke H, Kruse O, Mussgnug JH, Neuweger H, Niehaus K, Pühler A, Runte KJ, Szczepanowski R, Tauch A, Tilker A, Viehöver P, Goesmann A (2008) The metagenome of a biogas-producing microbial community of a production-scale biogas plant fermenter analysed by the 454-pyrosequencing technology. J Biotechnol 136:77–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2008.05.008 CrossRefPubMed

Schneider T, Riedel K (2010) Environmental proteomics: analysis of structure and function of microbial communities. Proteomics 10:785–798. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200900450 CrossRefPubMed

Schnürer A, Zellner G, Svensson BH (1999) Mesophilic syntrophic acetate oxidation during methane formation in biogas reactors. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 29:249–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.1999.tb00616.x CrossRef

Shrestha PM, Rotaru A-E (2014) Plugging in or going wireless: strategies for interspecies electron transfer. Front Microbiol 5:237. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00237 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Siddique MNI, Wahid ZA (2018) Achievements and perspectives of anaerobic co-digestion: a review. J Clean Prod 194:359–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.155 CrossRef

Singh S, Cheng G, Sathitsuksanoh N, Wu D, Varanasi P, George A, Balan V, Gao X, Kumar R, Dale BE, Wyman CE, Simmons BA (2015) Comparison of different biomass pretreatment techniques and their impact on chemistry and structure. Front Energy Res 2:62. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2014.00062 CrossRef

Speda J, Jonsson B-H, Carlsson U, Karlsson M (2017) Metaproteomics-guided selection of targeted enzymes for bioprospecting of mixed microbial communities. Biotechnol Biofuels 10:128. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-017-0815-z CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Summers ZM, Fogarty HE, Leang C, Franks AE, Malvankar NS, Lovley DR (2010) Direct exchange of electrons within aggregates of an evolved syntrophic coculture of anaerobic bacteria. Science 330:1413–1415. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1196526 CrossRefPubMed

Theuerl S, Kohrs F, Benndorf D, Maus I, Wibberg D, Schlüter A, Kausmann R, Heiermann M, Rapp E, Reichl U, Pühler A, Klocke M (2015) Community shifts in a well-operating agricultural biogas plant: how process variations are handled by the microbiome. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99:7791–7803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-015-6627-9 CrossRefPubMed

Tong X, Smith LH, McCarty PL (1990) Methane fermentation of selected lignocellulosic materials. Biomass 21:239–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-4565(90)90075-U CrossRef

Vanwonterghem I, Jensen PD, Ho DP, Batstone DJ, Tyson GW (2014) Linking microbial community structure, interactions and function in anaerobic digesters using new molecular techniques. Curr Opin Biotechnol 27:55–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2013.11.004 CrossRefPubMed

von Netzer F, Kuntze K, Vogt C, Richnow HH, Boll M, Lueders T (2016) Functional gene markers for fumarate-adding and dearomatizing key enzymes in anaerobic aromatic hydrocarbon degradation in terrestrial environments. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 26:180–194. https://doi.org/10.1159/000441946 CrossRef

Wang D, Liu Y, Ngo HH, Zhang C, Yang Q, Peng L, He D, Zeng G, Li X, Ni B-J (2017) Approach of describing dynamic production of volatile fatty acids from sludge alkaline fermentation. Bioresour Technol 238:343–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.04.054 CrossRefPubMed

Weiland P (2010) Biogas production: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 85:849–860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-009-2246-7 CrossRefPubMed

Wenzel L, Heyer R, Schallert K, Löser L, Wünschiers R, Reichl U, Benndorf D (2018) SDS-PAGE fractionation to increase metaproteomic insight into the taxonomic and functional composition of microbial communities for biogas plant samples. Eng Life Sci 18:498–509. https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.201800062 CrossRef

Westerholm M, Moestedt J, Schnürer A (2016) Biogas production through syntrophic acetate oxidation and deliberate operating strategies for improved digester performance. Appl Energy 179:124–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.061 CrossRef

Wilmes P, Bond PL (2004) The application of two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and downstream analyses to a mixed community of prokaryotic microorganisms. Environ Microbiol 6:911–920. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2004.00687.x CrossRefPubMed

Wilmes P, Bond PL (2009) Microbial community proteomics: elucidating the catalysts and metabolic mechanisms that drive the Earth’s biogeochemical cycles. Curr Opin Microbiol 12:310–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2009.03.004 CrossRefPubMed

Wilmes P, Heintz-Buschart A, Bond PL (2015) A decade of metaproteomics: where we stand and what the future holds. Proteomics 15:3409–3417. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201500183 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Wintsche B, Jehmlich N, Popp D, Harms H, Kleinsteuber S (2018) Metabolic adaptation of methanogens in anaerobic digesters upon trace element limitation. Front Microbiol 9:405. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00405 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Yan Q, Li Y, Huang B, Wang A, Zou H, Miao H, Li R (2012) Proteomic profiling of the acid tolerance response (ATR) during the enhanced biomethanation process from Taihu Blue Algae with butyrate stress on anaerobic sludge. J Hazard Mater 235–236:286–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.07.062 CrossRefPubMed

Yin D-M, Westerholm M, Qiao W, Bi S-J, Wandera SM, Fan R, Jiang M-M, Dong R-J (2018) An explanation of the methanogenic pathway for methane production in anaerobic digestion of nitrogen-rich materials under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions. Bioresour Technol 264:42–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.05.062 CrossRefPubMed

Zhang W, Dai K, Xia X-Y, Wang H-J, Chen Y, Lu Y-Z, Zhang F, Zeng RJ (2018) Free acetic acid as the key factor for the inhibition of hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis in mesophilic mixed culture fermentation. Bioresour Technol 264:17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.05.049 CrossRefPubMed

Zheng Y, Zhao J, Xu F, Li Y (2014) Pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for enhanced biogas production. Prog Energy Combust Sci 42:35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2014.01.001 CrossRef

Zhu Y, McBride MJ (2017) The unusual cellulose utilization system of the aerobic soil bacterium Cytophaga hutchinsonii. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 101:7113–7127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-017-8467-2 CrossRefPubMed

Ziemiński K, Frąc M (2012) Methane fermentation process as anaerobic digestion of biomass: transformations, stages and microorganisms. Afr J Biotechnol 11:4127–4139. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBX11.054 CrossRef

Ziganshin AM, Ziganshina EE, Kleinsteuber S, Nikolausz M (2016) Comparative analysis of methanogenic communities in different laboratory-scale anaerobic digesters. Archaea 2016:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3401272 CrossRef

Titel: Proteomics of Lignocellulosic Substrates Bioconversion in Anaerobic Digesters to Increase Carbon Recovery as Methane
verfasst von: Alicia Guadalupe Talavera-Caro
María Alejandra Sánchez-Muñoz
Inty Omar Hernández-De Lira
Lilia Ernestina Montañez-Hernández
Ayerim Yedid Hernández-Almanza
Jésus Antonio Morlett-Chávez
María de las Mercedes Esparza-Perusquia
Nagamani Balagurusamy
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Valorisation of Agro-industrial Residues – Volume I: Biological Approaches
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-39136-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-39137-9

Copyright-Jahr: 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39137-9_4