nach oben

The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology

Erschienen in:

08.02.2022 | ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Readiness levels of Industry 4.0 technologies applied to aircraft manufacturing—a review, challenges and trends

verfasst von: Gabriel Consoni Zutin, Gustavo Franco Barbosa, Pedro Cabegi de Barros, Eduardo Bizeli Tiburtino, Frederico Leoni Franco Kawano, Sidney Bruce Shiki

Erschienen in: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology | Ausgabe 1-2/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The present paper provides an overview of the state-of-the-art research, outlining the applications of the Industry 4.0 (I4.0) technologies on the aircraft manufacturing sector and their maturity state based on the technology readiness level (TRL) scale. A literature review has been conducted for the identification, selection, and evaluation of the published research. A total of 57 papers extracted from the two most relevant scientific databases for the area (Web of Science and Scopus), from 2010 to March 2021, were analysed and summarized. The research, analysis, and evaluation of these papers has provided an outlook of how the aircraft manufacturing industry is inserted into the I4.0 context, based on a classification of the I4.0 technologies maturity for this industrial branch. Then, a survey was performed with 12 specialists from 5 different aircraft manufacturing companies aiming to report the practical point-of-view in this area. Thus, this paper highlights and discusses the gaps found in the literature related to the I4.0 technologies applied to aircraft manufacturing and their main useful implications not only from the academic point-of-view but also from competitive business aspects, providing recommendations for industrial managers, engineers, and stakeholders. Finally, this paper proposes new opportunities and challenges for future research.

Vorheriger Artikel Precision hot forging forming experiment and numerical simulation of a railway wagon bogie adapter

Nächster Artikel A real-time dressing method for metal lapping pads based on the thermal deformation effect

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Brodzik C, Lamar K, Shaikh A (2020) Deloitte Insights. Tech Trends 2020. https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/focus/tech-trends.html. Accessed 2 Sept 2021

Hooi LW, Leong TY (2017) Total productive maintenance and manufacturing performance improvement. J Qual Maint Eng 23(1):2–21CrossRef

Chen T, Tsai HR (2017) Ubiquitous manufacturing: current practices, challenges, and opportunities. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 45:126–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2016.01.001CrossRef

Martin C, Leurent H (2017) Technology and innovation for the future of production: Accelerating value creation. World Economic Forum, Geneva, p 1–38. https://www.weforum.org/. Accessed 2 Sept 2021

Ganzarain J, Errasti N (2016) Three stage maturity model in SME’s towards industry 4.0. J Ind Eng Manag 9(5):1119–1128. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.2073CrossRef

Tasmin R et al (2020) The readiness of automotive manufacturing company on Industrial 4.0 towards quality performance. Int J Integr Eng 12(7):160–172. https://doi.org/10.30880/ijie.2020.12.07.018CrossRef

Haddara M, Elragal A (2015) The readiness of ERP systems for the factory of the future. Proc Comput Sci 64:721–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.598CrossRef

Benias N, Markopoulos AP (2017) A review on the readiness level and cyber-security challenges in Industry 4.0. In: South-East Europe Design Automation, Computer Engineering, Computer Networks and Social Media Conference, SEEDA-CECNSM 2017. https://doi.org/10.23919/SEEDA-CECNSM.2017.8088234

Frigo MA, da Silva ECC, Barbosa GF (2016) Augmented reality in aerospace manufacturing: a review. J Ind Intell Inf 4(2):125–130. https://doi.org/10.18178/jiii.4.2.125-130CrossRef

10.

Ferreira MJB et al (2009) Relatório de Acompanhamento Setorial Indústria Aeronáutica. Agência Brasileira de Desenvolvimento Industrial – ABDI e o Núcleo de Economia Industrial e da Tecnologia do Instituto de Economia da Universidade Estadual de Campinas – Unicamp. Volume IV, Dezembro de 2009.

11.

Seitz F, Steele LW (1985) The Competitive Status of the U.S. Civil Aviation Manufacturing Industry: A Study of the Influences of Technology in Determining International Industrial Competitive Advantage. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/641CrossRef

12.

Arnaldo Valdes R, Gómez Comendador VF (2018) Aviation 4.0: More safety through automation and digitization. WIT Trans Built Environ 174:225–236. https://doi.org/10.2495/SAFE170211CrossRef

13.

Zhang X, Zhu W (2019) Application framework of digital twin-driven product smart manufacturing system: A case study of aeroengine blade manufacturing. Int J Adv Robot Syst 16(5):1729881419880663. https://doi.org/10.1177/1729881419880663CrossRef

14.

Cai H, Zhang W, Zhu Z (2019) Quality management and analysis of aircraft final assembly based on digital twin. In: 2019 11th International Conference on Intelligent Human-Machine Systems and Cybernetics (IHMSC 2019), vol 1, p 202–205. https://doi.org/10.1109/IHMSC.2019.00054

15.

de Weck OL, Reed D (2014) Trends in advanced manufacturing technology innovation. In: Locke RM, Wellhausen RL (eds) Production in the Innovation Economy. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 235–262. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262019927.003.0009CrossRef

16.

Zhou J (2013) Digitalization and intelligentization of manufacturing industry. Adv Manuf 1(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-013-0006-5MathSciNetCrossRef

17.

Lewis D (2019) Aerospace 4.0 – why we need it. https://www.aero-mag.com/aerospace-4-0-why-we-need-it/. Accessed 2 Apr 2021

18.

Guyon I et al (2019) Analysis of the opportunities of industry 4.0 in the aeronautical sector. In: Centre for Robotics, MINES ParisTech, PSL Research University, 60 bd. Saint-Michel, Paris, 75006, France: International Institute of Informatics and Systemics, IIIS, p 62–67. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85066029548&partnerID=40&md5=1f3a58f46d46ca50d2205c67b055aa95. Accessed 5 Oct 2021

19.

Straub J (2015) In search of technology readiness level (TRL) 10. Aerosp Sci Technol 46:312–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2015.07.007CrossRef

20.

Lasi H, Fettke P, Kemper HG, Feld T, Hoffmann M (2014) Industry 4.0. Bus Inf Syst Eng 6(4):239–242CrossRef

21.

Büchi G, Cugno M, Castagnoli R (2020) Smart factory performance and Industry 4.0. Technol Forecast Soc Change 150:119790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119790CrossRef

22.

Lu Y (2017) Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications and open research issues. J Ind Inf Integr 6:1–10

23.

Vaidya S, Ambad P, Bhosle S (2018) Industry 4.0 - A Glimpse. Proc Manuf 20:233–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.034CrossRef

24.

Núñez-Merino M et al (2020) Information and digital technologies of Industry 4.0 and Lean supply chain management: a systematic literature review. Int J Prod Res 58(16):5034–5061. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1743896CrossRef

25.

Stock T, Seliger G (2016) Opportunities of sustainable manufacturing in industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP 40:536–541CrossRef

26.

Zhong RY, Xu X, Klotz E, Newman ST (2017) Intelligent manufacturing in the context of industry 4.0: a review. Engineering 3(5):616–630CrossRef

27.

Neil SP, Hashemi MR (2018) Technology Readiness Level Calculator. White Paper: Air Force Research Laboratory 2004 (December 2016), pp 1–16

28.

Héder M (2017) ‘From NASA to EU: the evolution of the TRL scale in Public Sector Innovation. Innov J 22(2):1–23

29.

Mankins JC (1995) Technology Readiness Levels White Paper 51(1):51

30.

Lemos JC, Chagas MF (2016) Application of maturity assessment tools in the innovation process: converting system’s emergent properties into technological knowledge. RAI Revista de Administração e Inovação 13(2):145–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rai.2015.08.001CrossRef

31.

Ma F et al (2016) The review of manufacturing technology for aircraft structural part. Proc CIRP 56:594–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.10.117CrossRef

32.

Ceruti A et al (2019) Maintenance in aeronautics in an Industry 4.0 context: the role of augmented reality and additive manufacturing. J Comput Des Eng 6(4):516–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcde.2019.02.001CrossRef

33.

Bueno A, Godinho Filho M, Frank AG (2020) Smart production planning and control in the Industry 4.0 context: a systematic literature review. Comput Ind Eng 149:106774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106774CrossRef

34.

Moher D et al (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6(7):e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097CrossRef

35.

Jia X, Geng J, Huang L (2011) Research on PLM-oriented collaboration digital process planning technology. In: Han JT, Jiang ZY, Jiao S (eds) Advanced Manufacturing Technology pts 1 and 2, vol 156–157. Trans Tech Publications Ltd, Zurich, pp 694–699. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.156-157.694CrossRef

36.

Wang C, Bi Z, Daxu L (2014) IoT and cloud computing in automation of assembly modeling systems. IEEE Trans Ind Inform 10(2):1426–1434. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2014.2300346CrossRef

37.

Song T, Xi F, Guo S, Ming Z, Lin Y (2015) A comparison study of algorithms for surface normal determination based on point cloud data. Precis Eng 39:47–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2014.07.005CrossRef

38.

Drouot A, Zhao R, Irving L, Ratchev S (2019) Towards industry 4.0: the future automated aircraft assembly demonstrator. IFIP Adv Inf Commun Technol 530:169–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05931-6_16CrossRef

39.

Guo F, Zou F, Liu J, Wang Z (2018) Working mode in aircraft manufacturing based on digital coordination model. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 98(5–8):1547–1571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2048-0CrossRef

40.

Guo Z, Zhang Y, Zhao X, Song X (2020) CPS-based self-adaptive collaborative control for smart production-logistics systems. IEEE Trans Cybernet 51(1):188–198CrossRef

41.

Ismail MS, Chan YP, Hussain MI, Muhammad N, Zain ZM (2019). A new approach of temperature and humidity alert system at composite panel manufacturing area. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, 2129(July). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5118013

42.

Korchagin A, Deniskina A, Fateeva I (2019) Lean and energy efficient production based on internet of things (IOT) in aviation industry. E3S Web Conf 110:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201911002124

43.

Luxenburger A, Mohr J, Spieldenner T, Merkel D, Espinosa F, Schwartz T, Reinicke F, Ahlers J, Stoyke M (2019) Augmented reality for human-robot cooperation in aircraft assembly. In: 2019 IEEE International Conference On Artificial Intelligence And Virtual Reality (AIVR), p 263–266. https://doi.org/10.1109/AIVR46125.2019.00061

44.

Tao F, Qi Q (2019) Make more digital twins. Nature 573(7775):490–491. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02849-1CrossRef

45.

Liang B, Liu W, Liu K, Zhou M, Zhang Y, Jia Z (2020) A displacement field perception method for component digital twin in aircraft assembly. Sensors 20(18):5161. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20185161CrossRef

46.

Miller J, Hoover M, Winer E (2020) Mitigation of the Microsoft HoloLens’ hardware limitations for a controlled product assembly process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 109(5–6):1741–1754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05768-yCrossRef

47.

Xin Y, Yang S, Wang G, Evans R, Wu F (2020) A tool path optimization approach based on blend feature simplification for multi-cavity machining of complex parts. Sci Prog 103(1):0036850419874233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0036850419874233CrossRef

48.

Zhang H, Yan Q, Wen Z (2020) Information modeling for cyber-physical production system based on digital twin and AutomationML. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 107(3–4):1927–1945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05056-9CrossRef

49.

Zhang Z, Guan Z, Gong Y, Luo D, Yue L (2020) Improved multi-fidelity simulation-based optimisation: application in a digital twin shop floor. Int J Prod Res. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1849846CrossRef

50.

AIRBUS (2019) How Airbus data analytic platform is helping to solve the aviation data challenge. MRO Aviation Okinawa, January, 2019.

51.

Barbosa GF, Shiki SB, Savazzi JO (2019) Digitalization of a standard robot arm toward 4th industrial revolution. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 105(5–6):2707–2720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04523-2CrossRef

52.

Bécue A, Maia E, Feeken L, Borchers P, Praça I (2020) A new concept of digital twin supporting optimization and resilience of factories of the future. Appl Sci 10(13):4482. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10134482CrossRef

53.

Bolotov MA, Pechenin VA, Ruzanov NV, Grachev IA (2019) Information model and software architecture for the implementation of the digital twin of the turbine rotor. J Phys Conf Ser 1368(5):052013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1368/5/052013CrossRef

54.

Bottani E, Vignali G (2019) Augmented reality technology in the manufacturing industry: A review of the last decade. IISE Trans 51(3):284–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725854.2018.1493244CrossRef

55.

Caggiano A, Teti R (2018) Digital factory technologies for robotic automation and enhanced manufacturing cell design. Cogent Eng 5(1):1426676. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2018.1426676CrossRef

56.

Cao X, Zhao G, Xiao W (2020) Digital Twin-oriented real-time cutting simulation for intelligent computer numerical control machining. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405420937869CrossRef

57.

Greco A, Caputo F, Caterino M, D’Ambra S, Fera M, Laudante E (2020) Composite parts assembly operational improvements. Macromol Symp 389(1):1900098. https://doi.org/10.1002/masy.201900098CrossRef

58.

Gupta RK, Belkadi F, Buergy C, Bitte F, Da Cunha C, Buergin J, Lanza G, Bernard A (2018) Gathering, evaluating and managing customer feedback during aircraft production. Comput Ind Eng 115:559–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.12.012CrossRef

59.

Khajavi HS, Holmström J, Partanen J (2018) Additive manufacturing in the spare parts supply chain: hub configuration and technology maturity. Rapid Prototyp J 24(7):1178–1192. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-03-2017-0052CrossRef

60.

Jenett B, Cramer N, Swei S, Cheung K (2019) Design approximation and proof test methods for a cellular material structure. In: AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2019-1861

61.

Kheddar A, Caron S, Gergondet P, Tanguy A, Ott C, Henze B, Mesesan G, Englsberger J, Roa M, Kheddar A, Caron S, Gergondet P, Comport A, Tanguy A, Kheddar A, Gergondet P, Comport A, Tanguy A, Ott C, Kanehiro F (2019) Humanoid robots in aircraft manufacturing: the airbus use cases. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 26(4):30–45CrossRef

62.

Liu C, Wu H, Yang Y, Wang J (2017) A rapid and intelligent approach to design forming shape model for precise manufacturing of flanged part. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91(9–12):3121–3134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9935-zCrossRef

63.

Liu J, Yu J (2013) Research on the framework of internet of things in manufacturing for aircraft large components assembly site. In: Proceedings - 2013 IEEE International Conference on Green Computing and Communications and IEEE Internet of Things and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing, GreenCom-IThings-CPSCom 2013, p 1192–1196. https://doi.org/10.1109/GreenCom-iThings-CPSCom.2013.207

64.

Lv X (2020) Overall framework design of integrated manufacturing center of underground laser rapid prototyping for aeroengine components based on cloud computing and internet of things. J Phys Conf Ser 1624(6):062009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1624/6/062009CrossRef

65.

Manda VR, Kampurath V, Mrk C (2018) 3D printing and its effect on outsourcing: a study of the Indian aircraft industry. J Aerosp Technol Manag 10:862. https://doi.org/10.5028/jatm.v10.862CrossRef

66.

Mandolla C, Petruzzelli AM, Percoco G, Urbinati A (2019) Building a digital twin for additive manufacturing through the exploitation of blockchain: A case analysis of the aircraft industry. Comput Ind 109:134–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2019.04.011CrossRef

67.

Manohar K, Hogan T, Buttrick J, Banerjee AG, Kutz JN, Brunton SL (2018) Predicting shim gaps in aircraft assembly with machine learning and sparse sensing. J Manuf Syst 48:87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.01.011CrossRef

68.

Marzano A, Friel I, Erkoyuncu JA, Court S (2015) Design of a virtual reality framework for maintainability and assemblability test of complex systems. In: Erkoyuncu J (ed) CIRPE 2015 - Understanding the Life Cycle Implications of Manufacturing, vol 37. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 242–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.08.067CrossRef

69.

Mas F, Oliva M, Rios J, Gomez A, Olmos V, Garcia JA (2015) PLM based approach to the industrialization of aeronautical assemblies. In: Canela JM, Corral IB (eds) Mesic Manufacturing Engineering Society International Conference 2015, vol 132. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1045–1052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.594CrossRef

70.

Mayrhofer W, Rupprecht P, Schlund S (2019) One-fits-all vs. tailor-made: user-centered workstations for field assembly with an application in aircraft parts manufacturing. Proc Manuf 39:149–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.287CrossRef

71.

Najmon JC, Raeisi S, Tovar A (2019) Review of additive manufacturing technologies and applications in the aerospace industry. In: Froes F, Boyer R (eds) Additive Manufacturing for the Aerospace Industry. Elsevier Inc, Amsterdam, pp 7–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814062-8.00002-9CrossRef

72.

Nunes VA, Barbosa GF (2020) Simulation-based analysis of AGV workload used on aircraft manufacturing system: a theoretical approach. Acta Sci Technol 42(1):e47034. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascitechnol.v42i1.47034CrossRef

73.

Ottogalli K, Rosquete D, Amundarain A, Aguinaga I, Borro D (2019) Flexible Framework to Model Industry 4.0 Processes for Virtual Simulators. Appl Sci 9(23):4983. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9234983CrossRef

74.

Ou P (2012) Maintenance Applications of Augmented Reality for The Chinese Aerospace Industry. In: School of Applied Science MSc, vol 66

75.

Pérez L, Rodríguez-Jiménez S, Rodríguez N, Usamentiaga R, García DF, Wang L (2020) Symbiotic human–robot collaborative approach for increased productivity and enhanced safety in the aerospace manufacturing industry. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 106(3–4):851–863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04638-6CrossRef

76.

Regenbrecht H, Baratoff G, Wilke W (2005) Augmented reality projects in the automotive and aerospace industries. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 25(6):48–56. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2005.124CrossRef

77.

Reis R, Diniz F, Mizioka L, Olivio P, Lemos G, Quintiães M, Menezes R, Amadio F, Caldas N (2018) FASTEN: An IoT platform for manufacturing. Embraer use case MATEC Web Conf 233:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201823300009CrossRef

78.

Rice M, Tay HH, Ng J, Lim C, Selvaraj SK, Wu E (2015) Augmented wire routing navigation for wire assembly. In: Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, ISMAR 2015, p 88–91. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2015.28

79.

Ríos J, Morate FM, Oliva M, Hernández JC (2016) Framework to support the aircraft digital counterpart concept with an industrial design view. Int J Agile Syst Manag 9(3):212–231. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJASM.2016.079934CrossRef

80.

Romero A, Vieira DR (2016) How additive manufacturing improves product lifecycle management and supply chain management in the aviation sector? In: Bouras A, Eynard B, Foufou S, Thoben KD (eds) Product Lifecycle Management in the Era of Internet of Things PLM 2015, vol 467. Springer, Cham, pp 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33111-9_8CrossRef

81.

Ruiz L, Torres M, Gómez A, Díaz S, González JM, Cavas F (2020) Detection and classification of aircraft fixation elements during manufacturing processes using a convolutional neural network. Appl Sci 10(19):1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10196856CrossRef

82.

Safi M, Chung J, Pradhan P (2019) Review of augmented reality in aerospace industry. Aircr Eng Aerosp Technol 91(9):1187–1194. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEAT-09-2018-0241CrossRef

83.

Santonino MD, Koursaris CM, Williams MJ (2018) Modernizing the supply chain of Airbus by integrating RFID and Blockchain processes. Int J Aviat Aeronaut Aerosp 5(4):4. https://doi.org/10.15394/ijaaa.2018.1265

84.

Seon G, Nikishkov Y, Makeev A, Ferguson L (2020) Towards a digital twin for mitigating void formation during debulking of autoclave composite parts. Eng Fract Mech 225:106792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106792CrossRef

85.

Um J, Choi Y-C, Stroud I (2014) Factory planning system considering energy-efficient process under cloud manufacturing. In ElMaraghy H (ed) Variety Management in Manufacturing: Proceedings of the 47th CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems, vol 17. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 553–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.01.084

86.

Xia R, Zhao J, Zhang T, Su R, Chen Y, Fu S (2020) Detection method of manufacturing defects on aircraft surface based on fringe projection. Optik 208:164332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.164332CrossRef

87.

Xu Z, Ji F, Ding S, Zhao Y, Zhou Y, Zhang Q, Du F (2020) Digital twin-driven optimization of gas exchange system of 2-stroke heavy fuel aircraft engine. J Manuf Syst 58:132–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.08.002CrossRef

Titel: Readiness levels of Industry 4.0 technologies applied to aircraft manufacturing—a review, challenges and trends
verfasst von: Gabriel Consoni Zutin
Gustavo Franco Barbosa
Pedro Cabegi de Barros
Eduardo Bizeli Tiburtino
Frederico Leoni Franco Kawano
Sidney Bruce Shiki
Publikationsdatum: 08.02.2022
Verlag: Springer London
Erschienen in: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology / Ausgabe 1-2/2022
Print ISSN: 0268-3768
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-08769-1

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1-2/2022

Impact of material data in assembly delay prediction—a machine learning-based case study in machinery industry

Mapping ductile-to-fragile transition and the effect of tool nose radius in diamond turning of single-crystal silicon

Uncertainty calibration and quantification of surrogate model for estimating the machining distortion of thin-walled parts

Mechanism analysis and engineering experiment of multi-directional pressing-forming complex large-size automobile axle housing

Chatter detection in milling process based on the combination of wavelet packet transform and PSO-SVM

Type-1 and type-2 radial basis function neural networks Mandami system to evaluate quality features

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten