Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
Given the growing importance of Socially Responsible Investing (SRI), it is surprising that there is no consensus of what the term SRI means to an investor. Further, most studies of this question rely solely on the views of investors who already invest in SRI funds. Our study surveys a unique pool of approximately 5,000 investors that contains both investors who have used SRI criteria in investment decisions and those who have not, and involves a broad array of criteria associated with SR investing. Our findings offer new insight into the SRI debate. For both sets of investors, environmental and sustainability issues dominate as the major category associated with SR investing. We find strong agreement in the ranking of the relative importance of various SRI factors despite differences between these two groups in their opinion of their overall importance. We also find that investors prefer to consider the SRI question in more holistic terms rather than using the exclusionary format favored by most SRI funds. Investors seem to prefer to reward firms who display overall positive social behavior rather than to exclude firms on the basis of certain products or practices. These findings can help providers of SR investment vehicles to improve the SRI products that they offer to the general investor, thus both encouraging the initial adoption of SR criteria by investors and increasing overall investment in SR choices.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Beal, D., & Goyen, M. (1998). Putting your money where your mouth is: A profile of ethical investors. Financial Services Review, 7(2), 129–143. CrossRef
Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a name? Reputation-building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 233–258. CrossRef
Greening, D. W., & Turban, D. B. (2000). Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business and Society, 39(3), 254–280. CrossRef
Junkus, J. C., & Berry, T. (2010). The demographic profile of socially responsible investors. Managerial Finance, 36(6), 474–482.
McLachan, J., & Gardner, J. (2004). A comparison of socially responsible and conventional investors. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(1), 11–25. CrossRef
Nilsson, J. (2008). Investment with a conscience: Examining the impact of pro-social attitudes and perceived financial performance on socially responsible investment behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 307–325. CrossRef
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441. CrossRef
Rosen, B. N., Sandler, D. M., & Shani, D. (1991). Social issues and socially responsible investment behavior: A preliminary investigation. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 25(2), 221–234. CrossRef
Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2008). Corporate citizenship in a globalized world: introduction to the handbook of research on global corporate citizenship. In A. G. Sherer & G. Palazzo (Eds.), Handbook of research on global corporate citizenship. Cheltenam: Elgar Publishing.
Schueth, S. (2003). Socially responsible investing in the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 189–194. CrossRef
Shank, T. M., Manullang, D. K., & Hill, R. P. (2005). Is it better to be naughty or nice? Journal of Investing, 14(3), 82–88. CrossRef
Statman, M. (2000). Socially responsible investments. Journal of Investment Consulting, 8(2), 17–37.
Statman, M. (2006). Socially responsible indexes. Journal of Portfolio Management, 32(3), 100–109. CrossRef
- Socially Responsible Investing: An Investor Perspective
Thomas C. Berry
Joan C. Junkus
- Springer Netherlands
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta