Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Education and Information Technologies
Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies 1/2011

01.03.2011

Students’ opinions on blended learning and its implementation in terms of their learning styles

verfasst von: Benlihan Uğur, Buket Akkoyunlu, Serap Kurbanoğlu

Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies | Ausgabe 1/2011

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to examine students’ views on the blended learning method and its use in relation to the students’ individual learning style. The study was conducted with 31 senior students. Web based media together with face to face classroom settings were used in the blended learning framework. A scale of Students’ Views on Blended Learning and its implementation, Kolb’s Learning Style Inventory, Pre-Information Form and open ended questions were used to gather data. The majority of the students’ fell into assimilators, accommodators and convergers learning styles. Results revealed that students’ views on blended learning method and its use are quite positive.
Vorheriger Artikel Editorial vol 16, no 1: Online learning technologies
Nächster Artikel Distance learning technology and service support in Greece: The case study of the Aristotle University over the last decade

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
Akkoyunlu, B., & Soylu, M. Y. (2006). A Study on students’ views on blended learning environment. Turkish Journal of Distance Education, 7(3), 43–56.
Akkoyunlu, B., & Soylu, M. Y. (2008). Development of a scale on learners’ views on blended learning and its implementation process. The Internet and Universities., 11, 26–32.
Aşkar, P., & Akkoyunlu, B. (1993). Kolb learning style inventory. Education and Science, 87, 37–47.
Bliuc, A. M., Goodyear, P., & Ellis, R. A. (2007). Research focus and methodological choices in studies into students’ experiences of blended learning in higher education. Internet and Higher Education., 10, 231–244.CrossRef
Buch, K., & Bartley, S. (2002). Learning style and training delivery mode preference. Journal of Workplace Learning, 14(1), 5–10.CrossRef
Caldwell, J., Toman, N., and Leahy, J. (2006) Diversity and difference in the learning experience of students in contemporary mass Higher Education. Paper presented at NUI Galway 4th Annual Conference on Teaching & Learning 8–9 June 2006.
Diaz, D. P., & Cartnal, R. B. (1999). Students’ learning styles in two classes: Online distance learning and equivalent on-campus. College Teaching, 47(4), 130–135.CrossRef
Dille, B., & Mezack, M. (1991). Identifying predictors of high-risk among community college telecourse students. The American Journal of Distance Education, 5(1), 24–35.
Driscoll, M. (2002). Blended Learning: Let’s get beyond the hype. elearning, March, 54
Fahy, P. J. (2005). Student learning style and asynchronous computer-mediated conferencing (CMC) interaction. TheAmerican Journal of Distance Education, 19(1), 5–22.CrossRef
Fox, M. (2002). The blended promise (pp. 27–30). March: E-Learning.
Federico, P. A. (1991). Student cognitive attributes and performance in a computer — managed instructional setting. In R. Dillion & J. Pellegrino (Eds.), Instruction: Theoratical and applied perspectives (pp. 16–46). New York: Praeger.
Federico, P. (2000). Learning styles and student attitudes toward various aspects of network-based instruction. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 359–379.CrossRef
Felder, R. M. (1996). Matters of style. ASEE Prism, 6(4), 18–23.
Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2005). Understanding student differences. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 57–72.
Ginns, P., & Ellis, R. (2007). Quality in blended learning: Exploring the relationships between on-line and face-to-face teaching and learning. Internet and Higher Education, 10, 53–64.CrossRef
Holley, J. H., & Jenkins, E. K. (1993). The relationship between learning style and performance on various test question formats. Journal of Education for Business, 68, 301–308.CrossRef
Karadeniz, Ş. (2009). Flexible design for the future of distance learning. Procedia Social and Behavioral Science, s 1, 358–363.CrossRef
Keefe, J. W. (1987). Learning style theory and practice. VA: Reston.
Kennedy, D., & McNaught, C. (1997). Design elements for interactive multimedia. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 13(1), 1–22.
Kerres, M., & DeWitt, C. (2003). A didactical framework for the design of blended learning arrangements. Journal of Educational Media, 28(2–3), 101–113.
Kolb, D. A., & Fry, R. (1975). ’Toward an applied theory of experiential learning. In C. Cooper (Ed.), Theories of Group Process. London: John Wiley.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development, Upper Saddle River. Prentice Hall: N. J.
Kolb, D. A. (1986). Learning Style Inventory: Technical Manual (Revth ed.). Boston, MA: McBer.
Liegle, J. O., & Janicki, T. N. (2006). The effect of learning styles on navigation needs of web-based learners. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(5), 885–898.CrossRef
Lu, H., Jia, L., Gong, S. H., & Clark, B. (2007). The relationship of Kolb learning styles, online learning behaviors and learning outcomes. Educational Technology & Society, 10(4), 187–196.
Maddux, C. D., Ewing-Taylor, J. F., & Johnson, D. L. (eds). (2002). Distance Education: Issue and concerns. New York: The Howarth Press.
Miller, M. L. (2005). Using learning styles to evaluate computer based instruction. Computers in Human Behaviour, 21(2), 287–306.CrossRef
Manochehr, N. N. (2006). The influence of learning styles on learners in e-learning environments: An empirical study. CHEER Virtual Edition, 18, 10–14.
Michalski, K. (2008). Learning styles and blended learning. Challenges and opportunities in distance education environment. In Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications. 4290–4297. Chesapeake, VA: AACE. Retrieved from http://​www.​editlib.​org/​p/​28980.
Mortera-Gutierrez , F. J. (2005). .Faculty best practises using blended learning in e — learning and face to face instruction. 20th Annual Conference on Distantance Teaching and Learning. Madison, Wisconsin
Newby, T. J., Stepich, D. A., Lehman, J. D., & Russell, J. D. (2000). Instructional technology for teaching and learning: Designing instruction, integrating computers, and using media (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
Oblinger, D., & Hawkins B. (2005). The myth about e-Learning. We don’t need to worry about e learning anymore. EDUCAUSE Review, 40(4), 14–15.
Oliver, R., & Short, G. (1996). The Western Australian Telecentres Network: A model for enhancing access to education and training in rural areas. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 2(4), 311–328.
Osguthorpe, R. T., & Graham, C. R. (2003). Blended learning systems: Definitions and directions. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(3), 227–234.
Prensky, M. (2001). "Digital natives, digital immigrants." On the Horizon. NCB University Press. 9(5).
Simpson, C., & Du, Y. (2004). Effects of learning styles and class participation on students’ enjoyment level indistributed learning environments. Journal of Education for Library & Information Science, 45(2), 123–136.CrossRef
Toman, N.; Leahy, J. and Caldwell, J. (2005) The Learning Culture of Students in Contemporary Mass Higher Education. Proceedings of 3rd International Conference — What a Difference a Pedagogy Makes.
Richmond, A., & Liu, L. (2005). Student learning style of traditional courses versus online distance courses. In C. Crawford, et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 576–578). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Terrell, S. R., & Dringus, L. (2000). An investigation of the effect of learning style on student success in an online environment. Journal of Educational Systems, 28(3), 231–238.CrossRef
Thiele, J. E. (2003). Learning patterns of online students. Journal of Nursing Education, 42(8), 364–367.
Tongdeelert, P. (2003). A proposed collaborative computer network-based learning model for undergraduate students with different learning styles. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE Volume:4 Number:4
Metadaten
Titel
Students’ opinions on blended learning and its implementation in terms of their learning styles
verfasst von
Benlihan Uğur
Buket Akkoyunlu
Serap Kurbanoğlu
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2011
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Education and Information Technologies / Ausgabe 1/2011
Print ISSN: 1360-2357
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7608
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-009-9109-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2011

Education and Information Technologies 1/2011 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Formalization and implementation of Eliminating and Optimizing Selection (EOS) approach

EditorialNotes

Editorial vol 16, no 1: Online learning technologies

OriginalPaper

Are online communities for young people an issue for education researchers? A literature review of Swedish and international studies within the educational field

OriginalPaper

E-learning in life long education: A computational approach to determining listening comprehension ability

OriginalPaper

E-Learning change management and communication strategies within a HEI in a developing country: Institutional organisational cultural change at the University of the Western Cape

OriginalPaper

Distance learning technology and service support in Greece: The case study of the Aristotle University over the last decade