nach oben

Education and Information Technologies

Erschienen in:

14.03.2023

The effects of microlearning-supported flipped classroom on pre-service teachers’ learning performance, motivation and engagement

verfasst von: Mustafa Fidan

Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies | Ausgabe 10/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Flipped classroom (FC) has recently attracted researchers’ interest in teacher education thanks to its potential for promoting pre-service teachers’ (PTs) professional development. However, some of major issues are the lack of interactivity, disengagement, and amotivation of PTs for pre-class activities due to poor online instruction design. This explanatory sequential mixed study explores the effects of the microlearning-supported FC on PTs’ learning performance for professional development, motivation, and engagement. A total of 128 PTs participated in this study from a university in Turkey. In the quantitative phase, a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest design was conducted and the treatment lasted for 14 weeks. The PTs were divided into two experimental groups and one control groups using random sampling technique. In first experimental group (m-FC, n = 43), the participants learned with microlearning-supported (by using a-bit sized learning chunks outside the classroom) FC model. In the second experimental group (t-FC, n = 39), the participants learned with traditional FC model. A control group (non-FC, n = 46) was not taught using FC model and teacher-centered approach was adopted in this group. The findings indicated that FC model (in both experimental groups) increased learning performance, intrinsic motivation, emotional, and behavioral engagement compared to a group that was not used to FC. Moreover, m-FC group had better intrinsic motivation and engagement than both t-FC and non-FC groups. Semi-structured interviews showed that two major themes emerged regarding benefits and challenges of microlearning-supported FC. Most of PTs had positive perceptions that it enhances the willingness to participate in pre-class activities. The implications for teacher education, recommendations and directions for further studies were also discussed.

Vorheriger Artikel Kahoot! and its effect on financial accounting marks at the university

Nächster Artikel Online technological STEM education project management

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 34, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934336CrossRef

Akcayir, G., & Akcayir, M. (2018). The flipped classroom: a review of its advantages and challenges. Computers & Education, 126, 334–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.021CrossRef

Bishop, J., Verleger, M. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. Proceedings of the 120th ASEE Annual Conference, & Exposition (1–18). Retrieved August 12, 2021, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285935974_The_flipped_classroom_A_survey_of_the_research

Barahona, C., Nussbaum, M., Espinosa, P., Meneses, A., Alario-Hoyos, C., & Pérez-Sanagustín, M. (2022). Transforming the learning experience in pre-service teacher training using the flipped classroom. Technology Pedagogy and Education, 31(3), 261–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2022.2041476CrossRef

Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International Society for Technology in Education.

Birgili, B., & Demir, O. (2022). An explanatory sequential mixed-method research on the full-scale implementation of flipped learning in the first years of the world’s first fully flipped university: departmental differences. Computers & Education, 176, 104352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104352CrossRef

Bond, M. (2020). Facilitating student engagement through the flipped learning approach in K-12: a systematic review. Computers & Education, 151, 103819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103819CrossRef

Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: a systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8CrossRef

Braun, V., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., & Terry, G. (2019). Thematic analysis. In P. Liamputtong (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in health and social sciences (pp. 843–860). Springer.

Buyukozturk, S., Akgun, O. E., Ozkahveci, O., & Demirel, F. (2004). The validity and reliability study of the turkish version of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 4(2), 207–239.

Cevikbas, M., & Kaiser, G. (2022). Student engagement in a flipped secondary mathematics classroom. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20, 1455–1480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10213-xCrossRef

Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (2012). Handbook of research on student engagement. Springer.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.

Debbag, M., & Yildiz, S. (2021). Effect of the flipped classroom model on academic achievement and motivation in teacher education. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 3057–3076. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10395-xCrossRef

Dolasinski, M. J., & Reynolds, J. (2021). Microlearning in the higher education hospitality classroom. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10963758.2021.1963748

Fidan, M., & Debbag, M. (2023). Comparing the effectiveness of instructional video types: an in-depth analysis on pre-service teachers for online learning. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 39(3), 575–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2041905CrossRef

Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2018). What works and what doesn’t work with instructional video. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 465–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.015CrossRef

Flipped Learning Global Initiative (2018). Flipped learning 3.0. Retrieved March 2, 2021, from https://www.flglobal.org/flipped-learning-3-0/

Förster, M., Maur, A., Weiser, C., & Winkel, K. (2022). Pre-class video watching fosters achievement and knowledge retention in a flipped classroom. Computers & Education, 179, 104399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104399CrossRef

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.CrossRef

Google (2020). Google trends: Flipped classroom. Retrieved June 6, 2022, from https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&q=flipped%20classroom

Hamdan, N., McKnight, P., McKnight, K., & Arfstrom, K. M. (2013). A review of flipped learning. Retrieved February 4, 2022, from https://flippedlearning.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/LitReview_FlippedLearning.pdf

Han, H., & Røkenes, F. M. (2020). Flipped classroom in teacher education: a scoping review. Frontiers in Education, 5, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.601593CrossRef

Horst, R., Naraghi-Taghi-Off, R., Rau, L., & Dörner, R. (2020). Bite-sized virtual reality learning applications: a pattern-based immersive authoring environment. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 26(8), 947–971. https://doi.org/10.3897/jucs.2020.051CrossRef

Hsia, L. H., Hwang, G. J., & Lin, C. J. (2022). A WSQ-based flipped learning approach to improving students’ dance performance through reflection and effort promotion. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(2), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1651744CrossRef

Huang, H., Hwang, G. H., & Chang, S. C. (2021). Facilitating decision making in authentic contexts: an SVVR-based experiential flipped learning approach for professional training. Interactive Learning Environments. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2000435

Hung, H. T. (2015). Flipping the classroom for English language learners to foster active learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.967701MathSciNetCrossRef

Jamaludin, R., & Osman, S. Z. (2014). The use of a flipped classroom to enhance engagement and promote active learning. Journal of Education and Practice, 5, 124–131.

Jovanović, J., Mirriahi, N., Gašević, D., Dawson, S., & Pardo, A. (2019). Predictive power of regularity of pre-class activities in a flipped classroom. Computers & Education, 134, 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.011CrossRef

Jung, H., Park, S. W., Kim, H. S., & Park, J. (2022). The effects of the regulated learning-supported flipped classroom on student performance. Journal of Computing Higher Education, 34, 132–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-021-09284-0CrossRef

Kapp, K. M., & Defelice, R. A. (2019). Microlearning: short and sweet. American Society for Training and Development.

Kim, N. H., So, H. J., & Joo, Y. J. (2021). Flipped learning design fidelity, self-regulated learning, satisfaction, and continuance intention in a university flipped learning course. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(4), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6046CrossRef

Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guildford.

Kossen, C., & Ooi, C. Y. (2021). Trialling micro-learning design to increase engagement in online courses. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 16(3), 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-09-2021-0107CrossRef

Lai, H. M., Hsieh, P. J., Uden, L., & Yang, C. H. (2021). A multilevel investigation of factors influencing university students’ behavioral engagement in flipped classrooms. Computers & Education, 175, 104318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104318CrossRef

Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: a gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31, 30–43. https://doi.org/10.2307/1183338CrossRef

Li, C. T., Hou, H. T., Li, M. C., & Kuo, C. C. (2022). Comparison of mini-game-based flipped classroom and video-based flipped classroom: an analysis of learning performance, flow and concentration on discussion. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 31, 321–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00573-xCrossRef

Lo, C., & Hew, K. (2017). A critical review of flipped classroom challenges in K-12 education: possible solutions and recommendations for future research. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(4), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-016-0044-2CrossRef

Manning, K. D., Spicer, J. O., Golub, L., Akbashev, M., & Klein, R. (2021). The micro revolution: effect of bite-sized teaching (BST) on learner engagement and learning in postgraduate medical education. BMC Medical Education, 21(69), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02496-zCrossRef

Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811678

Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7, 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104318CrossRef

Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2018). Mobile-based micro‐learning and assessment: impact on learning performance and motivation of high school students. Journal of Computing Assisted Learning, 34, 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12240CrossRef

Pandey, A. (2020). E-learning trends in 2020. Retrieved August 22, 2012, from https://www.td.org/user/content/ashapandey/elearning-trends-in-2020-03-03-20-07-22

Pekrun, R., & Perry, R. P. (2014). Control-value theory of achievement emotions. In R. Pekrun, & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 120–141). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801–813.CrossRef

Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: the concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 579–595. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032690MathSciNetCrossRef

Reinhardt, K. S., & Elwood, S. (2019). Promising practices in online training and support: Micro learning and personal learning environments to promote a growth mindset in learners. In J. Keengwe (Ed.), Handbook of research on virtual training and mentoring of online instructors (pp. 298–310). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-6322-8.ch013

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68CrossRef

Ryan, R. M., & Niemiec, C. P. (2009). Self-determination theory in schools of education. Can an empirically supported framework also be critical and liberating? Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 263–272.CrossRef

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publishing.

Schwichow, M., Hellmann, K. A., & Mikelskis-Seifert, S. (2022). Pre-service teachers’ perception of competence, social relatedness, and autonomy in a flipped classroom: effects on learning to notice student preconceptions. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 33(3), 282–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2021.1913332CrossRef

Shamir-Inbal, T., & Blau, I. (2020). Micro-learning in designing professional development for ICT teacher leaders: the role of self-regulation and perceived learning. Professional Development in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1763434CrossRef

Sointu, E., Hyypiä, M., Lambert, M. C. (2022). Preliminary evidence of key factors in successful flipping: predicting positive student experiences in flipped classrooms. Higher Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00848-2

Sozmen, E. Y., Karaca, O., & Bati, A. H. (2021). The effectiveness of interactive training and microlearning approaches on motivation and independent learning of medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2021.1966488CrossRef

Staker, H., & Horn, M. (2012). Classifying K-12 blended learning. The innosight institute website. Retrieved October 23, 2021, from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED535180.pdf

Stohr, C., Stathakarou, N., Mueller, F., Nifakos, S., & McGrath, C. (2019). Videos as learning objects in MOOCs: a study of specialist and non-specialist participants’ video activity in MOOCs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12623CrossRef

Strelan, P., Osborn, A., & Palmer, E. (2020). The flipped classroom: a meta-analysis of effects on student performance across disciplines and education levels. Educational Research Review, 30, 100314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100314CrossRef

Sun, F. R., Hu, H. Z., Wan, R. G., Fu, X., & Wu, S. J. (2022). A learning analytics approach to investigating pre-service teachers’ change of concept of engagement in the flipped classroom. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(2), 376–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1660996CrossRef

Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. In J. P. Mestre & B. H. Ross (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Cognition in education (pp. 37–76). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.

Taylor, A., & Hung, W. (2022). The effects of microlearning: a scoping review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70, 363–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10084-1CrossRef

Unal, E., & Uzun, A. M. (2021). Understanding university students’ behavioral intention to use Edmodo through the lens of an extended technology acceptance model. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(2), 619–637. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13046CrossRef

Vaughan, M. (2015). The flipped classroom: The benefits for preservice teachers. In D. Rutledge, & D. Slykhuis (Eds.), Proceedings from SITE 2015—Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education international conference (pp. 2622–2624). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.

Wagner, M., Gegenfurtner, A., & Urhahne, D. (2021). Effectiveness of the flipped classroom on student achievement in secondary education: a meta-analysis. Zeitschrift für P¨adagogische Psychologie, 35(1), 11–31. https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/a000274CrossRef

Wang, C., Bakhet, M., Roberts, D., Gnani, S., & El-Osta, A. (2020). The efficacy of microlearning in improving self-care capability: a systematic review of the literature. Public Health, 186, 286–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2020.07.007CrossRef

Wang, K., Zhu, C., Li, S., & Sang, G. (2022). Using revised community of inquiry framework to scaffold MOOC-based flipped learning. Interactive Learning Environments. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2071948

Webb, M., & Doman, E. (2019). Impacts of flipped classrooms on learner attitudes towards technology-enhanced language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(3), 240–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1557692CrossRef

Yin, J., Goh, T. T., Yang, B., & Xiaobin, Y. (2021). Conversation technology with micro-learning: the impact of chatbot-based learning on students’ learning motivation and performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(1), 154–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120952067CrossRef

Yoon, M., Hill, J., & Kim, D. (2021). Designing supports for promoting self-regulated learning in the flipped classroom. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 33(2), 398–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-021-09269-zCrossRef

Yough, M., Merzdorf, H. E., Fedesco, H. N., & Cho, H. J. (2019). Flipping the classroom in teacher education: implications for motivation and learning. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(5), 410–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117742885CrossRef

Zhang, Y., Chen, B. L., Ge, J., Hung, C. Y., & Mei, L. (2018). When is the best time to use rubrics in flipped learning? A study on students’ learning achievement, metacognitive awareness, and cognitive load. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(8), 1207–1221. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1553187CrossRef

Zheng, X., Johnson, T. E., & Zhou, C. A. (2020). Pilot study examining the impact of collaborative mind mapping strategy in a flipped classroom: Learning achievement, self-efficacy, motivation, and students’ acceptance. Education Techonology Research and Development, 68, 3527–3545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09868-0CrossRef

Zou, D., Xie, H., Wang, F., & Kwan, R. (2020). Flipped learning with Wikipedia in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 45(5), 1026–1045. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1750195CrossRef

Titel: The effects of microlearning-supported flipped classroom on pre-service teachers’ learning performance, motivation and engagement
verfasst von: Mustafa Fidan
Publikationsdatum: 14.03.2023
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies / Ausgabe 10/2023
Print ISSN: 1360-2357
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7608
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11639-2

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2023

The comparison of the effect of two methods of face-to-face and E-learning education on learning, retention, and interest in English language course

Course quality and perceived employability of Malaysian youth: The mediating role of course effectiveness and satisfaction

Online technological STEM education project management

Editorial for EAIT issue 10, 2023

The effects of pre-service early childhood teachers’ digital literacy and self-efficacy on their perception of AI education for young children

Language teachers’ beliefs about using high-immersion virtual reality

Premium Partner