Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Health and Technology 2/2014

01.08.2014 | Original Paper

The impact of Fukushima on global health: lessons learned from man-made and natural disasters

Erschienen in: Health and Technology | Ausgabe 2/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

On July 5, 2013 a special invited session entitled: “The Impact of Fukushima on Global Health—Lessons Learned from Man-Made and Natural Disasters” was held at the Osaka Convention Center in Osaka, Japan, during the 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE—Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. The purpose of that session was mainly to discuss what happened at Fukushima, its repercussions and what other countries particularly those in South, Central and North America, can do to be better prepared for similar events. The first three authors of this paper participated in that special session. This article examines the causes and consequences of the nuclear accident that took place March 11, 2011, at the Fukushima Dai-ichi plant in Fukushima, Japan. It explains the different security risks associated with nuclear energy and analyzes the natural, man-made and technical causes of the Fukushima disaster. While nature was the main instigator, poor design, relaxed safety standards and lack of training severely exacerbated the damage and prolonged the effects of the incident. Crisis management strategies from the incident showed how cloud computing can be useful and effective in emergency response situations. However, the article’s authors warn of potential failures due to infrastructure interdependencies and of the need to build resilient systems. The ongoing crisis in Fukushima serves as a testament to the different security risks associated with nuclear power and the serious, long lasting consequences they can have on critical infrastructures, the environment, public health, commerce and society—not just in Fukushima but anywhere in the world. In examining nuclear power as a viable energy resource, this article uses the Fukushima accident to encourage international discussion regarding the benefits and risks of nuclear power, the definition of government and utility company’s roles and responsibilities to the public, and the possibility of pursuing alternative energy sources. Finally, through an analysis of these risks and the lessons learned from Fukushima, this article will present policy recommendations regarding better risk analysis, plant construction, secure practices, restoration of critical infrastructures and other elements of disaster response in order to create safer, more responsible nuclear energy policies worldwide.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Glossar
1. Activity
See radioactivity
2. Alpha particles
A by-product of alpha decay when ejected becomes a source of ionizing radiation. They are large subatomic fragments consisting of two protons and two neutrons [71].
3. Becquerel (Bq)
A unit of measure of radioactivity. One Bq is equivalent to the amount of radioactive material that will undergo one transformation in one second. One curie is 37 billion Bq [72].
4. Beta particle
An electron counterpart that is ejected from the nucleus of some radioactive atoms [73].
5. curie (Ci)
A unit of measure of radioactive decay amounting to 37 billion disintegrations per second where disintegration is defined as the process of nuclear breakdown to emit subatomic particles [74].
6. Decay
The process where any radioactive isotope spontaneously emits radiation per unit time causing a decrease in amount of the isotope to form a new chemical species [75].
7. Decay product
The product of the radioactive decay of isotopes which include the high-energy electromagnetic radiation emitted by the nuclei of radionuclides [76].
8. Effective Dose Equivalent
The sum of the products of the dose equivalent to the organ or tissue and the weighting factors applicable to each of the body organs or tissues that are irradiated [77].
9. Fission
The splitting of the nucleus into at least two other nuclei resulting to the release of energy [78].
10. Fusion
A reaction of producing one heavier nuclei from the merging of two lighter, less stable nuclei accompanied by a release of energy [79].
11. Gamma ray
A decay product emitted from the nucleus of unstable radioactive atoms characterized as high ionizing radiation which is a health hazard [80].
12. gray (GY)
A unit of measurement for an absorbed dose. This is the amount of energy from any type of radiation absorbed by any material. One gray is equal to one joule of energy deposited in one kg of a material [81].
13. Half-life
The time required for half of the atoms of the radioactive element to decay or disintegrate [82].
14. Isomer
In isomeric transitions, this is the nuclear atomic species of a radioactive element having the same number of protons and neutrons but a different energy [83].
15. Isotope
A nuclear atomic species of radioactive element with the same number of protons but different number of neutrons [84].
16. joule (J)
The SI unit of energy. One joule is equivalent to approximately 9.478170 × 10−4 British thermal unit (Btu) [85].
17. Radiation
A form of energy traveling through a vacuum or medium in the structure of a wave or particle [86].
18. Radioactivity
A process where energetic particles or rays are spontaneously emitted by radioactive atoms [87].
19. sievert (Sv)
A unit used to derive the quantity, equivalent dose. This is the absorbed dose in human tissue from a specific type of radiation associated with the effective biological damage [88].
Fußnoten
3
Established on June 7, 2011
 
4
According to Investopedia: Regulatory capture is a theory associated with George Stigler, a Nobel laureate economist. It is the process by which regulatory agencies eventually come to be dominated by the very industries they were charged with regulating. Regulatory capture happens when a regulatory agency, formed to act in the public's interest, eventually acts in ways that benefit the industry it is supposed to be regulating, rather than the public.
 
5
Reference to Tokyo Electricity Power Company, “Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Video Tour, December 2012,” Presentation, 13 June 2013. http://​www.​youtube.​com/​watch?​v=​YWdjQs--Oxw. Accessed 20 September 2013.
 
6
Reference to Tokyo Electric Power Company, “‘Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Video Tour,’ September 2013,” Presentation, 17 September 2013. http://​www.​youtube.​com/​watch?​v=​sYKKnJmkm7o. Accessed 20 September 2013.
 
7
After Fukushima, Washington Post, 18 July 2011: A.14. Washington, DC.
 
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hirose K. Interview by Dr. Luis Kun []. Impact of the accident at the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Station on the society and the life of public people. 2013, October. Hirose K. Interview by Dr. Luis Kun []. Impact of the accident at the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Station on the society and the life of public people. 2013, October.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Lessons learned from the nuclear accident at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power station. Institute of Nuclear Power Operations, 1–42. 2012. Lessons learned from the nuclear accident at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power station. Institute of Nuclear Power Operations, 1–42. 2012.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Aldrich DP. Post-crisis Japanese nuclear policy: from top-down directives to bottom-up activism. Asia Pac Issues. 2012;103:1–12. Aldrich DP. Post-crisis Japanese nuclear policy: from top-down directives to bottom-up activism. Asia Pac Issues. 2012;103:1–12.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Pfotenhauer SM, Jones CF, Saha K, Jasanoff S. Learning from Fukushima. Issues Sci Technol. 2012;28:79–84. Pfotenhauer SM, Jones CF, Saha K, Jasanoff S. Learning from Fukushima. Issues Sci Technol. 2012;28:79–84.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Strickland E. Fukushima’s next 40 years: decommissioning the nuclear power plant is the world’s toughest demolition project. spectrum.ieee.org, 47–53. 2014. Strickland E. Fukushima’s next 40 years: decommissioning the nuclear power plant is the world’s toughest demolition project. spectrum.​ieee.​org, 47–53. 2014.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruff TA. A public health perspective on the Fukushima nuclear disaster. Asian Perspect. 2013;37:523–49. Ruff TA. A public health perspective on the Fukushima nuclear disaster. Asian Perspect. 2013;37:523–49.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Tabuchi H, Onishi N, Belson K. Japan extended reactor’s life, despite warning. New York Times. 2011, March 21. Tabuchi H, Onishi N, Belson K. Japan extended reactor’s life, despite warning. New York Times. 2011, March 21.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Health risk assessment from the nuclear accident after the 2011 Great East Japan earthquake and tsunami, based on a preliminary dose estimation. World Health Organization (WHO), 1–172. Health risk assessment from the nuclear accident after the 2011 Great East Japan earthquake and tsunami, based on a preliminary dose estimation. World Health Organization (WHO), 1–172.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Brumfiel G. Fukushima’s doses tallied. Nature. 2012;485:423–4. Brumfiel G. Fukushima’s doses tallied. Nature. 2012;485:423–4.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Inamasu T. Fukushima radiation health risk management. Nucl Plant J. 2013;31:42. 44–45. Inamasu T. Fukushima radiation health risk management. Nucl Plant J. 2013;31:42. 44–45.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ten Hoeve JE, Jacobson MZ. Worldwide health effects of the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear accident. The Royal Society of Chemistry: Energy and Environmental Science, 1–15. Ten Hoeve JE, Jacobson MZ. Worldwide health effects of the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear accident. The Royal Society of Chemistry: Energy and Environmental Science, 1–15.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Yasunaria TJ, Stohl A, Hayano RS, Burkhart JF, Eckhardt S, Yasunari T. Cesium-137 deposition and contamination of Japanese soils due to the Fukushima nuclear accident. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108. Retrieved March 1, 2014, from. Yasunaria TJ, Stohl A, Hayano RS, Burkhart JF, Eckhardt S, Yasunari T. Cesium-137 deposition and contamination of Japanese soils due to the Fukushima nuclear accident. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108. Retrieved March 1, 2014, from.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Aoki M. Fukushima farmers in two-front war. The Japan Times, pp. 1–3. 2012, March 7. Aoki M. Fukushima farmers in two-front war. The Japan Times, pp. 1–3. 2012, March 7.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagano. Fishermen watch recovery slip away; The wastewater leakage at Japan’s Fukushima nuclear plant puts their lives back in limbo. Los Angeles Times, p. A7. 2013, October 20. Nagano. Fishermen watch recovery slip away; The wastewater leakage at Japan’s Fukushima nuclear plant puts their lives back in limbo. Los Angeles Times, p. A7. 2013, October 20.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Eilperin J. China has world’s largest ‘SeafoodPrint’ China has world’s largest ‘SeafoodPrint’. The Washington Post. 2010, September 22. Eilperin J. China has world’s largest ‘SeafoodPrint’ China has world’s largest ‘SeafoodPrint’. The Washington Post. 2010, September 22.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Kazem H. US residents monitor Fukushima radiation. Aljazeera. 2014, January 19. Kazem H. US residents monitor Fukushima radiation. Aljazeera. 2014, January 19.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Little JB. How has Fukushima’s nuclear disaster affected the environment? Audubon Magazine. 2012, March 9. Little JB. How has Fukushima’s nuclear disaster affected the environment? Audubon Magazine. 2012, March 9.
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Aquino F. Japan’s birthrate drops to 1.03 million, number of deaths keep increasing. Japan Daily Press. 2013, June 7. Aquino F. Japan’s birthrate drops to 1.03 million, number of deaths keep increasing. Japan Daily Press. 2013, June 7.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Torres I. Japan’s population continues to shrink for third year in a row. Japan Daily Press. 2014, April 16. Torres I. Japan’s population continues to shrink for third year in a row. Japan Daily Press. 2014, April 16.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Aoki M, Rothwell G. A comparative institutional analysis of the Fukushima nuclear disaster: lessons and policy implications. El Sevier 53:240–47. Aoki M, Rothwell G. A comparative institutional analysis of the Fukushima nuclear disaster: lessons and policy implications. El Sevier 53:240–47.
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Howe BM, Oh JS. The Fukushima nuclear disaster and the challenges of Japanese democratic governance. Korea Obs. 2013;44:495–516. Howe BM, Oh JS. The Fukushima nuclear disaster and the challenges of Japanese democratic governance. Korea Obs. 2013;44:495–516.
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Funabashi H. Why the Fukushima nuclear disaster is a man-made calamity. Int J Jpn Sociol. 2012;21:65–75. Funabashi H. Why the Fukushima nuclear disaster is a man-made calamity. Int J Jpn Sociol. 2012;21:65–75.
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Tanter R. After Fukushima: a survey of corruption in the global nuclear power industry. Asian Perspect. 2013;37:475–500. Tanter R. After Fukushima: a survey of corruption in the global nuclear power industry. Asian Perspect. 2013;37:475–500.
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Osnos E. The fallout: letter from Fukushima. The New Yorker. 2011;87:46. Osnos E. The fallout: letter from Fukushima. The New Yorker. 2011;87:46.
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Mishra P. Nuclear power: India shouldn’t buy what Japan is trying to sell. The Japan Times. 2013, November 8. Mishra P. Nuclear power: India shouldn’t buy what Japan is trying to sell. The Japan Times. 2013, November 8.
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Hart P. Invited essay after Fukushima: reflections on risk and institutional learning in an era of mega-crises. Public Adm. 1–14. Hart P. Invited essay after Fukushima: reflections on risk and institutional learning in an era of mega-crises. Public Adm. 1–14.
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Dawson C, Hayashi Y. Fateful move exposed Japan plant. Wall Street J. 2011, July 12. Dawson C, Hayashi Y. Fateful move exposed Japan plant. Wall Street J. 2011, July 12.
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Queste A (Director). Vulnerability of modern societies towards natural disasters the impact on critical infrastructures. World Conference on Disaster Reduction. Lecture conducted from Federal Office for Civil Protection and Disaster Response, Germany, Kobe. 2005, January 18. Queste A (Director). Vulnerability of modern societies towards natural disasters the impact on critical infrastructures. World Conference on Disaster Reduction. Lecture conducted from Federal Office for Civil Protection and Disaster Response, Germany, Kobe. 2005, January 18.
48.
Zurück zum Zitat O’ Rourke PT (Director). Earthquake effects on effects on critical infrastructure. 2013 National Lifelines Forum. Lecture conducted from Cornell University and New Zealand Lifelines Committee. 2005, January 18. O’ Rourke PT (Director). Earthquake effects on effects on critical infrastructure. 2013 National Lifelines Forum. Lecture conducted from Cornell University and New Zealand Lifelines Committee. 2005, January 18.
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Katsumi B. Interview by Dr. Luis Kun []. Fukushima update. 2013, September 20. Katsumi B. Interview by Dr. Luis Kun []. Fukushima update. 2013, September 20.
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Yokoyama J. Fukushima disaster and reform. Environ Policy Law. 2013;43(4):226–33. Yokoyama J. Fukushima disaster and reform. Environ Policy Law. 2013;43(4):226–33.
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Strickland E. 24 hours at Fukushima. IEEE Spectr. 2011;48(11):40. Strickland E. 24 hours at Fukushima. IEEE Spectr. 2011;48(11):40.
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Strickland E. 24 hours at Fukushima. IEEE Spectr. 2011;48(11):42. Strickland E. 24 hours at Fukushima. IEEE Spectr. 2011;48(11):42.
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Scott Peterson J. What’s next for nuclear? IEEE Spectr. 2011;48(11):49. Scott Peterson J. What’s next for nuclear? IEEE Spectr. 2011;48(11):49.
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Virgilio M. What’s next for nuclear? IEEE Spectr. 2011;48(11):48. Virgilio M. What’s next for nuclear? IEEE Spectr. 2011;48(11):48.
57.
Zurück zum Zitat After Fukushima, Washington Post, 18 July 2011: A.14. Washington, DC. After Fukushima, Washington Post, 18 July 2011: A.14. Washington, DC.
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Strickland E. 24 hours at Fukushima. IEEE Spectr. 2011;48(11):36. Strickland E. 24 hours at Fukushima. IEEE Spectr. 2011;48(11):36.
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Strickland E. 24 hours at Fukushima. IEEE Spectr. 2011;48(11):37–8. Strickland E. 24 hours at Fukushima. IEEE Spectr. 2011;48(11):37–8.
60.
64.
Zurück zum Zitat Strickland E. 24 hours at Fukushima. IEEE Spectr. 2011;48(11):39. Strickland E. 24 hours at Fukushima. IEEE Spectr. 2011;48(11):39.
65.
Zurück zum Zitat Ritch J. What’s next for nuclear? IEEE Spectr. 2011;48(11):49. Ritch J. What’s next for nuclear? IEEE Spectr. 2011;48(11):49.
66.
Zurück zum Zitat Hassler S. IEEE Spectr. 2011;48(11):10. Hassler S. IEEE Spectr. 2011;48(11):10.
71.
Zurück zum Zitat U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Alpha particles. Understanding radiation: ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. EPA, 26 July 2012. Web. 22 November 2013. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Alpha particles. Understanding radiation: ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. EPA, 26 July 2012. Web. 22 November 2013.
72.
Zurück zum Zitat U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Radiation: becquerel. Understanding radiation: ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. EPA, 26 July 2012. Web. 22 November 2013. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Radiation: becquerel. Understanding radiation: ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. EPA, 26 July 2012. Web. 22 November 2013.
73.
Zurück zum Zitat U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Beta particles. Understanding radiation: ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. EPA, 26 July 2012. Web. 22 November 2013. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Beta particles. Understanding radiation: ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. EPA, 26 July 2012. Web. 22 November 2013.
74.
Zurück zum Zitat U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Curies. Understanding radiation: ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. EPA, 26 July 2012. Web. 22 November 2013. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Curies. Understanding radiation: ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. EPA, 26 July 2012. Web. 22 November 2013.
75.
Zurück zum Zitat U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Radiation and radioactivity: decay. Understanding radiation: ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. EPA, 26 July 2012. Web. 22 November 2013. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Radiation and radioactivity: decay. Understanding radiation: ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. EPA, 26 July 2012. Web. 22 November 2013.
76.
Zurück zum Zitat U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Radiation and radioactivity: decay products. Understanding radiation: ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. EPA, 26 July 2012. Web. 22 November 2013. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Radiation and radioactivity: decay products. Understanding radiation: ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. EPA, 26 July 2012. Web. 22 November 2013.
77.
Zurück zum Zitat U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Effective dose equivalent. NRC Library. NRC, 22 November 2013. Web. 22 November 2013. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Effective dose equivalent. NRC Library. NRC, 22 November 2013. Web. 22 November 2013.
78.
Zurück zum Zitat U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Radiation: fission. Understanding radiation: ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. EPA, 26 July 2012. Web. 22 November 2013. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Radiation: fission. Understanding radiation: ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. EPA, 26 July 2012. Web. 22 November 2013.
79.
Zurück zum Zitat U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Radiation: fusion. Understanding radiation: ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. EPA, 26 July 2012. Web. 22 November 2013. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Radiation: fusion. Understanding radiation: ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. EPA, 26 July 2012. Web. 22 November 2013.
80.
Zurück zum Zitat U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Gamma rays. Understanding radiation: ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. EPA, 26 July 2012. Web. 22 November 2013. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Gamma rays. Understanding radiation: ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. EPA, 26 July 2012. Web. 22 November 2013.
81.
Zurück zum Zitat U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Radiation: gray. Understanding radiation: ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. EPA, 26 July 2012. Web. 22 November 2013. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Radiation: gray. Understanding radiation: ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. EPA, 26 July 2012. Web. 22 November 2013.
82.
Zurück zum Zitat U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Half-life. Understanding radiation: ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. EPA, 26 July 2012. Web. 22 November 2013. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Half-life. Understanding radiation: ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. EPA, 26 July 2012. Web. 22 November 2013.
83.
Zurück zum Zitat U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Radiation: isomer (isomeric transtions). Understanding radiation: ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. EPA, 26 July 2012. Web. 22 November 2013. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Radiation: isomer (isomeric transtions). Understanding radiation: ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. EPA, 26 July 2012. Web. 22 November 2013.
84.
Zurück zum Zitat U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Radiation: isotope. Understanding radiation: ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. EPA, 26 July 2012. Web. 22 November 2013. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Radiation: isotope. Understanding radiation: ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. EPA, 26 July 2012. Web. 22 November 2013.
85.
Zurück zum Zitat University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. How many? UNC, 18 September 2001. Web. 22 November 2013. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. How many? UNC, 18 September 2001. Web. 22 November 2013.
86.
Zurück zum Zitat U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Radiation and radioacitivty: what is radiation? Understanding radiation: ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. EPA, 26 July 2012. Web. 22 November 2013. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Radiation and radioacitivty: what is radiation? Understanding radiation: ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. EPA, 26 July 2012. Web. 22 November 2013.
87.
Zurück zum Zitat U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Radiation and radioactivity: what is radioactivity? Understanding radiation: ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. EPA, 26 July 2012. Web. 22 November 2013. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Radiation and radioactivity: what is radioactivity? Understanding radiation: ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. EPA, 26 July 2012. Web. 22 November 2013.
88.
Zurück zum Zitat U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Radiation: sievert. Understanding radiation: ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. EPA, 26 July 2012. Web. 22 November 2013. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Radiation: sievert. Understanding radiation: ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. EPA, 26 July 2012. Web. 22 November 2013.
Metadaten
Titel
The impact of Fukushima on global health: lessons learned from man-made and natural disasters
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2014
Erschienen in
Health and Technology / Ausgabe 2/2014
Print ISSN: 2190-7188
Elektronische ISSN: 2190-7196
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-014-0090-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2014

Health and Technology 2/2014 Zur Ausgabe