Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Water Resources Management 6/2015

01.04.2015

The Influence of Objective Function and Acceptability Threshold on Uncertainty Assessment of an Urban Drainage Hydraulic Model with Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation Methodology

verfasst von: Wei Zhang, Tian Li

Erschienen in: Water Resources Management | Ausgabe 6/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Urban drainage model is an important computer-aided tool in stormwater management and drainage planning and designing. A popular urban drainage hydraulic model, stormwater management model (SWMM), was applied in a pump lifting combined sewer system for a high-intensity urban catchment located in Shanghai, China. Uncertainty of SWMM water quantity parameters was assessed with generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) methodology. The sensitivity of parameters was discussed and compared based on the results of uncertainty analysis. To discuss the influence of the acceptability threshold on model parameter sensitivity and the margin of uncertainty band, the GLUE approach was applied several times varying acceptability threshold. The results indicated that a higher acceptability threshold value is contributed to achieve a stricter verification with a high confidence level, and the uncertainty analysis significant level can be featured by the value of acceptability threshold. The selection of acceptability threshold value can be regarded as a tradeoff process. Both reducing the low efficient simulation and reducing computation cost should be considered for the selection of acceptability threshold. Moreover, the GLUE approach was applied several times varying different objective functions with corresponding acceptability thresholds. The results indicated that some parameters may be sensitive to a specific objective function, and other parameters may be sensitive to another objective function. Some parameters cannot easily identified when a single objective function was used within the GLUE approach, and a multiple-objective function combined different objective functions requirements, may be a alternative approach to reduce the model prediction uncertainty.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Arabi M, Govindaraju RS, Hantush MM (2007) A probabilistic approach for analysis of uncertainty in the evaluation of watershed management practice. J Hydrol 333:459–471CrossRef Arabi M, Govindaraju RS, Hantush MM (2007) A probabilistic approach for analysis of uncertainty in the evaluation of watershed management practice. J Hydrol 333:459–471CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Balascio CC, Palmeri DJ, Gao H (1998) Use of a genetic algorithm and multi-objective programming for calibration of a hydrologic model. T ASABE 41:615–619CrossRef Balascio CC, Palmeri DJ, Gao H (1998) Use of a genetic algorithm and multi-objective programming for calibration of a hydrologic model. T ASABE 41:615–619CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Barco J, Wong KM, Stenstrom MK (2008) Automatic calibration of the U. S. EPA SWMM model for a large urban catchment. J Hydraul Eng 134:466–474CrossRef Barco J, Wong KM, Stenstrom MK (2008) Automatic calibration of the U. S. EPA SWMM model for a large urban catchment. J Hydraul Eng 134:466–474CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Beven KJ, Binley A (1992) The future of distributed models–model calibration and uncertainty prediction. Hydrol Process 6:279–298CrossRef Beven KJ, Binley A (1992) The future of distributed models–model calibration and uncertainty prediction. Hydrol Process 6:279–298CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Butler D, Davies J (2010) Urban drainage. Taylor & Francis, London Butler D, Davies J (2010) Urban drainage. Taylor & Francis, London
Zurück zum Zitat Choi HT, Beven K (2007) Multi-period and multi-criteria model conditioning to reduce prediction uncertainty in an application of TOPMODEL within the GLUE framework. J Hydrol 332:316–336CrossRef Choi HT, Beven K (2007) Multi-period and multi-criteria model conditioning to reduce prediction uncertainty in an application of TOPMODEL within the GLUE framework. J Hydrol 332:316–336CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Coles NA, Sivapalan M, Larsen JE, Linnet PE, Fahrner CK (1997) Modelling runoff generation on small agricultural catchments: can real world runoff responses be captured? Hydrol Process 11:111–136CrossRef Coles NA, Sivapalan M, Larsen JE, Linnet PE, Fahrner CK (1997) Modelling runoff generation on small agricultural catchments: can real world runoff responses be captured? Hydrol Process 11:111–136CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Elliott AH, Trowsdale SA (2007) A review of models for low impact urban stormwater drainage. Environ Model Softw 22:394–405CrossRef Elliott AH, Trowsdale SA (2007) A review of models for low impact urban stormwater drainage. Environ Model Softw 22:394–405CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fontanazza CM, Freni G, Notaro V (2012) Bayesian inference analysis of the uncertainty linked to the evaluation of potential flood damage in urban areas. Water Sci Technol 66:1669–1677CrossRef Fontanazza CM, Freni G, Notaro V (2012) Bayesian inference analysis of the uncertainty linked to the evaluation of potential flood damage in urban areas. Water Sci Technol 66:1669–1677CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Freni G, Mannina G, Viviani G (2008) Uncertainty in urban stormwater quality modelling: the effect of acceptability threshold in the GLUE methodology. Water Res 42:2061–2072CrossRef Freni G, Mannina G, Viviani G (2008) Uncertainty in urban stormwater quality modelling: the effect of acceptability threshold in the GLUE methodology. Water Res 42:2061–2072CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Freni G, Mannina G, Viviani G (2010) The influence of rainfall time resolution for urban water quality modelling. Water Sci Technol 61:2381–2390CrossRef Freni G, Mannina G, Viviani G (2010) The influence of rainfall time resolution for urban water quality modelling. Water Sci Technol 61:2381–2390CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jia Y, Culver TB (2008) Uncertainty analysis for watershed modeling using generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation with multiple calibration measures. J Water Res Plan Manag 134:97–106CrossRef Jia Y, Culver TB (2008) Uncertainty analysis for watershed modeling using generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation with multiple calibration measures. J Water Res Plan Manag 134:97–106CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kang T, Lee S (2014) Modification of the SCE-UA to include constraints by embedding an adaptive penalty function and application: application approach. Water Resour Manag 28:2145–2159CrossRef Kang T, Lee S (2014) Modification of the SCE-UA to include constraints by embedding an adaptive penalty function and application: application approach. Water Resour Manag 28:2145–2159CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Liong SY, Chan WT, Lum LH (1991) Knowledge-based system for SWMM runoff component calibration. J Water Res Plan Manag 117:507–524CrossRef Liong SY, Chan WT, Lum LH (1991) Knowledge-based system for SWMM runoff component calibration. J Water Res Plan Manag 117:507–524CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Manz BJ, Rodríguez JP, Maksimović Č, McIntyre N (2013) Impact of rainfall temporal resolution on urban water quality modelling performance and uncertainties. Water Sci Technol 68:68–75CrossRef Manz BJ, Rodríguez JP, Maksimović Č, McIntyre N (2013) Impact of rainfall temporal resolution on urban water quality modelling performance and uncertainties. Water Sci Technol 68:68–75CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Notaro V, Fontanazza CM, Freni G, Puleo V (2013) Impact of rainfall data resolution in time and space on the urban flooding evaluation. Water Sci Technol 68:1984–1993CrossRef Notaro V, Fontanazza CM, Freni G, Puleo V (2013) Impact of rainfall data resolution in time and space on the urban flooding evaluation. Water Sci Technol 68:1984–1993CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Perrin C, Michel C, Andréassian V (2001) Does a large number of parameters enhance model performance? Comparative assessment of common catchment model structures on 429 catchments. J Hydrol 242:275–301CrossRef Perrin C, Michel C, Andréassian V (2001) Does a large number of parameters enhance model performance? Comparative assessment of common catchment model structures on 429 catchments. J Hydrol 242:275–301CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rossman LA (2010) Storm water management model user’s manual, version 5.0. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC Rossman LA (2010) Storm water management model user’s manual, version 5.0. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
Zurück zum Zitat Sorooshian S, Gupta VK (1995) Model calibration. In: Singh VP (ed) Computer models for watershed hydrology. Water Resources Publications, Highland Ranch, pp 23–68 Sorooshian S, Gupta VK (1995) Model calibration. In: Singh VP (ed) Computer models for watershed hydrology. Water Resources Publications, Highland Ranch, pp 23–68
Zurück zum Zitat Sourisseau S, Basseres A, Perie F, Caquet T (2008) Calibration, validation and sensitivity analysis of an ecosystem model applied to artificial streams. Water Res 42:1167–1181CrossRef Sourisseau S, Basseres A, Perie F, Caquet T (2008) Calibration, validation and sensitivity analysis of an ecosystem model applied to artificial streams. Water Res 42:1167–1181CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sun N, Hong B, Hall M (2014) Assessment of the SWMM model uncertainties within the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) framework for a high‐resolution urban sewershed. Hydrol Process 28:3018–3034 Sun N, Hong B, Hall M (2014) Assessment of the SWMM model uncertainties within the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) framework for a high‐resolution urban sewershed. Hydrol Process 28:3018–3034
Zurück zum Zitat Talebizadeh M, Morid S, Ayyoubzadeh SA, Ghasemzadeh M (2010) Uncertainty analysis in sediment load modeling using ANN and SWAT model. Water Resour Manag 24:1747–1761CrossRef Talebizadeh M, Morid S, Ayyoubzadeh SA, Ghasemzadeh M (2010) Uncertainty analysis in sediment load modeling using ANN and SWAT model. Water Resour Manag 24:1747–1761CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Thorndahl S, Beven KJ, Jensen JB, Schaarup-Jensen K (2008) Event based uncertainty assessment in urban drainage modelling, applying the GLUE methodology. J Hydrol 357:421–437CrossRef Thorndahl S, Beven KJ, Jensen JB, Schaarup-Jensen K (2008) Event based uncertainty assessment in urban drainage modelling, applying the GLUE methodology. J Hydrol 357:421–437CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tolson BA, Shoemaker CA (2007) Cannonsville Reservoir watershed SWAT2000 model development, calibration and validation. J Hydrol 337:68–86CrossRef Tolson BA, Shoemaker CA (2007) Cannonsville Reservoir watershed SWAT2000 model development, calibration and validation. J Hydrol 337:68–86CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Vázquez RF, Beven K, Feyen J (2009) GLUE based assessment on the overall predictions of a MIKE SHE application. Water Resour Manag 23:1325–1349CrossRef Vázquez RF, Beven K, Feyen J (2009) GLUE based assessment on the overall predictions of a MIKE SHE application. Water Resour Manag 23:1325–1349CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Willems P (2008) Quantification and relative comparison of different types of uncertainties in sewer water quality modeling. Water Res 42:3539–3551CrossRef Willems P (2008) Quantification and relative comparison of different types of uncertainties in sewer water quality modeling. Water Res 42:3539–3551CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yang YS, Wang L (2010) A review of modelling tools for implementation of the EU water framework directive in handling diffuse water pollution. Water Resour Manag 24:1819–1843CrossRef Yang YS, Wang L (2010) A review of modelling tools for implementation of the EU water framework directive in handling diffuse water pollution. Water Resour Manag 24:1819–1843CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zoppou C (2001) Review of urban storm water models. Environ Model Softw 16:195–231CrossRef Zoppou C (2001) Review of urban storm water models. Environ Model Softw 16:195–231CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The Influence of Objective Function and Acceptability Threshold on Uncertainty Assessment of an Urban Drainage Hydraulic Model with Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation Methodology
verfasst von
Wei Zhang
Tian Li
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2015
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Water Resources Management / Ausgabe 6/2015
Print ISSN: 0920-4741
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1650
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-0928-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2015

Water Resources Management 6/2015 Zur Ausgabe