nach oben

Education and Information Technologies

Erschienen in:

05.08.2020

The moderating effect of social capital on co-regulated learning for MOOC achievement

verfasst von: Rawad Chaker, Maria Antonietta Impedovo

Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies | Ausgabe 1/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to track down elements of self-regulated learning in a massive open online course regarding social capital. Specifically, the study is oriented to explore the relationship between feeling of belonging to an online community and individual and collective regulation of learning. For this aim, a combination of two already tested scales was operated, adapted for the research interests of this study and administered to a sample of MOOC participants. Several structural equation modelling analyses demonstrate that co- and self-regulated learning strategies lead to MOOC achievement (final exam score), and social capital is only a moderator of co-regulated learning (collective evaluation of content and collective decision-making) but not for self-regulated learning (individual environment control).

Vorheriger Artikel Learning programming by creating games through the use of structured activities in secondary education in Greece

Nächster Artikel Video-based self-reflection among pre-service teachers in Ireland: A qualitative study

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of management review, 27(1), 17–40. https://doi.org/10.2307/4134367.CrossRef

Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.

Artino, A. R. (2007). Self-regulated learning in online education: A review of the empirical literature. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 4(6), 3–18.

Azevedo, R. (2008). The role of self-regulation in learning about science with hypermedia. In D. Robinson & G. Schraw (Eds.), recent innovations in educational technology that facilitate student Learning (pp. 127–156). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

Azevedo, R., & Jacobson, M. J. (2008). Advances in scaffolding learning with hypertext and hypermedia: A summary and critical analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(1), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-007-9064-3.CrossRef

Bagozzi, R. P., & Dholakia, U. M. (2002). Intentional social action in virtual communities. Journal of interactive marketing, 16(2), 2–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.10006.CrossRef

Bandura, A. (1989). Human Agency in Social Cognitive Theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175–1184. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1175.CrossRef

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.CrossRef

Benson, J., & Fleishman, J. A. (1994). The robustness of maximum likelihood and distribution-free estimators to non-normality in confirmatory factor analysis. Quality and Quantity, 28(2), 117–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01102757.CrossRef

Bentler, P. M. (1992). On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the Bulletin. Psychological Bulletin, 112(3), 400–404.

Blau, P. (1964). Power and exchange in social life. Wiley. 352 p.

Boekaerts, M., Pintrich P, R. & Zeidner, M. (2000). Handbook of Self-Regulation. A Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Borkowski, J. G. (1992). Metacognitive theory: A framework for teaching literacy, writing, and math skills. Journal of learning disabilities, 25(4), 253–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949202500406.CrossRef

Bourdieu, P. (1986). L’illusion biographique. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 62(1), 69–72. https://doi.org/10.3406/arss.1986.2317.CrossRef

Bozkurt, A., & Keefer, J. (2018). Participatory learning culture and community formation in connectivist MOOCs. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(6), 776–788. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1412988.CrossRef

Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007.CrossRef

Chae, C., Suh, B., Han, S. H., Han, H., & Lim, D. H. (2018). Enhancing learner-driven informal learning in a virtual practice community: The Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) as a learning solution for professional development. In Handbook of research on digital content, mobile learning, and technology integration models in Teacher Education (pp. 207–226). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2953-8.CH011.

Chen, Y. H., & Chen, P. J. (2015). MOOC study group: Facilitation strategies, influential factors, and student perceived gains. Computers & Education, 86, 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.008.CrossRef

Chiu, C. M., Hsu, M. H., & Wang, E. T. (2006). Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision support systems, 42(3), 1872–1888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2006.04.001.CrossRef

Cho, M., & Shen, D. (2013). Self-regulation in online learning. Distance Education, 34(3), 290–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.835770.CrossRef

Coleman, J, S. (1990). Foundations of social capital. Cambridge: Belknap.

Davis, D., Chen, G., van der Zee, T., Hauff, C., & Houben, G. J. (2016). Retrieval practice and study planning in MOOCs: Exploring classroom-based self-regulated learning strategies at scale. In K. Verbert, M. Sharples, & T. Klobučar (Eds.), Adaptive and adaptable learning (pp. 57–71). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45153-4_5.

De Waard, I., Koutropoulos, A., Keskin, N., Abajian, S C., Hogue, R., Rodriguez, C O., & Gallagher, M S. (2011, October). Exploring the MOOC format as a pedagogical approach for mLearning. In Proceedings of 10th World Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning (pp. 138–145). https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5317/3406caa20421c35cee0abeee6148e63de1bc.pdf

Gasevic, D., Kovanovic, V., Joksimovic, S., & Siemens, G. (2014). Where is research on massive open online courses headed? A data analysis of the MOOC Research Initiative. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(5), 134–176. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1954.CrossRef

Gillani, N., & Eynon, R. (2014). Communication patterns in massively open online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 23, 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.05.004.CrossRef

Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Reid, R. (1992). Developing self-regulated learners. Focus on Exceptional Children, 24(6) https://www.jstor.org/stable/1477462.

Hadwin, A., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2018). Self-regulation, co-regulation, and shared regulation in collaborative learning environments. In D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Educational psychology handbook series. Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 83–106). Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group.

Hadwin, A. F., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2011). Self-regulated, co-regulated, and socially shared regulation of learning. Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance, 30, 65–84.

Hakkarainen, K., Lipponen, L., & Järvelä, S. (2002). Epistemology of inquiry and computer-supported collaborative learning. Cscl, 2, 129–156.

Holmbeck, G. N. (1997). Toward Terminological, Conceptual and Statistical Clarity in the Study of Mediators and Moderators. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65(4), 599–610. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.65.4.599.CrossRef

Hsu, J, Y., Chen, C, C., & Ting, P, F. (2018). Understanding MOOC continuance: An empirical examination of social support theory. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1446990

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.CrossRef

Hughes, T. A., & Kritsonis, W. A. (2007). Professional learning communities and the positive effects on student achievement: A national agenda for school improvement. The Lamar University Electronic Journal of Student Research, 4, 1–5.

Jaccard, J., & Wan, C. K. (1995). Measurement Error in the Analysis of Interaction Effects Between Continuous Predictors Using Multiple Regression: Multiple Indicator and Structural Equation Approaches. Psychological Bulletin, 117(2), 348–357. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.348.CrossRef

Jiang, J. Y., & Liu, C-W. (2015). High performance work systems and organizational effectiveness: The mediating role of social capital. Human Resource Management Review, 25(1), 126–137.

Johnson, G, B. (2013). Student perceptions of the flipped classroom (Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia).

Jones, M. H., Estell, D. B., & Alexander, J. M. (2008). Friends, classmates, and self-regulated learning: Discussions with peers inside and outside the classroom. Metacognition and Learning, 3(1), 1–15.CrossRef

Jones, K. M., Stephens, M., Branch-Mueller, J., & de Groot, J. (2016). Community of practice or affinity space: A case study of a professional development MOOC. Education for Information, 32(1), 101–119.CrossRef

Jöreskog, K. G., Yang, F., Marcoulides, G., & Schumacker, R. (1996). Nonlinear structural equation models: The Kenny-Judd model with interaction effects. Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques, 3, 57–88. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014976022227.CrossRefMATH

Kaplan, J. (2014). Co-regulation in technology enhanced learning environments. In L. Uden, F. J. Sinclair, Y.-H. Tao, & D. LiberonaF (Eds.), Learning Technology for Education in Cloud. MOOC and Big Data, CCIS (446) (pp. 72–81). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10671-7_7.

Kaplan, J., de Montalembert, M., Laurent, P., & Fenouillet, F. (2017). ERICA–an instrument to measure individual and collective regulation of learning. Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée/European Review of Applied Psychology, 67(2), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2017.01.001.CrossRef

Kellogg, S., Booth, S., & Oliver, K. (2014). A social network perspective on peer supported learning in MOOCs for educators. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(5), 263–289. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1852.CrossRef

Kizilcec, R. F., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Maldonado, J. J. (2017). Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in Massive Open Online Courses. Computers & Education, 104, 18–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.001.CrossRef

Lee, D., Watson, S, L., & Watson, W, R. (2019). Systematic literature review on self-regulated learning in massive open online courses. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3749

Lin, T, C., Hsu, J, S, C., Cheng, H, L., & Chiu, C, M. (2012). Exploring individuals’ loyalty to online support groups from the perspective of social support. The 16th pacific Asia conference on information system, Ho chi Minh, Vietnam.

Littlejohn, A., Hood, N., Milligan, C., & Mustain, P. (2016). Learning in MOOCs: Motivations and selfregulated learning in MOOCs. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.12.003.CrossRef

Liu, S. H. (2012). A multivariate model of factors influencing technology use by preservice teachers during practice teaching. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(4), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.12.003.CrossRef

MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A Comparison of Methods to Test Mediation and Other Intervening Variable Effects. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.83.CrossRef

Magen-Nagar, N., & Cohen, L. (2016). Learning strategies as a mediator for motivation and a sense of achievement among students who study in MOOCs. Education and Information Technologies, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9492-y

Milligan, C., Littlejohn, A., & Margaryan, A. (2013). Patterns of engagement in connectivist MOOCs. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 149–159 https://jolt.merlot.org/vol9no2/milligan_0613.pdf.

Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of management review, 23(2), 242–266. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.533225.CrossRef

Oztok, M., Zingaro, D., Makos, A., Brett, C., & Hewitt, J. (2015). Capitalizing on social presence: The relationship between social capital and social presence. The Internet and Higher Education, 26, 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.002.CrossRef

Perry, J. C., Fisher, A. L., Caemmerer, J. M., Keith, T. Z., & Poklar, A. E. (2018). The role of social support and coping skills in promoting self-regulated learning among urban youth. Youth & Society, 50(4), 551–570. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X15618313.CrossRef

Ping, R. (1995). A Parsimonious Estimating Technique for Interaction and Quadratic Latent Variables. The Journal of Marketing Research, 32, 336–347. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151985.CrossRef

Ping, R. (1998). EQS and LISREL Examples Using Survey Data. In R. E. Schumacker & G. A. Marcoulides (Eds.), Interaction and Nonlinear Effects in Structural Equation Modeling (pp. 63–100). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeinder (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRef

Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and psychological measurement, 53(3), 801–813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053003024.CrossRef

Putnam, R. (1993). The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. The American Prospect, 13(Spring), Vol. 4.

Sarirete, A., & Brahimi, T. (2014, November). Enabling communities of practice within MOOCs. In 2014 International Conference on Web and Open Access to Learning (ICWOAL) (pp. 1–4). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICWOAL.2014.7009232

Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Self-regulated learning, from teaching to self-reflective practice. New York: The Guilford Press.

Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (1996). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Sharma, S., Durand, R. M., & Gur-Arie, O. (1981). Identification and Analysis of Moderator Variables. Journal of Marketing research, 18, 291–300. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150970.CrossRef

Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in Experimental and Nonexperimental Studies: New Procedures and Recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422.CrossRef

Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1).

Siemens, G., Downes S., Cormier, D., & Kop, R. (2010). PLENK2010 –Personal Learning Environments, Networks and Knowledge. Course blog http://connect.downes.ca

Struminger, B., Arora, S., Zalud-Cerrato, S., Lowrance, D., & Ellerbrock, T. (2017). Building virtual communities of practice for health. The Lancet, 390(10095), 632–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31666-5.CrossRef

Tantardini, M., & Kroll, A. (2015). The role of organizational social capital in performance management. Public Performance & Management Review, 39(1), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2016.1071163.CrossRef

Terras, M. M., & Ramsay, J. (2015). Massive open online courses (MOOCs): Insights and challenges from a psychological perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 472–487. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12274.CrossRef

Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of management Journal, 41(4), 464–476. https://doi.org/10.2307/257085.CrossRef

Tschofen, C., & Mackness, J. (2012). Connectivism and dimensions of individual experience. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(1), 124–143. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1143.CrossRef

Wenger, E., McDermott, R, A., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Harvard Business Press.

Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (2008). The weave of motivation and self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (p. 297–314). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Young, A., & Fry, J. D. (2008). Metacognitive awareness and academic achievement in college students. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2017.812125.CrossRef

Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Developing self-fulfilling cycles of academic regulation: An analysis of exemplary instructional models. In D. S. E. B. J. Zimmermann (Ed.), Self-Regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 1–199). New York, London: The Guilford Press.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2.MathSciNetCrossRef

Titel: The moderating effect of social capital on co-regulated learning for MOOC achievement
verfasst von: Rawad Chaker
Maria Antonietta Impedovo
Publikationsdatum: 05.08.2020
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies / Ausgabe 1/2021
Print ISSN: 1360-2357
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7608
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10293-2

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2021

Rising waves in informal education: women of color with educationally oriented podcasts

Pre-adolescents’ digital competences in the area of safety. Does frequency of social media use mean safer and more knowledgeable digital usage?

The effect of Voki application on students’ academic achievements and attitudes towards English course

Understanding the “this” reference in object oriented programming: Misconceptions, conceptions, and teaching recommendations

The effect of E-books on Preservice student teachers’ achievement and perceptions in the United Arab Emirates

A software architecture perspective about Moodle flexibility for supporting empirical research of teaching theories