nach oben

Education and Information Technologies

Erschienen in:

23.01.2023

The perceptions of prospective ICT teachers towards the integration of 3D printing into education and their views on the 3D modeling and printing course

verfasst von: Memet Üçgül, Serhat Altıok

Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies | Ausgabe 8/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

3D printing technology has an influence on a variety of industries such as automotive, engineering, medical, aerospace, sports, fashion, education, and more. In education, 3D printing is used in many different fields like pharmacy, mathematics, biology, chemistry, art education, graphic design, engineering, and even in early childhood and special education. The adoption of 3D printing technology in education is still at a low level, and the lack of adequate technology education is considered a major obstacle to the adoption of this technology. As teachers’ knowledge of 3D printing technology increases, so will their intention to integrate 3D printing technologies into their classrooms. However, current teacher education programs have not provided sufficient training to trainees with the necessary expertise and skills to use digital fabrication in the classroom. This case study explored prospective information and communication technologies (ICT) teachers’ perceptions on the integration of 3D printing into teaching and learning as well as their evaluation of offered 3D modeling and printing course. The results showed that most of the prospective teachers were satisfied with the course and they felt competent enough about 3D printing processes and to integrate 3D printing in teaching-learning activities. They have positive opinions about the use of 3D printers for educational purposes, as they provide concretization of the subject, increase the motivation of the students, and they are very useful in the production of teaching materials. In line with the research results, suggestions were made for a course that aims to introduce 3D printing technologies in teacher education programs.

Vorheriger Artikel A methodology to design, develop, and evaluate machine learning models for predicting dropout in school systems: the case of Chile

Nächster Artikel A conceptual model of what programming affords secondary school courses in mathematics and technology

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Ambrosi, A., & Pumera, M. (2016). 3D-printing technologies for electrochemical applications. Chemical Society Reviews, 45(10), 2740–2755. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CS00714CCrossRef

ASTM (2012). Standard terminology for additive manufacturing technologies. In ASTM International F2792-12a. ASTM Committee F42 on Additive Manufacturing Technologies, & ASTM Committee F42 on Additive Manufacturing Technologies. Subcommittee F42. Retrieved February 1, 2022, from https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=H8ayrQEACAAJ

Autodesk, INC. (2021). 3ds Max. https://www.autodesk.com/products/3ds-max/overview

Becker, S. A., Brown, M., Dahlstrom, E., Davis, A., DePaul, K., Diaz, V., & Pomerantz, J. (2018). NMC horizon report: 2018 higher education edition. Educause. Retrieved October 25, 2021, from https://cit.bnu.edu.cn/docs/2018-09/20180918163624337480.pdf

Bell, P., Hoadley, C. M., & Linn, M. C. (2004). Design-based research in education. Internet environments for science education, 2004, 73–85.

Berman, B. (2012). 3-D printing: The new industrial revolution. Business Horizons, 55(2), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.11.003CrossRef

Bull, G., Maddox, C., Marks, G., McAnear, A., Schmidt, D., Schrum, L., Smaldino, S., Spector, M., Sprague, D., & Thompson, A. (2010). Educational implications of the digital fabrication revolution. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(4), 331–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782554CrossRef

Bull, G., Chiu, J., Berry, R., Lipson, H., & Xie, C. (2014). Advancing children’s engineering through desktop manufacturing. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (Fourth ed., pp. 675–688). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_54CrossRef

Bull, G., Haj-Hariri, H., Atkins, R., & Moran, P. (2015). An educational framework for digital manufacturing in schools. 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing, 2(2), 42–49. https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2015.0009CrossRef

Chen, M. Y., Skewes, J., Woodruff, M. A., Dasgupta, P., & Rukin, N. J. (2020). Multi-colour extrusion fused deposition modelling: A low-cost 3D printing method for anatomical prostate cancer models. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67082-7CrossRef

Cheng, L., Antonenko, P. D., Ritzhaupt, A. D., Dawson, K., Miller, D., MacFadden, B. J., Grant, C., Sheppard, T. D., & Ziegler, M. (2020). Exploring the influence of teachers’ beliefs and 3D printing integrated STEM instruction on students’ STEM motivation. Computers and Education, 158(June), 103983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103983CrossRef

Chery, D., Mburu, S., Ward, J., & Fontecchio, A. (2015) Integration of the arts and technology in GK-12 science courses. In 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1–4). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2015.7344165.

Chiu, P. H. P., Lai, K. W. C., Fan, T. K. F., & Cheng, S. H. (2015) A pedagogical model for introducing 3D printing technology in a freshman level course based on a classic instructional design theory. In 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2015.7344287.

Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104CrossRef

Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

De Sampaio, C. P., Spinosa, R. D. O., Tsukahara, D. Y., da Silva, J. C., Borghi, S. L. S., Rostirolla, F., & Vicentin, J. (2013, September). 3D printing in graphic design education: Educational experiences using Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) in a Brazilian university. In Proceedings of 6th International Conference Advanced Research Virtual Rapid Prototyping, Leiria, Portugal (pp. 25–30).

Demir, E. B. K., Çaka, C., Tuğtekin, U., Demir, K., İslamoğlu, H., & Kuzu, A. (2016). Üç boyutlu yazdırma teknolojilerinin eğitim alanında kullanımı: Türkiye’deki uygulamalar. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 17(2), 481–503. https://doi.org/10.12984/egeefd.280754CrossRef

Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001005CrossRef

Dickson, B., Weber, J., Kotsopoulos, D., Boyd, T., Jiwani, S., & Roach, B. (2021). The role of productive failure in 3D printing in a middle school setting. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 31(3), 489–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09568-zCrossRef

Drakoulaki, A. (2017). 3D Printing as Learning Activity in Higher Education A case study in a robotics’ prototyping course [Master's thesis, University of Oslo]. Retrieved October 24, 2021, from http://hdl.handle.net/10852/60806

El-Sayegh, S., Romdhane, L., & Manjikian, S. (2020). A critical review of 3D printing in construction: Benefits, challenges, and risks. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 20(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-020-00038-wCrossRef

Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299597CrossRef

Ford, S., & Despeisse, M. (2016). Additive manufacturing and sustainability: An exploratory study of the advantages and challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 1573–1587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.150CrossRef

Ford, S., & Minshall, T. (2019). Where and how 3D printing is used in teaching and education. Additive Manufacturing, 25, 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.10.028CrossRef

Fourches, D., & Feducia, J. (2019). Student-guided three-dimensional printing activity in large lecture courses: A practical guideline. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(2), 291–295. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00346CrossRef

Gao, W., Zhang, Y., Ramanujan, D., Ramani, K., Chen, Y., Williams, C. B., Wang, C. C. L., Shin, Y. C., Zhang, S., & Zavattieri, P. D. (2015). The status, challenges, and future of additive manufacturing in engineering. Computer-Aided Design, 69, 65–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2015.04.001CrossRef

Gonzalez, S. R., & Bennett, D. B. (2016). 3D printing: A practical guide for librarians (vol. 22). Rowman & Littlefield.

Grant, C., Antonenko, P., Tovani, J., Wood, A., & MacFadden, B. (2015). 3D Scanning of fossils for middle and high school students: Science teachers’ perspectives. In L. Liu & D. C. Gibson (Eds.), Research highlights in technology and teacher education 2015 (pp. 97–104). Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved October 24, 2021, from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/151871/

Gwangwava, N., & Hlahla, C. (2018). 3D printing applications in STEM education. Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Fourth Edition, 2626–2640. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2255-3.ch229.

Hall, S., Grant, G., Arora, D., Karaksha, A., McFarland, A., Lohning, A., & Anoopkumar-Dukie, S. (2017). A pilot study assessing the value of 3D printed molecular modeling tools for pharmacy student education. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 9(4), 723–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2017.03.029CrossRef

Hatzigianni, M., Stevenson, M., Bower, M., Falloon, G., & Forbes, A. (2020). Children’s views on making and designing. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 28(2), 286–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2020.1735747CrossRef

Holzmann, P., Schwarz, E. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (2020). Understanding the determinants of novel technology adoption among teachers: The case of 3D printing. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45(1), 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9693-1CrossRef

Horvath, J., & Cameron, R. (2018). Mastering 3D printing in the classroom, library, and lab. Springer.CrossRef

Huang, T. C., & Lin, C. Y. (2017). From 3D modeling to 3D printing: Development of a differentiated spatial ability teaching model. Telematics and Informatics, 34(2), 604–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.10.005CrossRef

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2011). Cooperative learning. In The Encyclopedia of Peace Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470672532.wbepp066

Jones, W. M., Smith, S., & Cohen, J. (2017). Preservice teachers’ beliefs about using maker activities in formal K-12 educational settings: A multi-institutional study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 49(3–4), 134–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2017.1318097CrossRef

Kalayci, M. (2019). Using 3D Printing as an Instructional Tool to Improve Spatial Ability (Doctoral dissertation, University of Houston).

Karaduman, H. (2018). Soyuttan somuta, sanaldan gerçeğe: Öğretmen adaylarının bakış açısıyla üç boyutlu yazıcılar. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(1), 273–303. https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2018..-358818CrossRef

Kaya, E., Newley, A., Yesilyurt, E., & Deniz, H. (2019). Improving preservice elementary teachers’ engineering teaching efficacy beliefs with 3D design and printing. Journal of College Science Teaching, 48(5), 76–83. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/26901320

Kostakis, V., Niaros, V., & Giotitsas, C. (2015). Open source 3D printing as a means of learning: An educational experiment in two high schools in Greece. Telematics and Informatics, 32(1), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2014.05.001CrossRef

Krajcik, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (2005). Project-based learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 317–334). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816833.020CrossRef

Kwon, H. (2017). Effects of 3D printing and design software on students’ overall performance. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 18(4), 37–42. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/181996/

Kwon, Y. M., Lee, Y. A., & Kim, S. J. (2017). Case study on 3D printing education in fashion design coursework. Fashion and Textiles, 4(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-017-0111-3CrossRef

Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310CrossRefMATH

Lim, K. H. A., Loo, Z. Y., Goldie, S. J., Adams, J. W., & McMenamin, P. G. (2016). Use of 3D printed models in medical education: A randomized control trial comparing 3D prints versus cadaveric materials for learning external cardiac anatomy. Anatomical Sciences Education, 9(3), 213–221. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1573CrossRef

MakerBot (n.d.). Types of 3D printing technologies. Retrieved June 26, 2020, from https://www.makerbot.com/stories/design/types-of-3d-printing-technologies/

Makino, M., Suzuki, K., Takamatsu, K., Shiratori, A., Saito, A., Sakai, K., & Furukawa, H. (2018). 3D printing of police whistles for STEM education. Microsystem Technologies, 24(1), 745–748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-017-3393-xCrossRef

Martin, R. L., Bowden, N. S., & Merrill, C. (2014). 3D printing in technology and engineering education. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 73(8), 30–35. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/159400/

McGahern, P., Bosch, F., & Poli, D. (2015). Enhancing learning using 3D printing. The American Biology Teacher, 77(5), 376–377. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2015.77.5.9CrossRef

Menano, L., Fidalgo, P., Santos, I. M., & Thormann, J. (2019). Integration of 3D printing in art education: A multidisciplinary approach. Computers in the Schools, 36(3), 222–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2019.1643442CrossRef

Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. In The JosseyBass higher and adult education series (vol. 2nd). Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCI.0b013e3181edd9b1.

Minetola, P., Iuliano, L., Bassoli, E., & Gatto, A. (2015). Impact of additive manufacturing on engineering education-evidence from Italy. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 21(5), 535–555. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-09-2014-0123CrossRef

Nemorin, S., & Selwyn, N. (2017). Making the best of it? Exploring the realities of 3D printing in school. Research Papers in Education, 32(5), 578–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2016.1225802CrossRef

Ngo, T. D., Kashani, A., Imbalzano, G., Nguyen, K. T. Q., & Hui, D. (2018). Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Composites Part B: Engineering, 143(December 2017), 172–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012CrossRef

Novak, J. I. (2019). Re-educating the educators. In Interdisciplinary and International Perspectives on 3D Printing in Education (pp. 28–49). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7018-9.ch002.

Novak, E., & Wisdom, S. (2018). Effects of 3D printing project-based learning on preservice elementary teachers’ science attitudes, science content knowledge, and anxiety about teaching science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(5), 412–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9733-5CrossRef

Novak, E., & Wisdom, S. (2020). Using 3D printing in science for elementary teachers. In Active learning in college science (pp. 729–739). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33600-4_45CrossRef

Olla, P. (2015). Opening pandora’s 3D printed box. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 34(3), 74–80. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2015.2461197CrossRef

Pai, S., Gourish, B., Moger, P., & Mahale, P. (2018). Application of 3D printing in education. International Journal of Computer Applications Technology and Research, 7(7), 278–280. http://ijcatr.com/archieve/volume7/issue7/ijcatr07071006.pdf

Paukstelis, P. J. (2018). MolPrint3D: Enhanced 3D printing of ball-and-stick molecular models. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(1), 169–172. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00549CrossRef

Paul, S. (2018). 3D printed manipulatives in a multivariable calculus classroom. PRIMUS, 28(9), 821–834. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2018.1445675CrossRef

Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE Publications Limited.

Smith, C. F., Tollemache, N., Covill, D., & Johnston, M. (2018). Take away body parts! An investigation into the use of 3D-printed anatomical models in undergraduate anatomy education. Anatomical Sciences Education, 11(1), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1718CrossRef

Smith, C., Onofre-Martínez, K., Contrino, M. F., & Membrillo-Hernández, J. (2021). Course design process in a technology-enhanced learning environment. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 93(August 2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107263

Song, M. J. (2018). Learning to teach 3D printing in schools: How do teachers in Korea prepare to integrate 3D printing technology into classrooms? Educational Media International, 55(3), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2018.1512448CrossRef

Song, M. J. (2020). The application of digital fabrication technologies to the art and design curriculum in a teacher preparation program: A case study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 30(4), 687–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09524-6CrossRef

Steed, M. B. (2019). Dynamic decision-making model: Integrating 3D printing in education. In Interdisciplinary and International Perspectives on 3D Printing in Education (pp. 1–27). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7018-9.ch001.

Sullivan, P., & McCartney, H. (2017). Integrating 3D printing into an early childhood teacher preparation course: Reflections on practice. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 38(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2016.1274694CrossRef

Sun, Y., & Li, Q. (2018). Visualization of Mathematical Education by 3D Printer. In 2018 1st IEEE International Conference on Knowledge Innovation and Invention (ICKII) (pp. 266–269). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICKII.2018.8569157.

Tillman, D. A., An, S. A., Cohen, J. D., Kjellstrom, W., & Boren, R. L. (2014). Exploring wind power: Improving mathematical thinking through digital fabrication. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 23(4), 401–421. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/42079/

Trust, T., & Maloy, R. W. (2017). Why 3D print? The 21st-century skills students develop while engaging in 3d printing projects. Computers in the Schools, 34(4), 253–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2017.1384684CrossRef

Trust, T., Woodruff, N., Checrallah, M., & Whalen, J. (2021). Educators’ interests, prior knowledge and questions regarding augmented reality, virtual reality and 3D printing and modeling. TechTrends, 65(4), 548–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00594-9CrossRef

Tu, J. C., & Chiang, Y. H. (2016). The influence of design strategy of peer learning on 3-D software learning. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(5), 1263–1271. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1511aCrossRef

Verner, I., & Merksamer, A. (2015). Digital design and 3D printing in technology teacher education. Procedia CIRP, 36, 182–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.08.041CrossRef

Wan, A., & Ivy, J. (2021). Providing access by integrating computer aided design in mathematics teacher education courses. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 37(4), 234–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2021.1965506CrossRef

Weber, C., Peña, V., Micali, M., Yglesias, E., Rood, S., Scott, J. A., & Lal, B. (2013). The role of the national science foundation in the origin and evolution of additive manufacturing in the United States. Science & Technology Policy Institute, 1, 1–175.

Wendt, J., Beach, J., & Wendt, S. (2019). 3D printing: Practical applications for k-16 education. In Integrating 3D Printing into Teaching and Learning (pp. 1–14). Brill Sense. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004415133_001.

Wisdom, S., & Novak, E. (2019). Using 3D printing to enhance STEM teaching and learning: Recommendations for designing 3D printing projects. In N. Ali & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Integrating 3D Printing into Teaching and Learning (Issue May, pp. 187–205). Brill | Sense. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004415133_010.

Yıldırım, G. (2018). Teachers’ opinions on instructional use of 3d printers: A case study. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(4), 304–320. https://doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2018.04.017CrossRef

Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research design and methods (5th ed.). Sage.

Titel: The perceptions of prospective ICT teachers towards the integration of 3D printing into education and their views on the 3D modeling and printing course
verfasst von: Memet Üçgül
Serhat Altıok
Publikationsdatum: 23.01.2023
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies / Ausgabe 8/2023
Print ISSN: 1360-2357
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7608
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11593-z

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2023

Understanding college students’ continuous usage intention of asynchronous online courses through extended technology acceptance model

Negative link prediction to reduce dropout in Massive Open Online Courses

Measuring and applying digital literacy: Implications for access for the elderly in rural China

Editorial for EAIT issue 8, 2023

An information system success model for e-learning postadoption using the fuzzy analytic network process

Designing virtual reality tools for students with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A systematic review

Premium Partner